20T2000_Amend0001.pdf

ACQR5761451

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation No. N40084-20-T-2000 Custodial Services at Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCI-PAC), Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinaw a, Japan

See continuation sheet for description of this amendment 0001.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Dec-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008420T2000

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Nov-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Dec-2019

CODE

NAVFAC FAR EAST

FEAD CAMP BUTLER

UNIT 35006

FPO AP 96373-5006

N40084 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008420T2000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMEND 0001

1. The purpose of this amendment is to provide response to Request for Information (RFI), revised ELINs, revised Schedule of Services, revised Performance Work Statement (PWS) and incorporate following changes to the solicitation as follows:

A. Provide response to RFIs, see Attachment 10_Gov Response to RFIs_20T2000.

B. Provide revised ELINs, see Attachment 2 - 20T2000 J-0200000-05 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) in excel_12DEC2019_rev1. Revision items are highlighted in yellow.

C. Provide revised Schedule of Services from the Base Period through the 4th Option Period. See Attachment 3a. through 3e. Revision items are highlighted in yellow.

D. Corrected ELIN number shown on page 3 of 72 in SF1449.

From:

PHASE IN PERIOD ELIN A000330

CLIN 0001: BASE PERIOD - RECURRING WORK

RECURRING WORK: IAW Attachment J-0200000-05 ELIN, A00101 through A00330.

TO:

PHASE IN PERIOD ELIN A000328

CLIN 0001: BASE PERIOD - RECURRING WORK

RECURRING WORK: IAW Attachment J-0200000-05 ELIN, A00101 through A00327.

E. Delete “Factor 1 - Management Approach” from the evaluation factors for award in its entirety in

SF1449.

F. Delete 2.8.8 Access to Sensitive Unclassified Information in PWS in its entirety. See Attachment 1 Revised

PWS.

G. Include Page number of Attachment (1) through 9e. on PART (D) LIST OF ATTACHMENTS, and add DFARS 252.204-7000 Page 36 and 37 of 72 in SF1449.

FROM:

PART (D)

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated on 8AUG2019 (119 pages) Attachment 2 - 20T2000 J-0200000-05 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) in excel 14NOV2019

Attachment 3a.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Kinser dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 3b.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, MCAS Futenma dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 3c.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Foster dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 3d.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Courtney dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 3e.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Hansen dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 3f.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Schwab dated 14NOV2019 Attachment 4 - 20T2000 PAP_FAP_12Aug19 (50 pages) Attachment 5 - Experience Form_14NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire_14NOV2019(6 pages) Attachment 7 - Inquiry Form -- To be submitted in Excel format_14 NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 8 - Site visit request Form_14NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 9a. - Schedule of Services_Base peirod in excel_14NOV2019 Attachment 9b. - Schedule of Services_ 1st Option Period in excel_14NOV2019 Attachment 9c. - Schedule of Services_2nd Option Period in excel_14NOV2019 Attachment 9d. - Schedule of Services_3rd Option Period in excel_14NOV2019 Attachment 9e. - Schedule of Services_4th Option Period in excel_14NOV2019

Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated on 16DEC2019_rev1 (120 pages) Attachment 2 - 20T2000 J-0200000-05 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) in excel_12DEC2019_rev1 Attachment 3a.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Kinser dated 14NOV2019 (31 pages) Attachment 3b.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, MCAS Futenma dated 14NOV2019 (18 pages) Attachment 3c.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Foster dated 14NOV2019 (94 pages) Attachment 3d.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Courtney dated 14NOV2019 (32 pages) Attachment 3e.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Hansen dated 14NOV2019 (18 pages) Attachment 3f.- 20T2000 J-1503050-05 Floor Maps, Camp Schwab dated 14NOV2019 (11 pages) Attachment 4 - 20T2000 PAP_FAP_12Aug19 (50 pages) Attachment 5 - Experience Form_14NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire_14NOV2019 (6 pages) Attachment 7 - Inquiry Form -- To be submitted in Excel format_14 NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 8 - Site visit request Form_14NOV2019 (1 page) Attachment 9a. - Schedule of Services_Base period in excel_16DEC2019_rev1 Attachment 9b. - Schedule of Services_1st Option Period in excel_16DEC2019_rev1 Attachment 9c. - Schedule of Services_2nd Option Period in excel_16DEC2019_rev1 Attachment 9d. - Schedule of Services_3rd Option Period in excel_16DEC2019_rev1 Attachment 9e. - Schedule of Services_4th Option Period in excel_16DEC2019_rev1

Attachment 10 - Gov Response to RFIs_20T2000 (1 page)

DFARS 252.204-7000 Disclosure of Information applies to all Documents, Exhibits, and Attachments as well as FAR 52.204-21 and DFARS 252.204-7008, 252.204-7009, and 252.204-7012.

H. Replace the language “2. Basis of Evaluation” on page 48 of 72 in SF1449.

A price that is found to be unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed requirement may be indicative of a lack of understanding of the RFQ requirements and may result in the quote not being considered for contract award.

A price that is found to be unreasonably high may serve as a basis for rejection of the proposal. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and completeness of the total evaluated price.

I. Correct the language Factor 3 – Experience, 2. Basis of Evaluation and add on page 50 of 72 in SF1449.

2. Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate Technical Experience based on relevancy of project in terms of scope, and complexity in comparison to the work being solicited. Relevant means sufficiently similar to this acquisition to provide indicators of expected performance. For example, services similarity and complexity, contract type, dollar value, major or critical subcontractors, teaming partners and joint ventures. The listing will be validated by the Government.

NOTE: The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

The Government will evaluate Technical Experience based on relevancy of project in terms of scope, and complexity in comparison to the work being solicited. Relevant means sufficiently similar to this acquisition to provide indicators of expected performance. For example, services similarity and complexity, contract type, dollar value, major or critical subcontractors, teaming partners and joint ventures. The listing will be validated by the Government.

NOTE: The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

The Government is seeking to determine if the offeror has demonstrated recent and relevant corporate experience involving the performance of custodial services.

An offeror will be rated “Acceptable” if a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 projects for “Experience” demonstrates experience involving the performance of Custodial Services (Annex 1503010) performed in Japan, with an annual contract value of JPY30,000,000 or greater per year. In order to demonstrate recent and relevant experience, such contracts must have been completed within the past seven (10) years of the issuance of this solicitation or must be an ongoing project with at least one year of completion.

An offeror will be rated “Unacceptable” if it fails to meet the submission requirements for Acceptable described above.

A proposal receiving an “Unacceptable” evaluation rating for Factor 3 will be ineligible for award.

J. Add the language on 1. Submittal Requirements on page 48 in SF1449.

(iv) Completed Attachment J-0200000-05 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) (CD in Microsoft Excel format). No hidden columns can be included in the worksheets files and the use of overly complex formulas shall be avoided. **Do not delete or add any columns or rows to the provided ELINs. **

TO:

(iv) Completed Attachment J-0200000-05 Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) (CD in Microsoft Excel format). No hidden columns can be included in the worksheets files and the use of overly complex formulas shall be avoided. **Do not delete or add any columns or rows to the provided ELINs. It is contractor’s responsibility to check all amounts are correct and accurate on ELINs.**

K. Replace the language for 52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) on page 46 in

SF1449.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Quote (LPTA) RFQ for Custodial Services at Marine Corps Installations Pacific (MCI-PAC), Camp Smedley D. Butler, Okinawa, Japan.

The Government will evaluate the quotes in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a Firm Fixed Price (FF), Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for a recurring and non-recurring commercial items contract to the responsible Offeror, whose quote conforms to all the terms and conditions of the RFQ and is technically acceptable with the lowest evaluated price. The RFQ shall specify that award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1 – Management Approach Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Experience Factor 4 – Past Performance

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) (ADDENDUM)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers/quotes:

Factor 1 – Management Approach Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Experience

Factor 4 – Past Performance

As stated earlier in this RFQ, this is a solicitation for commercial items IAW with FAR 12.6 and an RFQ IAW FAR 13.106. IAW FAR 13.106-2(b) the contracting officer has broad discretion in fashioning suitable evaluation procedures; and at the contracting officer's discretion, one or more, but not necessarily all, of the evaluation procedures in part 14 or 15 may be used. Additionally, in accordance with FAR 12.602(a) when using the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13 and the FAR 12 provision at 52.212-2 Evaluation of Commercial items, the contracting officer is not required to describe the relative importance of evaluation factors. IAW the forgoing, and for evaluation purposes this is a 15.101-2 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Quote (LPTA) RFQ. The Government will evaluate quotes in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for a recurring and non-recurring commercial items contract to the responsible Offeror, whose quote conforms to all the terms and conditions of the RFQ and is technically acceptable with the lowest evaluated price. The RFQ shall specify that award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

L. Add the Basic of Evaluation for Factor 4-Past Performance on page 51 in SF1449.

The Government is seeking to determine if the quoter has relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the RFQ. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the Quoter’s probability of meeting the RFQ requirements. The evaluation will consider how well the Quoter performed on recent and relevant projects submitted under Factor 3 - Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Quoter’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Quoter’s responsibility determination.

The Government will evaluate the degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand”

An quoter will be rated “Acceptable” if an quoter’s “Past Performance” information demonstrates: (1) An overall rating of at least Satisfactory or better on the Past Performance Questionnaires, Attachment 6 of this RFQ, (2) An overall rating of at least Satisfactory or better in the CPARS or other DOD or Government appraisal systems, or (3) Past Performance Evaluations from telephone interviews of Satisfactory or better.

An quoter will be rated “Unacceptable” if an quoter’s “Past Performance” information fails to demonstrate: (1) An overall rating of at least Satisfactory or better on the Past Performance Questionnaires, Attachment 6 of this RFQ, (2) An overall rating of at least Satisfactory or better in the CPARS or other DOD or Government appraisal systems, or (3) Past Performance Evaluations from telephone interviews of Satisfactory or better.

Note: In the case of an Quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the Quoter shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable.”

A quote receiving an “Unacceptable” evaluation rating for Factor 4 will be ineligible for award.

M. Add “Responsibility Determination / Pre-Award Survey” in SF1449.

1. Responsibility Determination / Pre-Award Survey

FAR 9.103 requires that purchases shall be made from, and contracts shall be awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only. Purchase or award shall be made only after the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility.

To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must—

(a) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them (see 9.104-3(a));

(b) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

(c) Have a satisfactory performance record (see 9.104-3(b) and subpart 42.15). A prospective contractor shall not be determined responsible or non-responsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history, except as provided in 9.104-2;

(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics

(e) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors)

(f) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them

(g) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations (see also inverted domestic corporation prohibition at 9.1

2. All other terms and conditions of this solicitation remain unchanged.

(End of Summary of Changes)