_2018-02-08_Amd_01___Poland_Joc.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT 01 N33191-18-R-0603 POLAND JOC

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Feb-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N3319118R0603

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Jan-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Feb-2018

CODE

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA SOUTHWEST ASIA

VIALE PORTO CAPODICHINO

NAPOLI 80144

N33191 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N3319118R0603

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 01

The purpose of this Amendment 01 is to:

1. Refer to Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 1.7 Preaward Survey/Responsibility Determination.

DELETE:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past two years.

REPLACE WITH:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three fiscal years.

2. Provide Pre Proposal Inquiry Answers for solicitiation N33191-18-R-0603 Poland JOC. See attachment _2018-02-08_PPI_LOG_ to this solicitation.

END OF CHANGES

For information purposes: The following prints the entire section that contains the Deleted and Replaced noted above.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OF WORK

1.2 SITE VISIT

1.3 ENGLISHLANGUAGE

1.4 AMENDMENTS

1.5 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSALINQUIRIES

1.6 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

1.7 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

1.8 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEEWITH LETTERSAMPLE

1.9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

1.10 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

1.11 BASIS FOR AWARD

1.12 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.13 SOLICITATION ATTACHMENTS

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND SCOPE OFWORK

A. This solicitation does not constitute award or authorization to begin work.

B. This procurement will be solicited as an unrestricted competitive solicitation in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 6.1 Full and Open Competition. This acquisition will result in the award of an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Job Order Contract (JOC) with Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) task orders for construction, alteration, and repair of real property (industrial, commercial) and utilities. The contract will be procured using negotiated procedures in accordance with FAR 6.401. The best value tradeoff source selection process will be used for this procurement.

C. The purpose of this procurement is to provide a contract vehicle for various renovations, repairs, maintenance, replacements, alterations, demolition, and NAVFAC construction category II, III, and IV projects for FY 2018 through FY 2023 for NSF Redzikowo, Poland. Construction to be performed may include design-build primarily consisting of construction, alteration, and repair of real property (industrial, commercial) and utilities. These projects will typically range in value between $2,000 and $3,000,000 however, task orders above or below these amounts may be considered, if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest.

D. The solicitation will include the following Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs):

CLIN 0001 Base Year – FFP IDIQ CLIN 0002 Option Period One – FFP IDIQ CLIN 0003 Option Period Two – FFP IDIQ CLIN 0004 Option Period Three – FFP IDIQ CLIN 0005 Option Period Four – FFP IDIQ

E. The contract period of performance will consist of a 12-month base period and four (4) 12-month option periods for a maximum duration of 60 months should all options be exercised.

1.2 SITE VISIT

The clauses 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in this solicitation and resultant award. Accordingly, Offerors are expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

There is no pre-proposal conferencel/ site visit scheduled for this solicitation.

1.3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE

Offers must be submitted in English, to include any and all supporting documentation (certificates, licenses, award documents, etc.). If supporting documentation cannot be recreated in English, than at a minimum an English translation for any supporting documentation written in a language other than English must be provided.

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by an employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

1.4 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will be posted to the EuroNECO website https://euro.neco.navy.mil. All documents published in EuroNECO will be transmitted to the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website at https://www.neco.navy.mil and the Federal business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov. It is highly recommended that firms register on EuroNECO as plan holders. It is the offeror’s responsibility to check the EuroNECO website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.5 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI) regarding the solicitation shall be submitted in writing via electronic mail to Ms. Vicki Blankenship at vicki.blankenship@eu.navy.mil and a copy to Ms. Cherie Mitchell at cherie.mitchell@eu.navy.mil .

Receipt will be acknowledged. The Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form provides as Attachment 1. The PPI shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section, including the paragraph number and include only one question per form. Verbal queries will not be entertained. Responses to the PPI will be provided by Amendment and will be posted to NECO, EuroNECO and FBO websites. The Government may not respond to PPIs submitted later than 10 days before proposal due date.

1.6 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

a. SAM registration is required for all offerors, including Joint Venture (JV) offerors (registration must state the NAME of the JV). SAM registration can be accomplished at https://www.sam.gov. Offerors not registered in SAM shall obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

b. A DUNS number is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV, JV offerors must provide a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in

SAM.

c. CAGE/NCAGE Code – A CAGE/NGAGE Code is required for all offerors, including Joint Venture offerors. Joint Venture offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the Joint Venture name.

(1) Companies located in the U.S., including Joint Venture offerors: To obtain a CAGE Code, you must first register in SAM. An offeror will be assigned a CAGE Code as part of the SAM validation process approximately 4-5 business days after your SAM application is approved.

(2) Companies located outside the U.S. ONLY: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

System for Award Management (SAM) registration is required for all Offerors; including Joint Venture (JV) Offerors (registration must state the NAME of the JV). SAM registration is required at the SAM website https://www.sam.gov. It will be necessary to obtain a DUNS number through DUN and Bradstreet which can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform, and a CAGE or NCAGE code prior to registering in SAM. Firms offering a response to this notice shall ensure that they have completed the provisions associated with the annual representations and certifications identified in FAR 4.1202 and Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFARS) 204.1202.

A DUNS number is required for all Offerors, including JV Offerors. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV Offerors, JV Offerors must provide a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV.

Note: Contractors must complete both the FAR and DFARS representations and certifications on the SAM website.

Contractors are provided access to the DFARS provision only when they answer affirmatively that they would like to do business with the Department of Defense. Award cannot be made to an offeror who does not have an active registration in SAM under the DUNS number and CAGE/NCAGE code contained in their proposal. Offerors who are not currently registered in SAM are encouraged to initiate the registration process at SAM.gov as soon as possible.

1.7 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. The following information shall be submitted:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three fiscal years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures, discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

FAR §9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. The following information shall be submitted:

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past two years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures, discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

1.8 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

Submittal Time: The offeror whose offer is accepted shall, within ten (10) days after award of task / delivery order equal to or greater than $150,000, either (1) a notarized Performance Guarantee letter, or (2) Performance and Payment bonds conforming to the requirements below. If the offeror fails to provide either (1) a Performance Guarantee letter or (2) Performance and Payment Bonds within ten (10) days, the contract may be terminated for default. In such event, the offeror shall be liable for any cost of procuring the work which exceeds the amount of its offer and the bid guarantee shall be available toward offsetting such difference.

Form of Performance Guarantee: The Performance Guarantee shall be an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the contract and shall be deposited into a properly certified banking institution, which will then issue an irrevocable letter guaranteeing (see Performance Guarantee Letter) the payment of the amount deposited plus any applicable interest, to the United States Government, upon demand by the Contracting Officer.

Demand will be made if the Contractor fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, or does not fulfill its undertaking in whole or in part. Payment to the Contracting Officer will be by check made payable to the "United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe, Africa, Southwest Asia." The Performance Guarantee shall take effect upon the date of signature of the Performance Guarantee letter and shall remain valid and irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. The Performance Guarantee letter shall be accompanied by a notarized document authenticating the financial institution's authority to sign the letter. An English translation of the Performance Guarantee letter shall be submitted concurrently.

Upon acceptance of all work by the Government, however, the Contractor may, with the approval of the Contracting Officer, replace this guarantee with a reduced guarantee in the amount of four percent (4%) of the then existing contract price, with modifications, if any. Such replacement guarantee will then remain in effect for one (1) year after the final acceptance of the work by the Government.

SAMPLE OF PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE ISSUED BY A BANK

This sample meets the material requirements of clause NFAS 5252.228-9306, “Performance Guarantee.” The Government will accept as valid a Performance Guarantee conforming to these requirements.

BANK LETTERHEAD

To: United States of America U.S. Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe Africa Southwest Asia Viale Porto, Box 51 Aeroporto Capodichino 80144, Napoli, Italia Attention: Contracting Officer Date Bank Letter of Performance Guarantee No.

Attention: Contracting Officer

This is a letter of performance guarantee. I/We, the undersigned, acting as the duly authorized representative(s) of the Bank, declare that the Bank hereby guarantees and is jointly and severally liable as guarantor with the Contractor named below to effect payment to the Contracting Office that issued the contract stated below, by check made payable to the “United States of America by the U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Europe Africa Southwest Asia,” within five (5) calendar days after receipt of a simple written request by registered mail, return receipt, in amount up to sum of (Amount equal to ten (10%) percent of the contract amount in the currency stated in the contract), which represents the deposit required of the Contractor to guarantee fulfillment of his obligations for the satisfactory completion and timely performance of the work under Contract No. (insert contract number) for (insert description of services and location), in strict compliance with the terms, conditions and specifications of said contract entered into between the United States of America by the U.S. Department of Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Europe Africa Southwest Asia and the Contractor (insert name of Contractor) on (insert contract date), plus legal interest to be calculated from the date of receipt of the registered letter of request by the Contracting Officer to the date of actual payment, without any need for the Contracting Officer to take any legal action or obtain the prior consent of the Contractor, or for any other proof, action or decision by any other authority. The request by the Contracting Officer shall simply inform the Bank that the Contractor failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, or did not fulfill his undertaking in whole or in part.

I/We agree and consent that said contract may be modified by change order or supplemental agreement affecting the amount or the period of performance of the contract without prior consent of the Bank and without affecting the validity of this guarantee; provided, however, that the amount of this guarantee shall remain unchanged.

This letter of performance guarantee will continue in effect without change in amount or terms until one (1) year after the work has been finally accepted by the Government through its Contracting Officer’s legal representative.

(BANK NAME & ADDRESS) (CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS)

Signed by: Signed by:

(Typed name) (Typed name)

(Title) (Title)

(This Performance Guarantee shall be accompanied by: (1) a notarized document authenticating the bank agent’s authority to sign the letter of performance guarantee for the bank company; and (2) a notarized document authenticating the contractor’s agent authority to bind the subject contractor)

Optional Performance and Payment Bonds: In lieu of a performance guarantee, the bidder may submit Performance and Payment Bonds in which the bidder and the surety obligate themselves in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the contract price, that the bidder shall undertake the performance of the contract, shall make all required payments to subcontractors, and that said Performance and Payment Bonds ensure the fulfillment of all agreements contained in the contract. To be considered for acceptability, the bidder (s) shall submit Performance and Payment Bonds that:

(a) The bonds shall be from a registered bank, bonding firm, or registered insurance firm approved by the Contracting Officer; and

(b) The bonds shall be of the U. S. standard type or of another approved type and shall include the following concepts: (1) name of Surety and name of agent signing in behalf of Surety; (2) name of Principal; (3) a statement that the Principal and Surety are firmly bound on the United States of America in the penal sum of the bond; (4) Contract number; (5) Penal sum of bond and the statement "This bond will be in force until the Contracting Officer of the above-cited Contract authorized cancellation of the bond"; and (6) date of issuance of bond and signature of Surety's agent.

1.9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

The closing date and time for receipt of proposals is no later than 2:00 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on 28 February 2018.

Offers shall submit proposals electronically. All proposals shall be e-mailed as a PDF file to Ms. Vicki Blankenship at vicki.blankenship@eu.navy.mil with a copy to Ms. Cherie Mitchell at cherie.mitchell@eu.navy.mil . Receipt will be acknowledged. Two separate proposals shall be submitted; Volume One (1) Price Proposal, and Volume Two (2) Technical Proposal.

Each electronic file submitted as an attachment to an e-mail transmission shall not exceed 5MB in size. If the aforementioned electronic file exceeds 5MB, divide data into separate files so as not to exceed 5MB per file. Files shall be names with X of X (e.g. e-mail 1 of 2) in the subject line. No facsimile proposals will be allowed.

False statements: The submissions must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

COMPETETIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2004) reference subparagraphs (c) (3) (ii) (A) and (1), and FAR 15.208. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure sufficient time is provided for electronic submission to be processed through the Government’s electronic point of entry.

1.10 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

(LTD), ETC.

For the purposes of this solicitation, a Joint Venture (JV) refers to a U.S.-styled formal legal entity in the nature of a partnership comprised of two or more persons or companies. Each JV must provide one (1) CAGE/NCAGE Code, one (1) DUNS number for the JV and one (1) DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. Each JV must be registered in SAM using the name of the JV.

Joint Venture Offerors shall provide a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after final inspection and acceptance of the work by the Government.

Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV document. The JV must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

1. Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

2. Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

3. Solicitation number.

4. Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A is performing 100% of design).

5. The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after contract completion.”

6. Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

7. Statement under oath stating that the JV is in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations at the time of submittal of the proposal. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the JV.

The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc.) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved or disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

1.11 BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to Price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

1.12 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Management Approach Factor 3 – Safety Factor 4 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors, Factors, 1, 2, and 3, are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor, Factor 4. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to Price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR

Price: (Volume I – Price Proposal)

For the purposes of establishing coefficients for this contract, the offeror shall provide a proposed coefficient for Contract Line Item Numbers 0001 through 0005 on the Coefficient Schedule, provided in Section 00010 – Solicitation Contract Form. Failure to offer a coefficient for CLINs 0001 through 0004 will result in the offeror being ineligible for award. The coefficients will become a part of the contract upon award and will be effective for the base period and all option periods.

On the Coefficient Schedule, the offeror is to multiply the proposed coefficients by their associated multiplier to arrive at an Estimated Amount for CLINs 0001 through 0005

Description of Coefficients – Refer to the General Requirements for a description of what is and what is not to be included in the proposed Coefficients for pre-priced items.

The Estimated Amounts for CLINs 0001 through 0005 are to be added together to arrive at the Total Evaluated Price.

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including Solicitation Number; name, address, telephone and email address of the Offeror; in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), the name of the JV MUST BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED; Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal;

DUNS Number and CAGE or NCAGE Code of the Offeror, in case the Offeror is a JOINT VENTURE (JV), provide a DUNS Number for each member of the JV.

2) Completed (Blocks 14 through 20c), signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

3) Completed Coefficient Schedule.

4) A bulleted list, identifying all cost factor categories included in your coefficient. At a minimum, your coefficient is to include the cost elements identified in the General Requirements, Paragraph C.4 and its subparagraphs of the Solicitation. This narrative is limited to one (1) 8.5” x 11” page.

5) Acknowledgement of all amendments;

7) Joint Venture (JV) Agreement (if applicable).

8) Financial Statements – The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization. If a new Joint Venture (JV) is being proposed, include the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each firm, certified by an independent accounting firm or at least by an authorized officer of the organization.

9) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital from an independent financial institution which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract.

10) The Government intends to pay invoices in accordance with the clause for Wide Area Work Flow. To do this, your firm must have a U.S. bank or a U.S. bank affiliate associated with your local bank. With your proposal, identify the name of your U.S. bank or affiliate for purposes of paying invoices.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the Total Evaluated Price of all SLINs on the Coefficient Schedule. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

Comparison of proposed coefficients received in response to the RFP;

Comparison of proposed coefficients with the Government Estimate;

Comparison of proposed coefficients with available historical information;

OR

Comparison of proposed coefficients with market average.

The price proposals will be ranked from lowest to highest based on the evaluation criteria stated above.

The Government reserves the right to conduct a price realism analysis of proposed prices to determine risk of unreasonably low proposed prices when compared to offeror-proposed prices submitted in response to the solicitation or in comparison with the IGE.

The price proposal will initially be evaluated separately from the technical proposal. The Government has the discretion of determining which offeror is most advantageous to the Government considering price and technical quality of the proposal.

NON-PRICE EVALUATION FACTORS (Volume II – Non-Price Proposal)

NON-PRICE FACTOR 1, EXPERIENCE:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Submit a minimum of five (5) to a maximum of ten (10) examples of recent and relevant projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience on projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the solicitation. For the purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

a. Similar in scope if it is one of the following projects types:

i. New Construction of a building / facility;

ii. Renovation: the renovation works must include ate least one of the following work types: architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing and electrical;

iii. Utility Systems (sanitary sewer distribution, potable water, electrical power, communications);

iv. Alteration, demolition or maintenance services performed on existing buildings/facilities/systems or structures.

b. Similar is size if it has a construction magnitude with a total value of $50,000 to $3,000,000.

Values should be provided in US dollars. If the projects were awarded in another currency, the value in equivalent US dollars must also be provided by the offeror. Failure to provide this information as specified will result in the project being considered unacceptable.

c. The construction project has been performed and completed within the last 5 years at the date of issuance of this RFP

A project is defined as a construction, repair, alteration, demolition, or maintenance services project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

Offerors MUST utilize the Construction and Design Experience Data Sheet (Attachment 4) to submit applicable project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) 8.5” x 11” page double-sided (or two (2) pages single sided) per project. The font shall be black and be no smaller than 11 point; do not use color. If an individual project data sheet exceeds two pages, only the first two pages will be evaluated.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed, the relevancy to the project requirements of the solicitation, and the location of the work performed (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects shall be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 1 if it was performed by a firm other than the offeror and there is no supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, letter of commitment, or explanation of meaningful involvement. Offerors are still limited to a total of ten projects combined.

The projects submitted must clearly identify if the offeror performed as a prime contractor, joint venture/team/partner member or as a subcontractor. If experience was as a subcontractor, then less credit may be given to the experience. If more than ten (10) projects are submitted, only the first ten will be reviewed in the evaluation. Failure to identify the offeror’s role in a project will be rated lower.

The contracts may be for the U.S. Government or other clients.

For each project the offeror must provide:

1. Contract number, title, and location

2. Dollar value; annually and contract life

3. Type of contract (i.e. fixed price, cost reimbursable, or other – specify) If applicable, identify base period and all option periods

4. Contract start date and completion date

5. Identify type of services provided – similar scope, size & complexity (brief)

6. Nature of firm’s responsibility (prime contractor or subcontractor/joint venture)

7. Percentage of the work that your firm performed as the prime contractor or subcontractor

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include a subjective assessment of the demonstrated experience and depth of experience of the Offeror’s team in performing relevant projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Relevancy will be evaluated in terms of scope consisting of construction, repair, alteration, demolition, or maintenance services. The Government will also evaluate the offeror’s relevant experience working as a Joint Venture partner or as a subcontractor on projects of similar size, scope and complexity.

Demonstrating any of the following factors may result in a more favorable consideration in the Government’s evaluation. Demonstrating three or more of the following, on a prior project, may result in additional strengths:

1. Relevant projects that demonstrate JOC or other IDIQ experience maybe considered more favorably than those that do not have IDIQ experience.

2. Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with compliance with Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)’s may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with compliance with UFC’s.

3. Relevant projects performed within Poland or other countries within Europe may be considered more favorably.

4. Offeror demonstrates leveraging of local resources may be considered more favorably.

5. Offeror demonstrates fast response times on urgent requirements may be considered more favorably.

6. Offerors including relevant projects that demonstrate experience self-performing relevant features of work may receive a higher rating than those who do not demonstrate self-performance.

7. Offerors that provide at least one relevant project demonstrating experience in ALL of the following types of work: new construction, renovation, utility systems and alteration may ), may receive a higher rating.

8. Offerors that demonstrate experience in ALL of the following types of utility systems:

potable water systems, waste water systems, electrical systems and mechanical systems (HVAC, Plumbing, pumps), may receive a higher rating.

9. Relevant projects performed for the US Government and in compliance with UFC’s may be considered more favorably than those that have not been performed for the US Government.

Proposals that fail to provide required and complete information will be deemed deficient.

NON-PRICE FACTOR 2, MANAGEMENT APPROACH:

Offeror’s response shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages (8.5” x 11” single sided) for this factor.

The font shall be black and no smaller than 11 point; do not use color for text, graphics or images. If more than fifteen (15) are submitted, only the first fifteen pages will be evaluated.

The Offeror shall provide the following:

1. Provide an organizational chart AND a workforce management plan describing the interrelationship of the off-site management team and on-site management team(s). Organization chart must clearly show management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability. At a minimum the organization chart must display key personnel. Workforce management plan should clearly describe how the offeror will meet the contract requirements for key personnel. Key personnel must include the following: Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety and Health Officer (See Solicitation Section C.2.6 Personnel Requirements) and where subcontractors report under the organization.

2. Discuss approach to Subcontractor relationships (if applicable). Include any pre-established relationships with organizations qualified for work within the scope of this solicitation, quantifying number of projects that have been completed together and/or number of years of partnering. If an Offeror does not intend to use sub- contractors, they must clearly state that all work will be self performed.

3. Describe offeror’s approach for working in areas with restricted or limited access due to security controls, limited laydown space, and working around activities with minimal disruption.

4. Discuss how your firm, will provide labor, materials, equipment, subcontractors and project management to multiple sites simultaneously, in Poland, and accommodate multiple tasks simultaneously when required.

5. Discuss how the offeror will respond to proposed task orders that may have short notice site visits and/or response times for submitting proposals.

6. Discuss management familiarity and approach to joint scoping work with the Government, to include examples of any previous joint-scoping efforts.

7. Provide process for scheduling and discuss how offeror shall handle surges in work quantities.

The evaluation will include a subjective assessment of the depth of experience and qualifications of the Offeror’s management team. The evaluation will also include a subjective assessment of the proposed management approach and Offeror’s responses to the submittal requirements for this factor.

Offerors may receive a higher rating if they can successfully demonstrate in their narrative their ability to meet one or more of the following:

1. Experience with managing multiple projects simultaneously under a JOC or other IDIQ contract.

2. Key personnel with experience or qualifications that exceed the minimum requirements in the scope of work

3. Offerors that provide an organizational chart and supporting management approach that shows adequate personnel and organizational structure to manage multiple and simultaneous task orders(more than five (5)).

4. Proven ability to leverage local resources

5. Demonstration of a strong Scheduling/Communication Plan

6. Quick turnaround times on last minute requirements

7. Demonstrate a good QA/QC program to maximize quality of workmanship

Offerors that fail to provide an organizational chart that meets the minimum workforce management plan requirements may be considered a deficiency.

NON-PRICE FACTOR 3, SAFETY:

The Offeror shall submit a Safety Narrative addressing the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following shall address each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; only one safety narrative is required.)

The narrative shall describe the offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Due to the variety of work that may be issued under this contract, the Offeror must submit their plan for potential subcontractors even if the offeror does not anticipate the use of subcontractors initially.

Failure to submit a plan to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors will be considered a deficiency.

The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two (2) pages single-sided, minimum font size of twelve (11). If more than two (2) pages are submitted, only the first two (2) pages will be reviewed in the evaluation.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the factor based on the degree to which an Offeror’s safety approach meets the solicitation requirements. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, the information provided in the Safety Narrative response, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resource.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

1. Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

2. Other sources of information available to the Government

Regarding subcontractors, the Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

Those Offerors who demonstrates a commitment to and a culture of safety may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

NON-PRICE FACTOR 4, PAST PERFORMANCE:

Offeror’s are to submit a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support system (CCASS) evaluation, CPARS or PPQs for the projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience.

If there is not a completed CCASS or CPARS evaluation, the Offeror must complete the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), included as Attachment 5 to the solicitation. The offeror or its team members must submit the PPQ to their client(s) for each project the offeror included in its proposal for Factor 1 - Experience. An offeror shall not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS is available. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure correct and current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client’s point of contact on the PPQ. Completed PPQs shall be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror must complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

If past performance data is supplied for a firm whose CAGE code and DUNS number does not match the CAGE code and DUNS number for the offeror, the offeror MUST provide a DETAILED written explanation of how the experience, past performance, and /or safety data is relevant.

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on projects that were performed for the US Government and relevant projects as described by relevancy ratings. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

Offerors may receive higher confidence assessment rating if they can demonstrate that their firm meets two (2) or more of the following criteria:

1. A pattern of successful completion of tasks, with ALL relevant projects submitted receiving a Satisfactory of better performance rating.

2. A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality, with more than five (5)…