P4041_RFP.pdf

5148343

Design-Bid Build Construction of P4041 Medical/Dental Replacement Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

See Section 00 21 00 – Instructions to Offerors The NAICS Code is 236220, and size standard is $36,500,000.00.

This solicitation is issued on an unrestricted basis w ith full and open competition.

Facsimile transmission of offers, acknow ledgment of amendments, or modif ications to offers is not authorized.

NOTE: Offerors must execute Blocks 14 through 20c on reverse. See Instructions to Offerors.

Estimated Cost Range: $10,000,000 to $25,000,000

SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS WILL BE ISSUED VIA AN AMENDMENT AT A LATER DATE.

WELTON THOMAS 757-341-0081

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

06-Jul-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________745 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________06 Aug 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

MARINE CORPS IPT

9324 VIRGINIA AVE

NORFOLK VA 23511

N40085

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

01:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (757)341-0695 TEL: FAX:

N4008518R0612 41

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008518R0612

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. SAFETY EVALUATION

5. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

6. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

6.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

6.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

6.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

6.4 NAVY ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ONLINE (NECO)

6.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

6.6 PRICE PROPASALS

7. ATTACHMENTS: Will be located on NECO under additional documents.

7.1 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE FORM

7.2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

7.3 PPI LOG TEMPLATE

7.4 BASE ACCESS PASS REGISTRATION SECNAV 5512/1

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This solicitation is being issued as Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 236220 and the size standard is $36.5M.

1.1.3 This acquisition will be advertised utilizing FAR Part 15 – Contracting by Negotiations resulting in a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for construction services.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

This project is a construction contract for the P4041, Medical/Dental Replacement located at the Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. The project will construct a new two story free-standing medical/dental facility of approximately 40,000 SF.

All Engineering systems will be furnished including Structural, Fire Suppression, Plumbing, HVAC, Electrical, and Communications. The basic structural frame will be comprised of steel beams supporting a steel bar joist and steel deck roof system. The exterior will be CMU and brick cavity walls.

Portions of the exterior walls will be hardened for Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) and windows within the hardened portion will meet AT/FP requirements. The facility will be fully sprinklered in accordance with DOD criteria. The facility will be provided with a complete and usable domestic cold/hot water distribution with hot water recirculation and sanitary drainage with all associated fixtures, equipment, and appurtenances. In addition, a complete and usable cooling and heating system will be provided with all associated ductwork and equipment. Mechanical equipment will include a direct expansion dedicated outside air unit with heat recovery wheel and a variable refrigerant flow system. A central dental evacuation system will be included in the plumbing. The mechanical equipment will be controlled by a Direct Digital Control system (DDC). The clinic will be served by 200 pair copper cable for voice service and 24 strand single mode optical fiber. The telecommunications infrastructure system will include 4-pair, category 6 cables. The voice and data system will include equipment racks, cabling, combination voice and data outlets, and termination equipment. The telecommunications systems will include: nurse call, public address, fire alarm, cable television, access control, an intrusion detection system infrastructure only, and a duress alarm system infrastructure only. A lightning protection system will be provided. Construction of supporting facilities will include all site utilities, site preparation, site improvements, paving (parking and roadways), and access roads.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2.2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

2.4. In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology:

Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order (lowest price to highest price). The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the three lowest priced proposals. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal from among the three lowest priced proposals unless discussions are deemed necessary. However, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

2.5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

3. SAFETY EVALUATION

3.1. Per NFAS 15.304(d), solicitations utilizing source selection procedures for procurements within the 50 United States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas shall contain a standard “Safety” technical evaluation factor. This factor shall be included as a stand-alone evaluation factor and not as a sub-factor or an element of the Past Performance evaluation factor. This action will result in the selection of contractors that have consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and the ability to properly manage and implement safety procedures for themselves and all tiers of subcontractors under their purview.

3.2. The safety evaluation has three elements: Experience Modification Rate (EMR);

Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) Days Away from Work, Job Restriction, or Transfer (DART) and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates; and Technical Approach to Safety.

3.2.1. The safety elements should be collectively considered and then assigned an overall adjectival rating for the safety factor. The board will need to make a qualitative determination of the rating for safety taking into account the risk ratings for EMR, DART, TRC and the subjective evaluation of the narrative.

3.3. The board will not average the rating from the three previous complete calendar years for the EMR, DART and TRC and should consider data trends.

3.4. The following should be utilized by evaluators as a general guideline to evaluate the EMR, DART, and TRC rates:

Risk EMR Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

4. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

Each offeror’s technical factors and past performance will be evaluated separately. Upon the conclusion of the evaluation of the technical factors, and past performance, an overall non-price factors rating of Acceptable (A) or Unacceptable (U) will be assigned to each offeror’s non-price factors proposal.

4.1. The following adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign a rating to each technical factor. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factor ratings. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable (U)

Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The weaknesses and/or deficiencies (as defined below) of each proposal for each non-price evaluation factor which influenced the assigned adjectival rating shall be identified.

Definitions Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness

A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

4.2. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Past Performance shall be evaluated when using the LPTA process, unless waived by the PCO in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b). Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the following table:

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable (A) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable (U) Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

(a) Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. There are two aspects of the past performance evaluation.

4.2.1 The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is relevant is unique to each LPTA source selection. For this solicitation, the criteria for recency and relevancy are as defined in Factor 1 below.

4.2.2 The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

(b) SSEB members will review past performance information to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment.

5. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

5.1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 - Corporate Experience Factor 2 - Safety Factor 3 - Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

5.2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Provide one (1) marked original, one (1) marked copy and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

In the event of any discrepancy, the original hard copy will govern. Furthermore, any non-price information contained within the price submittal will not be considered. Likewise, any price information contained within the non-price submittal will not be considered.

(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its DUNS Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal.

(ii) Completed Proposed Price.

(iii) Bid bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the Offeror identified on the SF1442.

(iv) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00600 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.

(v) FAPIIS Certification. Offeror shall ensure Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(vi) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit. An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

(vii) Responsibility Determination Information: In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued. In a separate tab, provide the following:

One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources.

If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required);

The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each Joint Venture companies and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror;

Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment; and Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

Price shall be evaluated on the basis of the cumulative price, inclusive of all Option Items (FAR 52.217-5). The Offeror is required to submit a complete Pricing Schedule that includes all CLINS.

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all options. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

Technical Proposal Submittal Requirements: Offerors shall provide one (1) marked original, three (3) marked copies, and one (1) electronic copy (CD) of the solicitation submittal requirements for non-cost/price factors identified below. In case of variation, the original hard copy proposal takes precedence over electronic or copies. Include a cover page to include the following for the Prime Contractor and Designer of Record: Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

No pricing shall be included in the technical proposal. Any non-price information contained within the price submittal will not be considered. Likewise, any price information contained within the non-price submittal will not be considered.

The technical proposal shall include submittals for each technical factor as specified below:

Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects completed in the past seven (7) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation that best demonstrate your experience as the prime contractor on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity as defined below. Of the relevant projects submitted, at least one must be a Medical and/or Dental Facility. If an offeror submits more than five (5) projects, only the first five (5) projects submitted will be considered. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as follows:

Similar Size: 35,000 SF or greater and a final construction cost of $18,000,000 or greater.

Similar Scope: New construction of a multi-story medical facility to include medical clinics, dental clinics, outpatient ambulatory care center or hospitals.

Similar Complexity: Each submitted project does not require demonstrated experience with all of the following components, but collectively, experience with all of the elements below must be established throughout the submitted relevant projects.

1. Project(s) demonstrating the ability to manage a project on constrained site (i.e. limited laydown area, limited site access, possible working hour restrictions, etc.)

2. Project (s) installation of high performance energy systems.

3. Project (s) performing enhanced commissioning of a building.

Projects that do not clearly demonstrate the above Size, Scope, and/or Complexity will not be considered.

A project is defined as a project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Corporate Experience Form (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for the Corporate Experience Form shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP as described above.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. For a JV, the offeror shall submit the signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures, the offeror shall submit the signed and U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) approved Mentor-Protégé agreement.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The requirement for Acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the Offeror in its proposal.

The Offeror must have at least two (2) relevant projects that meet the size, scope, and complexity requirements stated above.

Factor 2, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture;

however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2015, 2016, and 2017). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2015, 2016, and 2017). If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART rates, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2015, 2016, and 2017). If an offeror cannot submit TRC rates, for any year, the offeror must affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety: Provide a narrative that addresses the following:

Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

Describe the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

Describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

Describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

Note: The narrative shall be limited to two pages (two single sided pages or one double-sided page). For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to four (4) pages in length.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

- Total Recordable Cases (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror must affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not.

If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA

DART rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element.

The board will evaluate the OSHA DART rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(4) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/ processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(5) Other sources of information available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

Factor 3, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR APPRAISAL SUPPORT SYSTEM (CCASS)

EVALUATION OR CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS)

EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL FOR EACH

PROJECT INCLUDED IN FACTOR 1 FOR CORPORATE EXPERIENCE. IF THERE IS NOT A

COMPLETED CCASS OR CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT

A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contract. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which must provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information.

However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Georgia Scott, via email at welton.thomas@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors are strongly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors are also strongly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed two

(2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Performance awards or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance which may consider some or all of the following:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

6. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

6.1. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT: The site visit will be announced via Amendment.

6.2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include the Price Proposal and the Non- Cost/Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the above Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor and as follows:

6.2.1. The Price Proposal and the Non-Cost/Price Proposal shall be submitted in separate 3-ring binders. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Cost/Price Proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non- Cost/Price Proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non- Cost/Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered. Proposals shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR

NON-COST/PRICE PROPOSAL FOR RFP N40085-18-R-0612,

ATTN: : WELTON THOMAS; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.

6.2.2. The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

6.2.3. All proposals shall be mailed or hand carried to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic Marine Corps IPT, Acquisition 9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room 116 Norfolk, VA 23511 3624

Attn: Welton Thomas, Code OPQA1

6.2.4. Hand Carried Proposals: Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal and who do not currently have a valid badge issued by the Department of Defense (DoD) to enter Naval Station Norfolk must do the following:

6.2.4.1. Submit a Base Access Pass Registration SECNAV 5512/1

(Attachment 5.4) NO LESS THAN 10 BUSINESS DAYS by 1:00 P.M. EST prior to the proposal due date.

The request shall be sent to Welton Thomas at Welton.Thomas@navy.mil

6.2.4.2. Present the following information at the pass office: Valid Driver’s License, Current Vehicle Registration and/or Rental Car Contract, Current State Safety Inspection, Current Proof of Insurance.

6.2.4.3. .Naval Station Norfolk Pass & ID Office is located on Hampton Boulevard across from Gate 5. All potential offerors must adhere to this notice in order to avoid delay in submitting your proposal. The level of security at the Naval Station Norfolk may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Naval Station also increases. Early arrival is advised. Submission of a pass request form is no guarantee you will be able to get on the base. If for any reason you get to the gate and are not allowed onto the base (even if you have submitted a request form), you will need to find another way to get your proposal delivered. Government personnel may not be able to sponsor you on base to deliver your proposal. Ultimately, it is the contractor's responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission to the specified location. Due to heightened security, it is recommended that you allow sufficient time to get into the building and turn in your proposal.

If approved, the submitted pass request only allows access on the proposal due date. If the proposal due date is extended, the offeror must seek to have the date on the pass request revised. Submission of a new pass request form is not necessary. If any other information listed on a submitted pass request form changes, a new pass request form with the updated information must be submitted.

6.2.5. PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED NO

LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN

BLOCK 13A OF THESF1442. Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected.

6.3. PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs): All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist ten (10) calendar days prior to the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to welton.thomas@navy.mil Use of the PPI Log template is required. The PPI Log Template (5.3) can be found on the NECO website under the Additional Documents section.

6.4. NAVY ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ONLINE (NECO): Amendments will be posted directly to NECO/FedBizOpps. The drawings and specifications will be posted on NECO under the Additional Documents section of this RFP. Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO, such as the pre- proposal inquires (PPI) log, revised drawings, etc., under the Additional Documents section of the RFP. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings.

6.5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL: The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text. All contractor personnel shall meet or exceed the qualification standards, experience levels and trade background set forth in the technical proposal. In the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of this contract and the technical proposal, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (i) the contract (excluding the technical proposal), and then (ii) the technical proposal.

6.6 PRICE PROPOSAL

6.6.1 CONTRACT LINE ITEMS

Provide the Contract Line Item (CLIN) lump sum price for the following items:

CLIN 0001-BASE PRICE- Price includes the following:

CLIN 0001 shall be the total amount of items 0001 AA through 0001 AB, completed in accordance with the RFP, but not including the work indicated or specified to be provided underany option items.

CLIN 0001AA. Price for the entire work for Facility in accordance with the drawings and specifications, but excluding work described in Contract Line Items (CLIN) 0001AB, 0002, 0003, 0004, and 0005. $_________________

CLIN 0001AB. Price for demolition and excavation of buried concrete and debris that is encountered within planned excavation limits and not identified in the Contract Documents for demolition, greater than 0.5 cubic yards (c.y.) in size , in accordance with the following schedule:

CLIN 0002 Option Item No. 1 - Price includes the following:

Price for adding work in connection with providing an entry canopy as indicated, complete in accordance with drawings and specifications. $_________________ CLIN 0003 Option Item No. 2 - Price includes the following:

Price for adding work in connection with providing pedestrian crossing as indicated, complete in accordance with drawings and specifications. $_________________

CLIN 0004 Option Item No. 3 - Price includes the following:

Price for adding work in connection with providing site electrical in accordance with drawings and specifications. $_________________

CLIN 0005 Option Item No. 4 - Price includes the following:

Price for adding work in connection with providing landscaping in accordance with drawings and specifications. $_________________

6.6.2 GENERAL BID NOTES

6.6.2.1. If an Offeror provides a total but fails to enter a unit price, the total divided by the specified quantity will be held to be the intended unit price.

6.6.2.2. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 and CLIN 0005 to the Contractor at the proposed price within 30 calendar days after the contract award. A firm fixed proposed price is required for CLIN 0001, CLIN 0002, CLIN 0003, CLIN 0004 and CLIN 0005. No provision is made for economic price adjustment. If Options are exercised, the contract completion date remains the same.

6.6.2.3. The Government may reject an offer as nonresponsive if it is materially unbalanced as to prices for the basic requirement and the option quantities. An offer is unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices which are significantly overstated for other work.

6.6.2.4. If Contract Line Items (CLIN) 0002, 0003, 0004 and 0005 are exercised, additional bonding and consent of surety is required. Consequently, the Performance Bond must reflect 100 percent of the aggregate amount of all Items.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items NOV 2017

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

23.5 6.9

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North Carolina

(End of provision)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer.