Q_3_Response.pdf
PDF 72 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2015 MTA on USNS YUKON
- Solicitation number
- N32205-15-R-1000
About this file
Response to Question 3
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| J-10_Interport_Differential_Revised.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment_0002_USNS_YUKON.doc | DOC document | |
| Q_4_Response.pdf | ||
| Q_1_Response.pdf | ||
| Q_2_Response.pdf | ||
| Q_5_Response.pdf | ||
| N32205-15-R-1000-0001_AMENDMENT.pdf | ||
| J-14_NON_DISCLOSRE_AGREEMENT_FOR_GOVN'T_TECHNICAL_DATA_(V1.1 _2-27-14).docx | DOCX document | |
| J-9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.doc | DOC document | |
| J-12 Past Performance Data.docx | DOCX document | |
| N104-15-R-1000_J A_Redacted.pdf | ||
| J-10 Interport Differential.doc | DOC document | |
| N32205-15-R-1000_SOLICITATION.pdf | ||
| J-3 Category B Items.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| J-13__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| J-8 Request for Spec Clarification.doc | DOC document | |
| J-6 WI 015 CDRL.pdf | ||
| J-4 GFP - YUKON.pdf | ||
| J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.doc | DOC document |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N32205-15-R-1000
USNS YUKON (T-AO 202)
ATTACHMENT J - 8
REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION
11/12/14
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
SPECIFICATION ITEM NO.: 201
PARAGRAPH / SECTION NO: 7.2.8
TITLE: PORT AND STBD MAIN ENGINE 72,000 HOUR OVERHAUL
QUESTION:
Paragraph 7.2.8 – I, Requires ultrasonic testing of head studs, but these are renewed in para 7.2.3.
Paragraph 7.2.8 – F. OEM contractor states that this paragraph has an unquantifiable amount of machining required and is requesting that this effort be assessed, defined and submitted on a condition found report.
Please clarify.
ANSWER:
1. Until MSC issues a C/O to delete para 7.2.8 the contractor is responsible to accomplish this work.
2. The contractor should estimate accomplishing this work per the spec with the understanding that MSC will discuss with the MFG tech rep what is considered reasonable machining for this type of work.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .