Section_L_-_Instructions,_Conditions_and_Notices_to_Bidders.docx

DOCX document 65 KB Posted

Attached to
AIR-4. 11 Special Operations Forces Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (SOF C5ISR)
Solicitation number
N00421-17-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

This document provides draft elements for a proposed solicitation seeking system engineering services to support Special Operations Forces Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Combat Systems, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance systems. The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division Special Communications Mission Solutions Division intends to issue solicitation N00421-17-R-0003 to obtain expertise in Special Operations and C5ISR to rapidly develop, employ, and support capabilities for Special Operations Forces' global war on terror mission. Services include requirements definition, solution definition, integration, installation verification and validation, and operation and sustainment across systems' lifecycles. Tasks may involve new systems, upgrades to existing systems, and leveraging legacy, current and emerging technologies. Performance will primarily occur in the continental United States but some tasks require travel outside the US. The document requests industry feedback on the draft elements by February 7, 2018 and specifies submission to the identified contracting staff. It provides background on the Special Communications Mission Solutions Division and types of Special Operations Forces unique C5ISR systems supported.

N00421-17-R-0003 SOF DRAFT ELEMENT Section L: Instructions, Conditions and Notices

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N00421-17-R-0003_Amendment_0002_SOF_C5ISR.docx DOCX document
N00421-17-R-0003_Amendment_0001_SOF_C5ISR.docx DOCX document
Revised_Attachment_P8_Labor_Categories_Hours.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P3_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00421-17-R-0003_SOF_C5ISR.docx DOCX document
Attachment_16_ACOR_Designation_Ltr.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_RDTE_SOP_SCMS.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_FinancialProgressReportFormat.docx DOCX document
Exhibit_A_CDRLS_16_Nov_17.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P8_Labor_Categores-Hours_by_Locations.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_P2_Contractor_Performance_Assessment_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_P1_Past_Performance_Information_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_ElectronicTransferExpensesInstructions-Format.docx DOCX document
Attachment_14_OCI_List.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_TaskOrderClose-Out.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_List_of_Key_Personnel.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P4_Reserved_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_SegofCostsFormat.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_QASP_CSP.docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_Wage_Determinations.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P5_Reserved_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment_8_DataItemTransmittalForm.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_WorkforceReportingTemplate.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_10_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.docx DOCX document
Attachment_15_COR_Designation_Ltr.docx DOCX document
Attachment_12_List_of_Approved_Subcontractors.docx DOCX document
Attachment_P6_Cost_Summary_Spreadsheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_P7_Reserved_3.docx DOCX document
Section_M_-_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.docx DOCX document
Section_B_-_Supplies_or_Services_and_Prices.docx DOCX document
Section_C_-_Descriptions_and_Specifications.docx DOCX document
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Bidders

CONTENT OF PROPOSALS

L – 1 CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (SERVICES) (Nov 2017)

PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 GENERAL

The Offeror must respond to all requirements of the solicitation and not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The Offeror is advised that the Government may incorporate any portions of the Offeror’s proposal into the resulting contract.

In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization shall be emphasized during proposal preparation. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can comply with, or will comply with, the specifications, and paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information are considered inadequate by the Government, and may result in assessing weaknesses and/or deficiencies.

The Offeror must include any data that illustrates the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. Failure to address a specific factor or subfactor clearly may be considered a deficiency. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation materials beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.

The Government advises the Offeror that taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the RFP may result in the assessment of a deficiency to the proposal.

Throughout these instructions, a “principal subcontractor” is defined as a subcontractor who provides at least 20% of the proposed total price/cost (excluding the Offeror’s profit/fee), for the contract or provides one or more Key Personnel. “JV Team member” is defined as one of the entities that make up a joint venture (JV) formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation.

Questions: Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements by emailing the contract specialist at tyler.m.summers@navy.mil AND the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at Kristen.Ferro@navy.mil. It is required that all questions be received within 10 calendar days of the date this solicitation is issued. Questions received after this time period may not be answered prior to the submission deadline.

2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12 pt Normal font (no reduction permitted), single-spaced with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper. All pages should be numbered with section and page numbers. When foldout pages are used they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11 inch standard size and will count as 1 page. Graphs and tables shall be presented in no smaller than a 10 pt font and should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph. Graphic resolution, including such data as tables or charts, should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented.

The Offeror shall provide one complete copy of the proposal to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) as electronic files fully compatible with Microsoft 2010 and for information not supported by MS Office products, with the latest Adobe Acrobat reader on a CD-ROM. The Offeror shall ensure that the Price/Cost Volume is provided on a separate CD-ROM. Each CD-ROM is to be labeled for content and the Offeror’s name. If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the disk copy, the paper copy will take precedence.

3.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES

The Offeror shall present proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one-to-one comparison between the information presented and this Proposal Instruction. Proposal information must be structured such that its Volume/paragraph number matches the Proposal Instructions Volume/paragraph number provided in section “Part B Specific Instructions” to which it is responding, although the Offeror may add lower tier subparagraphs. The Offeror must provide reasons it will not provide information for a particular paragraph. The proposal information instructions are structured by paragraph numbers where first, second, third, and fourth parts correspond to the volume, section, and element, etc., in the Offeror’s proposal.

Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted as one original and additional copies as specified in the table below. The table below supersedes the copies requested in Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF) 33. All volumes of the original proposal shall be delivered to the address provided in Section 4.0 prior to the closing date/time stated in this solicitation. Page recommendations for each volume, if any, are also specified in the table below; title and table of contents pages do not count towards the page limit.

Information submitted as an Annex to the proposal includes manuals, specifications, plans, procedures, and policies that exist as an official document of the company or facility, as well as other information requested in Part B Specific Instructions. Page recommendations for Annexes, if any, are specified below. The authorized Annexes are summarized in the table below.

Volume Number
Volume Title
Page Recommendation
Copies Required
1
TECHNICAL

1 Original;

3 Paper Copies;

1 Electronic Copy

1.1
Understanding of the Work/Sample Task
10 pages for each task
1.2
Workforce/Personnel Qualifications/Key Personnel
2 pages per resume
1.3
Management Plan
20 pages
2
PAST PERFORMANCE
15 pages
1 Original;

3 Paper Copies;

1 Electronic Copy

3
PRICE/COST
No page recommendation
1 Original;

1 Paper Copy;

1 Electronic Copy

Annex 1
Past Performance Supporting Documents
No page recommendation
1 Original;

1 Paper Copy;

1 Electronic Copy

Each volume shall contain the following information:

-Cover and title page
-Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable
-Offeror’s name, address, and POC
-RFP number
-Proposal volume number
-Copy number
-Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements)
-Use tabs and dividers

The Offeror shall submit a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below, to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the evaluators’ review of the Offeror’s proposal. The CRM should be a single integrated matrix and cross-reference the proposal volumes and paragraphs to specific RFP requirements, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. The Offeror’s CRM may be identical to the example below or revised such as to add columns to indicate the page number on which information may be found, identify where other relevant information in the proposal is located, or provide other comments. The CRM does not count against any of the proposal page recommendations.

EXAMPLE OF A CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX (CRM)

Section L – Proposal Instructions
Government SOW/PWS
Section M – Evaluation Factor
Offeror’s Proposal Reference
CLIN Reference

Volume 1 Technical Example: Section L, Para 1.1 Note: This column shall address all subparagraphs.

2.A
Provide reference to Offeror’s Proposal Volume I – Technical. Example: Refer to appropriate page number in Offeror’s written proposal

Volume 1 Technical

Volume 1 Technical

4.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number. The submission date for all Volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in Block 9 of the SF 33 of the RFP.

Offeror shall submit proposals via United States Postal Service or through a commercial carrier. Proposals hand carried or sent via Commercial methods shall be delivered, attention Kristen Ferro and/or Tyler Summers to the address below:

Naval Air Warfare Center-Aircraft Division Code: AIR-2.5.1.2.11 (Tyler Summers) 47060 Liljencrantz Road, Building 433 Patuxent River, MD 20670 Solicitation Number: N00421-17-R-0003

Proposals submitted via USPS shall be delivered, attention Kristen Ferro and/or Tyler Summers, to :

Naval Air Warfare Center-Aircraft Division Code: AIR-2.5.1.2.3 (Tyler Summers) 21983 Bundy Road, Building 441 Patuxent River, MD 20670 Solicitation Number: N00421-17-R-0003

Offeror shall not submit proposals by facsimile or electronically via email.

5.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING:

The Offeror shall package the proposal volumes in cartons or equivalent packaging containers in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each container shall be single person portable. One container shall include all Original Proposal volumes including the original/signed documents submitted as part of Volume 3 Cost/Price.

Each box should include a packing slip detailing the contents to include the volume number, title, and copy number. Also, each box should be stamped or marked “For Official Use Only” and “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.”

6.0 CLASSIFIED DATA

All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED.

7.0 SOLICITATION CHANGES

For notice of any changes and additional information provided by the Government for the solicitation, please go to www.FedBizOpps.gov.

PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

Cost or pricing information shall only appear in the Price/Cost volume.

1.0 VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL

The Offeror shall provide all information and data required to conduct a thorough and complete technical evaluation. The Offeror shall address the following in the proposal:

1.1 Understand of the Work/Sample Task

1.1.1 ORGANIZATION OVERVIEW

The Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) Special Communications Missions Solutions (SCMS) Division operates as an organic lead systems integrator. As such the daily interactions between SCMS and its contracted vendor rely on open and frequent communications between the vendor and the individual Government Project Lead (GPL) assigned to complete the work. The nature of the SCMS customers and the speed of technology dictate an evolutionary approach to system requirements definition, solution definition, fabrication and installation. The typical cycle for an SCMS project is 6 to 24 months which demands a highly tailored acquisition and implementation approach. The final product in any effort will result from an iterative approach involving updates to user requirements, material solutions and support requirements. This sample task is to be approached from the perspective that the vendor has a very active role supporting the government in the development of documentation. The vendor will be relied upon to provide reliable, accurate and timely documentation and the workforce to conduct the physical labor. The GPL will be responsible for final decisions and for collaborating with vendor and customer prior to approving work to commence and/or continue. The goal of this sample task is to determine that a vendor has skillsets in the domains identified by the PWS/SOW and understands the SCMS/vendor/customer paradigm, as well as the compressed and tailored approach required.

1.1.2 SCENARIO BACKGROUND

Details to be released in the final RFP.

1.2 Workforce/Personnel Qualifications/Key Personnel

1.2.1 The Offeror shall propose personnel that meet all labor category requirements. Personnel must also have the required minimum level of security clearance as outlined within the solicitation. The offeror shall submit a statement agreeing that all personnel requirements, inclusive of non-key personnel, shall be met throughout contract performance.

1.2.2 The following definitions apply: A “contingent hire” is an individual who has committed, under a signed letter of intent (LOI), to being employed by the offeror with a stated salary, if the offeror is awarded the contract. A “prospective hire” is an individual that the offeror has committed to hiring if the offeror is awarded the contract whose identity may not be known until after award.

1.2.3 Labor Category Information. The offeror shall propose in accordance with the labor categories and minimum labor qualifications provided in the SOW.

1.2.4 Key Personnel Resumes

1.2.4.1 For all proposed current or contingent Key Personnel, provide a resume of the work assignments, training, etc., that demonstrates the experience and specialized qualifications of each key person proposed. Resumes shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:

· Employee name

· Years of employment experience in chronological order including narrative description of duties and responsibilities

· Current position, title and employer

· Educational history

· Institution name, degree or certification earned, and year for all degrees or certifications earned

· Current level of security clearance and status (final, interim, or pending)

1.2.4.2 The Government may check educational background to verify degrees or certifications received.

1.2.4.3 If the qualification (i.e. education, experience) does not readily or easily compare to the minimum qualification stated in the SOW/PWS, the offeror shall provide an explanation as to the equality of the proposed qualification to meet the minimum qualification.

1.3 Management Plan

The offeror’s management plan shall address the following:

1.3.1 Management Approach: Offerors shall address in sufficient detail the following:

1.3.1.1 Adequacy of corporate management and resources to support the technical requirements of the solicitation.

1.3.1.2 Proposed management roles of the Offeror’s proposed workforce and the lines of responsibility, authority, and communication through which the tasks will be managed for this requirement;

1.3.1.3 Procedures to be taken to ensure quality and cost control;

1.3.1.4 Plan for early identification and resolution of problems;

1.3.1.5 Identification of potential performance risks and proposed risk mitigation strategies;

1.3.1.6 Subcontract Management detailing how each subcontractor will be integrated and managed to ensure cohesive integration into the overall management approach; and

1.3.1.7 Qualification/recruitment/retention plan and procedures that demonstrate how the Offeror will meet the minimum requirements of the SOW/PWS.

1.3.2 Transition Plan – The Government anticipates a 30 day transition period. The Offeror’s transition plan shall include a written narrative delineating a transition plan that ensures a smooth workplace turnover at the beginning of this contract with no break in services and minimal loss of corporate knowledge. The plan should take into consideration the following elements as well as any additional elements deemed necessary by the Offeror:

(a) Work Turnover.

(b) Quality Assurance

(c) Training

(d) Risk Mitigation strategies

(e) Security Requirement to include OPSEC, facility clearances, and base access

(f) Data Transfer

1.3.3 Small Business Utilization Strategy:

1.3.3.1 Small Business (SB) Utilization Strategy: The Small Business Utilization Strategy shall be submitted as Annex 2. All Offerors shall describe their strategies for utilizing SB Concerns in the performance of this contract, whether as a JV, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor to achieve a Government established Small Business Participation goal of no less than 23% of the total contract value.

Small business offerors should include themselves in addressing their strategies. Although the aforementioned stated goal represents the Small Business category, offerors shall include goals for not only Small Business, but also for Small Disadvantaged Business, Veteran-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, and Women-Owned Small Business.

All goals shall be presented in both dollars and percentages in relation to total contract value. This strategy is separate from, but shall be consistent with, the SB Subcontracting Plan, if such a Plan is required.

1.3.3.2 SB Subcontracting Plans: The Large Business Offeror shall provide its SB Subcontracting Plan conforming to the requirements of FAR 19.7 and DFARS 219.7 as Annex 3, unless there is an already approved comprehensive SB Plan. The Subcontracting Plan of the successful Offeror(s) will be reviewed and approved by the PCO prior to contract award. See FAR 19.702(a) (1) Statutory Requirements, regarding failure of the apparent successful Offeror to negotiate and submit a Subcontracting Plan acceptable to the Contracting Officer. The successful Offeror’s approved Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into the resultant contract.

2.0 VOLUME 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

2.1 Sources of past performance evaluation information include information provided by the Offeror in response to the solicitation, information obtained from questionnaires, and any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information Systems, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System, or other databases; the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

2.2 The Offeror shall complete the Past Performance Information Form, Attachment P1, for each past performance reference performed within five years of the solicitation release date. The Offeror shall submit no more than five Past Performance Information Forms as the Prime Contractor, no more than two forms for each principal subcontractor, and/or no more than two forms for each JV team member. The Offeror shall submit written consent from its principal subcontractor(s) and JV team member(s) that will allow the Government to coordinate any past performance issues directly with the Offeror. If the Offeror does not submit the written consent, the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal subcontractor or JV Team member and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any principal subcontractor and JV team member that does not provide the written consent, the Offeror shall provide the name, address, phone number, and email address with whom the Government may address any past performance issues.

2.3 The Offeror shall provide a narrative on each Past Performance Information form in the “Contract Effort Description” area that clearly describes how each contract reference has relevant work effort that matches the relevancy definitions specified in Section M of the solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide one electronic copy of the Statement of Work/Performance Work Statement for each contract reference as Annex 1 to this Past Performance Volume.

2.4 The primary source of past performance information will be PPIRS. If a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) exists for multiple years for the same contract/order, all periods of performance within the recency period specified above, for that contract/order, will be used for evaluation.

In the event a CPAR does not exist for a past performance reference, the Offeror shall submit a Contractor Performance Assessment Questionnaire (CPAQ), Attachment P2, to the Program Manager who is the Assessing Official. The Offeror shall include instructions for the Program Manager to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of its receipt via e-mail toTyler Summers, Contract Specialist, at Email tyler.m.summers@navy.mil, thereby allowing the customer approximately two weeks to complete their response. All CPAQs should be received by the Government concurrently with the Offeror’s proposal submission.

3.0 VOLUME 3: PRICE/COST PROPOSAL

3.1 Volume Content:

(a) This Volume shall contain the Contract Compliance information specified below as follows:

i. Offeror Summary Table: The Offeror shall complete the table below. The Offeror shall include all subcontractors and JV team members who will be involved with the performance of the contract and list all sites where the work will be performed. If a JV teaming or subcontracting arrangement is proposed, identify the work share, distribution elements, and ratios that each contractor will perform using the table below. Also provide a definition of the legal relationship between the entities if it is other than a Prime/subcontractor relationship.

Contractor Name (Indicate Prime, JV Team Member, or Sub) Proposed Contract Type

Place of Performance/
CAGE CODE/DUNS #
Brief Work Description and/or Program Responsibility
% of Total Proposed Price
ii. For each subcontractor, list the type of subcontract, i.e. cost plus fixed fee, firm fixed price, labor hour, time & material;
iii.Signed SF33 or SF1449 for basic solicitation and acknowledgment of each amendment, including completion of any RFP clause or provision that requires a fill-in or response.
iv. Signed Representations, Certifications, and Acknowledgements and/or System for Award Management (SAM).
v. Guarantee the length of proposal validity (for at least 180 days after proposal submission).

(b) This Volume shall also contain a copy of Section B with the Contract Line Item (CLIN) and Sub-CLIN Unit Prices and, for evaluation purposes, the Total Prices filled in using the estimated quantities value in the solicitation and the instructions below. Section B prices shall be provided separately in one digital data copy in MS Office 2010 Excel format on CD-ROM media. Within all Excel spreadsheets, the Offeror shall use formulas and functions to the maximum extent possible and avoid using output type “value only” cells. If links are utilized, supply those referenced files. Spreadsheets shall not be protected (only required from Prime contractor).

(c) All price/cost and price/cost supporting information shall be contained in Section B and the price/cost proposal and applicable Annexes. No price or pricing information shall be included in any other technical volume including cover letters. Offeror are responsible for submitting sufficient information to enable the Government to fully evaluate their price/cost proposal.

3.2 Ground Rules and Assumptions:

3.2.1 As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate price competition anticipated, certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1 is not required. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from both the Offeror and subcontractors. Further, the Offeror may be required to provide a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to FAR 15.406-2.

3.2.2 The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its price/cost as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price/cost estimates.

3.2.3 If subcontractors are proposed, they shall provide the same information required for the prime contractor, unless otherwise noted below.

3.3 Price/Cost Information:

3.3.1 Offerors shall submit their fully completed cost/price proposal utilizing the Cost Summary Format (Attachment P6). The spreadsheet shall be formatted on letter size (8.5 X 11) paper and shall be unprotected and unlocked, with formulae intact to show mathematical operations. The Offeror shall use the CLIN Summary tab to break out total proposed costs by CLIN.

3.3.2 Complete Attachment P3, (Fully Burdened Labor Rates), detailing the fully burdened labor rates for all prime contractors and their subcontractor personnel. Fully burdened labor rates are defined as direct labor rates plus all applicable burdens, to include indirect rates, fee, and subcontractor pass-through costs where applicable. For subcontractor labor, the fully burdened labor rates shall be inclusive of any pass-through charges (e.g., subcontractor handling, fixed fee on subcontractor labor, etc.) applied by the prime contractor. Proposed fully burdened labor costs may be subject to the NAVAIR labor tripwire identified in Section M. Offerors that propose a fully burdened per employee labor cost exceeding the labor tripwire shall provide rationale in their cost proposal narrative section that justifies the reasonableness of the tripwire cost for the applicable employees.

3.3.3 Reasonableness and Consistency between the Technical and Price/Cost Volumes. Demonstrate that the unit prices and the total proposed price/cost are reasonable, realistic, and commensurate with the work required by the solicitation and the technical and management approaches identified in the Technical Volume of the proposal. Show traceability with the CLINs, SubCLINs, PWS, proposed effort, proposed manning levels, and prices/costs. Refer to specific sections in the Technical Volume as needed to illustrate the consistency between the Price/Cost Volume and the Technical Volume. The Offeror shall explain any inconsistency between promised performance and price/cost, as well as any appearance of unbalanced pricing, in the proposal.

3.3.4 The Government is not soliciting any investments. However, in order for the Government to properly assess a proposed price/cost that appears low due to a corporate decision to absorb costs, e.g., lower than usual burdens or rates, the Offeror shall fully identify and explain any such investments.

3.3.5 Direct/Indirect Rates: The Offeror shall submit Forward Pricing Rate Agreements (FPRAs), Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs), and Area Wage Determinations (AWDs) as applicable for all proposed personnel. The Offeror shall identify whether the labor rates proposed are FPRAs, CBAs, AWDs, ACO/DCAA recommended rates (FPRRs), or Offeror proposed rates (FPRPs). The Offeror shall propose in compliance with the current hourly rate set forth in the Department of Labor Wage Determination as applicable. The Offeror shall provide Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Information/Payroll Verification information as follows: A DCAA point of contact, with a current e-mail address, must be provided for the prime and each subcontractor. The Offeror and proposed subcontractors shall provide the most current DCAA Provisional Billing Rate Approval Letter, DCAA Final Billing Rate Approval Letter, and/or DCAA Forward Pricing Rate Agreement recommendation, payroll verification for currently employed proposed personnel, and any other information necessary to substantiate the rates proposed. Payroll verification shall consist of a form containing the title, direct labor rate, and a signed certification by an authorized representative of the company that the information contained in the form is correct. For key personnel contingent hires, the offeror shall provide contingent offer letters outlining salary information for contingent hire employees. For any prospective hires for non-key personnel, provide information to substantiate the rates proposed. All contingent hires shall have a letter of intent submitted under the Cost Volume. The letter of intent is a separate written agreement signed by the potential employee(s) to work for the Offeror effective at contract award. Any proposed consultants shall have a consultant agreement substantiating the rates proposed. If a composite rate or other pricing methodology (e.g. cost estimating relationships) is utilized, the Offeror shall demonstrate how those rates were developed. Subcontractors and team members with cost type subcontracts shall provide this information either separately or included in the Offeror’s submission of this document.

3.3.6 If any of the rates utilized by the Offeror or any subcontractors differ from the DCAA information and/or payroll verification, a justification shall be provided for the difference. If DCAA has not reviewed the rate information for an Offeror or one of its subcontractors, the Offeror must submit a detailed justification of the proposed direct and indirect rates. The Offeror shall also provide documentation verifying that it has a DCMA approved Accounting System in accordance with DFARS clause 252.242-7006, or state that its Accounting System has not been approved by DCMA. Offerors shall provide the last three (3) years of actual indirect information. The Government may compare a prospective Offeror’s labor category rate to the average labor rate from industry.

3.3.7 Except for FFP type of CLINs (e.g., CPFF, CPIF, or CPAF) under the solicitation, the Offeror shall fully disclose the buildup of cost/price of each CLIN.

3.3.8 When completing the Cost Summary Spreadsheet (Attachment P6), the Offeror shall not utilize any fully burdened hourly rates when pricing the labor of its employees.

3.3.9 Offeror's labor classifications should cross-reference to Department of Labor (DOL) wage determination classifications as much as possible.

3.3.10 This solicitation is, and the resulting contract will be, subject to the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended, and to FAR clause 52.222-41, contained in Section I of this solicitation. Offerors shall propose employee’s wages in accordance with the attached Wage Determination. As part of the cost/price proposal, the Offeror shall furnish the names of the proposed labor categories and the corresponding labor categories from the attached Wage Determination as well as documentation of compliance with the minimum monetary wages and fringe benefits for service employees as specified in the Wage Determination (provided as an attachment in Section J of this solicitation). Offerors are required to submit a total compensation plan setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for employees (including temporary and part time employees) who will work under the contract and are subject to the Act, and explain how the compensation plan complies with the Service Contract Act. Offerors are reminded that in accordance with FAR clause 52.222-43, proposals shall not include any allowance for any contingency to cover increased costs for which adjustment is provided under this clause.

If the Offeror’s proposed employees are under a collective bargaining agreement, the Offeror shall provide a copy of the agreement.

3.3.11 Provide a narrative that addresses any assumptions made during the preparation of the cost/price proposal and discuss the basis for the cost elements listed below:

3.3.11.1 Direct labor rates by category. The Offeror is required to submit labor rates for all proposed current, contingent, and prospective hire individuals. If composite or category averages are proposed, provide a breakdown of how rates are developed. If necessary provide a narrative to describe derivation of labor rates, use of uncompensated overtime, pools to which indirect rates are applied, historical /provisional billing rates for indirect rates for the last 3 years and description, and amount of proposed other direct costs. If the Offeror requires the use of consultants in performance of the effort, the consultant cost shall be captured under the appropriate labor CLIN not the ODCs CLIN.

3.3.11.2 Escalation on labor. Offerors, including subcontractors, shall address escalation for all Non-SCA labor categories, and shall provide rationale for the specific escalation rate used. Offerors that do not include escalation, or an explanation as to why it is not included, may be considered unrealistically low and may have their proposals adjusted by the Government to include escalation in the option periods.

3.3.11.3 Indirect costs (e.g., Overhead, Fringe Benefits, General & Administrative (G&A), etc.)

3.3.11.4 Information needed to explain the offeror’s estimating practices.

3.3.11.5 Profit/Fee: Identify profit/fee rate and total amounts proposed and identify the various cost elements to which the profit/fee is being applied. Profit, Base, Award, and Incentive fee rates, as applicable in Section B, must be clearly distinguishable. Profit/Fee shall not be applied to ODCs.

3.3.11.6 Other Direct Costs (ODCs) by specific cost element (e.g., Travel, Material, and NMCI). Reimbursement for Travel will be in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. If the Offeror proposes burdens on the Government provided ODC estimates, the Offeror shall provide a percentage breakdown of the Offeror’s indirect costs and burdens added to the Government estimates for any and all Cost Reimbursable CLINs in Section B.

3.3.11.7 When the Offeror elects to claim Cost of Money (COM) as an allowable cost, the Offeror must submit a COM form and show the calculations of the proposed amount.

3.4 Total Professional Compensation Plan:

3.4.1 The Offeror shall provide a Total Compensation Plan in accordance with FAR 52.222-46 for each proposed professional employee. The Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:

(1) The proposed direct labor rate for each professional employee proposed;

(2) The total cost of the proposed fringe benefits package for each professional employee proposed, including:

a) list and brief summary of the benefits that make up the fringe package (e.g., vacation time, sick leave, stock, incentive plans, family leave, life insurance, severance pay, bonus plans, health insurance, holidays, location allowance, retirement benefits); and

b) an itemization of the benefits that require employee contributions, and the amount of that contribution as a percentage of the cost of the particular benefit; and

(3) Data, such as recognized national and regional compensation surveys and studies of professional, public and private organizations, used by the Offeror in establishing the total compensation structure.

3.5 Government Furnished Information:

3.5.1 ODCs

The Government's estimate for ODCs for the prime and all subcontract efforts, unburdened is listed below:

Ordering Period Year
Travel
Material
Total ODCs
Year 1
$ 738,652
$ 2,954,607
$ 3,693,259
Year 2
$ 755,244
$ 3,020,974
$ 3,776,217
Year 3
$ 772,331
$ 3,089,324
$ 3,861,656
Year 4
$ 789,928
$ 3,159,711
$ 3,949,639
Year 5
$ 807,013
$ 3,228,053
$ 4,035,067
Total
$ 3,863,168
$ 15,452,670
$ 19,315,838

The Offeror shall utilize the above ODC estimates provided by the government for ODCs. If it is the Offeror’s accounting practice to apply (and invoice for) burdens with regards to ODCs, then the Offeror shall propose the ODC amount plus the addition of the applicable burdens. If the Offeror chooses not to burden ODCs, then the Offeror shall propose an H-clause to identify this special term and condition. (NO FEE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ODCs).

3.5.2 Labor Hours

The Government estimate is 898,320 hours for the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) work effort, inclusive of options. A work-year is defined as 1920 hours exclusive of holidays and leave. The estimated hours shall be used for pricing and setting ceiling at the basic contract level for the Labor CLINs. The labor may be performance based or non-performance based. For proposal purposes, the Offeror shall propose the labor categories/hours by location as outlined in Section J, Attachment P8.

3.5.3 Firm Fixed Price

The Government has estimated that $3,897,796 will be Firm Fixed Price. The Offeror shall use $3,897,796 as the pricing for the Firm Fixed Price portion of this effort.

3.5.4 Incumbent Information

This requirement is for a new contract, therefore there is no incumbent contractor..

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7
System for Award Management
OCT 2016
52.204-16
Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting
JUL 2016
52.204-18
Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance
JUL 2016
52.211-2
Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions Listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)
APR 2014
52.214-34
Submission Of Offers In The English Language
APR 1991
52.214-35
Submission Of Offers In U.S. Currency
APR 1991
52.215-1
Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition
JAN 2017
52.215-16
Facilities Capital Cost of Money
JUN 2003
52.215-20
Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data
OCT 2010
52.215-22
Limitations on Pass-Through Charges--Identification of Subcontract Effort
OCT 2009
52.222-24
Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation
FEB 1999
52.222-46
Evaluation Of Compensation For Professional Employees
FEB 1993
52.232-28
Invitation to Propose Performance-Based Payments
MAR 2000
52.237-1
Site Visit
APR 1984
52.237-10
Identification of Uncompensated Overtime
MAR 2015
252.215-7008
Only One Offer
OCT 2013

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-14 NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE USE (APR 2008)

Any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation will be [ ] DX rated order; [ X ] DO rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) (15 CFR 700), and the Contractor will be required to follow all of the requirements of this regulation.

52.216-1TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with non-performance and performance-based Cost plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) and Firm Fixed Price (FFP) task orders resulting from this solicitation.
52.233-2SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from Kristen W. Ferro, AIR-2.5.1.2.0, 47060 Liljencrantz Road, Building 433, Patuxent River, MD 20670, kristen.ferro@navy.mil.
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
52.252-1SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/far/ or http://www.farsite.hill.af.mil/.

52.252-5AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)
(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.
(b) The use in this solicitation of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 2) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.
5252.209-9513ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST INSTRUCTIONS (SERVICES) (NAVAIR)(JUN 1993)
(a) In accordance with FAR 9.507-1, the potential conflict of interest for this solicitation in the Contracting Officer's judgment would involve any prime contractor, subcontractor, co-sponsor, parties to a joint venture, consultant or other legal entity (1) who because of activities or relationships is unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the Government, or (2) whose objectivity in performing the contemplated contract work is or might otherwise be impaired, or (3) who has an unfair competitive advantage in regards to [Insert description of weapons system involved and contractor activities that are suspect, i.e., drafting specifications, planning requirements etc.].
(b) This solicitation contains special provision clause in Section H entitled, "Organizational Conflicts of Interest", which is to appear in the awarded contract.
(c) If the offeror has checked Block one of the NAVAIR 5252.209-9511, "Conflicts of Interest Representation" in Section K, indicating a potential conflict exists, the offeror shall in accordance with the 5252.209-9510, "Organizational Conflict of Interest" clause in Section H, disclose any and all information necessary to ascertain whether an organizational conflict of interest does exist, and if so, whether a waiver should be requested.
(d) The offeror shall take all reasonable steps to obtain documentation of organizational conflicts of interest, and shall cooperate fully with the Government in resolving such issues expeditiously.
(e) Along with responses to this solicitation, offerors must either (1) submit the following information concerning any existing or planned contracts with, or interests in, the suppliers and/or equipment identified in Attachment [Insert attachment number]; or (2) state that to the best of the offeror's knowledge no such interest or contract exists:
(1) a description of the conflict of interest (e.g., weapons systems supplier(s), corporate restructuring, first-tier subcontractor(s)) and identity of parties involved;
(2) a description of the work to be performed;
(3) the dollar amount;
(4) the period of performance; and
(5) a description of the contractor's internal controls and planned actions, to avoid any potential organizational conflict of interest.
(f) Documentation referred to above may be submitted in advance of proposal submission but must be submitted no later than the closing date for receipt of offers.
(g) Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest by Offerors.
(1) The offeror agrees to disclose, in writing and prior to the closing date for receipt of offers, any relevant facts pertaining to work previously performed or presently being performed by the offeror under private and Government contracts wherein the subject matter includes systems, components, technology, or services identical or similar to that encompassed by the proposed contract and which might give rise to the appearance of an organizational conflict of interest. Such disclosure should set forth all relevant facts including identification of contracts under which work was or is being performed.
(2) If any of the contracts identified pursuant to subparagraph (g)(1) contain an Organizational Conflict of Interest Provision, the offeror may request a waiver of that provision and propose contractual safeguards or job procedures to mitigate conflicting roles that might produce an Organizational Conflict of Interest.
(3) Any documentation submitted pursuant to this subparagraph shall identify this procurement by IFB/RFP or other appropriate number as a reference and shall be forwarded to:
47060 Liljencrantz Road,
Building 433
Patuxent River, MD 20670
ATTN: Organizational Conflict of Interest Material
(h) The Contracting Officer will determine whether such interests or contracts present potential organizational conflicts of interest that should preclude award to the offeror.
5252.215-9503ANTICIPATED AWARD DATE (NAVAIR)(FEB 1995)
The anticipated award date for this requirement is 4 January 2019. This information is provided for use as a basis for schedules and burden (labor, overheads, G&A, etc.) mid-point calculations.
5252.219-9501LESS THAN FIVE PERCENT SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING GOAL (NAVAIR) (MAR 1999)
Offerors submitting Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plans per FAR Clause 52.219-9, "Small Business Subcontracting Plan" and DFARS Clause 252.219-7003, "Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts)" which reflect a Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) goal of less than five percent shall also provide, as a part of the subcontracting plan submission, those extenuating circumstances of why a five percent SDB goal cannot be proposed.
5252.227-9508QUALIFIED U.S. CONTRACTORS FOR EXPORT-CONTROLLED TECHNICAL DATA (NAVAIR) (APR 1998)
(a) By Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5230.25 (hereinafter referred to as "the Directive"), a program was established to allow Qualified U.S. Contractors to obtain export-controlled technical data under certain conditions. A "Qualified U.S. Contractor" is a private individual or enterprise (hereinafter described as a "U.S. Contractor") that, in accordance with procedures established by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, certifies as a condition of obtaining export-controlled technical data subject to the Directive from the Department of Defense, that:
(1) The individual who will act as recipient of the export-controlled technical data on behalf of the U.S. contractor is a U.S. citizen, or a person admitted lawfully into the United States for permanent residence and is located in the United States;
(2) Such data are needed to bid or perform on a contract with the Department of Defense, or other U.S. Government agency, or for other legitimate business purposes in which the U.S. Contractor is engaged, or plans to engage. The purpose for which the data are needed shall be described sufficiently in such certification to permit an evaluation of whether subsequent requests for data are related properly to such business purpose.
(3) The U.S. Contractor acknowledges its responsibilities under U.S. export control laws and regulations (including the obligation, under certain circumstances to obtain an export license prior to the release of technical data within the United States) and agrees that it will not disseminate any export-controlled technical data subject to the Directive in a manner that would violate applicable export control laws and regulations.
(4) The U.S. Contractor also agrees that, unless dissemination is permitted by the Directive, it will not provide access to export-controlled technical data subject to the Directive to persons other than its employees or persons acting on its behalf, without the permission of the DoD component that provided the technical data.
(5) To the best of its knowledge and belief, the U.S. Contractor knows or no person employed by it, or acting on its behalf, who will have access to such data, who is debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible to perform under U.S. Government contracts; or has violated U.S. export control laws or a certification previously made to the Department of Defense under the provisions of the Directive.
(6) The U.S. contractor itself is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise determined ineligible by any agency of the U.S. Government to perform on U.S. Government contracts, has not been convicted of export control law violations, and has not been disqualified under the provisions of this Directive.
(b) Private individuals or enterprises are certified as Qualified U.S. Contractors by submitting a DD Form 2345 (attached hereto) to Commander, Defense Logistics Information Services (DLIS), Federal Center, Battle Creek, Michigan 49017-3084.
(c) Canadian contractors may be qualified in accordance with the Directive for technical data that do not require a license for export to Canada under section 125.12 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations and section 379.4(d) and 379.5(e) of the Export Administration Regulations, by submitting an equivalent certification to the DLIS.
5252.233-9500PROTEST/APPEAL FILED WITH THE NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVAIR) (MAR 1999)
(a) Agency protests/appeals will be processed in accordance with the procedures established at FAR 33.103. A protest to the Naval Air Systems Command shall be filed with the Contracting Officer whose name and address are shown in FAR Clause 52.233-2, "Service of Protest" of this solicitation.
(b) The protester may request an independent review of the Contracting Officer's decision on the protest by filing a written appeal with:
*The Chief of the Contracting Office DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, ATTN: TRACY MEDFORD, AIR-2.5.1, 21983 Bundy Road, Building 441, Patuxent River, MD 20670.
(c) The appeal must be received by the Chief of the Contracting Office within 10 calendar days after the Contracting Officer's protest decision was issued. The appeal shall include (1) the name, address, and fax and telephone numbers of the appellant; (2) the solicitation or contract number; (3) a detailed statement of the factual grounds for the appeal, to include a description of resulting prejudice to the appellant; (4) copies of relevant documents; (5) a request for an independent review by the Chief of the Contracting Office; (6) a statement as to the form of relief requested; and, (7) all information establishing the timeliness of the appeal.

5252.239-9500 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITIES AND PROCESSES (NAVAIR) (FEB 2001) Technical or Management:

The following information shall be provided by the offeror, team members, and subcontractors at the business unit(s) engaged in the software development of Software Intensive Systems (SIS). SIS is defined as any system where a significant portion or component of the functionality is implemented in software or where software presents the primary technical or programmatic challenge to the system.
(a) Identify the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Capability Maturity Model (CMM) for Software (SW-CMM), Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) or equivalent level of certification obtained through a Software Capability Evaluation or other SEI-approved assessment method.
(b) Demonstrate how this level of certification applies to this solicitation. As a minimum, provide the following information:
(1) Identify the agency/company that performed the Software Capability Evaluation and provide a point of contact’s name, telephone number, and e-mail address.
(2) Identify the date that the certification was obtained.
(3) Identify the projects that were evaluated for the level of certification and demonstrate the degree of relevancy that those projects have to the technical requirements of this solicitation. Include a comparability analysis between the projects being performed when the level of certification was made and those of this solicitation.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .