PWS.pdf

RFP APPENDIX A

12 JANUARY 2017

1. RAOMAC Contract ____________________, CTO_____________ Fund Type: ER,N Work Order: 558232

ACQR: 4605542

Project Title/Location: Groundwater Monitoring, Sampling, and Reporting at Tank Farm 950, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Ship System Engineering Station, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Attachments:

(a) Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated 12 January 2017;

(b) Site Maps dated 2000 and 2016;

(c) Tier II Sampling and Analysis Plan dated 2012; and

(d) Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum dated 12 December 2014.

All attachments will be uploaded to www.fbo.gov, with the exception of: (i) the PWS, which can be found below as Attachment (a); and (ii) larger files, which will be sent via AMRDEC Safe Access File Exchange to the RAOMAC Contract Holders, if necessary.

2. Project Points of Contact (POC):

NAVFAC MIDLANT Remedial Project Manager (RPM):

Mr. Paul Young Tel: 757-341-0488 E-Mail: paul.r.young@navy.mil The Contracting Officer has authorized the RPM to perform general oversight and technical administration of the negotiated contract. In that position, the RPM may provide in-scope direction to the contractor, and assures the terms of the negotiated services. The RPM administers the scope and outside agency interface, and coordinates criteria and technical oversight within the Navy’s Integrated Product Team (IPT).

NAVFAC MIDLANT Contract Specialist (CS):

Ms. Alanna Whybrew Tel: 757-341-0081 E-Mail: alanna.whybrew@navy.mil The Contract Specialist is responsible for all contract terms, changes or deviations requiring contract adjustments. No changes to the contract scope will be made or additional work authorized without the prior approval of a Contracting Officer. All correspondence (without enclosures) will be received by the Contract Specialist.

NAVFAC Public Works Department (PWD) Site Activity Point of Contact (POC) Mr. Christopher Harding Tel: 215-897-8048 E-Mail: christ.l.harding@navy.mil

The Site Activity POC is provided for obtaining site access and site information.

Coordination with the Site Activity POC is critical to ensuring that the scheduled site visits are consistently performed on time and with minimal impact to Navy facility operations.

3. Project Scope: See Attachment (a)

4. Schedule of Fees:

Please use the Price Proposal Form (Attachment A of the General Requirements) to submit your price proposal. The task order will be for a one-year base term, and the Government will have the option to extend the term of the order for four (4) additional one-year option periods.

The total duration of the task order, including options, if exercised, will not exceed sixty (60) months. A firm-fixed-price shall be provided for the base year and for each option year. For purposes of evaluating offers for award, the Government will utilize the pricing submitted for the base year and all option periods. If there are changes to the scope of work over the course of the task order term, a modification proposal will be requested, and once negotiated, the changes will be incorporated into the task order by bilateral agreement.

5. Submittal Due Dates:

The contractor shall begin work upon receipt of contract documents and pursue the work diligently in accordance with the Deliverable Schedule Matrix established therein. See Section 7 of Attachment (a) for the complete list of deliverables. Noted below is the project milestone date for the base year.

Project Milestone (base year):

Final Submittal Due Date: March 31, 2018

NOTE: All submittal dates are required to be met unless changes are authorized by the Contracting Officer in writing via a concurrence letter or task order modification. Any change in task order completion date shall be changed by modification only.

6. Project Submittal Requirements and Distribution:

The contractor shall provide for the direct distribution of documents to each addressee as listed in Section 6 of Attachment (a) and as directed by the RPM.

7. Price Proposal Form:

Each offeror shall complete the provided Price Proposal Form located in Attachment A of the General Requirements. All work requirements are described in Section 2 (Work Elements) of Attachment (a). The Price Proposal Form is provided to the offeror for proposal preparation and will be used to evaluate costs to complete the four elements described within the PWS.

Attachment (a)

REMEDIAL ACTION OPERATION MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT (RAOMAC)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) FOR

GROUNDWATER MONITORING, SAMPLING, AND REPORTING AT

TANK FARM 950, NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CARDEROCK DIVISION,

SHIP SYSTEM ENGINEERING STATION, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Mid-Atlantic

9324 Virginia Avenue Norfolk, Virginia 23511-3095

12 January 2017

SECTION 1 – GENERAL

This Contract Task Order (CTO) is for performing Groundwater Monitoring, Sampling, and Reporting at Tank Farm 950 located at Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Ship System Engineering Station in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The duration of work under this CTO shall not exceed sixty (60) months from the award date. The Department of the Navy (Navy) Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) will administer this contract and will manage the Work Elements under this CTO. All requirements of the Basic Contract, in addition to those specifically mentioned in this CTO, remain in full effect, and performance under this CTO shall be in accordance therewith.

1.1. Performance Objective(s)

The main objectives of this project are monthly groundwater monitoring, quarterly Enhanced Fluid Recovery (EFR) events using a vacuum truck, semi-annual groundwater sampling, and annual reporting. Groundwater monitoring, EFRs, and sampling will be conducted during the specified dates:

o Monthly monitoring of 16 groundwater monitoring wells includes water level/free product thickness gauging and manual bailing of free product, as needed, starting upon approval of the Section 2.2 Work Element 2 – Project Plans. Monthly monitoring is anticipated to begin in March, April, or May 2017 (12 events).

o Quarterly EFR events shall be performed in conjunction with the scheduled monthly monitoring events and semi-annual groundwater sampling events. These EFR events are anticipated to occur in May, August, and November 2017 and February 2018 (4 events).

o Semi-annual groundwater sampling in May and November 2017 (2 events).

This PWS has been developed to support the continuing assessment and remediation of a petroleum release at the site (see Attachment b for figures of the site and monitoring well locations). Note, only one Annual Report is required, although it is expected that the data from the first round of semi-annual sampling will be analyzed with the results provided to the RPM.

Section 2.3 Work Element 3 – Field Work provides site-specific sampling locations and analytical testing requirements. The contractor shall obtain final approval of the work required by

NAVFAC.

1.2. Background

The following background information is provided to support this PWS. The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Ships System Engineering Station, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, (NSWC, CD-SSES) tank farm area comprises of three (3) adjoining tank farms known as: (1) former Tank Farm 950 (removed in 2003); (2) Tank Farm 951; and (3) Tank Farm 952.

The former Tank Farm 950 site consisted of 15 aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) constructed around 1920 with capacities varying from 4,800 gallons to 20,000 gallons. At Tank Farm 950, twelve of the ASTs were single-walled and three were baffled (i.e., segregated into two or more compartments). These 15 ASTs were supported by reinforced concrete saddles surrounded by a concrete containment basin, and were historically used to store a number of different fuels, including No. 2 fuel oil, No. 6 fuel oil, Navy Special Fuel Oil (NSFO), diesel fuel, and JP-5. Tank Farm 951, constructed around 1942, consists of ten operational 15,000-gallon horizontal ASTs that currently contain No. 2 fuel oil, but formerly contained various fuels, including No. 6 fuel oil, NSFO, Navy distillate fuel, and JP-5. Immediately south of Tank Farm 951 is a 20,000-gallon vertical, double-walled, steel AST used to store JP-5. Tank Farm 952 consists of seven 64,000-gallon horizontal ASTs that contain distilled water for operations at Building No. 633.

The site has a history of both soil and groundwater contamination. In 1989 and 1990, a Phase I and Phase II environmental investigation was conducted at Tank Farms 950 and 951. The investigation was performed following a reported spill of lubricating oil from an oil water separator and a release from a fuel oil return line. According to the analytical results, the hydrocarbon type was identified as fuel oil and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were not detected at the site. In 1991, the USEPA conducted a RCRA Facility Assessment and identified the site as an Area of Concern (AOC). Discoloration of the concrete containment basins for Tank Farms 950 and 951 and free product within the containment area were noted. Cracks were reportedly visible in the containment wall and in the concrete pad. Monitoring wells MW-01 through MW-04 were installed in 1995. Historically, LNAPL was measured in monitoring well MW-03 at a thickness of 0.40 feet. Monitoring wells MW-05 and MW-06 were installed in 1996.

During the April 1997 sampling event, groundwater was not collected from monitoring wells MW-03 and MW-06 due to the presence of the LNAPL in the wells.

From February 1997 until August 1998, a bio-slurping system was operational at Tank Farm 950.

Initially, free product (LNAPL) was recovered from one extraction well (MW-03); however, in April 1998 a second extraction well (EW-2) was installed approximately 40 feet south of monitoring well MW-06. Bio-slurping system operations were suspended in August 1998 due to poor LNAPL recovery. The poor recovery rates were attributed to fluctuating groundwater levels as a result of tidal impact and low permeability of the underlying soils (heavy silts and clays). In September 1999, a soil and groundwater investigation was performed in the vicinity of Tank Farm 950. This investigation was conducted as part of a feasibility study to evaluate alternatives for the future replacement of the tank farms (Tank Farms 950, 951, and 952). During the 1999 investigation, the presence of a LNAPL sheen was observed in monitoring well MW-06.

In April 2003, the Tank Farm 950 ASTs, supporting structures, concrete saddles, and spill containment walls were demolished and removed from the site. During the May 2004 site characterization assessment of Tank Farm 950, monitoring wells MW-03 and MW-06 contained

0.10 foot and 4.01 feet of LNAPL, respectively.

In December 2007, approximately 565 tons of petroleum-contaminated soil were excavated and removed for off-site disposal from the former footprint of Tank Farm 950. Oil was observed seeping into the excavation from the bottom and side walls of the excavation. The sources of this oil could not be excavated due to buildings and other structures located within the immediate vicinity of the excavation area. Approximately 22,000 gallons of contaminated groundwater were collected and treated using a granular activated carbon filter. The treated water was discharged to the City of Philadelphia sanitary sewer in accordance with a Discharge Permit obtained from the Philadelphia Water Department.

In 2012, a revised Site Characterization Report was prepared and submitted to PADEP; however, the report was rejected for several reasons including the contamination had not been horizontally or vertically delineated. In February 2013, a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was completed for Tank Farm 950. PADEP deferred review of the RAP until the SCR was revised and approved. In August 2014, a Soil Excavation, Well Gauging, and Absorbent Sock Installation Report was prepared and noted that LNAPL was detected in monitoring wells MW-03 and MW-06. Also in 2014, additional monitoring wells were installed at the site to include monitoring wells MW-07 through MW-12. Free product was detected in monitoring well MW-10. In 2015, monitoring wells MW-13, MW-14, and MW-15 were installed at the site. In 2016, two rounds of groundwater samples were collected for the SCR. In August 2016, Oil/Water Separator OWS #6 was filled in place. In December 2016, eight soil borings were completed around Oil/Water Separator OWS #6 to further define the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination.

Currently, the Navy is in the process of completing the SCR and Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the site.

Groundwater monitoring and sampling have been performed at this site for a number of years.

Free product recovery is currently ongoing in monitoring wells MW-03, MW-06, and MW-10.

Sixteen wells are being gauged on a periodic basis for the presence of LNAPL and groundwater elevations. The wells being monitored include: MW-01, MW-02R, MW-03 through MW-15, and EW-2. Most recently on November 18, 2016, LNAPL thicknesses of 0.20, 0.17, and 4.20 feet were detected in monitoring wells MW-03, MW-06, and MW-10, respectively. Temporary storage of investigative-derived waste (IDW) has historically been located within a bermed area located adjacent to monitoring well MW-04. As required by the Philadelphia Public Works Department (PWD), all drums containing liquid IDW are to be overpacked in poly-overpack drum containers in order to provide secondary containment for these liquid-containing drums.

This procedure will continue as deemed necessary by the Philadelphia PWD.

SECTION 2 – WORK ELEMENTS

Furnish all labor, materials, tools, supplies, equipment, plant, transportation, services, project management, permits, contract/procurement administration, and other appurtenances necessary, as further specified in this PWS. For purposes of proposal preparation, offerors should use the work elements listed below as a basis for developing the price proposal for the base year, as well as the four (4) option years, which may be exercised at the Government’s discretion.

2.1. Work Element 1 – Meetings Project Management, and Administrative Support

2.1.1. Contract/Project Kick-off Meeting - Schedule a contract/project Kick-Off Meeting (Teleconference) within 14 days of the contract award. Attendees of this meeting shall include the Work Plan Phase Remedial Project Manager (RPM), Environmental Coordinators, and Health and Safety Representatives from NSWC Philadelphia and other appropriate Navy personnel. The agenda for this meeting shall include a discussion of access to the site, scheduling, and other issues related to implementing this CTO. The contractor shall provide all meeting materials including agenda, figures, and project schedules. The contractor shall provide meeting minutes to the Government within ten (10) calendar days following the Kick-Off Meeting Teleconference. The Kick-Off Meeting applies to the base year only.

2.1.2. Project management and administrative support shall include all general project management, infrastructure, and contract administrative support required to cost-effectively manage the contract according to the project schedule.

2.1.3. The contractor shall review the project schedule as provided in Section 7. The schedule shall be reviewed, coordinated with, and approved by the RPM and Site Activity POC. The contractor shall consider the timing of required submissions and site visits in accordance with this PWS.

2.2. Work Element 2 – Project Plans

2.2.1. The contractor shall ensure all project plans are approved by the Navy with assumed regulatory agency concurrence in accordance with the Deliverable Schedule Matrix in Section 7. Regulatory concurrence is not required. Acceptance of the plans by the Navy does not relieve the contractor of the obligation of complying with the requirements of the plans, this PWS, or the Basic Contract.

Project Plans shall be consolidated deliverables, as appropriate.

2.2.2. A Work Plan shall be prepared for this project, which shall describe in detail how the fieldwork shall be accomplished. The contractor may rely on previously established work plans and update them as appropriate, if available. The contractor shall provide a Draft Work Plan for Navy review and a Final Work Plan that incorporates the Navy’s comments into the Work Plan. This Work Plan shall include a main body of text that describes detailed plans and methods for accomplishing the work. This Work Plan shall include, but may not be limited to:

Site Conditions;

Regulatory Framework;

Project Requirements;

Site Work; and Report Requirements.

2.2.3. For the purpose of this contract, the contractor shall prepare a Health and Safety

Plan (HASP), which includes an Accident Prevention Plan (APP) and Site Safety and Health Plan (SSHP) for the site. In accordance with FAR 52.236-13, the HASP shall be site-specific and shall include an activity hazard analysis (AHA) for all tasks performed. References used to develop the site-specific plan shall include, but are not limited to: [29 CFR 1910.120 (Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response]; [EM 385-1-1 US Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual]; [Navy/Marine Corps Environmental Restoration Program Manual]; and [Local Activity safety plans and standard operating procedures]. The HASP shall address all sections deemed appropriate for performing this project and provide a safe and healthful environment for all personnel involved. The HASP shall be amended as appropriate and the AHA shall be a "living" document in that changes in the field shall be documented and added to the AHA as field change notices. The HASP must be reviewed and accepted by the RPM and Site Activity POC. The HASP shall be immediately accessible to all workers at the site at all times during the project, and copies shall be mounted on, located adjacent to the contractor's Safety and Health Bulletin on site or available in every vehicle utilized for work under this CTO.

2.2.4. For the purposes of this task order, the contractor shall prepare a Sampling and

Analysis Plan (SAP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the site. The contractor may rely on previously established SAPs or QAPPs and update them, as appropriate. For reference purpose, the 2012 Tier II Sampling and Analysis Plan and 2014 Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum are included as Attachments c and d, respectively. The contractor shall provide an Internal Draft for Navy review and a Final SAP and QAPP report that incorporates the Navy’s comments into the SAP. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Federal Policy (UFP) guiding the development of Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) and the Department of Defense Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing. The SAP should be written in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance documents and NAVFAC environmental work instructions. In addition, the SAP shall be reviewed and approved by the NAVFAC Quality Assurance Officer (QAO) prior to field implementation. The contractor shall submit the SAP for review and signature from the Navy chemist using the SAP Review module in the Navy Installation Restoration Information Solution

(NIRIS).

2.2.5. The contractor is required to provide a Waste Management Plan (WMP). The contractor shall document in the WMP its contractual, legal, and risk-management requirements in the generation, storage, sampling and analysis, waste typing, transportation, treatment, and ultimate disposal of purge water, manually bailed LNAPL, and EFR generated liquid waste for this CTO; and to assure that waste generated in the course of the fieldwork is safely managed and disposed of in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. The WMP shall be an attachment to the Work Plan described in Section 2.2.2 above. The WMP shall cover the liquid wastes (water and product) to be disposed of under this CTO and include investigative-derived waste (IDW) generated by the contractor, and the WMP shall include at a minimum:

a description of the wastes expected by types;

a description of minimization techniques for reducing the generated quantities of IDW;

a review of applicable federal, state, and local regulatory criteria governing the management of these materials;

a characterization rationale for solid and liquid waste materials;

a rationale for on-site management of each expected waste type; and waste transportation, treatment, and disposal methods for fieldwork.

2.2.6. The contractor is required to provide detailed drawings and specifications signed by a licensed professional in accordance with current NAVFAC guidance for all types of work, as required.

2.2.6.1. The project shall include all site surveying and layout work, shop drawings, drawing detail expansion, additional sketches, adequate engineering calculations, and other related work as required to properly prepare the detailed drawings and specifications. Accordingly, the contractor shall be responsible for proper planning and execution of each task.

2.2.6.2. All reference drawings and specifications accompanying this CTO shall be considered to be a part of this PWS. The contractor shall compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying out the work and shall be responsible for any errors, which might have been avoided thereby. The contractor shall schedule all appointments for examination of drawings or site visits through the RPM.

2.3. Work Element 3 - Field Work

All field work shall be executed in accordance with the approved project plans. The following general requirements are applicable to this CTO and supplement the Basic Contract requirements.

2.3.1 The contractor’s project manager shall notify the RPM, in writing or by phone, when each field work task is about to commence.

2.3.2 Work Restrictions shall be adhered to by all contractor personnel. Contract personnel employed on the Site Activity shall become familiar with and obey Site Activity regulations including safety, fire, traffic, and security regulations.

Keep within the limits of the work area and avenues of ingress and egress.

Ingress and egress of contractor vehicles is limited to the main gate or other appropriate roadway. Do not enter any restricted areas unless required to do so and unless cleared for such entry. The contractor’s equipment shall be conspicuously marked for identification.

2.3.3 Employee Parking - Contractor employees shall park privately owned vehicles in an area designated by the Site Activity Point of Contact. This area shall be within reasonable walking distance of the sampling site. Contractor employee parking shall not interfere with existing and established parking requirements of the military installation.

2.3.4 Site Maintenance - Execute cleanup activities during progress of the Work, at the completion of the Work, and in accordance with the Basic Contract. Cleanup shall be conducted to keep the site free from accumulations of waste materials, rubbish, and windblown debris resulting from sampling operations. The contractor shall perform repair of all landscaped areas damaged by equipment, including re-seeding of grassy areas, planting of trees/shrubs and repair of irrigation systems.

2.3.5 The contractor shall dispose of any and all investigative-derived waste (IDW) and wastewater generated from this Work in accordance with federal, state and local laws, regulations, and instructions. The contractor shall obtain all permits and pay all disposal fees as may be required. The contractor shall ensure that IDW is staged within appropriate secondary containment and is removed from the site within 90 days of generation.

2.3.6 The contractor shall make every effort to prevent the spread of contamination or release of contaminants to the environment in accordance with federal, state and local laws, regulations, and instructions.

2.3.7 The contractor shall be responsible for the safety and security of their equipment and materials at all times. Equipment may be stored within the fenced area of the site during site activities, if available.

2.3.8 Deliverables shall contain a brief responsiveness summary, as appropriate, indicating how each government/regulatory comment was addressed. Forward all deliverables to the RPM, unless otherwise directed above.

2.3.9 The contractor shall not incorporate his Navy review comment response(s) into any Final Report unless the RPM has indicated, in writing, that the contractor’s response appropriately addresses the Navy review comments.

2.3.10 The contractor shall in no case proceed to the next deliverable without receiving written government approval of the preceding deliverable as specified in Sections 7 and 8 of this PWS.

2.3.11 Mobilization and Demobilization

2.3.11.1 Commencement of Work. Fieldwork shall not commence until the Navy has approved all project plans.

2.3.11.2 After approval of all project plans by the RPM, the contractor shall execute the requirements of monitoring and sampling at the site. Groundwater monitoring and sampling are required to assess and remove the presence of petroleum-related contaminants during the contracted year of work.

Assumptions: The tasks under Work Element 3 will include at a minimum:

The contractor shall perform 12 monthly groundwater monitoring events. Monthly monitoring is anticipated to begin in March, April, or May 2017. A total of 16 groundwater monitoring wells (MW-01, MW-02R, MW-03 through MW-15, and EW-2) are located at the site. These monitoring wells shall be gauged using an oil/water interface probe that detects free product to a thickness of 0.01 feet. Water level elevation measurements within the monitoring wells shall be recorded along with any measurable thicknesses of free product. If free product is detected within a well, the thickness shall be recorded prior to manual bailing. Manual bailing shall be performed to recover to the maximum extent possible with the hand-bailed liquids being placed inside a labeled 55-gallon capacity steel recovery drum with provided secondary containment (poly-overpack container), as deemed necessary by the Site Activity POC. Temporary storage of the investigative-derived waste (IDW) has historically been located within a bermed area located adjacent to monitoring well MW-04. Upon completion of each monthly manual bailing event, and prior to leaving the site, the recovery drum(s) shall be inventoried by gauging the liquid levels using an oil/water interface probe with water and product thicknesses being recorded as data for the Annual Report.

The contractor shall perform four quarterly Enhanced Fluid Recovery (EFR) events using a vacuum truck (in May, August, and November 2017, and February 2018). The vacuum truck shall vacuum extract free product and minimal amounts petroleum impacted groundwater from the LNAPL-impacted wells. Currently, free product is located within monitoring wells MW-03, MW- 06, and MW-10. To enhance free product, dissolved phase, and vapor phase hydrocarbon removal using a vacuum truck, a modified down-well stinger/slurp tube with a rubber Fernco coupler shall be used to apply increased vacuum pressure to the well, as feasible. The purpose of each EFR event using a rubber coupling attached to the well head is to remove free product floating on the water table, minimal amounts of petroleum impacted groundwater from the unconfined shallow water table aquifer, and vapor phase hydrocarbons from the vadose zone and capillary fringe. Throughout the EFR event, the elevation of the stinger/slurp tube inside the wells shall be gradually lowered in order to create a gradient for free product to enter into the LNAPL-impacted well for extraction. Upon completion of each quarterly EFR event, and prior to leaving the site, the vacuum truck shall be inventoried by gauging the liquid levels using an oil/water interface probe (or alternative method such as water finding paste) with water and product thicknesses being converted into gallons recovered and recorded as data for the Annual Report. For proposal purposes, assume a total of 5,000 gallons of liquid IDW for the base year and four option years.

This assumed total is based on an estimated 1,000 gallons per quarterly from the four EFR events, liquid IDW from the 12 manual bailing events (temporarily stored in drums), and purged groundwater from the two semi-annual sampling events (temporarily stored in drums). Each EFR event shall provide for a minimum on-site duration time of 4 hours to vacuum extract from all LNAPL-impacted wells. These EFR events are to occur simultaneous with the groundwater monitoring/sampling events to minimize the number of site visits and reduce the impact to Site Activity personnel and operations.

The contractor shall perform two semi-annual groundwater sampling events (in May and November 2017). A total of 16 groundwater monitoring wells (MW-01, MW-02R, MW-03 through MW-15, and EW-2) are located at the site. The groundwater samples are to be collected using low-flow sampling techniques and shall be analyzed for PADEP Revised Short List of Petroleum Products for jet fuel, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 4, 5, and 6 fuel oils using EPA Method 8260C for Volatile Organic Compounds, EPA Method 8270D for Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds, EPA Method 6020A for Dissolved Lead, and EPA Method 8011 for 1,2- Dibromoethane and 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane. Monitoring wells containing measurable thicknesses of free product/LNAPL shall not be sampled. One MS/MSD sample, one duplicate sample, one field blank sample, and one trip blank sample shall be collected during each sampling event for QA/QC purposes.

As noted above, the contractor shall include the appropriate duplicate, trip blank, and field blank samples to ensure QA/QC. Temperature, pH, turbidity, and specific conductivity shall be monitored during well purging. These measurements shall be recorded and monitored to assess stabilization and ensure that the well has been sufficiently purged. In order to ensure that a representative groundwater sample is collected, all monitoring well sampling shall follow EPA’s, Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells (EPA 2010). All groundwater data shall be tabulated. Note that even though only one Annual Report is required for the site, it is expected that the data from the first round of semi-annual sampling will be summarized and reported to the RPM for review. The RPM shall also be periodically updated on the volumes of free product recovered from the manual bailing and EFR events and product thicknesses detected in the impacted wells.

1) The contractor shall submit all groundwater samples under appropriate Chain of Custody for analysis of listed compounds in accordance with the approved project plans.

2) Include all QA/QC samples in accordance with the SAP, as applicable.

3) All groundwater samples shall be submitted to an analytical laboratory certified by the Department of Defense (DoD) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) for analysis.

2.4. Work Element 4 - Data Submission and Reports

The Annual Report shall include: a brief Purpose, Site Description, and Background History introduction; a summary of the work performed; a presentation/discussion of the liquid (water and free product/LNAPL) level data for the 12 monitoring events including a discussion of groundwater fluctuations (i.e. tidal, storm, etc.) and direction of flow; a summary of liquid (purge water and free product/LNAPL) recovery with volume estimates of free product recovered including disposal documents; a presentation/discussion of the analytical data for the two sampling events; and Conclusions and Recommendations sections. Figure 1 shall illustrate the location of the site on a USGS topographic map and Figure 2 shall be the Site Map. Hydraulic gradient maps (i.e. groundwater flow direction maps) shall be prepared, presented, and evaluated for each monthly monitoring event. Tabular summaries and graphical trend analyses of free product thicknesses versus time shall be provided for the impacted wells. The analytical results shall be presented in table format and compared to regulatory levels to illustrate groundwater quality trends. The Navy intends to provide two rounds of historical analytical groundwater results from the Site Characterization Report to be included within the presentation/discussion of the Annual Report. Iso-concentration maps of selected parameters (i.e. BTEX, lead, etc.) shall be presented to illustrate plume locations. The figures, tables, and graphs referenced in the discussion sections shall be presented after the Recommendations section. A table shall be included that provides recovery drum and EFR vacuum truck inventory data. Field forms, laboratory analytical reports, disposal manifests, and any additional supporting information shall be provided as Appendices to the Annual Report.

2.4.1. Deliverables - The contractor shall forward all submissions (for example: internal draft, draft, and final reports) in accordance with the distribution schedule established in this PWS. Copies of submittal distribution letters shall be forwarded to the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic contract specialist and to the NAVFAC Atlantic administrative records manager.

2.4.1.1. All documents shall be submitted in electronic format and in hard copy format

(unless otherwise specified). Electronic formats shall contain a portable document file (pdf) optical character recognition (ORC) version of the complete document and native file versions. Upon completion of the project documentation, an electronic submission (CD-ROM) of the draft, all comments, responses to comments, draft final version, responses to comments, final version, final regulatory acceptance, and other related information that should be included in the administrative record files shall be submitted to the RPM in CD-ROM format. All pdf documents shall be book marked for ease of use. All internal draft reports shall be submitted via email or electronic transfer.

2.4.1.2. Work Plan, HASP, and SAP/QAPP (for Navy review). All of the planning documents will be required to be submitted for review and approval before proceeding.

2.4.1.3. Internal Draft Reports (for Navy review). The internal draft reports shall be reviewed and approved by the RPM before proceeding.

2.4.1.4. Draft Reports (addressing Navy comments). The draft reports shall address all comments received from the internal draft report review. Once the draft report has been updated with Navy comments, it may or may not be provided to PADEP for review and comment. Coordination with the RPM will be required prior to submitting the draft report to PADEP, if needed.

2.4.1.5. Final Reports (addressing regulatory comments and submittals). The final report shall include a cover sheet, report spine, and title sheet. The final report will also include an electronic CD-ROM formatted submittal.

Navy Installation Restoration Information Solution (NIRIS) - The contractor shall obtain access to NIRIS and shall submit all tabular and spatial data to NIRIS in accordance with current NIRIS standard operating procedures (SOPs). All analytical data generated by the laboratory shall be reviewed by the Contractor's Project Chemist to ensure the validity of the reported data prior to submittal to NIRIS. NIRIS data submittals shall be coordinated with the Command NIRIS Regional Data Manager (RDM), Monica Marrow (CH2MHill) for inclusion into NIRIS. NIRIS data shall include installation-wide data related to:

2.4.1.6. Environmental tabular data - the contractor shall submit all relevant environmental tabular data using the NIRIS Electronic Data Deliverable (NEDD) format as outlined in the current NEDD SOP. The contractor shall identify the appropriate NEDD tables to populate and obtain approval from the RPM to ensure completeness. [Note: The NEDD Selector in NIRIS shall be used to identify the required tables that shall be populated].

2.4.1.7. Environmental spatial data (i.e., Environmental Restoration site boundary information) – the contractor shall submit all spatial information in accordance with the current Non-NEDD Deliverable Submittal Guidelines (https://niris.navfac.navy.mil/Document_Management/Knowledge_Base/Sop_ Documentation/03-000-04%20Non- EDD%20Deliverable%20Submittal%20Guidelines.pdf).

2.4.1.8. Land Use Control (LUC) information for Controlled Areas - the contractor shall submit all LUC data in accordance with the LUC Tracker User Guide (https://niris.navfac.navy.mil/Document_Management/Knowledge_Base/Sop_ Documentation/04-USR-05%20LUC%20Tracker%20User%20Guide.pdf).

2.4.2. Records management - The contractor shall submit all documentation in accordance with the Deliverable Schedule Matrix in Section 7, Environmental Restoration Recordkeeping Program Manual, Appendix G, NAVFAC Contractor Work Instruction (https://niris.navfac.navy.mil/Document_Management/Knowledge_Base/Sop_Docu mentation/ER%20Recordkeeping%20Manual.pdf), and NAVFAC SW Environmental Work Instruction 4. Documentation shall include Administrative Record files, post decision files and site files.

2.4.3. The contractor shall provide copies of all correspondence to the RPM.

SECTION 3 – SPECIAL CONDITIONS

3.1. All communications with parties outside of the Navy team shall be coordinated through the RPM.

3.2. The contractor shall obtain approval from the RPM prior to obtaining photographic records, still or motion picture and/or aerial or ground photographs, in accordance with Public Law: 18 U.S. Code 795 and applicable station regulations. The Navy may provide a representative to act in an advisory capacity to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information.

3.3. Public Affairs - The contractor shall not disclose any information or data resulting from actions in this contract to the news media or public. The contractor may not distribute reports or data to any source, unless specifically authorized by the RPM and the Public Affairs Officer in accordance with NAVFAC Instruction 5720.10A. (Reference:

NAVFAC 5720/6 Form - Publication Security Review and Clearance).

3.4. Any oral directives, instructions, explanations, commitments and/or acceptances given by any government employee to the contractor or his personnel, shall not be construed by the contractor as a change in scope to this CTO. Any change to this PWS must be issued to the contractor, in writing, by the Contracting Officer to be binding on the government.

3.5. Access to all necessary locations shall be provided by the Navy prior to commencement of Work. No contractor personnel are to enter any location without first obtaining clearance from the Navy. Equipment and personnel entering the site and/or storage area(s) shall not be required to obtain a security pass.

3.6. The contractor shall verbally brief the RPM as to the progress of Work, status of field operations, and percentage of report completion.

3.7. The contract number shown in the CTO award is the number assigned to the contract for this Work, and shall be used on all reports and correspondence relative to this contract.

3.8. The Navy shall provide a representative to oversee and document remediation activities, as warranted by the RPM and Site Activity POC.

3.9. The Navy shall review all pertinent records provided by the contractor to authorize persons to enter and/or work at the sites. This review of records is in no way intended to relieve the contractor from his responsibility to comply with applicable regulations.

Additionally, the review is not intended to evaluate the effectiveness of employee training or the contractor’s medical surveillance program.

3.10. The task order will be for a one-year base term, and the Government will have the option to extend the term of the order for four (4) additional one-year option periods.

The total duration of the task order, including options, if exercised, will not exceed sixty

(60) months. A firm-fixed-price shall be provided for the base year and for each option year. For purposes of evaluating offers for award, the Government will utilize the pricing submitted for the base year and all option periods. If there are changes to this PWS over the course of the task order term, a modification proposal will be requested, and once negotiated, the changes will be incorporated into the task order by bilateral agreement.

SECTION 4 – REFERENCES

4.1. General Reference Documents:

4.1.1. Installation Restoration Chemical Data Quality Manual (IRCDQM), NFESC, 1999

4.1.2. EPA Requirements for QAPP for Environmental Data Operations, EPA QA/R-5,

4.1.3. Guidance Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA

QA/G-4, EPA 2006

4.1.4. DoD Quality System Manual for Environmental Laboratories, Version 4.1, April

4.1.5. EPA Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans, March 2005

4.1.6. EPA Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure for the Collection of

Groundwater Samples from Monitoring Wells. 2010

4.1.7. Project Specific Reference Documents: see Attachments b through d.

SECTION 5 – GOVERNMENT FURNISHED DATA (as applicable)

5.1 (1) Project Specific Reference Documents: see Attachments b through d.

(2) Project Drawings/Maps: see Attachments b.

(3) Project Specifications: see Attachments c and d.

SECTION 6 – POINTS OF CONTACT

Point of Contact Name Address Phone Email

Remedial Program Manager (RPM)

Paul Young NAVFAC

MIDLANT

9324 Virginia Ave., Bldg. Z144, Norfolk, VA 23511-3095

757- 341-paul.r.young@navy.m il

Contract Specialist

(CS)

Alanna Whybrew

NAVFAC

MIDLANT

9324 Virginia Ave, Bldg. Z-144, Norfolk, VA 23511-3095

341-alanna.whybrew@nav y.mil

Navy Site Activity Point of Contact (POC) and Acting Deputy Public Works Officer

Christopher Harding

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Public Works Department – Environmental,49

215- 897-christ.l.harding@navy.

mil

Point of Contact Name Address Phone Email

21 South Broad Street, Bldg. 1, Philadelphia, PA 19112

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) Project Manager (PM)

Susan Kennedy

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Southeast Regional Office, 2 East Main Street, Norristown, PA 19401

484- 250-sukennedy@state.pa.u s

Navy Installation Restoration Information System

(NIRIS)

Representative

Monica Marrow

CH2M Hill 5701 Cleveland Street, Suite 200, Virginia Beach, VA 23462

757- 671-monica.marrow@ch2 m.com

SECTION 7 – DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE MATRIX

Within the table below, the final deliverables for the base year have been listed with the number of copies required for each recipient. For purposes of proposal preparation, offerors should use the deliverable schedule matrix as a basis for the option years, which may be exercised at the Government’s discretion. Addresses for Navy POCs are provided in Section 6 above. Additional addresses shall be made available after contract award.

Deliverable (work element

#/deliverable title)

Navy (# of hard copies/CD ROM)

Regulatory Agency(ies)/Public (# of hard copies/

CD ROM)

Due Date

Revised or Updated Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Document

Electronic-RPM and Navy Chemist

0 05/15/17

Health and Safety Plan

(HASP)

Electronic-RPM and Site Activity

POC

0 05/15/17

Revised or Updated Work Plan (WP) with Waste Management Plan (WMP)

Electronic-RPM and Site Activity

POC

0 05/15/17

Deliverable (work element

#/deliverable title)

Navy (# of hard copies/CD ROM)

Regulatory Agency(ies)/Public (# of hard copies/

CD ROM)

Due Date

Draft Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report

Electronic-RPM 0 1/31/18

Final Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report

1/1-RPM

2/2-Site Activity

POC

1/1 3/31/18

NIRIS electronic 0 04/30/18

Project Milestones (base year):

Final Submittal Due Date: March 31, 2018

NOTE: All submittal dates are required to be met unless changes are authorized by the Contracting Officer in writing via a concurrence letter or task order modification. Any change in task order completion date shall be changed by modification only.

SECTION 8 – PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SUMMARY

8.1 The contractor shall be responsible for achieving the performance objectives in this PWS and successfully performing all the tasks required for successful performance.

8.2 Payments shall be made to the contractor upon completion of the following:

1) Verification that the corresponding performance standards and Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) defined below have been satisfactorily achieved, and

2) Submission of a properly prepared invoice. Invoices that fail to meet the requirements of this paragraph and/or the invoicing or prompt payment clauses of the contract may be rejected in their entirety; partial payments shall not be made.

8.2.1 If a task associated with a work element is eliminated or not necessary for accomplishing project completion, the payment amount associated with that task shall not be paid to contractor.

8.2.2 Failure to demonstrate that the performance objective(s) is achieved and the work elements are complete may result in non-payment of the final work element.

Work Levels / Task Performance Standard

Acceptabl e Quality

Level

Assessment Method

Performance Payment and Incentive

Work Element 1 – Meetings, Project Management, and Administrativ e Support

Completion and distribution of all meeting materials including agenda, handouts, figures, schedule, PowerPoint presentation, and meeting minutes. Attendance and technical support at the meetings.

Successful project management and administrative support to keep the project on scope, schedule and budget.

100% Navy acceptanc e

Navy acceptance by

RPM

Lump sum payable upon acceptance by RPM for each completed meeting and meeting minutes. Percentage of Project Management and Administrative Support amount per month throughout the contract upon acceptance by RPM

Work Element 2 – Project Plans:

Draft, Draft Final (other drafts as applicable)

Navy acceptance of each deliverable (no resubmittal required due to inadequate content or poor quality).

Work plan and all attachments shall include sufficient information to implement the remedial action in the field; be clearly written; and have minimal transcription, typographical, and grammatical errors. Detail the construction of the remedy to meet cleanup goals. Comply with all requirements of this PWS, applicable codes, standards, and regulations, including the NCP. Adhere to schedule.

100% Navy acceptanc e

Navy acceptance by

RPM

Lump sum payable upon acceptance by RPM for each draft of the project plans in accordance with outlined schedule of values. (Note:

schedule of values shall include separate line items for each draft, or if all drafts are listed under one line item, this sections should list a % payment schedule for each draft under the line item)

Work Element 2 – Project Plans:

Final Sampling & Analysis Plan, HASP, and Final Work Plan

Regulatory acceptance of each deliverable (no resubmittal required due to inadequate content or poor quality).

Detail the construction of the remedy to meet cleanup goals.

Comply with all requirements of this PWS, applicable codes, standards, and regulations, including the NCP. Adhere to schedule. (Note: regulatory acceptance is not required for this element.)

100% Navy acceptanc e

Navy acceptance by

RPM

Lump sum payable upon acceptance by RPM for completion of project plans

Work Complete field work as 100% Scheduled and Monthly payment on a

Element 3 – Field Work specified in the Project Plans and other requirements of this

PWS.

Navy acceptanc e unscheduled surveillance of fieldwork, bills of lading, daily logs, etc. by RPM and/or Site Activity POC and field measurements and test results consistent with the contractor’s accepted QC Plan, and other project plans prorated scale of schedule of value items completed and accepted by the RPM by the method of acceptance.

Work Element 4 – Reports:

Draft, Draft Final (other drafts as applicable)

Navy acceptance of deliverables and submissions (no resubmittal required due to inadequate content or poor quality).

Factors that influence Navy acceptance include timeliness, completeness and accuracy.

The report shall conform to the report requirements outlined in the PWS; be clearly written;

and have minimal transcription, typographical, and grammatical errors.

100% Navy acceptanc e

Navy acceptance by

RPM

Lump sum payable upon acceptance by RPM for each Draft of the project plans in accordance with outlined schedule of values. (Note:

schedule of values shall include separate line items for each draft, or if all drafts are listed under one line item, this sections should list a % payment schedule for each draft under the line item)

Work Element 4 – Report:

Final 2017 Annual Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report

Navy acceptance of deliverables and submissions (no resubmittal required due to inadequate content or poor quality).

Factors that influence Navy acceptance include timeliness, completeness and accuracy.

The report shall conform to the report requirements outlined in the PWS; be clearly written;

and have minimal transcription, typographical, and grammatical errors. (Note:

regulatory acceptance is not required for this element.)

100% Navy acceptanc e

Navy acceptance by

RPM

(Note: final acceptance should be coordinated with appropriate

NIRIS

coordinator to ensure completeness)

Lump sum payable upon acceptance by RPM for final project deliverables in accordance with outlined schedule of values.