d_Sampling_and_Analysis_Plan_Addendum_2014.pdf

SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN ADDENDUM

Additional Site Investigation

Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA

Prepared for:

Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic

9742 Maryland Ave.

Norfolk, VA 23511-3095

Contract Number N62470-11-D-8013

CTO WE25

Prepared by:

Resolution Consultants A Joint Venture of AECOM & EnSafe

1500 Wells Fargo Building 440 Monticello Avenue

Norfolk, VA 23510

December 12, 2014

Sampling and Analysis Plan Addendum Philadelphia Naval Shipyard Version No.: 1 Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAP Addendum Worksheet #1: Title and Approval Page .................................................... WS 1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv SAP Addendum Worksheet #5: Project Organizational Chart .............................................. WS 5-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #6: Communication Pathways ................................................. WS 6-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #9: Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet ......................... WS 9-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #11: Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements ................................................................................................. WS 11-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #12: Measurement Performance Criteria Table ....................... WS 12-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #14: Summary of Project Tasks ............................................. WS 14-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #15-1: Reference Limits and Evaluation Tables ....................... WS 15-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #16: Project Schedule/Timeline Table (Optional Format) ......... WS 16-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #17: Sampling Design and Rationale ...................................... WS 17-1 SAP Worksheet #18, 19, 20 and 30: Field Project Implementation (Field Project Instructions) ................................................................... WS 18,19,20 and 30-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #21: Project Sampling SOP References Table ......................... WS 21-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #23: Analytical SOP References Table .................................... WS 23-1 SAP Addendum Worksheet #28-1: Laboratory QC Samples Table ..................................... WS 28-1 SAP Worksheet #34-36: Data Verification and Validation (Steps I and IIa/IIb) Process Table ................................................................................................... WS 34-36-1 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... R-1

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Proposed Well Locations

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014 ii

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

CLEAN Comprehensive Long-Term Environmental Action Navy CSM Conceptual Site Model CTO Contract Task Order oC Degrees Celsius DoD Department of Defense DQOs Data quality objectives

EDB Ethylene Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)

FWEC Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation

GC/MS Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry GWNRU PADEP Groundwater Medium Specific Concentration for Non-Residential Used

Aquifers, Total Dissolved Solids < 2,500 mg/L

IDW Investigation-derived waste

LCS Laboratory control sample LNAPL Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid mg/L Milligrams per liter MS/MSD Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate MSC Medium Specific Concentration

NSWCCD-SSES Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Ship System Engineering Station

NFA No Further Action NTU Nephelometric turbidity unit

ORP Oxidation/reduction potential

PADEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PID Photoionization Detector PNBC Philadelphia Naval Business Center PPE Personnel protection equipment ppm Parts per Million PVC Polyvinylchloride

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014 iii

QA Quality assurance QAO Quality assurance officer QAPP Quality assurance project plan QL Quantitation limit

RAP Remedial Action Plan RPD Relative percent difference RPM Remedial project manager SAP Sampling and analysis plan SCR Site Characterization Report SHSNRU PADEP Statewide Health Standards Non-Residential, Used Aquifers with Total

Dissolved Solids < 2,500 mg/L SOP Standard operating procedure SVOCs Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds

TDS Total Dissolved Solids

UFP-QAPP Uniform Federal Policy Quality Assurance Project Plan µg/L Micrograms per Liter

VOA Volatile organic analysis VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014 iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On July 8, 2014 the Navy tasked Resolution Consultants (Resolution) to conduct additional site assessment activities for petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil and groundwater at Tank Farm 950 at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Ship System Engineering Station (NSWCCD-SSES) located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania under the Comprehensive Long-Term

Environmental Action Navy (CLEAN) Contract No. N62470-11-D-8013, Contract Task Order (CTO)

WE25. The NSWCCD-SSES is located within the Navy-retained property at the Philadelphia Naval

Business Center (PNBC).

The primary objective of this investigation will be to evaluate data gaps identified from the Site

Characterization Report (SCR) (Tetra Tech, 2004) and subsequent additional remedial and characterization activities. Activities occurring as part of this Sampling Analysis Plan (SAP) addendum have been outlined in the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (Resolution, 2013) and all site work is covered under the authority of the Tier II SAP which includes the Field Sampling Plan and

Quality Assurance Project Plan submitted in February 2012 (Tetra Tech, 2012). The RAP was prepared in general accordance with the Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act (Act 32); the

Storage Tank Corrective Action Process regulations (Pa. Code Title 25, Chapter 245, Subchapter D) and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Storage Tank Cleanup

Program Guidelines (255-4000-001; Sept. 2005).

During this scope of work, four monitoring wells will be installed and developed (MW09 through

MW12). Resolution will conduct an analysis of potential light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) migration pathways by conducting interviews, reviewing documents, including as-built drawings, sewer maps, water maps, and assessing the existing structures while on-site. Two groundwater sampling events will be conducted of the well network to account for seasonal variability.

This document is a modification of a Tier II SAP prepared by Tetra Tech (Tetra Tech, 2012) for site characterization at Tank Farm 950. As an addendum, this document includes only those items that are supplemental to, or different from, information and procedures presented in the original SAP.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 5-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #5: Project Organizational Chart

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 6-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #6: Communication Pathways

The communication pathways for the SAP are shown below.

Communication Drivers Responsible Entity Name Phone Number

Procedure (Timing, Pathway To/From, etc.)

Regulatory Agency Interface Navy RPM James Tarr 757-322-4223 Navy RPM will interface with Regulatory Agency directly via phone or email as needed.

Field Progress Reports Resolution FTL\SSO Resolution PM Navy RPM

Geoff Richards Michael Shannon James Tarr

215-315-4313 215-315-4290 757-322-4223

The Resolution FTL will email daily field progress reports to the Resolution PM. In addition, there will be phone conversation between the Resolution FTL and the Resolution PM as needed.

The Resolution RPM will email the Navy RPM at a minimum weekly or as needed.

Stop Work due to Safety Issues

Resolution FTL/SSO Resolution PM Resolution HSO Navy RPM

Geoff Richards Michael Shannon Michael Grasso James Tarr

215-315-4313 215-315-4290 607-201-6737 757-322-4223

The Resolution SSO will verbally inform onsite personnel, including subcontractors as soon as possible. The Resolution SSO will verbally inform the Resolution PM of the Stop Work condition as well as when it is resolved. As need be, the Resolution SSO and/or PM will work with the Resolution HSO and Navy RPM to resolve issues.

SAP/WP Changes prior to Field/ Laboratory work

Resolution PM Navy RPM

Michael Shannon James Tarr

215-315-4290 757-322-4223

The Resolution PM will notify the Navy RPM either verbally or via email of any planned amendments to the SAP. The Resolution PM will document the changes via a FTMR form and a concurrence letter.

SAP/WP Changes in the Field Navy RPM Resolution PM Resolution FTL/SSO

James Tarr Michael Shannon Geoff Richards

757-322-4223 215-315-4290 215-315-4313

The Resolution FTL will verbally notify the Resolution PM as soon as practical of realizing a need for an amendment. The Resolution PM will notify the Navy RPM either verbally or via email the same day of the realized change and the changes will be documented in a scheduled impact letter to the Navy RPM.

Field Corrective Actions Resolution FTL\SSO Resolution PM Navy RPM

Geoff Richards Michael Shannon James Tarr

215-315-4313 215-315-4290 757-322-4223

The need for corrective action for field issues will be determined by the Resolution FTL. The Resolution FTL will notify the Resolution PM.

Sample Receipt and Lab Quality Variances

Laboratory Project Manager Resolution FTL\SSO Resolution PM Resolution Project Chemist

Matt Cordova Geoff Richards Michael Shannon

Lori Herberich

732-355-4550 215-315-4313 215-315-4290

978-905-2244

The Laboratory PM will notify (verbally or via e-mail) the Resolution FTL immediately upon receipt of any chain of custody/sample receipt variances for clarification or direction from the Resolution FTL.

The Resolution FTL will notify (verbally or via e-mail) the Resolution PM and project chemist within 1 business day, if corrective action is required.

The Resolution PM or project chemist will notify (verbally or via e-mail) the Laboratory PM and the Resolution FTL within 1 business day of any required corrective action.

Analytical Corrective Actions Laboratory Project Manager Resolution Project Chemist

Matt Cordova Lori Herberich

732-355-4550 978-905-2244

The laboratory will notify the Resolution project chemist of any analytical data anomaly within 1 business day of discovery. After the laboratory receives guidance from Resolution project chemist, the laboratory shall initiate any corrective action to prevent further anomalies.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 6-2

Communication Drivers Responsible Entity Name Phone Number

Procedure (Timing, Pathway To/From, etc.)

Analytical Data Quality Issues

Resolution FTL\SSO Resolution PM Resolution Project Chemist Navy RPM Laboratory Project Manager

Geoff Richards Michael Shannon Lori Herberich James Tarr Matt Cordova

215-315-4313 215-315-4290 978-905-2244 757-322-4223 732-355-4550

The laboratory PM will notify (verbally or via e-mail) the Resolution project chemist within 1 business day of when an issue related to laboratory data is discovered. The Resolution project chemist will notify the Resolution PM within 1 business day.

The Resolution project chemist will notify the Resolution PM verbally or via e-mail within 48 hours of validation completion that a non-routine and significant laboratory quality deficiency has been detected that could affect this project and/or other projects. The Resolution PM will verbally advise the Navy RPM within 24 hours of notification from the chemist. The Navy RPM will engage the Navy QAO to ensure the issues with this project can be evaluated to determine impact to other DoD projects.

Reporting Data Validation Issues/ Data Validation Corrective Actions

Resolution PM Resolution Project Chemist

Michael Shannon Lori Herberich

215-315-4290 978-905-2244

The Resolution project chemist or data validator will perform validation as specified in Worksheets #34, 35, and 36, and will contact the laboratory as soon as possible if issues are found that require corrective action.

If the Resolution project chemist or data validator identifies non-usable data during the data validation process that requires corrective action, the Resolution PM will coordinate with the project chemist to take corrective action appropriate for the identified deficiency to ensure the project objectives are met. Corrective action may include resampling and/or reanalyzing the affected samples, as determined by the Resolution PM.

Notification of Non-Usable Data

Resolution PM Resolution Project Chemist Navy RPM Laboratory Project Manager

Michael Shannon Lori Herberich James Tarr Matt Cordova

215-315-4290 978-905-2244 757-322-4223 732-355-4550

If the laboratory determines that any data they have generated is non-usable, the Laboratory PM will notify (verbally or via e-mail) the Resolution project chemist within 1 business day of when the issue is discovered.

The Resolution project chemist will notify (verbally or via e-mail) Resolution PM within 1 business day of the need for corrective action, if the non-usable data is a significant issue (i.e., critical sample data). Corrective action may include resampling and/or reanalyzing the effected samples.

If a Resolution project chemist or data validator identifies non-usable data during the data validation process, the PM will be notified verbally or via e-mail within 48 hours of validation completion that a non-routine and significant laboratory quality deficiency has resulted in non-usable data.

The Resolution PM will take corrective action appropriate for the identified deficiency to ensure the project objectives are met. The Resolution PM will notify (verbally or via email) the Navy RPM on any problems with the laboratory or analysis that could significantly affect the usability of the data or project failures that impact the ability to complete the scope of work. The Navy RPM will contact the Navy QAO for assistance in problem resolution. Such notification will be made within 1 business day of when the issue is discovered.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 9-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #9: Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet

Project Name: Additional Site Investigation at Former Tank Farm 950

Date(s): September 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015 with contractual POP ending May 31, 2016.

Project Manager: Michael Shannon

Site Name: Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Site Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Date of session: CTO WE25 Modification 2, May 29, 2014.

Scoping Session Purpose: Establish series of deliverables for the performance of additional investigation for the presence of petroleum contamination in soil and groundwater is necessary at Former Tank Farm 950 to address the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) comments dated March 13, 2014 regarding the 2004 Site Characterization Report (SCR).

Name Title Affiliation Telephone Email Project Role

James Tarr RPM NAVFAC

MIDLANT

757-322-4223 James.tarr@navy.mil Remediation Project Manager

Michael Shannon PM Resolution 215-315-4290 Michael.shannon@aecom.com Project Manager

Comments/Decisions:

Provide additional site characterization to address data gaps for the presence of petroleum contamination in groundwater at the Former Tank Farm 950.Preparation of Tier II SAP and HASP.

Monitoring Well Installation and Sampling.

Preparation of Internal Draft Site Characterization Report.

Preparation of Final Site Characterization Report.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 11-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #11: Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements

The United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Guidance for Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives (DQO) Process (USEPA, 2006) describes the process used to determine the type, quantity, and quality of data necessary to support decision-making regarding current site conditions and future site management. Inherent in the development of DQOs is a systematic and logical approach intended to yield an efficient sampling design based on accepted levels of potential decision errors. The following sections present the problem statement, decision criteria, information inputs, and the analytical approach, along with decision rules to be used for field activities at Former Tank Farm 950. Performance criteria, to assure data used to make project decisions are of sufficient quality, are also presented herein.

The DQOs are presented in the following table. General discussions of each step of the DQO process are presented below.

State the Problem

Additional investigation activities for the presence of petroleum contamination in groundwater is necessary at Former Tank Farm 950 are necessary to address the PADEP comments dated March

13, 2014 regarding the 2004 SCR. Specific issues to be addressed at the sites are as follows:

Four monitoring wells (MW09 through MW12) will be installed and developed.

Two groundwater sampling events will be conducted of the well network. The first round of groundwater sampling will be conducted after the newly installed monitoring wells have been allowed to stabilize for a minimum of two weeks after installation. The second round of sampling will be conducted three months after the first round to account for seasonal variability.

Groundwater samples will be analyzed for PADEP Revised Short List of Petroleum Products for jet fuel, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 4, 5, and 6 fuel oils using EPA Methods 8260B, 8270C, 6020A, and 8011.

As a follow-up to an exceedance in a post confirmation sample collected during the 2012 lead hot-pot excavation, a small area of soil (less than 1 cubic foot) will be removed by hand in the area between the previous excavation and the asphalt pad. Soils will be contained in one 55 gallon drum and stored on-site pending transportation and disposal.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 11-2

Identify the Goals of the Study

The primary objective of this investigation will be to evaluate data gaps identified from the Site

Characterization Report (SCR) (Tetra Tech, 2004) and subsequent additional remedial and characterization activities.

Identify Information Inputs

To resolve the problem statement, the following data must be collected at each of the sites:

Chemical Data — Environmental media must be analyzed for potential site-related contaminants, as presented in Worksheet #15. The target analytes are based on the previous data were available and site history gathered from background documents including the 2013 RAP (Resolution, 2013), Post Remediation Investigation Activities Report

(April 25, 2012) and the 2012 SAP (TetraTech, 2012). Worksheet #15 lists all chemicals to be analyzed. Resolution of the problem statement requires that analyte-specific concentrations be compared to the PALs in Worksheet #15.

Field Parameters/Observations – Field observations, including groundwater elevations, headspace VOCs, and LNAPL presence, will be recorded. This information will be used to refine the CSM to assist the evaluation of the nature and extent of contamination.

Define the Boundaries of the Study

Lateral Boundaries

The boundaries of Former Tank Farm 950 extending north and west to the harbor, Building 833 and Constitution Avenue to the south, and Former Building 47 and 15th Street to the east.

The well network MW01 through MW08 and proposed wells MW09 through MW12.

Vertical Boundaries

The horizontal and vertical extent is based on the monitoring well network, tidally influenced depths-to-water, and the historically reported depth of impacts to soil.

Temporal Boundaries

Additional site investigation activities will begin approximately December 8, 2014 and continue through two rounds of groundwater sampling. The technical period of performance is predicted to be complete April, 2015.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 11-3

Develop the Analytical Approach

If the results of the groundwater gauging events indicate no presence of LNAPL and dissolved phase concentrations of select analytes are less than the project screening criteria listed in

Worksheet #15, then NFA consent will be pursued. If groundwater gauging determines the presence of free-phase LNAPL and/or concentrations of select analytes exceed applicable project screening criteria (Worksheet #15), then the nature and extent of impact will be assessed and a determination of plume stability will be evaluated.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 12-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #12: Measurement Performance Criteria Table

No change to Worksheet #12 from the Tier II SAP for Site Characterization at Tank Farm 951

(Tetra Tech, 2012).

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 14-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #14: Summary of Project Tasks

Clearing

Prior to the initiation of intrusive field work, Resolution and the Navy will conduct a site visit to mark out the proposed sampling locations. The mark out of the locations will be utilized for utility clearance (described below). The locations will also be cleared through local base personnel with historical knowledge of subsurface utilities.

Utility Clearance

Intrusive field investigation activities related to monitoring well installation and excavation are planned. Prior to the initiation of this field work, utility clearance will be conducted via a geophysical survey and via air knife/vacuum extraction.

Drilling and Subsurface Soil Sample Collection

Monitoring wells will be installed. The proposed boring locations are illustrated in Figure 3. The proposed locations may be adjusted in the field based on the presence of subsurface hazards.

Sample Handling

All samples will be preserved in accordance to this SAP. Upon collection the samples will be placed in coolers on ice and shipped to the laboratory chilled to less than 6 °C. Samples will be shipped on the day of sampling or as soon as logistically possible. All samples will be handled under appropriate chain-of-custody procedures.

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

The QA/QC sample collection frequency is as follows and project specific QA/QC samples are shown in Worksheet #12 (TetraTech, 2012) and combined worksheets #18, 19, 20, 30 (herein).

Equipment blanks - 1 per day per type of non-dedicated sampling equipment used for those methods and matrices for which they are included.

Trip blanks - 1 per cooler containing VOC samples and 1 per cooler containing 1,2-dibromoethane

Field duplicates – (single blind samples) 1 per 20 samples per method and matrix

MS/MSD or MS/Matrix Duplicate - 1 per 20 samples per method and matrix

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 14-2

Equipment Decontamination

To the maximum extent possible, Resolution will utilize dedicated and disposable sampling equipment to avoid the potential for cross contamination of samples due to inadequate decontamination processes. The dedicated sampling equipment will include plastic scoops, acetate liners, disposable gloves, and laboratory supplied sample bottles. Non-disposable or non-dedicated sampling equipment will be decontaminated prior to sampling and between samples. Cleaning of equipment is performed to prevent cross-contamination between samples and to maintain a clean working environment for all personnel. Decontamination will generally consist of a water rinse station to remove gross contamination (if needed), followed by a non-phosphate detergent (e.g., Alconox) water rinse, and a rinse with de-ionized water. All water generated during decontamination of sampling equipment will be containerized as IDW and disposed of per appropriate procedures.

Investigation-Derived Waste Management

Soil cuttings and monitoring well development water will be collected in properly labeled 55-gallon drums and temporarily stored on the site for off-site disposal. The containers will be characterized with laboratory analyses and properly disposed at a Navy approved disposal facility.

Laboratory Coordination, Data Management and Validation

Resolution’s Project Chemist will track the samples from collections through analysis and obtain data packets from the laboratories within the appropriate turn-around-time of sample receipt. A signed certificate of analysis will be provided in the narrative section of each laboratory data package. The laboratory will submit the data in hard copy and an electronic format.

Analytical results will be validated according to the procedures in combined Worksheets #34-36.

Resolution will be provided with the hard copy and electronic version of the laboratory. The hardcopy and electronic versions will be examined for completeness and accuracy. The electronic copy will be compared to the hardcopy results by Resolution’s Project Chemist and then loaded into the Resolution Sharepoint site and database.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 15-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #15-1: Reference Limits and Evaluation Tables

Matrix: Groundwater

Analytical Group: VOCs

Analyte CAS No.

Project Action Limit

(µg/L) Project Action

Limit Reference

Project Quantitation Limit (PQL) Goal (µg/L)

Laboratory Specific Limits

Limit of Quantitation

(LOQ)

Limit of Detection

(LOD)

Detection Limit (DL)

Benzene 71-43-2 5 PADEP MSC NR 1 0.5 0.35 0.21

Toluene 108-88-3 1,000 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.22

Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 700 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.4

Total Xylenes 1330-20-7 10,000 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.2

Cumene (Isopropylbenzene) 98-82-8 3,500 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.26

Naphthalene 91-20-3 100 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.27

Trimethylbenzene,1,2,4- (Trimethylbenzene,1,3,4-)

95-63-6 62 PADEP MSC NR 2 1

0.5

0.22

Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 108-67-8 53 PADEP MSC NR 4 2 0.5 0.17

Dichloroethane,1,2- 107-06-2 5 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 1 0.3

Dibromoethane,1,2- 106-93-4 0.05 PADEP MSC NR 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.0061

Methyl tert-butyl ether

(MTBE)

1634-04-4 20 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.26

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 15-2

SAP Addendum Worksheet #15-2: Reference Limits and Evaluation Tables

Matrix: Groundwater

Analytical Group: SVOCs

Analyte CAS No.

Project Action Limit

(µg/L) Project Action

Limit Reference

Project Quantitation Limit (PQL) Goal (µg/L)

Laboratory Specific Limits

Limit of Quantitation

(LOQ)

Limit of Detection

(LOD)

Detection Limit (DL)

Phenanthrene 85-01-8 1,100 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.19

Pyrene 129-00-0 100 PADEP MSC NR 2 1 0.5 0.9

Chrysene 18-01-9 1.9 PADEP MSC NR 1 1 0.5 0.16

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 15-3

SAP Addendum Worksheet #15-3: Reference Limits and Evaluation Tables

Matrix: Groundwater

Analytical Group: Metals

Analyte CAS No.

Project Action Limit

(µg/L) Project Action

Limit Reference

Project Quantitation Limit (PQL) Goal (µg/L)

Laboratory Specific Limits

Limit of Quantitation

(LOQ)

Limit of Detection

(LOD)

Detection Limit (DL)

Lead (dissolved) 7439-92-1 5 PADEP MSC NR 5.0 5.0 3.0 1.29

CAS – Chemical Abstracts Service µg/L – micrograms per liter

Notes:

State PALs were selected based on the lower of the following sources:

PADEP MSC NR – PADEP Medium Specific Concentrations, Non Residential Use, TDS <2500 mg/L (January 2011).

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 16-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #16: Project Schedule/Timeline Table (Optional Format)

Item Type of Deliverable Number of Copies Due Date

(Calendar Days)

1 Project Schedules Electronic As requested

2 Tier II SAP and HASP (Internal Draft) Electronic Four weeks after authorization – October 30, 2014

3 Tier II SAP (Draft) Electronic Four weeks after receipt of comments - December 3, 2014

4 Tier II SAP and HASP (Final ) Hard Copy and Electronic One week after receipt of comments - December 12, 2014

5 Well Installation NA After finalization of SAP and utility clearance – January 16, 2015

6 1st Round of Groundwater Sampling NA Three weeks after well installation – February 9, 2015

7 2nd Round of Groundwater Sampling NA Three months after 1st GW sampling event – May 13, 2015

8 Internal Draft SCR (Internal Draft) Electronic Two months after 2nd GW sampling event – July 15, 2015

9 Draft SCR (Initial Agency Submittal) Hard Copy and Electronic Two weeks after receipt of final comments from Navy – August 19, 10 Final SCR Hard Copy and Electronic 90 day PADEP review period, 1 month for the Navy and Resolution to address PADEP comments - December 19, 2015

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 17-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #17: Sampling Design and Rationale

Soil Removal

A removal action was conducted in 2007 that included the removal of 565 tons of petroleum impacted soil. Post excavation soil sampling and a site wide soil boring program conducted by

Tetra Tech in 2012 indicated that soil at the Site attains the SHSNRU with the exception of an isolated occurrence of lead south of tank JP5. Based on this information, no additional excavation of soil related to the release of petroleum products at the Site is warranted other than the potential removal of this isolated “hot spot”.

On January 16, 2014, a “hot spot” excavation was completed to address the isolated lead exceedance in soil sample 951SB001-0304. Approximately 900 cubic yards of soil were removed by

Tier Environmental from and area 4 feet wide by 9 feet long by 6 inches deep. Soil was removed to the west until asphalt was encountered. To the east some additional soil remained between the excavation and the asphalt. Confirmation soil samples were collected from two locations PE-1(0-

0.5) and PE-2(0-0.5’). Sample PE-2 exceeded the PA non-residential MSC direct contact value for surface soil (0-2’) of 1,000 mg/kg and both samples exceeded the PA non-residential MSC soil to groundwater value of 450 mg/kg for total lead.

Groundwater

Petroleum-related volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were not detected above the GWNRU during the 2012 groundwater sampling event. Although the

2012 groundwater results did not exceed the GWNRU, LNAPL has been observed in MW03 and

MW06. Potential data gaps exists upgradient and downgradient of these two monitoring wells as discussed in Section 3.3.

Groundwater from MW05 exceeded the GWNRU for lead. MW05 is located on the eastern upgradient edge of the Site. Lead has not exceeded the SHS in monitoring well MW04 located adjacent to

MW05 nor monitoring wells MW01 and MW08 located downgradient of MW05.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 17-2

Monitoring wells will be installed to close potential data gaps as follows:

MW09 will be installed downgradient of MW03 and MW06

MW10 will be installed sidegradient of MW03 and MW06, and

MW11 and MW12 will be installed upgradient of MW03 and MW06.

Monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 3; however final locations may be adjusted due to field conditions.

Monitoring Well Installation

The monitoring wells will be installed by a qualified driller using a hollow stem auger drill rig under the oversight of a Resolution geologist. Monitoring wells will be installed across the water table from 2 to 12 feet below ground surface, with final depth and screen interval potentially adjusted based on field observations of Resolution geologists. Monitoring wells will be constructed with 2-inch Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well casing and 0.01 inch slot screens. Morie No.1 filter sand packs will extend 1 foot above the top of the screen and a bentonite seal will cap the filter pack.

The monitoring well installed inside of Building 520 will also be installed by a qualified driller using a combination of tools such as an air compressor, jackhammer, posthole digger, hand auger, and vacuum excavation rig.

The wells will be developed by using a submersible pump. Groundwater quality parameters

(temperature, pH, ORP, turbidity, and specific conductivity) may be monitored during the well development. The wells will be developed until the turbidity is less than 10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) or for a maximum of two hours, whichever occurs first. The purge water and soil cuttings will be containerized and sampled for waste characterization purposes. The drummed investigation derived waste will be staged onsite while arrangements are made for disposal. Once the wells have been developed they will be allowed to equilibrate with the aquifer for at least 14 days before they are sampled.

Groundwater Sampling

Once monitoring wells MW09, MW10, MW11, and MW12 are installed and have stabilized for a minimum of 14 days, Resolution will conduct one round of groundwater sampling from the entire well network to determine if dissolved phase petroleum related constituents are present above the GWNRU. In addition, one groundwater sample will be collected from MW05 to verify the exceedance

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 17-3

of the lead GWNRU from the April 2012 groundwater sample. A second round of groundwater sampling will be completed in the spring to account for seasonal variability.

Prior to sampling, depth to groundwater and LNAPL thickness (if present) will be measured with a groundwater interface probe. If LNAPL is present in a monitoring well, the well will not be sampled. Groundwater samples will be collected using EPA low-flow sampling procedures. If a monitoring well yields insufficient water to conduct low-flow sampling, the well will be purged dry and allowed to recharge before a sample is collected with a bailer. Groundwater quality parameters will be monitored during sampling and recorded. Groundwater samples will be handled using chain-of-custody procedures. All groundwater samples will be analyzed for PADEP Revised

Short List of Petroleum Products for jet fuel, No. 2 fuel oil, and Nos. 4, 5, and 6 fuel oils by EPA

Methods 8260B, 8270C, 8011, and 6020A. All purge water will be containerized, sampled for waste characterization purposes, and staged onsite while arrangements are made for disposal.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-1

SAP Worksheet #18, 19, 20 and 30: Field Project Implementation (Field Project Instructions) Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: December 2014

Analysis Group VOCs1 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs1 Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05 EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C Cool <6 C

Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling Interval

X Y

Groundwater MW01 950MW01-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW02 950MW02-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW03 950MW03-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW04 950MW04-

YYYYMMDD

X X X X

Groundwater MW05 950MW05-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW06

950MW06-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW07 950MW07-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW08

950MW08-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW09 950MW09-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-2

Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: December 2014

Analysis Group VOCs1 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs1 Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05

EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C

Cool <6 C Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling IntervalX Y

Groundwater MW10 950MW10-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW11 950MW11-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW12 950MW12-

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-3

Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: December 2014

Analysis Group VOCs1 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs1 Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05 EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C

Cool <6 C Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling IntervalX Y

Field QC Samples

Field Duplicate

Same as parent sample+FD 1 per 20 samples X X X X

Trip Blank TB-YYYYMMDD 1 per day or shipment X NA NA

Matrix Spike Same as parent sample+MS

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Duplicate

Same as parent sample+MSD

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Same as parent sample+MS

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Duplicate

Same as parent sample+MSD

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Equipment Blank

NA EB-YYYYMMDD 1 per day X X X X

Total Number of Laboratory Samples 10 9 9 9

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-4

Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: March 2015

Analysis Group VOCs 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05

EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C

Cool <6 C Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling IntervalX Y

Groundwater MW01 950MW01-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW02 950MW02-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW03 950MW03-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW04 950MW04-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW05 950MW05-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW06 950MW06-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW07 950MW07-

YYYYMMDD

X X X X

Groundwater MW08 950MW08-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW09

950MW09-

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-5

Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: March 2015

Analysis Group VOCs 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05

EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C

Cool <6 C Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling IntervalX Y

Groundwater MW10 950MW10-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW11 950MW11-

YYYYMMDD X X X X

Groundwater MW12 950MW12-

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 18, 19, 20, 30-6

Sample Details

CTO25 Former Tank Farm 950 Naval Surface Warfare Center

Philadelphia, PA Estimated Sampling Date: March 2015

Analysis Group VOCs 1,2- Dibromoethane SVOCs Lead, dissolved Preparation and

Analytical Method 5030/8260B 8011 3510C/8270D 3010A/6020A

Analytical Laboratory/ Analytical SOP

Reference

EMS826B0-25

EOP5030-03 EGC8011-05 EMS820D-07

EOP001-14

EMA226-09

EMP070-16

Accutest Laboratories 2235 US Highway 130

Dayton, NJ 08810 Matt Cordova 732-355-4550

Data Package Turnaround Time 10 days 10 days 10 days 10 days

Container Type/ Volume required (if different than container volume)

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(3) 40 ml VOA vials w/Teflon lined septum

(2) 1L amber glass bottles w/Teflon lined cap/1000 ml

(1) 1 L plastic/250 ml

Preservative 1:1 HCl to pH<2;

Cool <6 C

Sodium thiosulfate; Cool

<6 C

Cool <6 C Filter, HNO3 to pH<2;

Cool <6 C Holding Time (Preparation/

Analysis) 14 days 14 days 7 days/40days 6 months

Site Matrix Station ID Sample ID Coordinates

(optional) Depth/ Sampling Interval

X Y Field QC Samples

Field Duplicate

Same as parent sample+FD 1 per 20 samples X X X X

Field Duplicate

Same as parent sample+FD

1 per 20 samples X NA NA

Trip Blank TB-YYYYMMDD 1 per day or shipment X NA NA

Matrix Spike Same as parent sample+MS

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Duplicate

Same as parent sample+MSD

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Same as parent sample+MS 1 per 20 samples X X X X

Matrix Spike Duplicate

Same as parent sample+MSD

1 per 20 samples X X X X

Equipment Blank NA EB-YYYYMMDD 1 per day X X X X

Total Number of Laboratory Samples 20 18 18 18

1 Project-specific list of VOCs and SVOCs presented in Worksheet #15.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 21-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #21: Project Sampling SOP References Table

Below is a list of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that shall be referenced during implementation of this SAP.

Reference Number

Title, Revision Date and / or Number

Originating Organization of Sampling

SOP Equipment Type

Modified for

Project Work?

(Y/N) Comments

3-01 Utility Clearance Resolution N

3-02 Log Books Resolution N

3-03 Record Keeping, Sample Labeling, and Chain-of- Custody

Resolution N

3-04 Sampling Handling, Storage and Shipping

Resolution N

3-05 IDW Management Resolution N

3-06 Equipment Decontamination Resolution N

3-14 Monitoring Well Sampling Resolution

YSI, Turbidity Meter, Peristaltic

Pump and/or Submersible

Bladder Pump, Oil Water Interface

Probe

N

3-17 Direct Push Sampling Techniques

Resolution N

3-20 Operation and Calibration of a Photoionization Detector

Resolution PID N

3-24 Water Quality Parameter Testing

Resolution

YSI, Turbidity Meter, Peristaltic

Pump and/or Submersible

Bladder Pump

N

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 23-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #23: Analytical SOP References Table

Worksheet #23 has been updated to reflect the change in laboratories.

Laboratory Name and Address: Accutest Laboratories, 2235 US Highway 130, Dayton, NJ 08810

Lab SOP Number

Title, Revision Date, and Number

Definitive or

Screening Data

Matrix and Analytical

Group Instrument Variance to QSM

Modified for

Project Work?

(Y/N)

EMS8260-25

Method 8260B, Volatile Organic Compounds By Gas

Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Rev 25

10/17/14

Definitive VOCs GC/MS No Variance N

EMS8270D-07

Method 8270D, Semivolatile Organic Compounds By Gas

Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Rev

710/17/14

Definitive SVOCs GC/MS No Variance N

EGC8011-05

Method 8011, 1,2 Dibromoethane, 1,2 Dibromo-

3-chloropropane and 1,2,3 Trichloropropane by

Microextraction and Gas Chromatography

Definitive EDB GC No Variance N

EMA226-09

Method 6020A, Metals by

Inductively Coupled Plasma- Mass Spectroscopy

Definitive Metals ICP/MS No Variance N

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 28-1

SAP Addendum Worksheet #28-1: Laboratory QC Samples Table

Matrix: Groundwater

Analytical Group: VOCs

Analytical Method/SOP Reference: SW-846 8260B/ EMS8260-25

QC Sample Frequency/

Number

Method/SOP QC Acceptance

Limits1 Corrective Action

Person(s) Responsible for

Corrective Action Data Quality

Indicator (DQI) Measurement

Performance Criteria

Method Blank One per preparation batch of twenty or fewer samples of similar matrix.

No Target Compounds>1/2RL; no common lab contaminants >RL.

If sufficient sample is available, reanalyze samples. Qualify data as needed. Report results if sample results >10x blank result or sample results ND.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias- Contamination

No Target Compounds>1/2RL; no common lab contaminants >RL.

Laboratory Control Sample

One per preparation batch of twenty or fewer samples of similar matrix.

%R must be within DoD QSM limits, if available; otherwise, within laboratory’s statistically-derived QC limits.

Allow for the number of marginal exceedances presented in DoD QSM Table G-1.

Correct problem, then re-prepare and reanalyze the LCS and all samples in the associated preparatory batch for failed analytes, if sufficient sample material is available.

Contact Client if samples cannot be reanalyzed within hold time.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Matrix Spike/Matrix

Spike Duplicate

One per Sample Delivery Group or every 20 samples.

%R should be within the same limits as for the LCS.

RPD should be 30%.

Determine root cause; flag MS/MSD data; discuss in narrative. If due to matrix interference, corrective action is not necessary.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias/ Precision

Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Surrogate Four per sample:

Dibromofluoromethane 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4

Toluene-d8 4-Bromofluorobenzene

%R must be within DoD QSM limits, if available; otherwise, within laboratory’s statistically-derived QC limits.

For QC and field samples, correct problem then re-prepare and reanalyze all failed samples for failed surrogates in the associated preparatory batch, if sufficient sample material is available. If obvious chromatographic interference with surrogate is present, reanalysis may not be necessary.

Contact Client if samples cannot be reanalyzed within hold time.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 28-2

QC Sample Frequency/

Number

Method/SOP QC Acceptance

Limits1 Corrective Action

Person(s) Responsible for

Corrective Action Data Quality

Indicator (DQI) Measurement

Performance Criteria

Internal Standard

Three per sample:

Chlorobenzene-d5

1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4

Fluorobenzene

Retention times for internal standards must be + 30 seconds and the responses within -50% to +100% of the ICAL midpoint standard.

Inspect mass spectrometer or gas chromatograph for malfunctions;

mandatory reanalysis of samples analyzed while system was malfunctioning.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Notes:

This is a summary of the acceptance criteria; refer to the method SOP for specific or more information.

SOPs are reviewed/revised on an annual schedule. The current version will be followed at the time of sample receipt.

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 28-3

SAP Addendum Worksheet #28-2: Laboratory QC Samples Table

Matrix: Groundwater

Analytical Group: SVOCs

Analytical Method/SOP Reference: SW-846 8270C/ EMS8270D-07

QC Sample Frequency/

Number

Method/SOP QC Acceptance

Limits1 Corrective Action

Person(s) Responsible for

Corrective Action Data Quality

Indicator (DQI) Measurement

Performance Criteria

Method Blank One per preparation batch of twenty or fewer samples of similar matrix.

No Target Compounds>1/2RL; no common lab contaminants >RL.

If sufficient sample is available, reanalyze samples. Qualify data as needed. Report results if sample results >10x blank result or sample results ND.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias- Contamination

No Target Compounds>1/2RL; no common lab contaminants >RL.

Laboratory Control Sample

One per preparation batch of twenty or fewer samples of similar matrix.

%R must be within DoD QSM limits, if available; otherwise, within laboratory’s statistically-derived QC limits.

Allow for the number of marginal exceedances presented in DoD QSM Table G-1.

Correct problem, then re-prepare and reanalyze the LCS and all samples in the associated preparatory batch for failed analytes, if sufficient sample material is available.

Contact Client if samples cannot be reanalyzed within hold time.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Matrix Spike/Matrix

Spike Duplicate

One per Sample Delivery Group or every 20 samples.

%R should be within the same limits as for the LCS.

RPD should be 30%.

Determine root cause; flag MS/MSD data; discuss in narrative. If due to matrix interference, corrective action is not necessary.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias/ Precision

Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Surrogate - 3 per sample:

Nitrobenzene-d5 2-Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-d14

For project-specific targets base/neutral surrogates are evaluated

%R must be within DoD QSM limits, if available; otherwise, within laboratory’s statistically-derived QC limits.

For QC and field samples, correct problem then re-prepare and reanalyze all failed samples for failed surrogates in the associated preparatory batch, if sufficient sample material is available. If obvious chromatographic interference with surrogate is present, reanalysis may not be necessary.

Contact Client if samples cannot be reanalyzed within hold time.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Philadelphia, PA 12/12/2014

WS 28-4

QC Sample Frequency/

Number

Method/SOP QC Acceptance

Limits1 Corrective Action

Person(s) Responsible for

Corrective Action Data Quality

Indicator (DQI) Measurement

Performance Criteria

Internal Standard

Six per sample:

1,4-

Dichlorobenzene-d4

Naphthalene-d8 Acenaphthene-d10 Phenanthrene-d10

Chrysene-d12 Perylene-d12

Retention times for internal standards must be + 30 seconds and the responses within - 50% to

+100% of the ICAL midpoint.

Inspect mass spectrometer or gas chromatograph for malfunctions;

mandatory reanalysis of samples analyzed while system was malfunctioning.

Analyst / Section Supervisor

Accuracy/Bias Same as Method/SOP QC Acceptance Limits.

Notes:

This is a summary of the acceptance criteria;…