QASP.pdf

PDF 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Transformation Management Support Services
Solicitation number
N0018918RZ097
Issued by

About this file

This document provides a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Transformation Management Support Services required by the Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC) Norfolk. The QASP establishes performance standards and surveillance methods to ensure the contractor provides all required services in a timely, accurate and complete manner. Critical performance includes completing all contract and task order requirements by their due dates. Performance will be measured on factors such as adhering to schedules and delivering conforming products by deadlines, with acceptable quality levels defined as more than 95% of deliverables submitted on time and without rework needed. Surveillance methods include random sampling, inspections, and validated customer complaints, conducted on a frequency ranging from quarterly to monthly. Incentives include annual performance ratings that could impact future awards or option exercises, while disincentives involve issuing Contract Discrepancy Reports and potential termination for unsatisfactory performance.

The related federal contract opportunity notice seeks proposals for Transformation Management Support Services to facilitate transformation efforts within the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Manpower, Personnel, Training and Education). Services include project management, acquisitions assistance, cost estimating, change management support, data analytics, and standing up new offices. The Naval Supply Systems Command intends to award multiple cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts for a period of five years, with proposals due in late July or August 2018. Offerors must register in the System for Award Management database to be eligible for award.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N0018918RZ097-0004.docx DOCX document
N0018918RZ097-0003.docx DOCX document
N0018918RZ097-0002.docx DOCX document
N0018918RZ097-0001.docx DOCX document
N0018918RZ097_N0018918RZ097-0001.docx DOCX document
N0018918RZ097.docx DOCX document
Corporate_Experience_and_Past_Performance_Information_Form.doc DOC document
CAP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Purpose: To ensure that the Government has an effective and systematic method of surveillance for the services in the PWS. The QASP will be used primarily as a tool to verify that the contractor is performing all services required by the PWS in a timely, accurate and complete fashion.

1. Critical performance processes and requirements. Critical to the performance of the MPTE Business Management Support Services is the timely, accurate and thorough completion of all contract/task order requirements.

2. Performance Standards

a. Schedule - The due dates for deliverables and the actual accomplishment of the schedule will be assessed against original due dates and milestones established for the contract or task order(s).

b. Deliverables – The deliverables required to be submitted will be assessed against the specifications for the deliverables detailed in the contract/task order(s) and the Quality Control Plan (QCP), if required by the contract, for the required content, quality, timeliness, and accuracy.

c. Cost - The COR will review monthly cost vouchers to monitor the contractor’s expenditures throughout the contract and/or task order performance period(s). Also, the COR will analyze the impact on cost of any inaccurate management assertions, acceleration of the due dates for the financial reports, or the lack of personnel.

d. Past Performance - In addition to any schedule, deliverables, and cost aspects of performance discussed above, pursuant to FAR 42.15, the Government will assess the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship, the contractor’s record of forecasting and controlling costs, the contractor’s adherence to contract schedules including the administrative aspects of performance, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer.

3. Surveillance methods: The primary methods of surveillance used to monitor performance of this contract will include, but not be limited to, random or planned sampling, periodic or inspection, and validated customer complaints.

4. Performance Measurement: Performance will be measured in accordance with the following table:

Performance

Element Performance Requirement

Surveillance Method Frequency Acceptable Quality Level

Contractor Quality Control Plan

QC activities, inspections, and corrective actions completed as required by the plan.

Inspection by the COR Quarterly for overall QC activities;

100% Compliance with the contractor plan.

As Required for corrective actions.

Contract Deliverables

Contract deliverables furnished as prescribed in the PWS, attachments, CDRLs, Task Orders, etc., as applicable.

Inspection by the COR 100% inspection of all contract deliverables.

>95% of deliverables submitted timely and without rework required.

Overall Contract Performance

Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to earn a Satisfactory (or higher) rating in the COR’s annual report on Contractor

Performance

Assessment by the COR Annual All performance elements rated Satisfactory (or higher)

Invoicing Monthly invoices per contract procedures are timely and accurate.

Review & acceptance of the invoice

Monthly 100% accuracy

If performance is within acceptable levels, it will be considered to be satisfactory. If not, overall performance may be considered unsatisfactory.

Incentives/Disincentives:

The COR’s makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract/task order and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts/task orders. The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order may result in the non-exercise of available options.

For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.

For any FFP orders, in accordance with the inspection of services provisions of the contract, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional cost, to replace or correct work that fails to meet contract requirements.

For any CPFF orders, in accordance with inspection of services provisions of the contract, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional fee, to replace or correct work that fails to meet contract requirements. To maximize the profit earned on costs incurred, the contractor is incentivized to ensure that quality products are provided in a timely manner.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .