Amendment 1 N3220521R4216.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USNS GRASP FY22 ROH/DD Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N3220521R4216
About this file
This document provides details for a federal solicitation requesting repair and alteration work on the USNS GRASP. The Navy's Military Sealift Command is seeking proposals to perform repairs, overhauls, and drydocking availability for the USNS GRASP in fiscal year 2022. Proposals are due by August 24, 2021 and the work must be completed by the period end date specified in the contract sections. Offerors must provide pricing using the attached price breakdown forms, with unit and extended prices for each line item and any associated costs. The solicitation identifies evaluation criteria and submission requirements for proposals, including past performance information.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N3220521R4216
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION / CONTRACT FORM
The required response date/time has changed from 10-Aug-2021 02:00 PM to 24-Aug-2021 02:00 PM.
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICE TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
rINSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
1. To obtain access to attachment J-1 and GFI-TD, complete and return attachment J-14 to the contract specialist. Indicate if data will be forwarded to subcontractors. Files will be available via DOD SAFE for download for up to seven (7) days. Alternatively and at the determination of the KO, attachment J-1 and GFI-TD may be distributed on CD.
2. REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
a. Proposal Submittal and Inquiries.
1) Proposals shall be received, via DoD SAFE ONLY, prior to the closing date and time identified on SF 33 block 9, at the following e-mail address: colin.j.edick.civ@us.navy.mil
2) Hard copy and facsimile submissions will not be accepted. Offers shall be sent/delivered via DOD SAFE. To access DOD SAFE, offerors must contact Colin Edick at colin.j.edick.civ@us.navy.mil for a DOD SAFE internet link and upload instructions to submit the offer. Offerors are responsible for the risks associated with the delivery method and for ensuring that the Government receives the complete proposal at the appropriate designated location prior to the due date and time for proposal submission.
3) All questions concerning the solicitation shall be addressed via email to colin.j.edick.civ@us.navy.mil
b. General Instructions
1) The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing source selection (negotiated) procedures as delineated in FAR Subpart 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria under Section M, “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may hamper the Government’s ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award.
2) The offer. The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror’s acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation.
3) It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to submit their best technical proposal and prices in initial proposals. IAW FAR 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency IAW FAR 15.306(c)(2). Proposals containing unacceptable ratings may be included in the competitive range provided they can be made acceptable as a result of discussions.
4) Instructions outlined in paragraph “c” below prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of information needed to allow for evaluation of proposals.
5) The WI Package is only available upon a written request to the contract specialist. All other referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the GPE website at https://beta.sam.gov/.
6) Debriefings. The KO will promptly notify offerors of the decision to eliminate their proposals from the competitive range, whereupon an offeror can request and receive a debriefing IAW FAR 15.505. The KO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision IAW FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Any offeror requesting a debriefing must make the request IAW the requirements of FAR 15.506.
c. Proposal Preparation Instructions
1) Offeror’s proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes: (Volume I) General; and (Volume II) Technical Proposal.
2) Proposal Format
a) The proposals shall be organized into two (2) separate volumes.
b) Offerors shall provide digital files in Adobe PDF, Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and/or Excel. Offerors shall ensure that proposal files are virus-free and free of password protection. The Government reserves the right to eliminate a proposal from consideration if access to proposal data is prohibited due to viruses, passwords, and/or wrong format.
c) The table below shows detailed page limits to be submitted. The proposal shall not exceed the stated limits. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit shall be removed and remain unread.
| Volume |
| Title |
| Page Limits |
| I |
| General |
| N/A |
| II |
| Technical Proposal |
| 50 pages, excluding appendices |
d. Proposal Content. The offeror shall submit a technical and a price proposal that shall include, at a minimum:
1) Volume 1 – General. Offerors are required to submit: (TAB A) a completed SF 33 to include acknowledgment of amendments, if applicable; (TAB B) Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs and an itemized breakdown of price on the form(s) provided in Attachments J-2 and J-3; (TAB C) Subcontracting Plan (not applicable for small business concerns); (TAB D) Section K Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors; and (TAB E) Past Performance.
TAB A, SF 33. The SF 33 shall be fully completed upon submission. The offeror shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP IAW the instructions on the SF 33 and FAR 52.215-1(b).
TAB B, Price:
Offerors shall submit prices in the format specified on the Contractor Price Breakdown forms of this solicitation, Attachments J-2 and J-3. Each specification Item Number must be either priced or marked “NSP.”
Overall Price. Unit prices and extended prices must be submitted as indicated, except NSP items.
Offerors shall include any costs associated with third-party access to the contractor’s facility, including costs for badges, safety orientation instruction, and/or parking, in the price proposal under the Shipboard Access and Security Item. For estimating purposes, offerors shall assume that (1) the Government will require access, to include safety orientation instruction and parking at the shipyard facility, for thirty individuals for the entire duration of the performance period; and (2) 20% of the badges issued to the Government and third-party personnel will be lost/misplaced and will require replacement.
The contractor agrees that its man-hour rate for the 8,300 man-hours of the AGR includes the complete and full compensation to which it is entitled, including, but not limited to, compensation for all the direct labor costs (e.g., straight time, overtime, premium time, shift differential, holiday time, standby time) for performing the AGR, as well as compensation for acceleration, delay and disruption, and other impacts, if any, to the aforementioned WI, to work performed under any other Government contract, and to any work in progress for the Government. The contractor further agrees that it is not entitled to a time extension to the delivery date of any ship under a Government contract by reason of or as a result of the ordering of the 8,300 man-hours of AGR.
AGR does not include work performed pursuant to the clauses of this contract entitled “Inspection and Manner of Doing Work,” “Guarantees,” or other contract provisions relating to the correction of defects.
The contractor shall follow the instructions stated below when completing Section B:
CLIN 0001 – The contractor shall complete CLIN 0001 NET AMT, each of the fill-in items stated in the extended description, and complete Attachment J-2 – Category “A” WIs.
CLIN 0002 – Indicate the FBLR (e.g., G&A, overhead, profit, supervision, consumables, and/or support functions) and the ODC profit and G&A rate.
CLINs 0003 through 0009 – The offeror shall complete CLIN 0003 through 0009 NET AMT, each of the fill-in items, and complete Attachment J-3 – Category “B” WIs.
TAB C, Reserved.
TAB D, Section K (Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors). The offeror shall ensure that its Section K submission is thoroughly completed, with all blocks in each certification/representation executed in their entirety and truthfully.
TAB E, Past Performance:
The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an offeror’s recent and relevant Past Performance. Offerors may provide information for up to three (3) previous Government contracts where the effort is/was recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. If the offeror has not had three (3) Government contracts within the last three (3) years, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or recent and relevant commercial contracts may be submitted.
a. “Recent” is defined as a contract in progress or completed within the last three (3) years.
b. “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements of this solicitation.
i. Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the WI package.
ii. Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the WI package.
iii. Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the WI package. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).
A Past Performance Data Sheet (Attachment J-12) shall be submitted for each contract to be considered as past performance. Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation; a detailed description of the work performed for the contract; and the role performed, including whether the offeror acted as a prime contractor or a subcontractor. Offerors are responsible for the accuracy of all data provided. Past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement may be provided as past performance submissions.
For each of the contracts the offeror describes in a Past Performance Data Sheet (Attachment J-12), the offeror is requested to provide a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment J-13) to a reference at the organization that awarded the contract. The reference, not the offeror, shall email the completed Past Performance Questionnaire, BEFORE THE DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS, directly to Colin Edick at colin.j.edick.civ@us.navy.mil. Hard copy and fax submittals will not be considered. If the contracts listed in Attachment J-12 are available in a Government past performance system (i.e. CPARS, FAPIIS, ESRS) for Government review, Attachment J-13 is not required. The offeror, NOT THE GOVERNMENT, is responsible for ensuring the Government receives completed Past Performance Questionnaires.
2) Volume II – Technical Proposal.
a) The technical proposal will be the basis for assessing the offeror’s ability to understand and perform the tasks in the solicitation. Section M of the solicitation outlines the evaluation factors and defines the source selection evaluation criteria for evaluating the technical proposal. A legible, neat, orderly, and comprehensive proposal is required. Data should be presented in Evaluation Factor sequence (1.0-3.0) and paragraph numbering in the proposal submitted should coincide with the numbering system set forth in Section M. Failure to respond to any one of the evaluation factors may result in disqualification of the proposal.
b) The technical proposal must demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to meet all of the requirements covered in the specification. The proposal should be sufficiently complete to demonstrate how the offeror will comply with Government directions and requirements throughout the performance period. Data previously submitted, or presumed to be known, i.e., descriptions of previous projects performed for the Government, cannot be considered as a part of the proposal unless physically incorporated into the proposal.
c) All information must be presented in sufficient depth for the Government to make a comprehensive evaluation of the offeror’s understanding of the work package and of the offeror’s capability to successfully perform the work package.
d) The proposal should demonstrate this understanding and capability in a concise, logical manner and should not contain superfluous material not directly related to the solicitation.
3. SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION. Offerors may use the RFC, provided in attachment J-8, to request clarification of any WI specification or contract term. No verbal requests for information will be accepted. Offerors’ questions must be submitted via email to colin.j.edick.civ@us.navy.mil. All requests for specification clarification must be received by MSC Norfolk no later than 02:00 PM EST on 17 August 2021.
4. NOTICE TO OFFERORS.
a. Proposals will be received by the KO at the hour and date specified in the solicitation for the performance of the work specified in the solicitation and IAW the terms of the Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels, as amended through the date of this solicitation.
b. Any drawings and specifications referenced in this solicitation are an integral part of the solicitation.
c. The work shall be completed on or before close of business on the completion date of the period indicated in Sections C.
d. Liquidated damages as specified in Section I shall be payable by the contractor to the Government IAW FAR 52.211-11.
e. In submitting a solicitation response for Ship Repair, a vendor must cite the above solicitation number and each amendment thereto, if any, and must respond to each certification in this solicitation.
f. The Government cannot guarantee that an application for a security clearance (if required) can be processed in the time between the solicitation closing and the time of award.
(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .