Amend_0003_135230.pdf

12-0028

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N40085-13-B-5230, Repair Small Arms Range Component of RTAFG

The time and date for the receipt of proposals are hereby extended to 1300 on Thursday, 25 July 2013.

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Jul-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40085-13-B-5230

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

21-Jun-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Jul-2013

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

OFFICER IN CHARGE OF CONSTRUCTION

MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST

1005 MICHAEL ROAD

CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28547-2521

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

rachel.a.ashton Typewritten Text All pre-award Requests for Information (RFIs) shall be submitted no later than 72 hours rachel.a.ashton Typewritten Text prior to the bid opening date.

rachel.a.ashton Typewritten Text

N40085-13-B-5230

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0003

1. Question: Specification Section – 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide.

Reference Information: Lejeune Sanitary Landfill, Contractor Specification Sheet (wastes).

The above guidance mentions that wastes identified on the prescribed sheet should be managed through contact with the Environmental Management Division (EMD). Will the EMD remain responsible for disposing of recovered lead from fired munitions excavated including manifesting and required reporting per 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended by Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)?

Answer: No lead reclamation activities are part of this project

2. Question: Specification Section - 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide. Reference

Information: ANNUAL REPORT OF PRODUCTS CONTAINING RECOVERED MATERIALS. Where can historic information regarding values and reportable quantities for reclaimed, recovered, or spent lead from the small arms range be obtained? Is that information available from the EMD and is it reported per the form noted in the Reference Information? If so, is there a POC for this solicitation?

nswer: No lead reclamation activities are part of this project.

3. Question: Specification Section - 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide Does the MCBCL, in compliance with the CWA Water Quality Act of 1987, required to report lead discharge limits from storm water run-off in their NPDES permit? If so, what are the storm water management plan requirements for the anticipated site work?

Answer: Lead is not a required reporting parameter for the Base's NPDES Permit.

4. Question: Specification Section - 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide. Does the MCBCL operate removal and clean-up of spent fired munitions lead in accordance with the Military Munitions Rule codified at 40 CFR Parts 260 through 266, and part 270?

Answer: Yes, but this is not applicable to this contract as no lead reclamation or soil remediation/excavation activities are part of this contract.

5. Question: Specification Section - SECTION 02 41 00 DEMOLITION. Reference

Information: 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide. Worker protection is based on the potential for inhalation and ingestion of lead. As it may be common for lead to be in particulate form in air or soils at a firing range, dust control, protective clothing, and safe work practices should be specified. What are the PPE requirements for serving the existing bullet traps? Where are training records maintained in accordance with OSHA standard 29 CFR 1926.62? Is that a Base responsibility or a Contractor responsibility (The MCBCL Environmental Guide states that training for work involving Lead Based Paint removal or abatement is to be provided by the contractor….Does the same apply for demolition activities at the firing range?)

Answer: The Contractor shall be responsible for implementing a safety plan and shall be responsible for the workers’ safety.

6. Question: Specification Section- 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide. In July of 1994, the

EPA issued “Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities”. Does the MCBCL prescribe to any internal target objectives for remediating lead contaminated soils at the firing range? Is the MCBCL required by Consent Decree to meet emission and release criteria? Has the MCBCL identified a recommended approach for contaminated soil treatment?

Answer: No lead reclamation activities are part of this project.

7. Question: Specification Section - 1.0 Contractor Environmental Guide.

Reference Information: Lejeune Sanitary Landfill, Contractor Specification Sheet (wastes).

Reclaimed soil that is hazardous due to the lead toxicity characteristic (exceeds 5 mg/L when subjected to TCLP analysis) cannot be placed in an ordinary solid waste landfill and require pre-treatment before disposal. Is Stabilization/Solidification and/or Soil Washing employed on-site at any MCBCL firing ranges? If so, are supporting records available?

Answer: No lead reclamation activities are part of this project.

8. Question: How old is the existing steel bullet trap system?

Answer: The existing steel bullet trap system is 15+ years old.

9. Question: Have the steel plates been breached by fired ammunition?

Answer: No, the steel plates have not been breached by fired ammunition.

10. Question: Have the deceleration chambers been breached by fired ammunition?

Answer: Yes, the deceleration chambers have been breached by fired ammunition

11. Question: Has the current HEPA HVAC sytem been breached by fired ammunition?

Answer: No, the current HEPA HVAC sytem has not been breached by fired ammunition.

12. Question: Is the current HEPA HVAC system in working condition?

Answer: Yes, it is in working condition.

13. Question: Is the steal bullet trap system currently in working order? If not, what is the estimated problem?

Answer: Yes, 12 of the 16 firing points are still usable.

14. Question: Has this steel trap system been modified/retorfitted/maintained in the past? If so, were the changes made to the system that differentiates it from the supplied drawings?

Answer: Maintenance has been performed on the steel trap system. Bid as per plans and specifications.

15. Question: When was the bullet trap maintenance last performed?

Answer: Bullet trap maintenance was last preformed approximately 5 years ago.

16. Question: Is there any existing containerized lead that needs to be transported from the range site, either in current buckets, drums, or the deceleration chambers?

Answer: No, all buckets will be cleaned prior to start of construction.

17. Question: Are there any obstruction to access both side of the steel bullet trap system with a reachlift?

Answer: No, there are not obstructions preventing access on both sides of the steel bullet trap system with a reachlift.

18. Question: Are there any obstructions to access the front or back of the steel bullet trapy system with a reachlift?

Answer: Yes, there are obstructions preventing access at the front or back of the steel bullet trap system with a reachlift.

19. Question: Would the OICC Marine Corps – Camp Lejeune Range Owner allow for an alternative bullet trap system that demonstrates a substantially reduced HVAC requirement, lower maintenance costs, and offers better training scenarios with more calibers and types of guns? Additionally, a bullet trap replacement that costs substantially less, is quieter, and is used at numerous other Marine Corps installations?

Answer: No, bid per the plans and specifications provided.

20. The site visit sign-in sheet dated 18 July 2013 is provided on the next two pages.

(End of Summary of Changes)