Solicitation Amendment 0001.pdf

ROICC SIGONELLA

PSC 812 BOX 3000

FPO AE 09627

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N33191-20-R-4011, Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract, Sigonella, Italy

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the proposal due date and answ er PPI.

See page 2 for description.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Feb-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N3319120R4011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Jan-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Feb-2020

CODE

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA CENTRAL

PSC 817 BOX 51

FPO AE 09622-0051

N33191 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N33191

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N3319120R4011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001

The purpose of this amendment is to:

Include NAVFAC P-307 June 2016 Weight Handling Program Management (Attached) Include EM-385-1-1 USACE Safety and Health Requirements- see link:

(https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Manuals/) Provide Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs) responses.

The proposal due date shall be extended until Friday, 14 February 2020 at 14:00 Central European Time (CET).

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs)

1. In reference to section INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS paragraph 1.10 paragraphs a) and b (3), page 10 of 60.

A) First question: we ask you if an existing Consortium consisting of twenty companies, of which only four companies will participate to the present solicitation, must to submit the SOA certificates of all the companies of consortium or only the SOA certificates of the companies that will participate to the solicitation and that meet the certification requirements in paragraph a.

Gov Response: Pending.

B) Second question: the three companies of consortium are: firm A, firm B, firm C; it is possible to participate with the following composition to meet requirements in paragraph a?

Firm A has SOA certificate OG1 class. V, OG3 class.VI, OG11 class. IV and will perform 100% OG1, OG3, OG11

Firm B has SOA certificate OG6 class II and will perform 40% Firm C has SOA certificate OG6 class III and will perform 60% Gov Response: Pending

2. Reference is made to page 09 of 60 point 4 Solicitation Section 00600, “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors”. Offerors shall comply with the requirements in accordance with FAR 52.204-8. Please clarify where Section 00600 is in the Solicitation.

Gov Response: Disregard section 00600 reference. See Clause in full text on page 25 of the solicitation.

3. 1.10 Societa’ Organismi D’Attestazione (SOA Certification) If Offeror is qualified under all SOA categories but does not fulfill the Classification of one Category in example:

Solicitation requirement SOA Category:

OG 11 - Classification IV Offeror is qualified under OG 11 Classification II.

Are Teaming Agreements also accepted in order to fulfill the SOA Classifications?

Gov Response: Pending.

4. We kindly ask you, if this request does not cause any problems to your offices, the possibility of a two-week time extension of the due date.

Gov Response: Proposal due date will be extended to 14 February 2020 at this time.

5. We kindly request Attachments A and B in Word format.

Thank you.

Gov Response: See attached.

6. FACTOR TWO – EXPERIENCE > (2) Design Experience

USG, please confirm that it is possible submitting experiences of two Design Subcontractors, so to have the opportunity to rely on one or the other based on the nature of the Task Order to be designed.

If so, please clarify is it is possible to submit from 2 to 5 experiences, for both of them.

Gov Response: Per the soliciation submittal requirements, a total of five submissions is the maximum number of responses that will be allowed. See the details in the Construction section and the details in the Architect- Enginer Section.

7. The RFP at Pages 41 and 42 provides Clause 252.204-7007 ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JUN 2019). In several locations in the clause, the statement "[Contracting Officer Check as Appropriate]" is made, but no checks are included in the document.

Can the Solicitation please be provided with the desired checks made in the document?

Gov Response: (iii) Trade Agreements Certificate and (iv) Secondary Arab Boycott of Israel were selected.

8. Section 00 10 00, Paragraph 1.10 requires SOA documents and Paragraph 1.11 requires a BLG.

With which phase of the Proposal are such documents to be submitted?

Gov Response: Pending.

9. We are a General Contractor Firm incorporated in U.S.

Please provide instruction on how we can comply with the requirement of S.O.A. Certification requested on page 10of 60 of the RFP.

10. Reference is made to solicitation page 16 of 60, Factor 2 - Experience, Solicitation Submittal

Requirements.

The solicitation states : " Projects submitted must have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP."

Due to the number of variables and evaluation factors to be satisfied please confirm that it would be acceptable to the Government if one or more of the submitted projects is substantially completed with a completion status of 90% or above, as in other NAVFAC solicitation where the wording "substantially completed" appeared in the evaluation factors. We believe that a 90% completion threshold does not prevent the Government's evaluation of a contractor's capabilities since at this completion stage the salient works have been performed by the contractor.

11. Is the intent of this solicitation to limit or exclude US Firm participation?

12. It seems that it would be in the best interest of the Contracting Office to allow as many US firms and new and qualified JV partnerships to enter into the Sigonella construction / maintenance bid opportunities arena, as to do otherwise would limit competition and result in less than ideal full and open competition per FAR

6.101 Policy, Competition Requirements.

13. We respectfully request that in the spirit of fair competition and allowing new bidders into this area of operations Phase 1 requirements allow for OG/SOA certs to be from one JV partner and Past Projects also be allowed from one partner. This will allow for a much larger pool of bidders, thereby competitively sourcing an eligible contractor from a wider body of qualified contractors.

14. We respectfully request NATO / Italian Defense Ministry projects funded by USAF in Italy be allowed to be submitted as US Government experience.

15. In RFP Pg. 10, point b. (1) - 1.10 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA)

CERTIFICATION:

” (1) An unexpired SOA Certificate (including joint venture partner, consortium partners or subcontractors that will be utilized to meet the qualification standard).”Is it necessary for the consortia to have their own SOA certificate on behalf of the consortium besides the consortium partners certificates or are sufficient also only the certificates of the consortium partners?

Gov Response: Pending

16. Pg. 15, Factor 2 – Experience ; (1) Construction Experience

The Projects submitted by the Offeror must have been completed within the past five (5) years or not? It is not indicated in RFP.

Gov Response: Pending

17. In RFP Pg. 10, point b. (1) - 1.10 SOCIETA’ ORGANISMI D’ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION: refers to the possibility to use subcontractors to meet the qualification standard, this means that if we do not own one or more SOA categories can we attach the SOA certificate of a subcontractor?

18. Please, kindly confirm that it is possible to participate in this solicitation, even if SAM registration is in progress, but the offeror has already obtained DUNS number and CAGE / NCAGE code.

Gov Response: SAM registration is required for award.

19. Please, kindly confirm that it is possible to participate in this solicitation as an established Associazione Temporanea di Imprese composed by two or more companies (ATI), in accordance to D.Lgs 50/2016 (current Italian Public Contract Law which has replaced the DeLise Code D.lgs. 163/2006), by providing a relevant notarized legal document along with the proposal.

Gov Response: Pending.

20. Please, kindly clarify if a “Società Cooperativa Consortile” – type of consortium set forth in the Italian Public Contract Law (D.Lgs. 50/2016) - is eligible to participate in this solicitation, meeting the requirements provided for under “Factor 2 – Experience” by submitting relevant projects in which the said “Società Cooperativa Consortile” is the contractor and some of its members are the entities that carried out the works.

21. Please, kindly clarify if “Avvalimento” (reliance on the capacities of other entities in order to meet the requirements set forth in this solicitation, according to art. 89 D.Lgs. 50/2016) is permitted.

Gov Response: Pending.

22. Please confirm that it is possible submitting as Corporate Experience a Project performed in Sigonella and 92% completed, stuck from months for reasons beyond Contractor responsibility.

Gov Response: Pending.

23. With reference to paragraph 1.10 SOA B. (3) page 10 of 60 If there are two Company A and B with the following references:

-COMPANY A: SOA OG1 CLASS.VIII; OG3 CLASS. VI; OG 6 IV-BIS; OG 11 CLASS. IV

-COMPANY B: SOA OG 6 CLASS. II, experiences for U.S. Government, Management – P.M., Quality Controll, SSHO Please let us know if the Joint and Venture COMPANY A and COMPANY B is compliant to the solicitation requirements.

24. With reference to paragraph 1.10 SOA B. (3) page 10 of 60

If there are two Company A and B with the following references:

-COMPANY A: SOA OG1 CLASS.VIII; OG3 CLASS. VI; OG 6 IV-BIS; OG 11 CLASS. IV

-COMPANY B: SOA OG 6 CLASS. II, experiences for U.S. Government, Management – P.M., Quality Control, SSHO

-COMPANY B is subcontractor of COMPANY A

Please let us know the Company A is compliant to the solicitation requirements.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 07-Feb-2020 02:00 PM to 14-Feb-2020 02:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)