N3319121R4002 SOUDA BAY JOC.pdf

Job Order Contract (JOC) for construction services in Souda Bay, Greece.

The w ork under this contract w ill consist primarily of renovation; repair; maintenance; replacement; alteration; demolition; and construction tasks in Souda Bay, Greece.

This indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract is limited to a maximum of 60 months (consisting of one 12-month base period and fourpotential 12-month option periods) or total maximum value of $40,000,000.00 over the life of the contract, w hichever comes f irst.

The guaranteed minimum for this contract is $5,000.00.

MICHELLE RUIZ +39 081 568 1595

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

30-Apr-2021

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA CENTRAL

VIALE PORTO CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

N33191

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________ .)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

(hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

39 081 568 7750FAX:TEL: 39 081 568 7750 TEL: FAX:

N3319121R4002 120

X

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Page | 3

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Period

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed-priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer. The aggregate value of all task orders awarded under this contract is Not to Exceed (NTE) $40,000,000.00 (Base period and four option periods) or a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Option Period I

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed-priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer. The aggregate value of all task orders awarded under this contract is NTE $40,000,000.00 (Base period and four option periods) or a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

Page | 4

Option Period II

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed-priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer. The aggregate value of all task orders awarded under this contract is NTE $40,000,000.00 (Base period and four option periods) or a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

Option Period III

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed-priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer. The aggregate value of all task orders awarded under this contract is NTE $40,000,000.00 (Base period and four option periods) or a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

Page | 5

Option Period IV

FFP

This is an Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract, with preestablished price coefficients. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined on individual firm fixed-priced task orders issued by the Contracting Officer. The aggregate value of all task orders awarded under this contract is NTE $40,000,000.00 (Base period and four option periods) or a total of 60 months, whichever comes first.

Page | 6

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS

PROPOSAL: The Proposal shall be submitted via email to Michelle Ruiz at Michelle.ruiz@eu.navy.mil and Alex Wingert at Alex.wingert@eu.navy.mil no later than 1 June 2021 at 14:00 Central European Time (CET). Hand carried proposals will be NOT be accepted. Submit the Proposal with the following subject line:

“SOLICITATION N33191-21-R-4002 SOUDA BAY JOC PROPOSAL”

Multiple e-mails may need to be sent for any of the submissions, if your e-mail exceeds 5MB. The U.S. Navy computer server will only accept e-mails with attachments up to 5MB. If you need to submit more than one e-mail for the above submission, number them at the end of the e-mail subject title as “1 of ?”, “2 of ?”, etc.

Proposals not received at the above address on or before the hour and date set for the receipt of proposals shall be considered late, subject to the provisions of FAR Clause 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors -- Competitive Acquisition (JAN 2004).

The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

a. First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR52.215-1(c)(2)

b. All information required by the Price Proposal submission

The NON-PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

a) First page of the proposal shall be in accordance with FAR52.215-1(c)(2)

b) All information required by Factor 1, Corporate Experience

c) All information required by Factor 2, Management Approach

d) All information required by Factor 3, Safety

e) All information required by Factor 4, PastPerformance

It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure the government received the proposal and all enclosures by the proposal due date and time as set forth above.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI)

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in writing via electronic mail to Michelle Ruiz, Contract Specialist at Michelle.ruiz@eu.navy.mil and Alex Wingert at Alex.wingert@eu.navy.mil . Pre- Proposal Inquiries shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section, including paragraph number.

Verbal queries will not be accepted. Responses to the Pre-Proposal Inquiries will be provided as an attachment to an amendment and will be posted to the Contract Opportunities (FBO) website www.beta.sam.gov . The Government may not respond to Pre-Proposal Inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt due date. The Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Template is provided as Attachment C.

AMENDMENTS

Amendments will be posted to the Contract Opportunities (FBO) website www.beta.sam.gov . It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the www.beta.sam.gov website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation. All Amendments SHALL be acknowledge in the offeror’s proposal per instructions.

PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITYDETERMINATION

FAR 9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws

Page | 7 and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. The following information shall be submitted:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures, discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

The Contractor shall provide a notarized Performance Guarantee letter within ten (10) days after issuance of each task order greater than $150,000 or as required by the Contracting Officer. In lieu of the 10% Performance Guarantee requirement, the Offeror may provide Performance and Payment Bonds, pursuant to FAR Clause 52.228- 15, through an approved surety under the United States Treasury Department Circular 570. If the Offeror fails to provide a Performance Guarantee letter or Performance and Payment Bonds within ten (10) days, the task order may be terminated for default. In such event, Offeror shall be liable for any cost of re-procuring the work which exceeds the amount of his offer.

The Performance Guarantee letter shall be accompanied by a notarized document authenticating the financial institution's authority to sign the letter. An English translation of the Performance Guarantee letter shall be submitted at the same time.

Performance Guarantee: An amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the contract shall be deposited into a properly certified banking institution, which will then issue an irrevocable letter guaranteeing the payment of the amount deposited plus any applicable interest, to the United States Government, upon demand by the Contracting Officer. Demand will be made if the Contractor fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, or does not fulfill its undertaking in whole or in part. Payment to the Contracting Officer will be by check made payable to the "United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia."

The Performance Guarantee shall take effect upon the date of signature of the Performance Guarantee letter and shall remain valid and irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government."

A. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. This One-Phase procurement will result in the award of an Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) contract. In making the best-value award decision, the government will evaluate Factors 1-4 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (i.e., Technical Approach, Experience and Safety) are equal to each other and when combined are approximately equal to the performance confidence assessment (past performance). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Page | 8

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions.

Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. It is the Government's intent to award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions if they are deemed necessary.

When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the Non-Price Evaluation Factors) are approximately equal to Price.

The importance of price will increase if the offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS (Volume I – Price Proposal)

For the purposes of establishing coefficients for this contract, the offeror shall provide a proposed coefficient for Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) 0001 through 0004 on the Coefficient Schedule, provided as an attachment to the solicitation. Failure to offer a coefficient for CLINs 0001 through 0004 will result in the offeror being ineligible for award. CLIN 0005 will be a placeholder for the design price for task orders requiring the need for a professional engineer’s stamp. The Coefficient Schedule will always include a coefficient of 1.0 for this CLIN.

For projects that require a professional engineer’s stamp, these costs will be negotiated at the time of each task order. The coefficients will become a part of the contract upon award and will be effective for the base period and all option periods. On the Coefficient Schedule, the offeror is to multiply the proposed coefficients by their associated multiplier to arrive at an Estimated Amount for CLINs 0001 through 0004.

The Estimated Amounts for CLINS 0001 through 0004 are to be added together to arrive at the Total Evaluated Price.

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror’s price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number;

name, address, telephone and email address of the Offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED;

Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal; DUNS Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror, in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), provide a DUNS Number for each member of the JV.

2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award. In block 14, please include a point of contract with a valid phone number and email address. Offerors shall provide a CAGE/NCAGE code in block 14.

3) Letter from the offeror’s surety. The letter is to verify the offeror has at least a $3M aggregate bonding capacity.

4) Completed Coefficient Schedule.

5) A bulleted list, identifying all cost factor categories included in your coefficient. At a minimum, your coefficient is to include the cost elements identified in the General Requirements, Paragraph C.4 and its subparagraphs. This narrative is limited to one (1) 8.5” x 11” page, one inch margins, Times New Roman size 12 font.

6) Acknowledgement of all amendments.

7) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable).

Page | 9

8) Financial Statements – The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If a new Joint Venture (JV) is being proposed, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

9) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

10) The Government intends to pay invoices in accordance with the clause for Wide Area Work Flow. To do this, your firm must have a U.S. bank or a U.S. bank affiliate associated with your local bank. With your proposal, identify the name of your U.S. bank or affiliate for purposes of paying invoices.

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) of all CLINs on the Coefficient Schedule. To calculate the TEP the Government will:

1. Calculate each contract contract-line item number (CLIN) price by multiplying the proposed coefficient for each CLIN by the corresponding estimated value of work.

2. Sum the price for all CLINs to arrive at TEP.

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

• Comparison of proposed coefficients received in response to the RFP;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with the Government Estimate;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with available historical information;

• Comparison of proposed coefficients with market average.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a price realism analysis of proposed prices to determine risk of unreasonable low proposed prices when compared to offeror-proposed prices submitted in response to the solicitation or in comparison with the IGE.

(b) NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS (Volume II – Non-Price Proposal)

This One-Phase procurement will result in the award of an Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) contract.

In making the best-value award decision, the government will evaluate Factors 1-4 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (i.e., Technical Approach, Experience and Safety) are equal to each other and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. It is the Government's intent to award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions if they are deemed necessary. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the Non-Price Evaluation Factors) are approximately equal to Price.

Page | 10

The importance of price will increase if the offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a minimum of five (5) to a maximum of ten (10) examples of recent and relevant projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience. Offerors shall utilize the Construction and Design Experience Data Sheet, Attachment C, to submit applicable project information. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) pages (8.5” x 11”; one inch margins; times new roman size 12 font) per project. If the page limit is exceeded, only the first two (2) pages per project will be evaluated.

For each project the offeror shall provide:

1. Contract number, title, and location

2. Dollar value; annually and contract life

3. Type of contract (i.e. fixed price, cost reimbursable, or other – specify) If applicable, identify base period and all option periods

4. Contract start date and completion date and beneficial occupancy date (BOD)

5. Identify type of services provided – similar scope, size & complexity

6. Nature of firm’s responsibility (prime contractor or subcontractor)

7. Percentage of the work that your firm performed as the prime contractor or subcontractor

A project is defined as a repair, alteration, demolition, maintenance services or construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed, the location of the work performed, and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). The projects may be for the U.S. Government or other clients.

For purposes of this evaluation, a recent project is defined as a project that was completed no more than five (5) years prior to issuance of the solicitation.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is defined as:

a. Has a total value of at least $40,000. (If a project was awarded in a currency other than US dollars, the offeror must convert the non-US dollar currency into US dollars using the appropriate exchange rate as of the day the contract for the submitted project was awarded).

b. Is for renovation; repair; maintenance; replacement; alteration; demolition; or construction tasks performed under a single order or contract.

c. The project narrative reflects the capability to perform multiple projects and disciplines simultaneously.

The projects submitted shall clearly identify if the offeror performed as a prime contractor, joint venture/team/partner member or as a subcontractor. If experience was as a subcontractor, then less credit may be given to the experience. If more than ten (10) projects are submitted, only the most recent ten will be reviewed in the evaluation.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects

Page | 11 shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the offeror and there is no supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, letter of commitment, or explanation of meaningful involvement. Offerors are still limited to a total of ten (10) projects combined.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include a subjective assessment of the demonstrated experience and depth of experience of the offeror in performing recent and relevant projects, as defined in the solicitation requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s recent and relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Only projects that meet the criteria for recency and relevancy will be evaluated.

Demonstrating any of the following may result in a more favorable consideration in the Government’s evaluation. Demonstrating three or more of the following, on a prior project, may result in additional strengths:

1. Experience working on JOC or other IDIQ contracts.

2. Experience with compliance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC).

3. Experience within Souda Bay, Greece or other countries within the NAVAC EURAFCENT area of responsibility.

4. Experience leveraging local resources.

5. Fast response times on urgent requirements.

6. Experience self-performing relevant features of work.

7. Experience in ALL of the following types of work: new construction, renovation, utility systems and alteration.

8. Experience in ALL of the following types of utility systems: potable water systems, waste water systems, electrical systems and mechanical systems (HVAC, Plumbing, pumps).

Proposals that fail to provide required and complete information will be deemed deficient/unacceptable.

FACTOR 2, MANAGEMENT APPROACH:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offeror’s response shall be a minimum of five (5) and maximum ten (10) pages (8.5” x 11”; one inch margins; times new roman size 12 font) for this factor. If more than ten (10) pages are submitted, only the first ten (10) pages will be evaluated. The offeror shall provide the following:

1. Provide an organizational chart and a workforce management plan describing the interrelationship of the off-site management team and on-site management team(s).

Organization chart should clearly show management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability. At a minimum the organization chart must display key personnel. Workforce management plan should clearly describe how the offeror will meet the contract requirements for key personnel identified in Section C.4 (Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer).

2. Discuss approach to Subcontractor relationships (if applicable). Include any pre-established relationships with organizations qualified for work within the scope of this solicitation, quantifying number of projects that have been completed together and/or number of years of partnering. If an offeror does not intend to use sub-contractors, they must clearly state that all work will be self-performed.

3. Describe offeror’s approach for working in areas of limited access, limited lay down space, and

Page | 12 working around activities with minimal disruption.

4. Discuss how the offeror will provide labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors, and key personnel to perform multiple tasks and multiple sites simultaneously, when required.

5. Discuss how the offeror will respond to proposed task orders that may have short notice site visits and/or response times for submitting proposals.

6. Discuss management familiarity and approach to joint scoping work with the Government, to include examples of any previous joint-scoping efforts.

7. Discuss the how offeror will handle surges in workload and the offeror’s approach to work scheduling.

8. Discuss how the Offeror will provide Fire Protection Engineering services both through a US License Fire Protection Engineer (US Professional Engineering (PE) registration under Fire Protection) and also a Greek Licensed Fire Protection Engineer (Greek Professional Engineer licensed by the Technical Chamber of Greece (TCG) with the technical duties dictated by Greek legislation to include among others Greek Presidential Gazettes PD 41/2018 and PD 187/2018). These services would apply to design development and for construction submittals

9. Discuss the Offeror’s Phase-In and Phase-Out plan in order to provide continuity of services at the start of the contract (See Paragraph B.3 of Section 01 00 00 - General Requirements).

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The evaluation will include a subjective assessment of the depth of experience and qualifications of the offeror’s management team. The evaluation will also include a subjective assessment of the proposed management approach and offeror’s responses to the submittal requirements for this factor.

Offerors may receive a higher rating if they can successfully demonstrate in their narrative their ability to meet one or more of the following:

1. An organizational chart and supporting management approach that shows adequate personnel and organizational structure to manage multiple and simultaneous task orders (more than five (5)).

2. Strong scheduling capabilities demonstrating the ability to manage multiple simultaneous project schedules with competing milestone dates.

3. Quick turnaround times on last minute requirements.

4. A good QA/QC program to maximize quality of workmanship.

Offerors that fail to provide an organizational chart that meets the minimum workforce management plan requirements may be considered a deficiency.

FACTOR 3, SAFETY:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit a Safety Narrative addressing the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following shall address each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture;

only one safety narrative is required.)

The narrative shall describe the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Due to the variety of work that may be issued under this contract, the offeror shall submit their plan for potential subcontractors even if the offeror does not anticipate the use of subcontractors initially. Failure to submit a plan to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors will be considered

Page | 13 a deficiency.

The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages (8.5” x 11”; one inch margins; times new roman size 12 font). If more than two (2) pages are submitted, only the first two (2) pages will be reviewed in the evaluation.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the offeror has consistently demonstrated a proven history of safety.and that the offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the factor based on the degree to which an offeror’s safety approach meets the solicitation requirements. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees, the offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors and safety methods that the offeror plans to implement for this procurement.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, the information provided in the Safety Narrative response, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases and other related resource. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

1. Offeror’s technical approach to safety

2. Other sources of information available to the Government

Regarding subcontractors, the Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

Demonstrating any of the following may result in a more favorable consideration in the Government’s evaluation:

1. A proven history of safety.

2. A proven history of hiring subcontractors with a culture of safety.

FACTOR 4, PAST PERFORMANCE:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) or Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience.

If a completed CPAR evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal. If there is not a completed CPAR evaluation, the PPQ, Attachment B, is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to their client(s) for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Experience.

An offeror shall not submit a PPQ when a completed CPAR is available. Ensure correct and current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client’s point of contact. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror must complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Page | 14

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

If past performance data is supplied for a firm whose CAGE code and DUNS number does not match the CAGE code and DUNS number for the offeror, the offeror MUST provide a DETAILED written explanation of how the experience, past performance is relevant.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the recent and relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other projects documented in other sources. More emphasis will be placed on projects that were performed for the US Government and relevant projects as described by relevancy ratings. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)/CPARS using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other source.

Offerors may receive higher confidence assessment rating if they can demonstrate that their firm meets two (2) or more of the following criteria:

1. A pattern of successful completion of tasks, with ALL relevant projects submitted receiving a Satisfactory or better performance rating.

2. A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality, with more than five (5) recent and relevant projects with a Satisfactory or better performance rating AND that were completed within the scheduled period of performance.

3. A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Client at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.)

4. Successful performance of recent and relevant projects/tasks that are identical to, similar to or related to the successful performance of the task at hand.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the offeror’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral Confidence rating.

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A – Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment B – Construction and Design Experience Project Data Sheet Attachment C – Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form Attachment D – Coefficient Schedule

Attachment Spec Item Description

Page | 15

Section J - Attachment 1

C.3.3

PWD-UTILITY

CONNECTION-01

Section J - Attachment 2

C.3.3

Utility Permit Applications

Section J - Attachment 3

C.16.6

PWD-OUTAGE-

Section J - Attachment 4

Outage Request Form

Section J - Attachment 5

PWD-HYDRANT

CONNECTION-01

Section J - Attachment 6

H.11.12

PWD-

EXCAVATION-01

Section J - Attachment 7

H.11.12

Excavation Request Form

Section J - Attachment 8

Marathi Base Map

2015 & NSA GDM

Complete Jan2016

Section J - Attachment

JC6

C.6

Coefficient Schedule

Section J - Attachment 9

C.19

Environmental Checklist

Section J - Attachment 10

L.2

Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI)

Section J - Attachment 11

M

Past Performance Questionnaire

(PPQ)

Section J - Attachment 12

M

Construction and Design Experience

Page | 16

Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0005 N/A N/A N/A N/A

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 N/A N/A N/A Government 0003 N/A N/A N/A Government 0004 N/A N/A N/A Government 0005 N/A N/A N/A Government

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions JUN 2020 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government JUN 2020 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures JUN 2020 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014

Page | 17

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

JUN 2020

52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct JUN 2020 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

JUN 2020

52.204-2 Alt II Security Requirements (Aug 1996) - Alternate II APR 1984 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications MAR 2020 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

JUN 2020

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

AUG 2020

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

JUN 2020

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.210-1 Market Research JUN 2020 52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999 52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.211-15 Defense Priority And Allocation Requirements APR 2008 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation JUN 2020 52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data AUG 2011 52.215-11 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data--

Modifications

JUN 2020

52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data JUN 2020 52.215-13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications JUN 2020 52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions OCT 2010 52.215-18 Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits

(PRB) Other than Pensions

JUL 2005

52.215-19 Notification of Ownership Changes OCT 1997 52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or

Information Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

OCT 2010

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges--Identification of Subcontract Effort

OCT 2009

52.215-23 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges JUN 2020 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.217-6 Option For Increased Quantity MAR 1989 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-38 Compliance With Veterans' Employment Reporting

Requirements

FEB 2016

52.223-3 Hazardous Material Identification And Material Safety Data JAN 1997 52.223-4 Recovered Material Certification MAY 2008 52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.223-15 Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products MAY 2020

Page | 18

52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts

AUG 2018

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

JUN 2020

52.224-2 Privacy Act APR 1984 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.225-20 Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in

Sudan--Certification

AUG 2009

52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

JUN 2020

52.227-4 Patent Indemnity-Construction Contracts DEC 2007 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.228-3 Worker's Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) JUL 2014 52.228-4 Workers' Compensation and War-Hazard Insurance Overseas APR 1984 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.228-15 Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction JUN 2020 52.229-6 Taxes--Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts FEB 2013 52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts JAN 2017 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

OCT 2018

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.233-1 Alt I Disputes (May 2014) - Alternate I DEC 1991 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-8 Other Contracts APR 1984 52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements

APR 1984

52.236-10 Operations and Storage Areas APR 1984 52.236-11 Use and Possession Prior to Completion APR 1984 52.236-12 Cleaning Up APR 1984 52.236-13 Alt I Accident Prevention (Nov 1991) - Alternate I NOV 1991 52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services APR 1984 52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts APR 1984 52.236-17 Layout of Work APR 1984 52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction FEB 1997 52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference FEB 1995 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-14 Suspension of Work APR 1984 52.243-4 Changes JUN 2007 52.243-5 Changes and Changed Conditions APR 1984 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items NOV 2020 52.245-1 Alt I Government Property (JAN 2017) Alternate I APR 2012 52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012 52.246-12 Inspection of Construction AUG 1996 52.246-13 Inspection--Dismantling, Demolition, or Removal of

Improvements

AUG 1996

52.246-21 Warranty of Construction MAR 1994 52.247-63 Preference For U.S. Flag Air Carriers JUN 2003

Page | 19

52.247-64 Preference for Privately Owned U.S. - Flag Commercial Vessels

FEB 2006

52.248-3 Value Engineering-Construction OCT 2020 52.249-2 Alt I Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed-

Price) (Apr 2012) - Alternate I

SEP 1996

52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction) APR 1984 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

DEC 2019

252.204-7016 Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services -- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7017 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services -- Representation

DEC 2019

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

JAN 2021

252.209-7999 (Dev) Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law (Deviation)

JAN 2012

252.222-7000 Restriction On Employment Of Personnel MAR 2000 252.222-7006 Restrictions on the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements DEC 2010 252.223-7001 Hazard Warning Labels DEC 1991 252.223-7004 Drug Free Work Force SEP 1988 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7004 Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada--Submission after Award

OCT 2020

252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2017 252.225-7017 Photovoltaic Devices JAN 2020 252.225-7030 Restriction On Acquisition Of Carbon, Alloy, And Armor

Steel Plate

DEC 2006

252.225-7041 Correspondence in English JUN 1997 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.227-7022 Government Rights (Unlimited) MAR 1979 252.227-7033 Rights in Shop Drawings APR 1966 252.231-7000 Supplemental Cost Principles DEC 1991 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

DEC 2018

252.232-7008 Assignment of Claims (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.233-7001 Choice of Law (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.236-7000 Modification Proposals-Price Breakdown DEC 1991 252.236-7001 Contract Drawings, and Specifications AUG 2000 252.236-7002 Obstruction of Navigable Waterways DEC 1991 252.236-7005 Airfield Safety Precautions DEC 1991 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items OCT 2020 252.244-7001 Contractor Purchasing System Administration MAY 2014 252.245-7001 Tagging, Labeling, and Marking of Government-Furnished

Property

APR 2012

252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property DEC 2017 252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration APR 2012

Page | 20