J - 13 Past Performance Questionnaire - 20-R-4037.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS MIGUEL KEITH PSA
Solicitation number
N3220520R4037
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on a solicitation from the Military Sealift Command. The solicitation seeks proposals for a post award shakedown availability on the USNS MIGUEL KEITH, a T-ESB class ship, to take place for 120 calendar days starting on or around August 3, 2020. Interested contractors must complete a non-disclosure agreement to receive drawings, references and a work item package. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and comments on a contractor's previous performance in areas such as quality, timeliness, business relations, personnel and cost controls. It must be completed and returned by March 6, 2020 to be considered in evaluating proposals for this solicitation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP QandA 8 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
RFP QandA 9 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4037-0007.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy for Amendment 0007.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy of Solicitation-0006.docx DOCX document
Amendment N3220520R4037-0006.docx DOCX document
Amendment N3220520R4037-005.docx DOCX document
Revised J-4 Government Furnished Property (UPDATED 9 MARCH 2020).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3rd Revised J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4037.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP QandA 4 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
RFP QandA 5 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy of Solicitation.docx DOCX document
Revised J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4037.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220520R4037-0004.docx DOCX document
RFP QandA 3 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
J - 4 Gvt Furnished Property_25JAN2020_PMS385 Update_14Feb.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Revised J - 3 Category B Items - 20-R-4037.xls XLS spreadsheet
Confirm Copy Amendment Solicitation 003.docx DOCX document
RFP QandA #1 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4037-0003.docx DOCX document
RFP QandA #2 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
Amendment N3220520R4037-0002.docx DOCX document
Amendment N3220520R4037-0001.docx DOCX document
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-017.pdf PDF
MK J&A 4037_Redacted.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-025.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-004.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-012.pdf PDF
MK Solicitation N3220520R4037.docx DOCX document
J - 12 Past Performance Data - 20-R-4037.doc DOC document
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-021.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-006.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-001.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-016.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-020.pdf PDF
J - 3 Category B Items - 20-R-4037.xls XLS spreadsheet
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-022.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-015.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-007.pdf PDF
J - 7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey - 20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-023.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-014.pdf PDF
J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form - 20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-019.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-003.pdf PDF
J - 8 Request for Spec Clarification - 20-R-4037.doc DOC document
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - 20-R-4037.doc DOC document
J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure - 20-R-4037.docx DOCX document
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-024.pdf PDF
DD Form 1423-1 SWI-002.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 58 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, March 6, 2020 at 2:00 pm E.T. to Mr. Samuel Queen. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Mr. Queen at Samuel.queen@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Samuel Queen
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Mr. Samuel Queen

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Mr. Samuel Queen
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443-5813
(E-mail Address)samuel.queen@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .