N4008420R6500 Regular MACC at CFAS.pdf

Design-Build/Design-Bid-Build Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract (Regular MACC) at Commander Fleet Activities, Sasebo (CFAS), Japan and other areas throughout NAVFAC Far East’s area of responsibility in Japan (Regular MACC at CFAS)

The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) amount for all the MACC contract aw ards combined under Solicitation N4008420R6500 is $249,000,000.00; it is not the maximum value of each individual MACC contract.

The task order range is betw een JPY 50,000,000 to JPY 3,000,000,000.

Task orders w ill be solicited and aw arded in Japanese Yen. Payment w ill be made in Japanese Yen. How ever, the price of task orders w ill also be expressed in U.S. Dollars for the administrative convenience of the U.S. Government.

The Point of Contact (POC) for this requirement is the Contract Specialist, Hirokazu Toyofuku.

Email: Hirokazu.toyo.ja@fe.navy.mil

Telephone (local) 0956-50-2395.

Telephone (from USA) 011-81-956-50-2395

HIROKAZU TOYOFUKU 252-2395

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

06-Dec-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______0 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1826 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________3 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________21 Jan 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC FAR EAST

FEAD SASEBO

PSC 476 BOX 66

FPO AP 96322-1160

N40084

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

10:00 AM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008420R6500 61

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued)

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008420R6500

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 249,000,000 Each $1.00 $249,000,000 Regular MACC

FFP

Design-Build/Design-Bid-Build Multiple Award Construction Contract (Regular

MACC) at Commander Fleet Activities, Sasebo (CFAS), Japan

The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) amount for all the MACC contract awards combined under Solicitation N4008420R6500 is $249,000,000.00; it is not the maximum value of each individual MACC contract.

The task order range is between JPY 50,000,000 to JPY 3,000,000,000.

Task orders will be solicited and awarded in Japanese Yen. Payment will be made in Japanese Yen. However, the price of task orders will also be expressed in U.S.

Dollars for the administrative convenience of the U.S. Government.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Y1JZ

MAX

NET AMT

$249,000,000

SEED PROJECT

(Lump sum price for the seed project)

Replace HVAC System in Bldg. PW63 and 1604 at the U.S. Fleet

Activities, Sasebo, Japan (eProject # 1637154)

A task order for the seed project will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract to the contractor selected as the best value for the seed project.

*Do not complete pricing until requested by the Government in Phase Two of the evaluation.

OFFEROR’S INFORMATION:

OFFERORS NAME: ______________________________________________

CAGE Code: _____________________________________________________

NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER:

PRINT NAME: ______________________________________

SIGNATURE: ______________________________________

OFFER DATE: ______________________________________

****IMPORTANT****

Offerors shall not submit a lump price for the seed project (Phase Two) until requested by the Government.

Offerors will receive a notification from the Government informing them that they will or will not be invited to submit a proposal for Phase Two of the solicitation.

****IMPORTANT****

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A - Regular MACC Specification (ep#1626280) dated 22 Oct 2019 (355 pages)

Attachment B - Seed Project Specification (ep#1637154) dated 26 Sept 2019 (719 pages)

Attachment C - Seed Project Drawings (ep#1637154) (3711 pages)

Attachment D - ICAP Training Manual_v9 (93 pages)

Attachment E - Contractor ICAP- Template (1 tab in Excel)

Attachment F - Provision 52.204-24 (1 page)

Attachment G - Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (2 pages)

Attachment H - Past Performance Questionnaire (7 pages)

Attachment I - Government PreProposal Inquiry Form (1 page)

Attachment J - DBIDS Card – Paper Pass Request (3 tabs in Excel)

Attachment K - SECNAV5512-1 (2 pages)

Notice: DFARS 252.204-7000 Disclosure of Information applies to all Documents, Exhibits, and Attachments as well as FAR 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems and DFARS 252.204-7008

Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls, 252.204-7009 Limitations on the Use or

Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information, and 252.204-7012 Safeguarding

Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 5 yrs. ADC 249,000,000 NAVFAC FAR EAST

FEAD SASEBO

PSC 476 BOX 66

FPO AP 96322-1160

(315) 252-3469

FOB: Destination

N40084

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

I.

DESCRIPTION OF MACC

1. The Government intends to award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Design-Build/Design-Bid-Build

Multiple Award Construction Contract (Regular MACC) at Commander Fleet Activities, Sasebo (CFAS), Japan and other areas throughout NAVFAC Far East’s area of responsibility in Japan (Regular MACC at CFAS) with a five year ordering period.

2. The proposed scope of work will be specified in each Task Order and may include, but is not limited to, building construction, renovations and repairs, the installation and/or repair of road pavement, fencing, painting, fire suppression systems, HVAC systems, renewable energy source technologies, advanced metering systems, the removal and disposal of lead based paint and asbestos containing material, the installation, repair and optimizing of operations of shore-based equipment, the network integration of building automation and control equipment; and pier maintenance dredging work.

3. The Not-To-Exceed (NTE) amount for all the MACC contract awards combined under this solicitation is

$249,000,000.00; it is not the maximum value of each individual MACC contract. The NTE capacity of this MACC will be tracked using the US Dollars amount obligated on Task Orders and modifications at the time of execution.

Task Orders will be solicited and awarded in Japanese Yen. Payment will be made in Japanese Yen. However, the price of Task Orders will also be expressed in U.S. Dollars for the administrative convenience of the U.S.

Government.

4. The minimum guarantee for this MACC is JPY 500,000 per contract. A Task Order for the minimum guarantee will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract for the offerors awarded a MACC, but not awarded the seed project. The Contracting Officer will issue a unilateral no-cost cancellation for the minimum guarantee

Task Order if/when the MACC contractor receives a Task Order that is equal to or exceeds the amount of the minimum guarantee.

5. The Government intends to use the MACC to solicit requirements with an estimated value between JPY

50,000,000 and JPY 3,000,000,000. Task Orders less than JPY 50,000,000 and greater than JPY 3,000,000,000 may be issued under this MACC.

II.

DESCRIPTION OF SEED PROJECT

1. There is one “seed” project for this solicitation which will be awarded at the time of award of the MACC contracts.

Title: Replace HVAC System in Bldg. PW63 and 1604 at the U.S. Fleet Activities, Sasebo, Japan (eProject #

1637154)

2. A Task Order for the seed project will be issued concurrently with the award of the basic contract for the contractor selected as the best value for the seed project.

3. In accordance with FAR 36.204, the magnitude of construction for the Seed Project is between $1,000,000 and

$5,000,000 (based on the FY20 Budget Execution Rate of JPY 111.1542 = $1.00).

4. In accordance with FAR 52.211-10 Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work, the offeror awarded the seed project shall be required to commence work for the Seed Project within 15 days after date of award, prosecute the work diligently, and complete the entire work ready for use not later than 360 days after date of Task

Order award. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

5. In accordance with FAR 52.211-12 Liquidated Damages, if the offeror awarded the seed project fails to complete the work within the time specified in the Task Order for the seed project, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of JPY 1,938,421 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

III.

INSTRUCTION, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO THE OFFEROR

1. STATUS OF FORCES AGREEMENT

The U.S. Government will not offer "United States Official Contractor" status under Article XIV of the U.S.-Japan

Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to any offeror awarded a contract under this solicitation. The U.S. Government may certify qualified employees of a contractor as "Members of the Civilian Component" under Article I(b) of the

SOFA.

2. INQUIRIES

Inquiries regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry

(PPI) form provided as Attachment I. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Hirokazu Toyofuku, Contract

Specialist, at hirokazu.toyo.ja@fe.navy.mil.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 calendar days before the proposal closing date and time. In the event the due date for inquiries falls on a weekend or a U.S. Government holiday, the due date shall become the next normal business day for the U.S. Government.

3. AMENDMENTS

Amendments will be posted to the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE), currently betaSAM (https://beta.sam.gov).

Hard copies of the amendment will not be mailed. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

4. AUTHORIZATION TO PERFORM & CONTRACTOR LICENSING REQUIREMENTS

In accordance with DFARS 252.225-7042, the offeror must be duly authorized to operate and to do business in

Japan. Prior to award of any contract, Offerors must be registered to do business and possess a construction license

(Kensetsu Gyo Kyoka) issued by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, or prefectural government.

5. RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION / PRE-AWARD SURVEY

FAR 9.103 requires the Contracting Officer to make an affirmative determination of responsibility prior to making an award. The general standards for responsibility are outlined in FAR 9.104 and include having adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them, being able to comply with the required performance schedule, having a satisfactory performance record, having the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them, having the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them, and being otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

The Government may conduct a pre-award survey of offerors to determine whether such offeror is qualified and capable of performing the contract. The pre-award survey may involve examination of the bidder's financial and technical status and understanding of the contract requirements.

Requested information shall be forwarded within three business days upon request or as indicated on the letter from the Contracting Officer. Failure to provide requested information may result in rejection of the proposal.

The following are examples of the information that, upon request, the offeror shall be required to provide in writing to the pre-award survey team.

a. Identification of the Contractor's personnel and management to be used on this contract.

b. The Contractor's technical and management plans for performing required services.

c. Description of Contractor's facilities and equipment.

d. Summary of the Contractor's experience in performing work of the type required by this specification.

e. Current financial statements and data.

f. Other work presently under contract.

g. Prior contracts for similar work, and the names and addresses of individuals with the organization issuing the contract who may be contacted for information concerning the Contractor's performance.

h. Contractor Quality Control plan for this contract.

6. BONDING REQUIREMENTS

Performance bonds are required by this solicitation. See FAR 52.228-2, 52.228-11, 52.228-14, 52.228-15, and

NAVFAC language in the solicitation titled, “Notice of Bonding Requirements” for details. Bid Guarantee and

Payment bonds are not required.

In addition to those firms appearing on Treasury 570, corporations executing performance bonds as sureties will also be considered acceptable if they have received approval to do so from the Ministry of Finance, Government of

Japan, notwithstanding any requirement stated elsewhere that such corporations be approved by the U.S. Department of Treasury.

Individual sureties will be permitted in accordance with FAR 52.228-11. The Contracting Officer will determine the acceptability of individuals proposed as sureties.

Electronic copies of the SF25, SF25B, and SF28 may be downloaded at the below URLs:

SF25: https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/performance-bond

SF25B: https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/continuation-sheet-standard-forms-24-25-and-25a

SF28 https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/affidavit-individual-surety

7. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM):

Offerors are required to be registered in SAM at the time an offer is submitted in order to comply with the annual representations and certifications requirements. Offerors may obtain information on SAM registration via https://www.sam.gov/.

8. INCURRED EXPENSES

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

9. SUBMISSION OF OFFERS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in the English language. Offers received in other than

English shall be rejected.

10. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

Proposals in response to this RFP must be received by the due date and time specified in block 13 of SF1442, or as amended.

The Business Proposal Volume and Non-cost/price Factors for each Phase shall be submitted, hard copy, in separate volumes. Complete electronic proposals are required via CD/DVD and shall contain the Business Proposal Volumes and Non-cost/price Factors as separate files. The offeror’s name and solicitation number must be clearly marked on the outside of the package and each volume.

Number of copies for each proposal:

Phase One:

Business Proposal Volume for Phase One - One original. No copies.

Non-cost/price Factors for Phase One - One original and three copies

One electronic copy (CD/DVD) of the entire proposal for Phase One (Business Proposal Volume for Phase One and

Non-cost/price Factors for Phase One).

Phase Two (Offerors shall only submit Phase Two when requested, in writing, by the Government):

Business Proposal Volume for Phase Two - One original. No copies.

Non-cost/price Factors for Phase Two - One original and three copies

One electronic copy (CD/DVD) of the entire proposal for Phase Two (Business Proposal Volume for Phase Two and

Non-cost/price Factors for Phase Two).

Proposals may be sent by mailing service via a commercial courier (Kuroneko Yamato, Sagawa Express, etc.). If you choose to use the mailing services, please contact the POC at least 10 days prior to the closing date. Offerors are responsible for ensuring the delivery date to meet the closing date and time.

Offerors shall submit the proposal to the following address:

Attn: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Far East

PWD Sasebo, FEAD Acquisition Branch

Bldg 200, 2nd Floor, Hirase-Cho, Sasebo-shi, Nagasaki-ken 857-0056, Japan

Hand-delivery or private courier proposal: Offerors are advised that the PWD Sasebo, Bldg. 200 / Acquisition

Office is located on a secured base where passes are required to enter the base. Therefore, Offerors should anticipate delays in base access. Individuals are required to have a “DBIDS CARD” (BASE ACCESS PASS) for CFAS Main

Base in order to access the PWD Sasebo, Bldg. 200 / Acquisition Office. If the individual(s) submitting the proposal does not have a DBIDS CARD, please contact the POC at least 10 days prior to the closing date and follow the

POCs instructions.

If you do not have a DBIDS CARD, please submit a color copy of your picture ID and the pass request form, Attachment J or, for U.S. Nationals only, Attachment J and Attachment K, to the POC via email no later than 10:00

AM at least five business days prior to the due date and time for receipt of proposals in order to receive a DBIDS

PAPER PASS (Temporary Pass).

** Picture ID **

Japanese National - Valid Japanese Passport, Japanese My Number Card or Japanese driver's license with address

(Juminhyo Honseki Kinyu ari), or Permanent Address indicated paper from JN police.

Non-Japanese National (Japanese resident) - Valid Passport and either a Japanese Resident Card or Japanese driver’s license.

Non - Japanese National (not a Japanese resident) - Valid Passport.

Individuals that do not have a DBIDS CARD must be escorted by Government personnel. Individuals requiring escort must coordinate for escort with the POC at least five business days prior to the due date and time for receipt of proposals.

Please be advised that if the application information is received after the specified due date, access may be denied for hand-delivery of the proposal.

IV.

BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all Offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the

Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the

Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

V.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Phase One:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach

Factor 2 – Experience

Factor 3 – Past Performance

Phase Two:

Factor 4 – Safety

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors as follows:

Phase One: Factors 1, 2, and 3 will be evaluated in Phase One. Factor 1 will be rated as either

Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable for Factor 1, such offeror will not be invited to participate in Phase Two, regardless of its ratings under any of the other factors. For purposes of Phase One evaluation, Factor 2 Experience is equal in importance to Factor 3 Past Performance (past performance/performance confidence assessment).

Phase Two: Factors 4, 5, and Price will be evaluated in Phase Two. In making the best value award decision for Phase Two, the Government will consider Factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and Price. Factors 1, 2, 4, and 5 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to Factor 3. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Offerors shall submit proposals for Phase One (Factors 1, 2, and 3 and the Business Proposal Volume for Phase

One) in response to the RFP.

Phase One evaluation will result in the selection of a maximum of ten (10) most highly qualified Offerors, who will be requested to submit proposals in Phase Two of the solicitation. Offerors will receive a notification from the

Government informing them that they will or will not be invited to submit a proposal for Phase Two of the RFP.

Offerors shall only submit Phase Two (Factors 4 and 5 and the Business Proposal Volume for Phase Two) when requested, in writing, by the Government.

(a) Business Proposal Volume (Price):

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements for Business Proposal Volume for Phase One:

(1) Cover Letter which includes at a minimum, but not limited to:

Solicitation number

Offeror’s name, address, telephone, and email address

CAGE Code

Name, title, telephone number, and email address of person(s) authorized to negotiate on behalf of the offeror in connection with this solicitation.

Name, title, telephone number, and email address of person(s) authorized to sign contractual documents on behalf of the offeror in connection with this solicitation and any resultant contracts or task order, if a MACC contract is awarded to your company.

(2) SF 1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award). Offeror shall complete blocks 14 through 20c.

Offers must be valid for any number of days equal to or greater than the minimum requirements stated in line 13D of the SF 1442. The offeror is not required to submit a price for CLIN 0001 as it is already included in the issued RFP.

A price for the seed project shall only be submitted as a part of Phase Two.

(3) Representations and Certifications – Offeror is to submit a conformed copy of

Representations/Certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM).

(4) Letter from bonding agent or surety indicating single and aggregate bonding capacity for task order awards under this contract OR a letter from the offeror, bonding agent, or surety documenting the offeror’s inability to obtain bonding and reason(s) why. While bonding capacity is not required to be determined responsible IAW FAR 9.104, it will be considered as a part of the responsibility determination in order to ensure the offeror is generally able to submit performance bonds, when required, for task orders issued to them within the

Ordering Limitations identified in the IDIQ.

(5) Joint Venture Agreement or Partnership Agreement (if applicable). The JV or Partnership must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as the JV or Partnership. The SAM website is located at https://www.sam.gov. Failure to submit the Joint Venture Agreement or Partnership Agreement may result in an offeror’s proposal being rejected as non-responsible.

(6) A copy of the offeror’s construction license (Kensetsu Gyo Kyoka) issued by the

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and Tourism or prefectural government. The construction license will be considered as a part of the responsibility determination only in order to ensure the offeror is duly authorized to operate and conduct construction business in Japan.

(ii) Solicitation Submittal Requirements for Business Proposal Volume for Phase Two:

(1) Cover Letter which includes at a minimum, but not limited to:

Solicitation number

Offeror’s name, address, telephone, and email address

CAGE Code

Name, title, telephone number, and email address of person(s) authorized to negotiate on behalf of the offeror in connection with this solicitation.

Name, title, telephone number, and email address of person(s) authorized to sign contractual documents on behalf of the offeror in connection with this solicitation and any resultant contracts or task order, if a MACC contract is awarded to your company.

Summary of any changes to the Business Proposal Volume documentation submitted for Phase Two compared to Phase One. (i.e. please note changes such as increases to bonding capacity, changes to the construction license, etc.). If no changes or updates were made, please clearly state no changes or updates were made.

(2) Signed Amendments, if any. Offeror must complete blocks 15a, 15b, and 15c.

(3) Lump sum price for the seed project. Offeror must sign and date the price sheet for the seed project. Offeror must include the name and title of person authorized to sign the offer.

(4) Completed and signed Provision 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain

Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

Note: The Offeror is only required to submit the below (5), (6), (7), and (8) if updates or changes need to be made since the Business Proposal Volume for Phase I was submitted.

(5) Representations and Certifications – Offeror is to submit a conformed copy of

Representations/Certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM).

(6) Letter from bonding agent or surety indicating single and aggregate bonding capacity for task order awards under this contract OR a letter from the Offeror, bonding agent, or surety documenting the

Offeror’s inability to obtain bonding and reason(s) why. While bonding capacity is not required to be determined responsible IAW FAR 9.104, it will be considered as a part of the responsibility determination in order to ensure the

Offeror is generally able to submit performance bonds, when required, for task orders issued to them within the

Ordering Limitations identified in the IDIQ.

(7) Joint Venture Agreement or Partnership Agreement (if applicable). The JV or Partnership must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as the JV or Partnership. The SAM website is located at https://www.sam.gov. Failure to submit the Joint Venture Agreement or Partnership Agreement may result in an Offeror’s proposal being rejected as non-responsible.

(8) A copy of the Offeror’s construction license (Kensetsu Gyo Kyoka) issued by the

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and Tourism or prefectural government. The construction license will be considered as a part of the responsibility determination only in order to ensure the offeror is duly authorized to operate and conduct construction business in Japan.

(iii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project. The price proposal of the seed project will not be assessed an adjectival rating but will be ranked from lowest to highest. Price will be evaluated and offerors will be ranked accordingly. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the techniques identified in

FAR 15.404-1 to ensure a fair and reasonable price.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) A narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6).

(2) A simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item (3) below is not included in this page limitation.

(3) A signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 – Experience:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

- A project with a minimum contract value of JPY 50,000,000;

- A project for facility and built-in equipment repair, construction, equipment installation, sustainment, restoration / modernization, new footprint and/or demolition;

- A project comprised of a combination of architectural, mechanical, electrical and/or civil works.

Projects submitted for the offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this

RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment G) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the

Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable design features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S.

Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the

Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint

Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

- A project with a minimum contract value of JPY 50,000,000;

- A project for facility and built-in equipment repair, construction, equipment installation, sustainment, restoration / modernization, new footprint and/or demolition;

- A project comprised of a combination of architectural, mechanical, electrical and/or civil works.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment G) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the

Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable design features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S.

Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined."

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design

Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable design features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable design features.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment H) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The offeror should provide completed Past Performance

Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The

Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Toyofuku Hirokazu at Hirokazu.Toyo.JA@fe.navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The

Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

This evaluation will consider how well the offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 –

Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the

Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating. Past performance ratings of “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

Factor 4 – Safety

The offeror shall submit a narrative that describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work and the offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of subcontractors. The narrative should include:

Technical Approach for Safety:

- Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

- Describe the safety management system that will be used to oversee safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

- Describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels.

- Describe the methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

Note: For a partnership or joint venture only one safety narrative is required.

The Government will subjectively evaluate the degree to which the offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and the degree to which the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor

Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the offeror.

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

Provide a Proposed Design and Construction Schedule and Narrative of Technical Understanding describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

- Design Narrative:

Air flow quantity for spaces using Dedicated Outside Air System (DOAS) to prevent mold grow

Schematic diagram for Air flow system considering new DOAS, existing ventilation and existing

HVAC

Intended equipment list for DOAS

- Proposed Design and Construction Schedule:

A design and construction schedule that shows an overview of the design and construction activities required to complete the project within the required contract period of performance.

Narrative shall not exceed three (3) double-sided pages (or six (6) single-sided pages). Up to three (3) conceptual drawings may be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e., floor plan, exterior elevation, and site plan).

The Government will evaluate the Proposed Design and Construction Schedule, Narrative of Technical

Understanding, and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017

52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards OCT 1995

52.222-56 Certification Regarding Trafficking in Persons Compliance

Plan.

MAR 2015

252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-2 AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS

LISTED IN THE ACQUISITION STREAMLINING AND STANDARDIZATION INFORMATION SYSTEM

(ASSIST) (APR 2014)

(a) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(1) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/);

(2) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/);

(3) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(b) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point

(DoDSSP) by--

(1) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(2) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/ http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ http://assistdocs.com/ https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm

(3) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(End of provision)

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, AND ENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be DX rated order; X DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations

System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the…