Amendment_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0004 - Solicitation N33191-16-R-1002, Construction of Rota Navy Lodge Expansion

See page 2 for extended descripton.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Dec-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N33191-16-R-1002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Nov-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Dec-2015

CODE

NAVFAC EUROPE AFRICA SOUTHWEST ASIA

PSC 817 BOX 51

FPO AE 09622-0051

N33191 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N33191-16-R-1002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

The purpose of Amendment 0004 is as follows:

1. Provide Government responses to thirteen (13) Pre-Proposal Inquiries.

2. Updates to Technical Evaluation Factors 1 and 3.

3. Updates to specifications and drawings in TECHNICAL CONTINUATION SHEET section.

4. Incorporate attachments SKC-1 and SKL-1.

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES:

1. Question: 2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS, Page 27 - Section 4

According to this section, as a basis of evaluation for general construction experience, significant features include:

(i) multi-story construction;

(ii) at least 30 hospitality suites/rooms;

(iii) phased renovation of at least 5,000 square feet;

(iv) similar elements to Navy Lodge including guest rooms, front desk, lobby area, offices, retail space and lounge;

(v) phased renovation of hospitality common spaces;

(vi) emphasis on quality of workmanship on ALL aspects of the project; and

(vii) strict completion schedule.

Please, clarify why items (iii) and (v) “phased renovation” are significant to experience if the scope of work in the RFP doesn’t include any “renovation” in existing building.

Answer: See section entitled AMENDMENT 0004 – Eval Factors for information.

2. Question: 2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS, Page 28 - Section 4- Subfactor 1b

Regarding to this section, several dudes have arisen:

- In order to provide the more accurate information, please, clarify which “security works” have to be performed, as we have not found in the RFP any “security works”.

- If according to the specs (section 27 10 00 and section 33 82 00) all the communication works have to be done by one of the authorized vendors in the Base (Telefónica, Sinetel or Dominion), why is required company’s experience or subcontractors experience for this work?

- Basis of evaluations for this subfactor includes contradictories statements:

*Offerors who propose Offeror/specialized subcontractor teams or joint venture (JV) teams that have worked together previously on projects submitted for review may be rated higher.

* Offerors who demonstrate their own experience on the specialized work may be rated higher.

Please, clarify what is rated higher: own experience or subcontractor works.

Answer: See section entitled AMENDMENT 0004 – Eval Factors for information.

3. Question: Buried fuel pipes

We haven’t found in the specs any provision for the buried fuel pipes to be installed between the tank and the mechanical room. Please, provide the requirements (features, testing,….) these pipes must comply with.

Answer: Information provided in the TECHNICAL CONTINUATION SHEET section of this Amendment.

4. Question: Buried water tank – Drawing C108 Note 21

Note 21 in drawing C108 refers to a “buried water tank” to be installed close to the building. We have not found neither in the plumbing drawings nor in the specs the features for this tank and the connection to the interior water system.

Please, provide this information.

5. Question: The transformer for this project is identified as 1000 kVA in the attached drawing from the project and 2000 kVA from the attached SOW reference from the project.

Can you please verify which transformer capacity is correct?

Answer: Transformer capacity is 1000kVA.

6. Question: We haven’t found in the RFP the technical specs related to the wood trellis to be installed in the exterior of the building. Please, provide.

Answer: Provide pressure treated wood lumber members and fasteners as indicated on the drawings and specified in Section 06 20 00 Finish Carpentry.

7. Question: KITCHEN AND LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT

We have doubts regarding the kitchen and laundry equipment to be provided and installed by the awarded contractor. Please, clearly clarify which pieces of equipment are to be provided.

Answer: The equipment to be provided is specified in all Division 11 sections of the Specification.

8. Question: SECTION 31 23 00.00 20 Page 4- paragraph 1.7.1, DRAWING S-005 – SPECIAL

INSPECTION NOTES – Note 4

Section 31 23 00.00 20 Page 4- paragraph 1.7.1 “requires to hire a Professional Geotechnical Engineer to provide inspection of excavations and soil/groundwater conditions throughout construction”.

Drawing S-005, Special Inspection note 4 “recommends to hire the geotechnical services of a licensed Geotechnical Engineer to perform the soil special inspection”.

Please, clarify if the “Geotechnical Engineer” is mandatory or just recommended for the project inspection.

Answer: A licensed Geotechnical Engineer is required to perform the inspection.

9. Question: PART II - EVALUATION FACTORS - 2.3 EVALUATION FACTORS AND

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS - FACTOR 3 – SCHEDULE –

This section requires “submit a narrative discussing transition plans for renovation work, including how the front desk, reception guest check-in area and admin office construction, relocation, and migration will be phased”

We have not found in the project any description or provision regarding renovation work, existing facilities relocation or migration. Please, provide information about the scope of this work.

Answer: See section entitled AMENDMENT 0004 – Eval Factors for information.

10. Question: RFP PART B - TECHNICAL SPECS

Several sections in the specs call for “LEED requirements” for materials and procedures, but it is not clearly stated whether this is a “USGBC LEED certified project” or not. Please, clarify whether this is a “USGBC LEED certified project” and therefore a LEED AP is required.

Answer: Yes, the project is USGBC LEED Certified and is currently registered as LEED Silver.

HBA has received approval of the design credits and the contractor will be responsible for providing the construction credits. See Section 01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS. Also see requirements of Section 01 45 00.00 20 QUALITY

CONTROL.

11. Question: RFP PART B - TECHNICAL SPECS –Courts – section 32 86 04

Regarding the playing courts surface system, specs in paragraphs 2.2.2 and 2.3.1 call for: “Basketball court / Tennis court surface shall be as indicated on the drawings and meet the requirements of Section 32 12 17, "Hot Mix Bituminous Pavement." Neither drawings nor spec 32 12 17 provide data for the surface system to be applied. Please, provide the requirements for this material.

12. Question: RFP PART B - TECHNICAL SPECS –section 09 05 00-paragraph 2.1 + Drawing

A604

Drawing A604 calls for “Noraplan Envioncare Art 1462” as the basis of design for the rubber tiles (F7). This is a roll tile with 2 mm thickness. However, specs require 300 mm square tiles with 3.2 mm overall thickness. Please, clarify the correct features the rubber flooring should comply with.

13. Question: RFP PART B - TECHNICAL SPECS –section 09 26 00

Specs section 09 26 00 addresses the “veneer plaster” finish. However, we haven’t found in the drawings where this finish has to be applied. Please, clarify.

Answer: Refer to Sheet A-603, ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE REMARKS NOTE 8.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 14-Dec-2015 02:00 PM to 13-Jan-2016 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

AMENDMENT 0004

TECHNICAL CONTINUATION SHEET

The following drawings shall be revised as indicated:

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045116 (S-005)

SPECIAL INSECTION NOTES:

DELETE Note 4 and INSERT:

“Contractor shall hire the geotechnical services of a licensed geotechnical engineer in the project’s jurisdiction to perform the soil special inspection.”

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045247 (A-603)

ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE – TYPICAL GUEST SUITE:

ADD Ceiling Finish “C6” to Living Room, Dining Room, Bedroom 1 and Bedroom 2.

FINISH SCHEDULE REMARKS:

Note 3 is correct in referring back to Enlarged Plans for location of C4 and C6 ceiling types.

ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE – GREAT ROOM 1019:

DELETE Ceiling Finish C1.

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045452 (E-609)

POWER RISER DIAGRAM:

DELETE “250KVA Diesel Generator” and INSERT “250KW Diesel Generator”

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045453 (E-610)

TELECOMMUNICATIONS RISER DIAGRAM:

DELETE Note and INSERT:

“All work associated with telecommunication equipment i.e. cross connects, rack equipment, VOIP switches etc.

will be included in the telecommunication contractors contract with the prime contractor. This work shall be accomplished by the telecommunications contractor at the new Navy Lodge and the existing Navy Lodge. The prime contractor shall contract Telefonica for all work associated with the outside plant telecommunications cabling.”

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045087 (C-108)

See attached sketch SKC-1 for clarification on underground water storage tank and greywater processor.

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045108 (L-106)

See attached sketch SKL-1 for clarification on underground water storage tank and greywater processor.

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 14045248 (A-604)

INTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE:

F7 - RESILIENT TILE:

DELETE Style “1462” and INSERT “2462”

The following specifications shall be revised as indicated:

SECTION 26 12 19.10 – THREE-PHASE PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS

2.2.2 Transformer

EDIT Paragraph 2.2.2.b. as follows:

DELETE: “2000 kVA” INSERT: “1000 kVA”

SECTION 32 13 13.06 – PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS ANS SITE

FACILITIES

DELETE: The following Paragraph

1.5.1 Ready Mix Concrete Plant Certification

SECTION 32 84 24 – IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS

ADD the following paragraphs:

1.3.1 Domestic Laundry Water Harvesting System - Grey Water Source

The source of the Grey Water Irrigation System shall be the Lodge Washing Machines. The washes shall be primarily of the room sheets and towels. The washing machine discharge of the 3 machines shall be combined and exit the building in one location. See sheet P-104, First Floor – Area “C” – Waste Piping.

Directly outside the building shall be a 2,000 gallon (7570 L) underground storage tank. The grey water shall gravity flow from the building to the underground storage tank. This water shall be pumped to Grey Water Processor / Distribution System (L-106).

The Grey Water Processor shall filter (lint from washing machines) the water and distribute to each individual Irrigation Zone.

2.7 STORAGE TANK

Polyethylene underground water storage tanks, (cistern) shall be produced with 100% virgin resin which meets FDA specifications for potable water. The ribbed tank design has a storage capacity of 2,000 gallon (7570 L) and will be supplied with manhole extensions and lid/riser combinations to bring access to ground level. Provide bulkhead fittings to help adapt the cistern to suit specific needs or applications. The underground polyethylene tank must be installed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and installation instructions.

Made to order fiberglass tanks will be special ordered and custom molded to meet the specifications for specific projects. All penetrations will be predetermined and molded in the tank. An approved detailed drawing shall be submitted prior to ordering or delivery of fiberglass tank. The tank design has a storage capacity of 2,000 gallon (7570 L) and will be supplied with manhole extensions and lid/riser combinations to bring access to ground level.

Any specific options such as ladders will be approved prior to ordering a fiberglass tank. Provide tie down straps and dead man anchors for securing fiberglass tanks. All fiberglass underground tanks must be installed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and installation instructions.

2.8 STORAGE TANK TRANSFER PUMPS

Transfer pump shall be 48 GPM (182 LPM). Provide sufficient amperage, phase, and voltage from a dedicated circuit. All electrical connections must meet manufacturer's specifications and meet all compliance requirements.

Submersible pumps shall be approved by the manufacturer for submersible operation, constructed of stainless steel metal parts and have a vertically oriented shaft. Pump will be plumbed to allow for removal without entering the tank. Pump will be connected to the power source by means of a power cable and waterproof connections that comply with the manufacturer's recommendations and installation instructions.

2.9 STORAGE TANK TRANSFER PUMP CONTROLS AND FLOAT SWITCHES

Provide control panel, housed in a NEMA 4 hinged wall mount enclosure with back plate, fully integrated into the rainwater harvesting system, prefabricated and configured as noted to run pumps when required. One Normally Open Float Switch (non mercury type) will be installed to protect pumps from run dry condition.

SECTION 33 52 10 – SERVICE PIPING, FUEL SYSTEMS

ADD this section in its entirety – see attached.

SECTION 33 82 00 – TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)

1.6.2.1 Telecommunications Contractor Qualifications

DELETE the paragraph in its entirety and INSERT:

“The telecommunications contractor shall be Telefonica.”

SECTION 32 86 04 – ATHLETIC FIELDS AND EQUIPMENT

2.2.2 Basketball Court Surface

ADD the following sentence:

“The Playing Court Surface System shall be as specified in Section 32 18 23.43 Playing Court Surface System”

2.3.1 Surface System for Tennis Courts

ADD the following sentence:

“The Playing Court Surface System shall be as specified in Section 32 18 23.43 Playing Court Surface System”

ADD the following specification section:

SECTION 32 18 23.43 – PLAYING COURT SURFACE SYSTEM

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SECTION INCLUDES

A. Asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating system.

1.2 RELATED REQUIREMENTS

Playing Court Surface System shall use Section 32 12 17 – HOT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT and section 32 86 04 ATHLETIC FIELDS AND EQUIPMENT, IN ADDITION TO THIS SECTION.

1.3 REFERENCE STANDARDS

A. American Sports Builders Association (ASBA).

B. United States Tennis Association (USTA) Rules of Tennis.

1.4 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation; submittals not having a "G" designation are for Contractor Quality Control approval. The following shall be submitted in accordance with Section 01 33

00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-03 Product Data

Submit manufacturer’s product data, including surface and crack preparation and application instructions.

SD-04 Samples

Submit manufacturer’s color samples of color coating.

SD-06 Test Reports

1. Submit independent test results for solar reflectance index.

2. Submit independent test results for 2000 Hour ASTM G154, accelerated weathering UV test, to demonstrate long-term durability and fade resistance.

3. Submit independent test results for 2000 Hour, accelerated weathering ASTM G155 Xenon Arc test, to demonstrate long-term fade resistance and quality of pigment.

SD-07 Certificates

Manufacturer’s Certification: Submit manufacturer’s certification that materials comply with specified requirements and are suitable for intended application.

Warranty Documentation: Submit manufacturer’s standard warranty.

1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE

A. Manufacturer’s Qualifications:

1. Manufacturer regularly engaged, for past 5 years, in manufacture of asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating systems of similar type to that specified.

B. Applicator's Qualifications:

1. Applicator regularly engaged, for past 3 years, in application of basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating systems of similar type to that specified.

2. Employ persons trained for application of basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating systems.

1.6 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

A. Delivery and Acceptance Requirements: Deliver materials to site in manufacturer’s original, unopened containers and packaging, with labels clearly identifying product name and manufacturer.

B. Storage and Handling Requirements:

1. Store and handle materials in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

2. Keep materials in manufacturer’s original, unopened containers and packaging until application.

3. Store materials in clean, dry area indoors.

4. Store materials out of direct sunlight.

5. Keep materials from freezing.

6. Protect materials during storage, handling, and application to prevent contamination or damage.

7. Close containers when not in use.

1.7 AMBIENT CONDITIONS

A. Do not apply asphalt basketball & multi-purpose court surface color coating system when air or surface temperatures are below 10 degrees C during application or within 24 hours after application.

B. Do not apply asphalt basketball & multi-purpose court surface color coating system when rain is expected during application or within 24 hours after application.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1 MANUFACTURER

A. SportMaster Sport Surfaces, PO Box 2277, 2520 South Campbell Street, Sandusky, Ohio 44870. Toll Free 800-326-1994. Fax 877-825-9226. Website www.sportmaster.net. E-mail info@sportmaster.net OR

ACCEPTABLE EQUIVALENT

2.2 MATERIALS

A. Asphalt Basketball, Tennis & Multi-Purpose Court Surface Color Coating System.

B. Color Coating:

1. 100 percent acrylic emulsion coating.

2. Mix on-site with silica sand and water.

3. Color coats basketball & multi-purpose courts.

4. Weight per Gallon at 25 Degrees C: 4.2 Kg (9.2 lbs)., plus or minus 0.22 Kg (0.5 lbs.)

5. Color: Basketball Court:

Playing Surface: Forest Green Perimeter: Maroon

Color: Tennis Court:

Playing Surface: Forest Green

Perimeter: Maroon

C. Line Markings Primer:

1. 100 percent acrylic emulsion primer, clear drying.

2. Primes line markings and prevents bleed-under for sharp lines.

3. Chemical Characteristics, by Weight, Nominal:

a. Acrylic Emulsion: 38.0 percent.

b. Hiding Pigment: 0.0 percent.

c. Mineral Inert Fillers: 7.0 percent.

d. Film Formers, Additives: 1.5 percent.

e. Water: 50.0 percent.

4. Weight per Gallon at 25 Degrees C: 4.0 Kg (8.9 lbs)., plus or minus 0.22 Kg (0.5 lbs.)

5. Non-Volatile Material: 29 percent, plus or minus 5 percent.

D. Line Paint:

1. Pigmented, 100 percent acrylic emulsion line paint.

2. Line marking on asphalt basketball & multi-purpose courts.

3. Chemical Characteristics, by Weight, Nominal:

a. Acrylic Emulsion: 25.89 percent.

b. Pigment: 14.90 percent.

c. Mineral Inert Fillers: 13.12 percent.

d. Additives: 4.73 percent.

e. Water: 41.36 percent.

4. Weight per Gallon at 25 Degrees C: 4.8 Kg (10.65 lbs)., plus or minus 0.34 Kg (0.75 lbs.)

5. Non-Volatile Material: 45.17 percent, plus or minus 5 percent.

6. Color: White.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 EXAMINATION

A. Examine asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surfaces to receive color coating system.

B. Notify Contracting Officer of conditions that would adversely affect application or subsequent use.

C. Do not begin surface preparation or application until unacceptable conditions are corrected.

3.2 SURFACE PREPARATION

A. Protection of In-Place Conditions: Protect adjacent surfaces and landscaping from contact with asphalt basketball & multi-purpose court surface color coating system.

B. Prepare surfaces in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

C. Cure new asphalt surfaces a minimum of 14 to 30 days before application of asphalt basketball & multi-purpose court surface color coating system.

D. Remove dirt, dust, debris, oil, grease, vegetation, loose materials, and other surface contaminants which could adversely affect application of asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating system. Pressure wash entire surface.

E. Repair cracks, depressions, and surface defects in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions before application of filler course and color coating.

F. Level depressions 1/8 inch and deeper with patch binder in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

G. Apply 1 or 2 coats of filler course as required by surface roughness and porosity to provide smooth underlayment for application of color coating.

H. Ensure surface repairs are flush and smooth to adjoining surfaces.

3.3 APPLICATION

A. Apply asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating system in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions at locations indicated on the Drawings.

B. Mix materials in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

C. Apply Filler Course and Color Coating with a 50-60 durometer, soft rubber squeegee.

D. Filler Course:

1. Apply 2 coats on new asphalt or existing acrylic surfaces with extensive cracks or low spot repair.

2. Apply 1 coat on existing acrylic surfaces with minimal repairs.

E. Color Coating: Apply a minimum of 2 coats of color coating to prepared surfaces in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

F. Allow material drying times in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions before applying other materials or opening completed surface to foot traffic.

3.4 LINE MARKINGS

A. Lay out court line markings as indicated.

B. Apply line markings primer, after masking tape has been laid, to seal voids between masking tape and court surface to prevent bleed-under when line paint is applied.

C. Apply a minimum of 1 coat of line paint in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

3.5 PROTECTION

A. Allow a minimum of 24 hours curing time before opening basketball & multi-purpose courts for play.

B. Protect applied asphalt basketball, tennis & multi-purpose court surface color coating system to ensure that, except for normal weathering, coating system will be without damage or deterioration at time of Substantial Completion.

END OF SECTION

SECTION 00600 - REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

AMENDMENT 0004 - EVAL FACTORS

Technical factors 1 and 3 are revised as follows:

(a) FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE:

Corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by an offeror that are similar in size, scope and complexity to the project requirements as set forth in the subject Solicitation.

1) Proposal Submission Requirements: For all projects to be submitted for the Experience factor (both general and specialized), the attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit 1) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information.

The project description must describe the scope of work performed to demonstrate its relevancy to the applicable requirements of the RFP. Individual blocks on the form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet cannot exceed two (2) single-sided pages. A minimum Times New Roman, 10 point font size may be used for the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet.

Subfactor 1.A General Construction Corporate Experience:

For general construction corporate experience, the Government seeks to evaluate the relevant hospitality facility construction experience of the Offeror as a prime construction contractor directly responsible to the owner, emphasizing quality of workmanship on all aspects of the project, and working within a congested construction area and under a tight construction schedule. Criteria for Subfactor 1.A are:

• Projects completed by the Offeror in any capacity other than a prime construction contractor will be considered unacceptable.

• Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor will be considered unacceptable.

• Projects with a total value below $10M (or foreign currency equivalent) will be considered unacceptable.

• Projects with less than 50,000 square feet of work will be considered unacceptable.

• With regard to the significant features, not every single project needs to include every single feature, but the relevant projects collectively must demonstrate experience in all of the significant features for the general experience of the offeror to be considered acceptable or higher.

• The prime contractor does not have to self-perform the work identified as significant features;

however the prime contractor must demonstrate that it has managed projects that included these features.

• If the Offeror is an existing JV, then the Offeror must provide at least one relevant general construction experience from one of its members.

• If the Offeror is a JV that does not have relevant general construction experience as a JV, then each member of the JV must submit at least one relevant general construction project in order for the Offeror to be considered acceptable.

• If each member of the JV does not have at least one relevant general experience project then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

• For multiple award contract (MAC) or indefinite delivery / indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contracts, the specific relevant task order(s) that constitute a single project on the same site, not the entire MAC or ID/IQ contract, will be considered the project for evaluation purposes.

• Offerors who demonstrate projects that exceed general construction experience requirements or experience on widely recognized, Mid-Market Limited Services Hotel facilities may be rated higher.

• Offerors who demonstrate work on mid-scale hotel facilities with similar amenities to the proposed project and that have consistently documented high guest satisfaction surveys may be rated higher.

In Tab 1a of the technical proposal, submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) construction projects (new construction or renovation) completed by the Offeror as the prime construction contractor that best demonstrate the Offeror's experience successfully executing and managing projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the one under this RFP. Construction Projects shall have a total value of $10 million (or the equivalent foreign currency) or higher with at least 50,000 square feet of work and completed within the past seven (7) years from the date of issuance of the RFP. As detailed in the basis of evaluation for general construction experience, significant features include:

(i) multi-story construction;

(ii) at least 30 hospitality suites/rooms;

(iii) REMOVED

(iv) similar elements to Navy Lodge including guest rooms, front desk, lobby area, offices, retail space and lounge;

(v) REMOVED

(vi) emphasis on quality of workmanship on ALL aspects of the project; and

(vii) strict completion schedule.

Project description for each project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this Solicitation (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. For projects which are registered USGBC Certified, submit a copy of the LEED certificate. The LEED certificate does not count towards the overall page count.

Subfactor 1.B Specialized Communications and Security Construction Corporate Experience

REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY

(a) Basis of Evaluation:

Projects that are not submitted on the MANDATORY Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Exhibit 2) will NOT be evaluated. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed two (2) 8 ½ x 11” pages. Additional pages in excess of two (2) pages will not be evaluated.

Projects not yet accepted by the owner as of the date of the issuance of the RFP, or projects completed more than seven (7) years prior to the issuance of the RFP, will be considered unacceptable.

DELETE: Offerors who propose Offeror/specialized subcontractor teams or joint venture (JV) teams that have worked together previously on projects submitted for review may be rated higher.

ADD: Offerors who propose under a teaming agreement (JV, UTE, LLD, LTD) that have worked together previously on projects submitted for review may be rated higher.

Offerors who demonstrate projects that exceed general and/or specialized construction experience requirements may be rated higher.

Offerors who demonstrate experience on widely recognized, Mid-Market Limited Services Hotel facilities may be rated higher.

Offerors who demonstrate work on mid-scale hotel facilities with similar amenities to the proposed project, and that have consistently documented high guest satisfaction surveys may be rated higher.

Offerors who demonstrate their own experience on the specialized work may be rated higher.

Offerors who demonstrate more or better specialized communications and security construction experience may be rated higher.

DELETE: Offerors who demonstrate more recent construction experience (within the past seven (7) years) may be rated higher.

DELETE: Offerors who submit more than the minimum relevant general construction or specialized construction projects will be rated higher. The more relevant construction corporate experience, the higher the rating.

ADD: Offerors who submit more than the minimum relevant general construction projects will be rated higher.

The more relevant construction corporate experience, the higher the rating.

(3) FACTOR 3 – SCHEDULE:

(a) Proposal Submission Requirements: In Tab 3 of the technical proposal, submit a draft work Schedule that will project a reasonable time table for completing this project. The period of performance submitted in your proposal must not exceed 850 (GE) calendar days from the time of award. Offerors who provide a schedule below 850 (GE) calendar days may be rated higher. HOWEVER, be aware that the Offeror’s schedule will be incorporated into the contract as the final contract completion date. If the successful offeror exceeds the schedule originally proposed, then the successful offeror is subject to liquidated damages.

Provide key elements of scheduling/phasing to show understanding of project requirements.

Specifically address:

• Critical path

• Sample room requirements for finish levels

• Long lead items

• Red Zone activities

• Key milestones in RFP

• Substantial Completion Date (SCD)

• Contract Completion Date (CCD)

DELETE: The schedule shall be one (1) page, ledger size (11x17) sheets and will not count toward the page limit. In addition to the schedule, submit a narrative discussing transition plans for renovation work, including how the front desk, reception guest check-in area and admin office construction, relocation, and migration will be phased. The narrative may also reflect an approach to tasks that could be performed simultaneously to assist with meeting each phase and the overall completion date. This narrative shall be limited to two 8.5 x 11 sheets; single-sided, and does count toward the page limitation.

ADD: The schedule shall be one (1) page, ledger size (11x17) sheets and will not count toward the page limit. In addition to the schedule, submit a narrative discussing an approach to tasks that could be performed simultaneously to assist with meeting each phase and the overall completion date. This narrative shall be limited to two 8.5x11 sheets; single-sided, and does count toward the page limitation.

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the information submitted for this factor to assess the offeror’s approach and understanding of the project scope, critical path Sample Room Activities, and phasing activity milestones that are written in the Scope of Work. The schedule does not need to be a full, baseline schedule, but must include sufficient details to demonstrate understanding of the complexities of this project. The period of performance submitted in your proposal must not exceed 850 (GE) calendar days from the time of award. A schedule that demonstrates realistic and feasible early completion of this facility may be rated higher. The schedule and duration in the successful Offeror's proposal will establish the final completion date for this project. Offerors shall not assume that overtime will be allowed and shall base their schedule on working during regular work hours as stated in the scope of work. Required assumptions for an acceptable schedule are:

• Facility is complete and useable for its intended purpose as a hotel at the CCD

• Final rooms will meet quality established and approved by NEXCOM during Final Sample

Room inspections

• Facility is fully functional –major appliances, air conditioning, lighting, plumbing, communications, keying system works and is fully programmed, etc. at CCD

• Punchlist shall only be aesthetic in nature (e.g., minor touch up paint, and must be able to be completed within two weeks)

Offerors who provide a schedule below 850 (GE) calendar days may be rated higher. However, be aware that the Offeror’s schedule will be incorporated into the contract as the final contract completion date. If the successful offeror exceeds the schedule originally proposed, then the successful offeror is subject to liquidated damages.

(End of Summary of Changes)