AIR-6_7_SOW_CHPT_Advanced_Planning_Notice.docx

1.0 SCOPE

1.1 The Industrial and Logistics Maintenance Planning/Sustainment Competency (AIR-6.7) at Cherry Point, NC is responsible for providing acquisition logistics management integration across all Logistics support elements. The acquisition of these services is required in order to ensure consistency in the procurement of logistics support services.

1.2 AIR-6.7 provides the people, skills, knowledge, equipment, tools, facilities, technical data, to establish and maintain policies, processes, and procedures for an integrated Naval Aviation Logistics and Industrial support package. AIR-6.7 is responsible for design interface, industrial and maintenance planning, integrated Warfighter support, training and training support, support equipment management and integration. They integrate Naval Aviation Enterprise (NAE) maintenance and supply functions, and maintenance scheduling and management in accordance with NAE constructs. They provide overarching industrial business operations planning and analysis to ensure continuous logistics engineering services and support from concept refinement and technology development through disposal to ensure maintainability, readiness, supportability, and affordability. These logistics management services apply to all Weapons Systems and Subsystems procured by the Naval Air Systems Command at Cherry Point.

1.3 This Statement of Work (SOW) is intended to provide logistics and technical support services in the areas of planning, analysis, development, training, support equipment management, facilities and execution for AIR-6.7 at Cherry Point, NC.

1.4 The potential customers include, but are not limited to, AIR 6.0 Competency and Business Unit, PEO(A), PEO(T), PEO(U&W), PEO(JSF), and AIR-1.0.

1.5 This SOW is intended to cover full logistics and technical support of AIR-6.7 at Cherry Point. This program utilizes the following types of funding: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, (RT&E), Aircraft Procurement, Navy (APN), Operations and Maintenance and Navy (O&MN).

1.6 Section 3.0 of this Statement of Work defines specific requirements relating to contract performance. Because individual task orders may contain only portions of the SOW, all acronyms used are defined in a table at the end of the document.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: To be specified in individual task orders.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS:

3.1 O&M AND FMS REQUIREMENTS

3.1.1 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.1.1 Prepare and provide a LORA compliant with TA-STD-0017 and SAE AS 1390.

3.1.1.2 Identify the data element inputs for preparation of the LORA (These inputs may become the basis for an organic conducted LORA or provided to the OEM for preparation of a LORA).

3.1.1.3 Conduct an economic LORA, apply sensitivities to identify the most economical repair level and provide results and identify options in the LORA report to include a Source Maintenance Recoverability (SMR) code and a rationale statement section of a part I maintenance plan.

3.1.1.4 Provide an economic LORA to determine possible costs of all maintenance support options and then identify least cost solution. Provide a non-economic LORA to identify reasons maintenance at the Organizational, Intermediate, or Depot level should or should not be performed and provide suggestions in the LORA report.

3.1.1.5 Monitor existing system repair performance against identified repair specification or goal objectives are met. Determine the difference between results of the LORA and the programs planned or baseline maintenance concept. Provide suggested rationale for changing the programs’ maintenance concept.

3.1.1.6 Perform Configuration Management (CM) reviews to ensure repair operations are optimally maintained.

3.1.2 Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP)-Design Interface-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.2.1 Evaluate and present alternatives for changing the maintenance programs for existing systems and equipment, which includes:

3.1.2.1.1 Determine available maintenance data.

3.1.2.1.2 Identifying and/or preparing a Baseline Comparison system (BCS).

3.1.2.1.3 Provide a Comparative Analysis of new systems/equipment to the BCS.

3.1.2.2 Provide independent, technical and systems engineering assessments of logistics data for affordability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, supply support, maintenance concepts and warranty considerations.

3.1.2.3 Perform a technical review of various databases and the impacts of any proposed engineering changes that would affect the Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and operational readiness.

3.1.2.4 Perform a technical review of Naval aviation and weapon systems maintenance engineering, logistics technical, financial and schedule data to support ILS and maintenance policy development.

3.1.2.5 Identify the underlying quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics needs.

3.1.2.6 Identify ILS and maintenance policy options and provide cost/benefit trade-off analysis of policy options.

3.1.2.7 Identify and apply alternative Life Cycle Cost (LCC) model procedures and tracking approaches for incorporation into LCC management plans.

3.1.2.8 Provide a list of suggestions to update the LCC program objectives and technical information requirements.

3.1.3 Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP) Maintenance Planning-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.3.1 Continue performance monitoring of the Organizational, Intermediate and Depot levels of maintenance regarding overall reliability, maintainability, and availability characteristics and determine their projected availability, specifically with the following metrics:

3.1.3.1.1 Direct Maintenance Man-Hours/Flight Hours (DMMH/FH).

3.1.3.1.2 Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR).

3.1.3.1.3 Mean-Time-Between-Removals (MTBR).

3.1.3.1.4 Mean-Time-Between-Failures (MTBF).

3.1.3.1.5 Mean-Flight-Hours-Between-Failures (MFHBF).

3.1.3.1.6 Cost Per Flight Hour (CPFH).

3.1.3.2 Track the interface between weapon systems, Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), aircraft systems and other Government furnished systems and provide a list of alternatives for improving operating/maintenance procedures.

3.1.3.3 Monitor maintenance concepts, storage and handling requirements and procedures for composite materials.

3.1.3.4 List alternatives for improvements to existing maintenance concepts, procedures and handling requirements.

3.1.3.5 Provide alternatives for the assignments of composite maintenance and repair capabilities among Organizational, Intermediate and Depot level activities.

3.1.3.6 Monitor the maintenance planning programs and compare the maintenance engineering aspects of the programs with projected requirements for transition of maintenance capabilities.

3.1.3.7 The contractor shall perform the following Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks:

3.1.3.7.1 Monitor the accuracy and completeness of the maintenance plans, assuring traceability with interfacing documents.

3.1.3.7.2 Monitor and document the Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks and ensure the scheduled and preventive inspection requirements are complete.

3.1.3.7.3 Monitor the replaceable items appearing on the Inspect and Repair (I&R) working lists.

3.1.3.7.4 Maintain and update completed data for each replaceable item on the aircraft.

3.1.3.7.5 Rank the failure rates and repair levels of systems, subsystems and equipment on in-services aircraft.

3.1.3.7.6 Determine the impacts of each replaceable item on the supportability of the aircraft. Include manpower, cost, spares, maintenance capability and operational readiness impacts.

3.1.3.7.7 Monitor and update the difference in recovery rates between interchangeable and replaceable items.

3.1.3.8 Monitor the impact to maintenance planning for alternative maintenance concepts and evaluate only to provide alternatives for enhancements.

3.1.3.9 Identify and provide alternatives for optimizing maintenance intervention and tactics to meet predetermined affordability and reliability goals.

3.1.3.10 Provide on-site support to improve O-Level corrosion prevention, inspection, detention, and repair technologies, and improve aircraft material conditions while reducing In-Service Repair (ISR) costs, Planner and Estimator (P&E) costs, and IMC turnaround Time (TAT).

3.1.3.11 Provide IPS planning alternatives and courses of action to meet fleet readiness requirements in response to Product Quality Deficiency Reports or Engineering Investigations.

3.1.3.13.1 Monitor the data/techniques and source of data used in generating data (and identified in) the maintenance plans.

3.1.3.13.2 Track failure modes, design feature comparisons, support experience, and operational environments.

3.1.3.13.3 Track the full integration of logistic support elements.

3.1.3.13.4 Monitor logistic elements and data required to support end items.

3.1.3.13.5 Determine compliance with maintenance policies and philosophies.

3.1.3.13.6 Document analytical processes with supportability analysis procedures.

3.1.3.13.7 Provide changes in failure modes, design features, operational environments and performance baseline monitoring back through the PSA process for possible updates to PSA packages, or MRC decks.

3.1.3.14 Identify the quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support updating policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, and operational logistic needs utilizing Naval Aviation and/or Weapons maintenance, engineering, technical, financial and schedule data to support Integrated Product Support (IPS) policies/conceptualizations and the implementation of IPS documentation.

3.1.3.15 Update IPS support and maintenance policy options and related forecasts and projections of the options’ impact on Fleet support. Provide cost/benefit tradeoff analyses of policy options.

3.1.3.16 Provide maintenance planning support to the organization’s continuous process improvement (CPI) program by updating maintenance sustainment strategies.

3.1.3.17 Identify maintenance performance gaps regarding CPI deployment and functionality to include list of alternatives for gap closure.

3.1.3.18 Track fleet maintenance, operational data, and readiness degraders to identify systemic in-services support issues and shortfalls to include list of alternative solutions.

3.1.4 Logistic Support Analysis (LSA) Database and Reports-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.4.1 Update logistics support analysis, technical studies, and reports in support of maintenance task analysis and IPS resource requirements in accordance with TA-STD-0017.

3.1.4.2 Identify LSA output report requirements and assist with logistics product data (LPD) key entities and attributes commensurate with the sustainment phase.

3.1.4.3 Updating maintenance task analysis, maintenance task requirements, and resources that complement the maintenance concept, identify sequential subtasks and task resource requirements.

3.1.4.4 Provide logistics engineering technical reviews of selected components of the weapon systems to identify variances in the actual performances versus logistic support analysis projections and identify impacts to PSA packages for updating the LSA database(s).

3.1.4.5 Identify and provide possible corrective and/or mitigation options for system(s)/subsystem(s) or the individual components.

3.1.4.6 Track deployment discrepancies regarding support resources and spares. List alternatives for Beyond Capability of Maintenance (BCM) interdictions.

3.1.4.7 Prepare Post Deployment Maintenance, Engineering and Logistics Review Management Plans that identify the requirements for determining the adequacy of deployed resources to include supply shortages in repairables and consumables for possible pack-up kits and include identification of problem areas noted during the review and assessment phase.

3.1.4.8 Provide schedules, milestones, and estimates of the level of personnel required.

3.1.4.9 Provide Lessons Learned for support planning adequacy of systems and equipment.

3.1.5 Environmental Logistics-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.5.1 During the design interface and maintenance planning process ensure compliance with Federal, DoD, and Navy, state and local environmental regulations and policies.

3.1.5.2 Monitor and report on emergent technologies and their attendant processes, storage and disposal requirements.

3.1.5.3 Participate in the LSA process, planning/analysis, technical publication and manual reviews in order to:

3.1.5.3.1 Ensure support of the Aviation Hazardous Materials Control and Management Program by identifying hazardous materials and making suggestions for eliminating/minimizing their use.

3.1.5.3.2 Promote cost effective environmental technology solutions to reduce LCC and environmental impact.

3.1.5.4 Plan and coordinate the integration of maintenance pollution prevention and hazardous material technology alternatives.

3.1.5.5 Identify hazardous materials as an analysis report or as data elements in the LSAR output report.

3.1.5.6 Update technical studies in support of Environmental Compliance initiatives.

3.1.5.7 Monitor and identify life cycle support requirements and their effects on environmental policies, regulations and laws.

3.1.6 Supply Support-with the employment of requisite policies, processes procedures, tools, Standard Work Packages (SWP), etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.6.1 Support the Direct Vendor Delivery (DVD) and Requirements Determination programs by coordinating overall Fleet Support Team (FST) actions for DVD programs. Document the points of both synergy and counteraction between perceived logistic functions and weapon systems.

3.1.6.2 Perform Requirements Determinations of aircraft initiatives by collecting relevant data to support specific item reviews for possible Logistics Engineering Change Proposals (LECP) and DVD programs and determine which require further investigations and those that do not meet specified selection criteria. Input information in the requirement determination calculation programs and store calculations into databases.

3.1.6.3 Monitor the supply support posture for a given system. This may include work such as, administering Readiness Based Forecasting Model (RBFM), forecasting efforts, parts call support, quarantine issues, DLA/NAVSUP WSS critical parts reviews, etc.

3.1.6.4 Using a working knowledge of Cataloguing requirements in accordance with NAVSUP P-724, Chapter 8, and knowledge in maintaining logs, matrices, websites, and other cataloguing tools, the contractor shall:

3.1.6.4.1 Prepare, submit and coordinate National Stock Number/ Naval Ammunition Log Code (NALC) submittals using NOLSC-724/6, cataloguing/ Identification/ Disposition Request.

3.1.6.4.2 Obtain technical documentation for explosive items (AUR or Component Item) for cataloguing purposes (i.e., HERO, ESD, and Packaging, Certification and Final Hazard Classification documentation).

3.1.6.6 PPL–Update PPL using the baseline and a Provisioning Requirements Statement (PRS). Distribute to the technical points of contacts as specified by the APML, for their review. Upon a Desk Top Provisioning Conference lead by the Supply Support Lead, a PPL will be entered into the ICAPS program.

3.1.6.7 Provide support to a wide range of Material Supply Support, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)/technical and functional obsolescence requirements and Supply Chain Management (SCM). Monitor programs defined supply chain concerning elements of procurement, transportation, storage, handling, receiving, issuing and delivery of material. Monitor reliability, availability, supportability, and affordability requirements, developing viable alternatives improving support of program requirements. List alternatives to improve existing SCM elements.

3.1.7 Maintenance Scheduling/Management-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.7.1 Monitor and report on depot/intermediate capabilities/capacity requirements and issues.

3.1.7.2 Review and update metrics, track progress, and provide status reports on depot capability establishment against required capability plans.

3.1.7.3 Update metrics, monitor progress and assist in tracking depot and intermediate production in support of competency, COMFRC, NAVAIR and NAE goals. Document reasons for late work-in-process and late deliveries.

3.1.7.4 Identify impacts and provide reports in support of organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance tasks and maintenance scheduling and management efforts.

3.1.7.5 Perform trend analyses of actual data compared to Workload Standards (WLS).

3.1.7.6 Provide Readiness improvement status reports, identifying current fleet readiness problems, mission capabilities and full mission capability factors causing readiness degradations, corrective actions, and get well dates.

3.1.7.7 Monitor current processes and list options for improvements.

3.1.7.8 Provide data input and database administration for Maintenance and Scheduling Management databases.

3.1.8 Metrology and Calibration-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.8.1 Monitor, identify impacts, track and report on Engineering Investigations, Product Quality Deficiency Reports, Hazardous Material Reports, Aircraft Inspection Discrepancy Reports, Depot work/rework and trouble reports.

3.1.8.2 Collect, track and report on Local Engineering Specifications and Local Process Specifications.

3.1.8.3 Monitor calibration and measurement requirements and implement Calibration and Measurement Requirements Summary reports.

3.1.8.4 Collect, track and report on Engineering specifications and local process specifications related to metrology and calibration requirements/support.

3.1.8.5 Monitor reference calibration standards, calibration equipment, infrastructure, support processes and policies in terms of their effectiveness in meeting aviation readiness goals. List options or methods for potential improvements.

3.1.8.6 Monitor and track commercial and organic technical data, documents and manuals which support the metrology and calibration program, including effective liaison with supporting organizations responsible for distribution to aviation activities (and others as required). This task includes electronic media and digitization of current and legacy documents.

3.1.8.7 Provide technical review, identify impacts, and list options for product line organizational structure, and process reengineering required to meet high-level METCAL policy/guidance as required to support naval aviation engineering, logistics and maintenance.

3.1.8.8 Monitor, improve or update metrology and calibration training strategies/plans, provide skill assessments and training; including but not limited to, Integrated Learning Environment, Web Based Training, and Embedded Training.

3.1.8.9 Provide metrology technical support in program reviews. Propose technical program improvements when appropriate or as opportunities arise. Contribute to strategic planning and identify initiatives when experience gained from participating in technical issue resolutions dictates. Provide support in planning and tracking the execution of the metrology and calibration programs.

3.1.8.10 Schedule equipment into global service centers and calibration laboratories for calibration and repair using MEASURE and direct interface with customer activities to determine their mission support needs and priorities.

3.1.8.11 Provide technical and procedural advice, guidance and support to calibration laboratory personnel and other Navy & Marine personnel concerning metrology related matters such as the repair, calibration and modification of precision measurement equipment.

3.1.8.12 Attend, participates, provide input, and report on meetings, conferences and review boards.

3.1.9 Industrial Business Ops-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.9.1 Provide timely and accurate tactical, operational, and strategic planning support for depot maintenance industrial business operations in support of weapon systems with primary focus on those that are aeronautical in mission.

3.1.9.2 Compile reports and provide data relative to the Industrial Depot Maintenance subject area, and its goals and objectives. Participate on teams working maintenance efficiency studies, software maintenance, advanced maintenance technology study and development, and UAV maintenance. Deliver report summaries as directed.

3.1.9.3 Identify and update information and briefing materials to support APML/APMSE and other critical briefing requirements, to include presenting the briefing.

3.1.10 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.1.10.1 Perform sustainment monitoring and list options of Life Cycle Management opportunities for system and subsystems.

3.1.10.2 Perform sustainment assessment/identification of Life Cycle Management opportunities for system and subsystems.

3.1.10.3 Perform sustainability/obsolescence monitoring on a system or subsystem to identify supply, reliability, logistics and readiness constraints and/or impacts using customer specified Tools and Data Sources.

3.1.10.4 Identify possible corrective and/or mitigation options of the whole system(s)/subsystem(s) or the individual components.

3.1.10.5 Provide support planning and/or implementation of alternative solutions to programs/platforms.

3.1.10.6 Provide cross-platform, technical, and programmatic support and trends to the DMSMS/Obsolescence Team.

3.1.10.7 Monitor program risk and list options for mitigation and update product performance metrics to provide measures of performance, cost and schedule.

3.1.10.8 Compile and prepare briefings for customer collaboration and communication efforts through participation in: NAVAIR/DoD DMSMS Working Group; DMSMS Conference; various Government Meetings; “Lead Free” RoHS mitigation training; and update source data for website(s) and communication media.

3.2 APN 1,2,3,4 AND FMS REQUIREMENTS

3.2.1 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.1.1 Prepare and provide a LORA compliant with TA-STD-0017 and SAE AS 1390.

3.2.1.2 Identify the data element inputs for preparation of the LORA (These inputs may become the basis for an organic provided LORA or provided to the OEM for preparation of a LORA).

3.2.1.3 Provide an economic LORA, apply sensitivities to identify the most economical repair level and provide results and identify options in the LORA report to include a Source Maintenance Recoverability (SMR) code and a rationale statement section of a part I maintenance plan.

3.2.1.4 Provide an economic LORA to determine possible costs of all maintenance support options and then identify least cost solution. Provide a non-economic LORA to identify reasons maintenance at the Organizational, Intermediate, or Depot level should or should not be performed and provide suggestions in the LORA report.

3.2.1.5 Evaluate LORA of systems, equipment, and associated hardware for all class one ECPs that change the baseline maintenance concept for possible impacts on PSA packages and provide list of alternatives for improvements.

3.2.1.8 Identify Logistics Product Data (LPD) key entities and attributes commensurate with the acquisition phase for the preparation of LORA input data.

3.2.2 Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP)-Design Interface-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.2.1 Evaluate and present alternatives for changing the maintenance programs for new or existing systems and equipment, which includes:

3.2.2.1.1 Determine available maintenance data.

3.2.2.1.2 Identifying and/or preparing a Baseline Comparison system (BCS).

3.2.2.1.3 Provide a Comparative Analysis of new systems/equipment to the BCS.

3.2.2.2 Provide independent, technical and systems engineering assessments of logistics data for affordability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, supply support, maintenance concepts and warranty considerations.

3.2.2.3 Perform a technical review of various databases and the impacts of any proposed engineering changes that would affect the Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and operational readiness.

3.2.2.4 Perform a technical review of Naval aviation and weapon systems maintenance engineering, logistics technical, financial and schedule data to support ILS and maintenance policy development.

3.2.2.5 Identify the underlying quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics needs.

3.2.2.6 Identify ILS and maintenance policy options and Provide cost/benefit trade-off analyses of policy options.

3.2.2.7 Identify and apply alternative Life Cycle Cost (LCC) model procedures, validation approaches and tracking procedures for incorporation into LCC management plans.

3.2.2.8 Assess alternatives and identify advantages and disadvantages of LCC planning and maintenance concepts for the selected end items and support items.

3.2.2.9 Provide list of alternatives to update the LCC program objectives and technical information requirements.

3.2.2.10 Develop and Provide general and specialized tests and analyses related to specification and material certifications, process specifications, maintenance task developments, failure analyses, process controls, and verifications of material tasks, material processes, specifications and standards.

3.2.3 Design Interface/Maintenance Planning (DI/MP) Maintenance Planning-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.3.1 Determine, analyze and Provide performance monitoring of the Organizational, Intermediate and Depot levels of maintenance regarding overall reliability, maintainability, and availability characteristics and determine their projected availability, specifically with the following metrics:

3.2.3.1.1 Direct Maintenance Man-Hours/Flight Hours (DMMH/FH).

3.2.3.1.2 Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR).

3.2.3.1.3 Mean-Time-Between-Removals (MTBR).

3.2.3.1.4 Mean-Time-Between-Failures (MTBF).

3.2.3.1.5 Mean-Flight-Hours-Between-Failures (MFHBF).

3.2.3.1.6 Cost Per Flight Hour (CPFH).

3.2.3.2 Assess the interface between weapon systems, Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), aircraft systems and other Government furnished systems and provide a list of alternatives for improving operating/maintenance procedures.

3.2.3.3 Prepare and provide maintenance concepts, storage and handling requirements and procedures for composite materials.

3.2.3.4 List alternatives for improvements to existing maintenance concepts, procedures and handling requirements.

3.2.3.5 Provide alternatives for the assignments of composite maintenance and repair capabilities among Organizational, Intermediate and Depot level activities.

3.2.3.6 Assess and review the maintenance planning programs and compare the maintenance engineering aspects of the programs with projected requirements for transition of maintenance capabilities.

3.2.3.7 The contractor shall perform the following Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks:

3.2.3.7.1 Review the accuracy and completeness of the maintenance plans, assuring traceability with interfacing documents.

3.2.3.7.2 Assess and document the Remove and Replace (R&R) tasks and ensure the scheduled and preventive inspection requirements are complete.

3.2.3.7.3 Review the replaceable items appearing on the Inspect and Repair (I&R) working lists.

3.2.3.7.4 Prepare complete data for each replaceable item on the aircraft.

3.2.3.7.5 Rank the failure rates and repair levels of systems, subsystems and equipment on in-services aircraft similar to those on the advanced development aircraft.

3.2.3.7.6 Identify the impacts of each replaceable item on the supportability of the aircraft. Include manpower, cost, spares, maintenance capability and operational readiness impacts.

3.2.3.7.7 Review the difference in recovery rates between interchangeable and replaceable items.

3.2.3.8 Assess the impact to maintenance planning for alternative maintenance concepts and provide alternatives for enhancements.

3.2.3.9 Identify and provide alternatives in areas for changes and improvements for optimizing maintenance intervention and tactics to meet predetermined affordability and reliability goals.

3.2.3.10 Provide on-site support to improve the RCM data collection process, improve O-Level corrosion prevention, inspection, detention, and repair technologies, and improve aircraft material conditions while reducing In-Service Repair (ISR) costs, Planner and Estimator (P&E) costs, and IMC turnaround Time (TAT).

3.2.3.11 Provide engineering analyses and studies of maintenance/support disciplines. Provide IPS planning alternatives and courses of action to meet fleet readiness requirements in response to Product Quality Deficiency Reports or Engineering Investigations.

3.2.3.12 Prepare and review maintenance plans, supportability analyses, maintenance tasks and LORA. Review supportability analysis worksheets, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) for analytical correctness, product support integration and return on investments (ROI).

3.2.3.13 Identify the quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistic needs utilizing Naval Aviation and/or Weapons maintenance, engineering, technical, financial and schedule data to support IPS policies/conceptualizations and the development and/or implementation of IPS documentation.

3.2.3.14 Identify IPS support and maintenance policy options and related forecasts and projections of the options’ impact on Fleet support. Provide cost/benefit tradeoff analyses of policy options.

3.2.4 Logistic Support Analysis (LSA) Database and Reports-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.4.1 Provide analyses, technical studies and reports in support of task analyses and IPS resource requirements in accordance with TA-STD-0017.

3.2.4.2 Identify LSA output report requirements and provide assistance in developing logistics product data (LPD) key entities and attributes commensurate with the acquisition phase.

3.2.4.3 Provide a maintenance task analysis, identify maintenance task alternatives and resources that complement the maintenance concept, identify sequential subtasks and task resource requirements.

3.2.4.4 Assess prime and OEM contract documentation for tailored maintenance task analyses for specified Airborne Weapon Systems, Subsystems and Support Systems. This includes tailoring PSA requirements and objectives and developing required contract documentation.

3.2.4.5 Provide logistics engineering evaluations of selected components of the weapon systems to identify variances in the actual performances versus logistic support analysis projections and identify impacts to PSA packages for updating the LSA database(s).

3.2.4.6 Identify and investigate possible options for corrective and/or mitigation options of system(s)/subsystem(s) or the individual components, as the analysis dictates.

3.2.4.7 Provide Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) that provides costs, resolution cost, trade-off studies, return on investments and solution options and produce report summarizing findings and list of alternatives.

3.2.4.8 Provide alternatives to analyze and track deployment discrepancies regarding support resources and spares. List alternatives for BCM interdictions.

3.2.4.9 Prepare Post Deployment Maintenance, Engineering and Logistics Review Management Plans that:

3.2.4.9.1 Identify the requirements for evaluating the adequacy of deployed resources to include supply shortages in repairables and consumables for possible pack-up kits.

3.2.4.9.2 Include identification of problem areas noted during the review and assessment phase.

3.2.4.9.3 Provide alternatives to improve policies and procedures for the Provide evaluations.

3.2.4.9.4 Provide schedules, milestones, and estimates of the level of personnel required.

3.2.4.9.5 Provide Lessons Learned for support planning adequacy of systems and equipment.

3.2.5 Environmental Logistics-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.5.1 Provide environmental reviews & analyses during the design interface and maintenance planning process to ensure compliance with Federal, DoD, and Navy, state and local environmental regulations and policies.

3.2.5.2 Collect, analyze, review and report on emergent technologies and their attendant processes, storage and disposal requirements.

3.2.5.3 Participate in the LSA process, ECP reviews, RCM, planning/analysis, technical publication and manual reviews in order to:

3.2.5.3.1 Identify and review impacts of new designs/design changes on existing support systems relative to environmental policies, regulations, and laws.

3.2.5.3.2 Ensure support of the Aviation Hazardous Materials Control and Management Program by identifying hazardous materials and making list alternatives for eliminating/minimizing their use.

3.2.5.3.3 Promote cost effective environmental technology solutions to reduce LCC and environmental impact.

3.2.5.4 Plan and coordinate the integration of maintenance pollution prevention and hazardous material technology alternatives.

3.2.5.5 Identify hazardous materials as an analysis report or as data elements in the LSAR output report.

3.2.5.6 Provide analyses and technical studies in support of Environmental Compliance initiatives.

3.2.5.7 Review and identify life cycle support requirements and their effects on environmental policies, regulations and laws.

3.2.6 Supply Support-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.6.1 Support the Direct Vendor Delivery (DVD) and Requirements Determination programs by coordinating overall Fleet Support Team (FST) actions for DVD programs. Provide list of alternatives on the hardware development prime contractor’s statements of work and provide preliminary repair data to prospective vendors. Ensure milestone efforts that require NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support (WSS) actions are completed on time. Provide both consultative and active support in the adaptation of provisioning tasks (e.g. item selection, cataloging, classification, etc.) to the DVD program through independent research and analyses of findings. Document the points of both synergy and counteraction between perceived logistic functions and weapon systems.

3.2.6.2 Continuously monitor the supply support posture for a given system. This may include work such as, administering Requirements Based Forecasting Model (RBFM), forecasting efforts, parts call support, quarantine issues, DLA/NAVSUP WSS critical parts reviews, etc.

3.2.6.3 Using a working knowledge of Cataloguing requirements in accordance with NAVSUP P-724, Chapter 8, and knowledge in maintaining logs, matrices, websites, and other cataloguing tools, the contractor shall:

3.2.6.3.1 Prepare, submit and coordinate National Stock Number/Naval Ammunition Log Code (NALC) submittals using NOLSC-724/6, cataloguing/Identification/Disposition Request.

3.2.6.3.2 Obtain technical documentation for explosive items (AUR or Component Item) for cataloguing purposes (i.e., HERO, ESD, and Packaging, Certification and Final Hazard Classification documentation).

3.2.6.3.3 Prepare weekly highlights and keep Government Team Lead current on status of any/all cataloguing efforts.

3.2.6.4 Provide provisioning requirements using the Interactive Computer-Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) database. The Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System is used to prepare a Parts Provisioning List (PPL) which will be prepared using the production contractor-originated baseline based upon the Technical Data Package.

3.2.6.5 Draft PPL–Update Draft PPL using the baseline and a Provisioning Requirements Statement (PRS). Distribute to the technical points of contacts as specified by the APML, for their review. Upon a Desk Top Provisioning Conference lead by the Supply Support Lead, a PPL will be entered into the ICAPS program.

3.2.6.6 Final PPL–Submit the final PPL to NAVSUP WSS for final APL (Allowance Parts List) preparation by NAVSUP WSS. The APL will be used by the 'users' and Fleet for ordering purposes and maintenance by NAVSUP WSS.

3.2.6.7 Prepare and submit Support Equipment List alternative Data (SERD) efforts for cataloguing purposes.

3.2.6.8 IAW a SEMS AUTOSERD Template, and a top level signed drawing, submittal is made to Code 66000E, 575 I Avenue, Suite 1, Point Mugu, CA 93042-5049.

3.2.6.9 Code 66000E will take submittal and forward to NAWCAD, Lakehurst, NJ. Lakehurst will forward to NAVSUP WSS for NSN assignment.

3.2.6.10 Perform a needs assessment, requirements determination and/or requirements validation concerning Interim Supply Support (ISS) assuring program requirements are appropriately understood and reflected in relevant Acquisition Plans, Integrated Logistics Support Plans, Maintenance Plans, operational and interim support plans, data requirements, job analysis, task analysis, POA&Ms, performance criteria.

3.2.7 Maintenance Scheduling/Management-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.7.1 Review ship, weapons and aviation program acquisition documentation to identify areas of aviation interface and possible logistics concerns for both new and in-service ships and new and legacy aircraft and weapons. Present list of alternatives to promote the integration of evolving Navy goals and priorities such as manpower reduction, distance support, etc.

3.2.7.2 Provide analyses on current and future depot/intermediate capabilities/capacity requirements and issues.

3.2.7.3 Provide metrics, track progress, and provide status reports on depot capability establishment against required capability plans.

3.2.7.4 Provide metrics, monitor progress and assist in analyzing depot and intermediate production in support of competency, COMFRC, NAVAIR and NAE goals. Provide reasons for late work-in-process and late deliveries. Assist in process improvement identification and the preparation of production recovery plans.

3.2.7.5 Provide analyses, technical studies and reports in support of organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance tasks and maintenance scheduling and management efforts.

3.2.7.6 Provide analyses for current and future Workload Standards (WLS).

3.2.7.7 Provide Readiness improvement status reports, identifying current fleet readiness problems, mission capabilities and full mission capability factors causing readiness degradations, corrective actions, and get well dates.

3.2.7.8 Provide Industrial Source of Repair process tasks in support of depot capability establishment.

3.2.7.9 Perform analysis of current processes and procedures/document list alternatives improvements.

3.2.7.10 Provide data input and data base administration for Maintenance and Scheduling Management data bases.

3.2.8 Integrated Warfighter Support Community (IWSC)/Warfighter Response Center (WRC)-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.8.1 Perform in depth analysis and capture the As-Is state, perform Gap Analysis and develop the To-Be state for various aviation logistics/maintenance processes, business processes and associated data applications/systems.

3.2.8.2 Prepare and integrate functional requirements and design of an enterprise architecture that supports the Integrated Warfighter Support Community future state.

3.2.8.3 Prepare policy/procedures that address the Integrated Warfighter Support processes.

3.2.8.4 Prepare metrics/methods to measure/monitor ability to deliver reactive, predictive and proactive support to the Warfighter to include emergent requirements/capabilities.

3.2.8.5 Support the implementation, operation and enhancement of the Integrated Warfighter Support Services systems and supporting systems/components.

3.2.9 Support Equipment (SE)-with the employment of requisite policies, processes, procedures, tools, SWPs, etc, the contractor shall:

3.2.9.1 Identify the SE quantitative and qualitative data necessary to support new policy initiatives required in response to changing/evolving technical, acquisition and operational logistics support.

3.2.9.2 Prepare, review and update SE Integrated Logistics Support Documentation.

3.2.9.3 Prepare and review ECP’s, TD’s and Publication changes, and related documents to assure that ILS requirements are properly addressed and are consistent within known program constraints. Identify their impacts on life cycle logistics planning. These evaluations shall include identifying changes to logistic support elements, associated requirements dates and impacts on delivery and deployment schedules. Identify problems and provide list alternatives for their correction.

3.2.9.4 Provide independent assessments of logistics data for affordability, reliability, maintainability, supportability, supply support, maintenance concepts and warranty considerations.

3.2.9.5 Review systems and equipment to identify obsolete/out-of-production components. Assess Government owned inventory of obsolete/out-of-production components, usage rates and remaining service life of used-on systems/equipment. Perform analyses to determine the severity of problems and list alternatives.

3.2.9.6 List alternatives methods for identifying and assessing the principal factors impacting the supportability of systems and equipment to quantify the scope and nature of logistic support required to affordably, efficiently and effectively meet specific operational mission requirements.

3.2.9.7 Assess Integrated Logistics Support planning and management data and documentation to identify supportability problem areas. List alternative quantitative and qualitative methodologies to evaluate the impact of Integrated Logistics Support shortfalls. Provide a list of corrective actions to alleviate identified support problems.

3.2.9.8 Provide on-site quantitative and qualitative analyses of the Integrated Logistics Support elements, assessing support prior to and during the introduction of systems and equipment at selected test and evaluation sites, training sites and operational ashore and afloat sites. Identify variances from the documented plans, list alternatives corrective actions and track implementation to meet site/unit activation planning milestones.

3.2.9.9 Define SE requirements and associated support strategies for new and modified weapon systems, and support Logistics Managers (LM) in the preparation of input to acquisition schedules, Life Cycle Supportability Plans (LCSP), User’s Logistics Support Summaries (ULSS), Logistics Requirements Funding Summaries (LRFS), ILS SOWs, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)/obsolescence Plans, Unique Identification (UID) Plans, Support Equipment List alternative Data (SERD), Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Configuration Control Board forms, and other logistic element planning documents. Provide inputs for the preparation, review and management of acquisition documents such as SOWs, Request for Proposals (RFPs) and/or Integrated Logistics Support Detail Specification (ILSDS).

3.2.9.10 Support LMs in the identification of, impact on and implementation of all SE ILS elements.

3.2.9.11 Perform cost-benefit analyses, supportability analyses and logistics impact assessments on new and modified and pre-planned improvements, SE ECPs, Technical Directives, Design Change Notices, Source Maintenance & Recoverability (SM&R) Code changes and other documentation detailing list alternatives for correction of SE performance and logistics deficiencies.

3.2.9.14 Support SE LMs in developing Repair of Repairable and spare/material budgets while utilizing Navy Inventory Control Point models to forecast dollar requirements.

3.2.9.15 Provide site surveys and review available data to evaluate SE requirements, capabilities, availability, and supportability capabilities to provide logistics, maintenance planning, MPT, and supply support list alternatives and accompanying documentation.

3.2.9.16 Review and assess contractor proposed changes in SE component reliability, obsolescence or performance characteristics and develop or provide list alternatives changes to SE ILS planning documents such as Support Material Lists, Gross Requirements Lists, and Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD).

3.2.9.17 Participate in logistics-related meetings including logistics reviews, ILS Management Teams meetings, LSA/LMI reviews, Provisioning Guidance Conferences, telephone conferences, program reviews, procurement review planning conferences, site activation meetings and initial outfitting meetings and provide coordination with other government, Fleet users, FMS customers and industry representatives while providing inputs to ensure complete SE logistics support.

3.2.9.18 Analyze in-service SE reliability, maintainability and availability characteristics, project availability, identify Fleet readiness problems and supply support deficiencies. Associated metrics for SE shall be tracked and reported on to assist in Cost-Wise Readiness Improvements. This shall include preparing data base queries from NALDA and OARS, reports and briefings as required.

3.2.9.19 Review, assess and provide list alternatives for possible changes to site support Integrated Logistics Support readiness including: Maintenance planning; Phased support; Manpower and personnel requirements; Initial provisioning and material support; Support equipment including Automatic Test Equipment; Training and training devices; Technical data including computer resources support; Packaging, handling, storage and transportation; and Facilities, both Shore and Ship.

3.2.9.20 Review technical manuals and instructions for compliance with environmental policies, regulations and laws.

3.2.9.21 Provide technical support for the management of Support Equipment List alternatives Data (SERD) efforts, such as creating, revising and reviewing SERDs, entering applicable data into AUTOSERD, tracking excess/deficit SE in Support Equipment Resources Management Information System (SERMIS) and creating unique queries in ACQ Access for program management, engineering and logistics personnel.

3.2.9.22 Review Source Data Revision List alternatives (SODARRS) and provide disposition list alternatives.

3.2.9.23 Provide technical support for system/design requirements determination and SE acquisition. Support preparation of all acquisition documents for the procurement of new and modified SE end-items including technical specifications and Statements of Work (SOWs).

3.2.9.24 Provide on-site representative (OSRs) to support acquisition, site activation and design and development logistics tasks.

3.2.9.25 Attend and participate in design reviews, program reviews, Technical Coordinating Meetings (TCMs) and other designated meetings. The Contractor shall assist in the support of aircraft platform Fleet Support Team (FST) meetings, SE meetings, aircraft maintenance plan reviews and tool vendor meetings.

3.2.9.26 Utilization of information systems including LSA, APIMIS, NATEC Website, NAVICP Asset Visibility, and SERMIS is required.

3.2.9.27 Assist in the distribution of Support Equipment including the initial outfitting of Peculiar Support Equipment for Aircraft Platform Site Activations.

3.2.9.28 Assure the timely delivery of designated SE for Initial Outfitting/Site Activation purposes.