MACC_Amend_01_08062013.doc

RFP N40083-13-R-2637; SMALL BUSINESS MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY, CRNAE IN

AMENDMENT 01:

SBMACC 2013 PHASE I

Questions and responses to clarifications

FIRST question set: August 6 2013

Future questions and clarifications will be added to this set and released as a continuous list.

1. QUESTION: Will you be providing an SF 1442 for Phase I?

ANSWER: No.

2. QUESTION: On page 8, under Factor 1: Technical Approach, (a)(3) Corporate Management, the solicitation reads, " Offerors shall complete Personnel Reference sheets in the solicitation for all key personnel.." Can you please provide Personnel Reference sheets?

ANSWER: No. Any standard resume that defines education and work history with the proposer and any prior companies will be sufficient.

3. QUESTION: Factor 3 - Past Performance "The Offeror should provide completed Past

Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQ's previously submitted for other RFPs." In past government proposals we have been allowed to use PPQ's that have been completed for other proposals but in others it has been required that a new PPQ be completed for this submittal only. Does the Navy require that new PPQ's be filled out and submitted or can we submit PPQs that have been completed for past proposals?

ANSWER: We do not require new PPQs be completed. The RFP does not prohibit reusing previously completed questionnaires. It prohibits just referencing those questionnaires and not including copies of them in RFP.

4. QUESTION: For the Crane, Indiana SB MACC under Factor 2, it states that we are required to utilize the Construction Project Data Sheet but that we may expand individual blocks. However, the format provided is an un-editable PDF. In order to expand the boxes, it needs to be a form. Could you please re-issue as a form so that we may expand the boxes?

ANSWER: See attached word versions.

5. QUESTION: In the RFP Factor 2 - Experience (a), (1) - "Projects submitted for the

Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP." Bold and italicized added. Would the Navy consider changing this requirement for projects being completed by 30 July 13 (the RFP issuance date) to the date the proposals are due to the Navy or consider reducing the requirement from "completed" to "substantial completion" which is typically defined as 80% or more complete?

ANSWER: No. The experience verbiage is from the portion of the tech evaluation factors that have been set by headquarters and cannot be edited. The intent is to evaluate company history to the time of the RFP issuance and not to potentially affect the conduct/processing of contracts and Task orders that are not closed out yet..

6. CORRECTION: On page 5 of the solicitation, ‘1.1. GENERAL PROJECT OVERVIEW’ please revise the following statement: FROM: “The total contract term shall not exceed five years (60 months) or $40,000,000.00, whichever comes first.”

TO READ: “The total contract term shall not exceed five years (60 months) or $50,000,000.00, whichever comes first.”