BMAC IDIQ Bidders Questions Responses SAM.GOV - 20250522.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Waterborne Security Barriers Sustainment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00024-25-R-4101
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file for Solicitation N00024-25-R-4101, a Waterborne Security Barriers Sustainment contract issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide installation, refurbishment, upgrade, and engineering design support for waterfront security barrier systems at various naval activities worldwide, including passive and active waterfront barriers, port security barriers, mooring systems, and miscellaneous waterfront security systems.
Key details include a proposal due date of 03 June 2025 at 3:00 PM local time, with the contract being a follow-on requirement from a previous Naval Facilities Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center contract. The solicitation allows only one proposal per prime contractor, will make awards to qualifying offerors, and does not consider cost/price as an evaluation factor. The contract includes a unique element of designing a "WSB 2.0" waterborne barrier system not currently fielded, with potential future implementation during the period of performance. Proposals must include a 20-page management approach and capability section, past performance documentation, and sample task order details.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A
| Question Number: | Question Source: (RFP, Attachment #, etc.) | Page Number and Paragraph Header from Source: | Question: | Government Response: |
| Last updated: 05/22/25 | ||||
| 1 | General | N/A | Please confirm this bidding approach: submitting one proposal priming with a subcontractor and submitting another as a subcontractor to another prime, sometimes referred to as over and under. | Confirm as acceptable. Per Section L.3 of the solicitation, offerors may submit only one proposal as a prime contractor. |
| 2 | General | N/A | Is there any incumbent/recompete or this is a brand-new project? If yes, could you please provide us with their award number or even if the customer bought similar services in the past | N00024-25-R-4101 is a follow-on requirement from Naval Facilities Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC) (N39430-15-D-1614). NAVSEA now has cognizance of the Waterborne Security Barriers Sustainment. |
| 3 | General | N/A | How does the government intend for us to populate CLINs 0001-0004 in Section B of SF33. Understand CLIN 0005 is "not separately priced." Page 68 element 2 speaks to the sample tasks and CLINs 0001-0004 but not specifically stating how to populate section B. | CLINS 0001-0004 do not need to be filled in for Section B to meet the requirement of "Solicitation Sections A through J “Solicitation, Offer and Award” to include all required clause fill-ins". CLINs 0001-0004 shall be filled in for each sample and submitted with the sample order proposal in Volume I. |
| 4 | RFP | L.4, pg. 57 | Do resumés count towards page limitations in the table in L.4 (pg. 57)? | Yes. However, total page limitation is now 20 pages for Management Approach & Capability |
| 5 | RFP | L.5, pg. 61 | Please define “Contract effort”. Is “contract effort” referring to the Sample Task Order Level, or Base Contract level? | In regards to Past Performance, contract effort" refers to a previously held Government and, if necessary commercial, state and local, contracts." |
| 6 | RFP | Section M, pg. 66 | Section M includes evaluation criteria for non-cost/price factors but does not include any evaluation of cost/price. Will cost be an evaluation factor? If so, how with the Government evaluate offerors’ price? In the absence of price evaluation, how will the Government determine “best value” without considering cost? | Per solicitation section M.1, the Government intends to make award to each and all qualifying Offerors. Qualifying offers are defined at FAR 2.101. Cost/price is not an evaluation factor. Cost/price information shall be included with the Sample Orders to demonstrate an understanding and capability of the sample delivery order requirements. |
| 7 | SF Form 33 | Block 9 | States we are to upload proposals via PIEE; however, the solicitation number does not appear to be active in PIEE so it is unclear how we can link the proposal to the RFP number. Will NAVSEA be adding this solicitation to PIEE? | The solicitation is available under Notice ID: N0002425R4101. Public Posting Link: https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/search/oppMgmtLink.xhtml?noticeId=N0002425R4101¬iceType=SolicitationNotice |
| 8 | RFP | Page 8, C.1.0 Scope | What is the Waterborne Security Barriers 2.0, and is it currently in use at any location? Exhibit A included the J-1 through J4 drawing sets for the PSB-V, PSB-P, PSB-T and PSB-Flt V but no information has been provided on the WSB 2.0. | "WSB 2.0” is the government nomenclature used to describe the yet to be designed waterborne barrier system. It is currently not fielded at any location but will likely have similar components as the current system. If WSB 2.0 is fielded during the PoP of the BMAC, the government will provide additional information regarding the final design and its maintenance requirements on future task order RFPs. |
| 9 | RFP | Section I Contract Clauses | The requested work requires many of the skill sets covered by the Service Contract Act. Will 52.222-41Service Contract Labor Standards be added to this section? | Recommend: "The Navy considers this a supply-type contract, consistent with the Product Service Code (PSC) 1945 - Pontoons and Floating Docks; therefore, the Service Contract Act is not applicable to this effort." |
| 10 | RFP | Page 16, C-244-H002 (3) | Please confirm this section does not apply and Task Orders will not be issued via SeaPort. | Confirm task orders will not be issued via SeaPort. |
| 11 | Attachment L4 | pdf page 5, Table 2 | Please confirm Total days is 27 including semi-annual maintenance (not 25 as shown). | The total of 25 days was incorrectly calculated in the attachment. Total "days onsite" should multiply the quarterly schedule by four (i.e. 3 days per visit times 4 trips per year for a total of 12 days onsite for that activity per year) and the semi-annual schedule by 2 (i.e. 3 days per visit times 2 trips per year for a total of 6 days onsite for that activity per year). The Total for the sample tasking should read 94. |
| 12 | RFP | L.5 Factor 1 - Technical | For the technical volume can the resumes be included in an appendix since the page count is limited as this would allow for more detail on the Management Approach and Capability. | Total page limitation is now 20 pages for Management Approach & Capability |
| 13 | RFP | L.1 | Can we kindly suggest to the government for an one week extension since the due date is right after the holiday weekend and key resources to the development of this proposal have pre scheduled leave | 1 Week extension will be provide, proposal due date is 03 June 2025 3:00PM local time. |
| 14 | RFP | L.5, Factor 2: Past Performance, page 62 | Can the government confirm that each past performance used, required information includes the information described in the three bullets on page 62, (for example, clarifying that the narrative is not a separate overall section but included on each named past performance). | Yes. Each Past Performance shall include the 3 bullets in the narrative. |
| 15 | RFP | L.5, Factor 2: Past Performance | If possible can the government provide a template for the past performance? | The Government does not have a template to provide. |
| 16 | RFP | Section M | Please confirm that no cost proposals are required. That the sample tasks will only be evaluated technically as described in Sections L and M | Cost/Price is not an Evaluation Factor for reasonableness. However, to demonstrate an understanding of the Sample Order requirements, Cost/Price information shall be included within the Sample Order. |
| 17 | RFP | Section A | Request an extension to the due date of an additional 1-2 weeks. | 1 Week extension will be provide, proposal due date is 03 June 2025 3:00PM local time. |
| 18 | RFP | L.1, page 56 | We would like to point out a conflict in section L of the solicitation. On page 56, paragraph L.1 the due date for submitting questions is shown as 1500 Local time Washington DC on 27 May 2025. Then on page 65, paragraph L-215-H007 (b) it is stated as 14 days after issuance of the solicitation. | 27 May 2025 will remain in the solicitation as the due date for submitting questions. Proposal shall be due 3 June 2025 3:00PM local time |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .