Industry__Brief_Planning_Yard_6_Dec_2017_Final.pdf

PDF 822 KB Posted

Attached to
Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Planning Yard Support Solicitation
Solicitation number
N00024-18-R-4313
Issued by

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Littoral Combat Ship Sustainment

LCS Planning Yard Recompete

Industry Day (7 Dec 2017) Robert Warren PMS 505AP - Abbey Scholl SEA 024

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

• FAR 15.201

- Exchanging of information to improve the understanding of Government requirements and industry capabilities.

Industry Day Intent

Questions

• NAVSEA will post this Industry Day presentation and Q&A sheets on the

FBO.gov website.

• Industry is invited to provide the Navy comments, concerns or questions. All inquiries shall be directed to David Hector, Contracting Officer, and Abbey

Scholl, Contract Specialist, at david.hector@navy.mil and abbey.scholl@navy.mil.

• Questions will be treated as “Bidder’s Questions” and all answers will be made publicly available via www.fbo.gov.

• To ensure the Navy is able to adequately consider Industry’s feedback in the upcoming solicitation, it is requested they be submitted no later than 1400

EST on 18 December 2017.

http://www.fbo.gov/

Agenda

• Introductions

• PMS 505 Fleet Introduction and Sustainment

Program Office

• SEA 02 Contracts - NAVSEA Contracting

Process

• One on One Sessions (by confirmed request only)

PMS 505 LCS

Fleet Introduction & Sustainment

PEO LCS Products

PMS 505:

Fleet Introduction and Sustainment

• Provides a single point of entry for the Fleet, Type Commander (TYCOM), and the Maintenance and Sustainment communities

• PMS 505 integrates ship and mission package fleet introduction, logistics, training, and maintenance strategies to deliver and sustain LCS combat capability for the Fleet

• PMS 505 provides:

- Technical oversight, management, and direct Fleet support for the LCS Class and its systems;

- Intermediate maintenance and depot level support of mission package systems and components, as well as the Command and Control Software; and

- Crew training until the Navy training pipeline is established.

Overview of LCS Class Ships

• Two different ship variants meeting the same design requirements: Monohull (Freedom

Variant) and Trimaran (Independence

Variant)

- Small crew focused on mission execution

- 18 months forward deployed

• Targeted at critical capability: mines, small fast surface craft, and diesel submarines

• Notional 42 ships planned (Mixture of LCSs and Frigates)

• Modular Mission Packages

- MCM, ASW, and SUW

San Diego LCS 1 – Freedom

LCS 2 – Independence

LCS 3 – Fort Worth

LCS 4 – Coronado

LCS 6 – Jackson

LCS 8 – Montgomery

LCS 10 – Gabrielle Giffords

LCS 12 – Omaha

LCS 14 – Manchester

LCS 16 – Tulsa

LCS 18 – Charleston

LCS 20 – Cincinnati

LCS 22 – Kansas City

LCS 24 – Oakland

LCS 26 – Mobile

LCS 28 – TBD

Mayport

LCS 5 – Milwaukee

LCS 7 – Detroit

LCS 9 – Little Rock

LCS 11 – Sioux City

LCS 13 – Wichita

LCS 15 – Billings

LCS 17 – Indianapolis

LCS 19 – St. Louis

LCS 21 – Minneapolis/St. Paul

LCS 23 – Cooperstown

LCS 25 – Marinette

LCS 27 – TBD

LCS Homeport Layout

Planning Yard supports both homeports and LCS variants

• Selected Restricted Availability (SRA)

- 17 weeks every 64 months (LCS 1 variant only)

- Performed in the ship’s homeport

- Includes Continuous Maintenance/ Emergent Maintenance (CM/EM) performed during SRA periods

• Dry-docking SRA (DSRA)

- 25 weeks every other 64 months (LCS 1 variant)

- 25 weeks every 32 months (LCS 2 variant)

- Performed in the ship’s homeport

- Includes CM/EM performed during DSRA periods

• Continuous Maintenance Availability (CMAV)

- Quarterly availabilities (2 weeks in duration) includes corrective/emergent maintenance

- Performed CONUS and OCONUS

• Preventative/Planned Maintenance Availability (PMAV)

- Monthly availabilities (5 days in duration)

- PMS tasked to a mixture by contractor(s) and ship’s force

- Performed CONUS and OCONUS

Notional Availability and

Periodicity

• Support Ship Change Document (SCD) development

• Create Ships Installation Drawings (SIDs) to support modernization

- Often requires shipchecks to verify “as is” condition of the ship

• Procure and kit Long Lead Time Material (LLTM) especially in support of Firm

Fixed Price contracting via Provisioning Item Order (PIO) CLIN

• Create Availability Analysis Books in support of CNO Availabilities

• Keepers/Maintainers of the Configuration of the LCS Class

- ILS Product Development

- Configuration Data Management

- Provisioning Technical Documentation

- Ship Selected Record Documents

• Coordination includes, but not limited to: the Program Offices, RMCs, Executing

Contractors under Sustainment Execution Contract – East and West Coast (SEC

East/West), Execution Planning Contractor, Fleet/TYCOM, and Warfare Centers

Typical Planning Yard Efforts

NAVSEA 02

Contracting Process

Objective

• High level overview of the contracting strategy.

• Information presented is representative of the “planned” acquisition.

• Released solicitation will govern the terms and conditions of the competitive process.

Planning Yard Contract Assumptions

• Full and Open Competition

- Cost Reimbursement Contract Type

Level of Effort CLINs-Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)

PIO CLIN for Material purchases-Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)

Travel CLIN-Cost Only

- Base year with four option years

• Evaluated using Best Value Trade-Off Source Selection

- This process permits tradeoffs among cost and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal.

- Technical is more important than Cost.

The importance of cost as an evaluation factor will increase as the difference in overall technical merit among proposals narrows.

CLIN Structure

CLIN Title Applicability

0001 Program Management LCS Class

0002 Planned Maintenance Management LCS Class

0003 Corrective and Continuous Maintenance LCS 1 Variant

0004 Corrective and Continuous Maintenance LCS 2 Variant

0005 Ship/Availability Product Work LCS 1 Variant

0006 Ship/Availability Product Work LCS 2 Variant

0007 Ship Alteration Work LCS Class

0008 In Service Engineering Activity (ISEA) LCS Class

0009 Emergent Installation and Repair Support LCS 1 Variant

0010 Emergent Installation and Repair Support LCS 2 Variant

0011 Logistics Management (CM/DMSMS) LCS Class

0012 PIO and Other Material (Warehouse) LCS Class

0013 Data

0014 Travel LCS Class

Technical & Cost Proposal

• Technical Proposal will be evaluated to determine Technical Capability and Management Approach as it pertains to the requirements of the

Statement of Work.

- The Navy is assessing how we will evaluate a transition plan.

• Cost Proposal will be evaluated to determine Cost Realism in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(d) to derive a total projected cost to the

Government.

- While cost is the least important factor, it is still an important consideration.

- Failure to provide the required cost information may render the proposal non-responsive.

Proposal Quality

• Proposals should be organized in accordance with solicitation requirements.

• Technical Proposal should stand on its own merits.

- Do not assume evaluation team possesses any pre-existing knowledge about your company or its unique business practices.

• Cost Proposal should be free of mathematical and formula errors.

- To the greatest extent possible, do not include hard entered data with no traceability to formulas.

• Ensure consistency between the Cost and Technical proposals.

- Cost proposal needs to represent the technical solution provided in the

Offeror’s Technical proposal.

- Inconsistency between the Cost and Technical Volumes will result in an adjustment to the Offeror’s proposed cost.

Notional Dates

• Pre-Solicitation Synopsis……………………………… Jan 2018

• Release RFP…………….…………............................... Feb 2018

• Proposal Due Date…………………………………… April 2018

• Award ………………………………………….......October 2018

Comments ?

Back Up

PMS 505/NAVSEA HQ

• Establishes the Letter Of

Authorization for CNO Avails

• Program Office funded SCDs

• Program Office funded SIDs

• Manages overall PY work plan

• Provides New Construction Dwgs from PMS 501

ISEA, Software Support, and Warfare Centers –

NSWC Philly (HM&E), PHD

(CS)

• ILS Certs

• SCD Development

Execution Planning/aka 3PP

• 4e Work Specs to support CNO avails, CMAVs, EM

• LLTM and Kitting

• Work Packages

• Turnover Books

• Warehousing

Supervisor of Shipbuilding

• Manage all funding except

PMS 505 (NAVAIR,

SPAWAR, ETC.) as ACO

• Manage all contract mods except PMS 505 as ACO

• Manages the LLTM process including LLTM ROMs

Executing Contractors (SEC East/West)

• Perform and manage CNO Avails and CM/EM

• Maintain Integrated Master

Schedule (IMS)

• Perform PMS checks, FM, CC

• electronic Liaison Action Records

(eLARs)

• Redline Dwgs

Different Commands

(SPAWAR, NAVAIR)

• Provide Funding

• Provide design direction

Regional Maintenance

Centers/LCSRON

• Manage CNO Avails, CM/EM, PM, FM, Corrosion Control as NSA

Fleet/TYCOM

• Requirements

• Funding

• Fleet funded SCDs

• Fleet funded SIDs

• Fleet funded LLTM

Planning Yard Interfaces

Planning Yard/Advance Planning

• CNO Avail

• CM/EM

• PM (Planning assistance & Part

Mgmt)

• Ship Change Documents (SCD)

• Ship Installation Dwgs (SIDS)

• LLTM, Kitting, Warehousing

• Avail Analysis Books

• ILS Product Development

File details come from the government source that posted it.