Solicitation Amendment N0001917R00810003.docx

N0001917R0081

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 19-Apr-2018 02:00 PM to 30-Apr-2018 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 03

The purpose of this Amendment is to make the following changes:

1. change Block 9 of the SF 33 from 19 April 2018 to 30 April 2018 to extend the proposal submittal date;

2. under Section J, delete Attachment (1) "U.S Navy T56 Series IV Engine Module Repair Performance Work Statement" dated 7 March 2018 in its entirety and replace with Attachment (1) "U.S Navy T56 Series IV Engine Module Repair Performance Work Statement" dated 20 March 2018. This 20 March 2018 Performance Work Statement revises paragraph 3.5.6.5.2 under Section 3.5.6, and updates the Technical Manuals Table in Section 5.3;

3. under Section LA-1, Part A, paragraph 1.0 "General", provide instructions for obtaining Technical Manuals referenced in the Performance Work Statement, Enclosures and Appendices to Attachment (1) in Section J of this Solicitation, and Historical Usage Data (to be used for informational purposes only);

4. under Section LA-1, Part A, paragraph 4.0 "Proposal Submission", change the submittal date for Volume 3 Past Performance information from "30 March" to “9 April”. This change moves the definitive date for submittal of Volume 3 Past Performance information.

Note: Offerors are to sign and date Amendment N0001917R00810001, Amendment N0001917R00810002, and Amendment N0001917R00810003 and include the signed Amendments with the proposal submittal.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

EXHIBIT/ATTACHMENT

ATTACHMENTS

EXHIBIT

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

LA – [1] CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (SERVICES)(FEB 2016) (JULY 2017)

PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 GENERAL

The Offeror is required to submit sufficient information concerning the following areas to enable Government personnel to fully ascertain capabilities of the Offeror to perform the requirements. The proposal must be sufficient in detail and scope to permit evaluation and provide the evaluators a clear understanding of the Offerors capability to meet or exceed the defined elements as required by the solicitation. All proposals must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks. Offeror must respond to all requirements of the solicitation and not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The Offeror is advised that the Government may incorporate any portions of the Offerors proposal deemed beneficial to the Government. With the exception of the Price/Cost volume, no cost or pricing information should appear in any volume.

In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization should be emphasized during proposal preparation. The Offeror shall present sufficient information to allow the Government to evaluate the proposed work effort, support, and approach, as well as the price/cost proposal without opening discussions. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can comply with or will comply with, the specifications, and paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information are considered inadequate by the Government, and may result in a rating of unacceptable.

The Offeror must include any data that illustrates the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. Failure to address a specific factor or subfactor clearly may be considered a deficiency. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation materials beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.

Offeror is expected to comply with all requirements of the RFP. The Government advises the Offeror that taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the RFP may make an offer unacceptable, and the proposal unawardable, unless the RFP expressly authorizes such an exception or deviation with regard to that specific term or condition. The Government may consider any exception or deviation to any term or condition of the RFP that is not expressly authorized by the RFP to be a deficiency.

In order to obtain a CD with the Enclosures and Appendices to Section J, Attachment (1) Performance Work Statement, as well as the Technical Manuals listed in the Performance Work Statement Offerors shall email Regina Ford at regina.ford@navy.mil and Selinda Joyner at selinda.joyner@navy.mil and provide the Offerors point of contact and address. The CD will also contain Historical Usage Data that was collected from 2015 to current date, this data is provided for informational purposes only. All CDs shall be returned to the Government within 3 days from request of the PCO.

Throughout these instructions, a “principal subcontractor” is defined as a subcontractor who provides at least 10% of the proposed total price/cost (excluding the Offerors profit/fee), for the contract. “Team member” is defined one of the entities that make up a joint venture (JV) or any other partnership or teaming arrangement formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation. “Critical team member” is defined as one of the entities of the Offeror that perform a critical function in the performance of the resulting contract, whether it is technical or financial, and/or that have important roles in any high- or medium- risk areas identified in the Offerors proposal.

Questions: Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements by emailing the contract specialist at regina.ford@navy.mil and the Procuring Contracting Officer at selinda.joyner@navy.mil. It is requested that all questions be received within 10 calendar days of the date this solicitation is issued.

2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12 pt normal font (no reduction permitted), single-spaced with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper. All pages should be numbered with section and page numbers. When foldout pages are used they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11 inch standard size and will count as 1 page. Graphs shall be presented in no smaller than a 10 pt font and should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph to the same accuracy that a 10 x 10 to the ½ inch grid provides. Graphic resolution, including such data as tables or charts, should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented.

The Offeror will provide one complete copy of the proposal to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) as electronic files fully compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 and for information not supported by MS Office products, with the latest Adobe Acrobat reader on a CD-ROM. The Offeror will ensure that the Price/Cost Volume is provided on a separate CD-ROM. Each CD-ROM is to be labeled for content and the Offerors name. If a discrepancy exists between the original paper copy of the proposal and the disk copy, the paper copy will take precedence.

3.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES

The Offeror must present proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one-to-one comparison between the information presented and this Proposal Instruction. Proposal information must be structured such that its paragraph number/letter is identical to the Proposal Instructions paragraph number to which it is responding, although the Offeror may add lower tier subparagraphs. The Offeror must provide reasons it will not provide information for a particular paragraph. The proposal information instructions are structured by paragraph numbers where first, second, third, and fourth parts correspond to the volume, book, section, and element, etc., in Offer's proposal.

Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted as one original and additional copies as specified in the table below. The table below supersedes the copies requested in Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF) 33.All volumes of the original proposal shall be delivered to the address provided in Section 4.0 prior to the closing date/time stated in this solicitation. Page limitations for each volume if any, are also specified in the table below; title and table of contents pages do not count towards page limit. Any pages submitted exceeding the page limit shall be disregarded and NOT evaluated.

AND WAIVERS

Each volume shall contain the following information:

- Cover and title page

- Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable

- Offeror's name, address and POC

- RFP number

- Proposal volume/book number

- Copy number

- Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements)

- Use tabs and dividers

The Offeror shall submit a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below, to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the evaluators' review of the Offeror's proposal. The CRM should be a single integrated matrix and cross-reference the proposal volumes and paragraphs to specific RFP requirements, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. The Offeror's CRM may be identical to the example below or revised such as to add columns to indicate the page number on which information may be found, identify where other relevant information in the proposal is located, or provide other comments. The CRM does not count against any of the proposal page limitations.

EXAMPLE OF A CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX (CRM)

Volume 2 Technical Example: Para 3.1 Note: This column shall address all paragraphs in Sections xx and xy of the Performance Specification

Volume 2 Technical

Volume 2 Technical

4.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:

Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number. The submission date for all Volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in Block 9 of Standard Form 33 of the RFP. However it is requested that Volume 3 Past Performance information be submitted by 2:00PM on 09 April 2018.

Offeror shall submit proposals via United States Postal Service or through a commercial carrier using the address provided below. Offeror shall not submit proposals by facsimile or electronically via email.

Naval Air Systems Command Code: AIR-2.2.2.3.1 (Regina Ford) or AIR-2.2.2.2 (Selinda Joyner) 47123 Buse Road Building 2272, Room 453 Patuxent River, MD 20670 Solicitation Number: N0001917R0081

Hand carried proposals may be delivered to the address above, attention (PCO) and/or (Specialist).

5.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING:

The Offeror shall package the proposal volumes in cartons or equivalent packaging containers in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each container shall be single person portable. One container shall include all Original Proposal volumes including the original/signed documents submitted as part of Volume 1 Executive Summary.

Each box should include a packing slip detailing the contents to include the volume number, title, and copy number. Also, each box should be stamped or marked “For Official Use Only” and “Source Selection Information - See FAR-2.101 and 3.104”.

6.0 CLASSIFIED DATA

All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED

7.0 SOLICITATION CHANGES

For any changes and additional information provided by the Government for the solicitation please go to www.FedBizOpps.gov

PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

Cost or pricing information shall only appear in the Price/Cost Volume.

1.0 VOLUME 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.

The purpose of the Executive Summary is to provide the evaluators with an overview of the Offeror's proposal and strategy. The Offeror shall include the following in this volume:

i. A concise abstract of the Offeror's strategy for each non-cost evaluation factor/subfactor contained in the solicitation.

ii. Offeror Summary Table: The Offeror shall complete the table below. The Offeror shall include all subcontractors and team members who will be involved with the performance or management of the contract and list all sites where the work will be performed. If a teaming or subcontracting arrangement is proposed, identify the work share, distribution elements, and ratios that each contractor will perform using the table below. Also provide a definition of the legal relationship between the entities if it is other than a Prime/subcontractor relationship.

Contractor Name (Indicate Prime, Team Member or Sub)

iii. Signed SF33 or SF1449 for basic soli citation and acknowledgment of each amendment, including completion of any RFP clause or provision that requires a fill-in or response.

iv. Signed Representations, Certifications and Acknowledgements or System for Award Management (SAM) reference.

v. Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations or Waivers if Volume 5.0 is not being submitted as part of the proposal.

vi. Guarantee the length of proposal validity (for at least 270 days after proposal submission).

vii. Written consent from principal subcontractors and critical team members that will allow the Government to coordinate potential past performance and/or cost/price issues with the Offeror.

2.0 VOLUME 2: TECHNICAL

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.

The Offeror shall provide all information and data required to conduct a thorough and complete technical evaluation.

The Offeror shall address the following in the proposal:

2.1.2 Manpower/Management – The Offeror shall describe the projected manpower requirements, including management, engineering, artisan, and administrative support to be utilized to meet the requirements of this solicitation and the plan to meet those requirements. The plan shall also include other projected workload for the business unit. The manpower description shall address monthly capacity requirements projected for the estimated RFP quantities as well as the other projected workload. For evaluation purposes only, assume level loading of projected workload over a 12-month period.

2.1.3 Workload Fluctuation – The Offeror shall address its ability to meet workload fluctuations taking into account other projected workload for the business unit. Specifically, the Offeror shall address the ability, including projected lead-time requirements, to grow total monthly capacity for the Power Section and Reduction Gear Assembly. For evaluation purposes only, provide a plan to go from 3 Power Sections and 2 Reduction Gear Assemblies per month to 6 Power Sections and 4 Reduction Gear Assemblies per month for each module (Power Section and Reduction Gear Assembly) within a period of less than 6 months. .

2.1.4 Material – The Offeror shall provide a material requirements plan for supporting the contractor furnished material requirements of the solicitation. The plan shall include information on projected parts utilization by module substantiated by data/analysis and strategies to address parts constraints. In addition, the plan shall also provide a strategy on how its vendors, subcontractors and remanufacturing capability will support the estimated quantities identified in Section B of the solicitation

2.1.5 Technical Processes – The Offeror shall demonstrate how the repair processes (plating, coating, heat treatment, welding, NDI, rotor balancing, and bearing processing inspection capability) will be accomplished. Illustrate each repair process by means of a flow or block diagram. For each repair process, identify how the process is monitored to ensure compliance with quality requirements. Identify any process, or portion of a process, which will be accomplished at a vendor or satellite facility. Describe the quality measures taken to ensure the integrity of the effort or service performed by the vendor or satellite facility. Include a description of the documentation and controls at the point in the process where a part is sent to a vendor or satellite facility for additional work or inspection, and at the point in the process where these parts are returned to the in-house manufacturing process. The Offeror shall provide a list of all vendors or satellite facilities to be used for each repair process.

2.2 Turn Around Time (TAT)

The Offeror shall provide the projected TAT for each firm fixed price repair Item in Section B of this solicitation. The Offeror's proposed TAT shall be substantiated by data/analysis and supported by an accounting of projected TAT for each of the major repair steps, including Disassembly, Cleaning, Awaiting Parts (AWP), Inspection, Assembly, and Final Acceptance test. The Offeror's proposed TAT, if less than the Not To Exceed turnaround, will be incorporated into the resultant contract in Section F. TATs shall not exceed the following:

No warranty is required, however any warranty proposed will be evaluated and may be considered a strength. Any warranty proposed may be incorporated into the contract.

2.4 Small Business (SB) Utilization Strategy

(1) Small Business (SB) Utilization Strategies: All Offerors (Large and Small Businesses) shall address their strategies for utilizing SB Concerns in the performance of this contract, whether as a JV, teaming arrangement or subcontractor. SB Offerors may meet this requirement using work they perform themselves. For purposes of this solicitation, the term SB Concern shall also include the sub-categories of Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned SB, HUBZone SB, Veteran-Owned SB, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned SB. Each subcategory of SB shall be addressed. This strategy is separate from, but shall be consistent with, the SB Subcontracting Plan, if such a Plan is required. In describing its SB Utilization Strategy for this solicitation, the Offeror shall, as applicable:

- Describe its approach to identifying SB Concerns;

- Describe the extent of participation of SB Concerns on this contract, including a detailed description of the supplies and services for each SB Concern subcategory, and the complexity and variety of the work SB Concerns are to perform. For each SB Concern specifically identified in the proposal, provide the SB Concern's CAGE Code, or if the SB Concern is not registered in the Central Contractor Registration, as a minimum provide evidence of self-certification as a SB Concern. Where possible, provide documentation regarding enforceable commitments to utilize each SB Concern;

- Identify what processes have been implemented to correct past inabilities to meet proposed goals and any validated improvements;

- Provide goals, expressed as dollars and percentages of total contract values and percentages of total subcontract values for SB Concern and each subcategory of SB. Goals of subcontractors must be listed separately;

- Describe its specific efforts to ensure the resulting contract meets or exceeds proposed goals. These efforts shall include, but are not limited to sponsoring program specific outreach events and industry conferences, establishing Mentor-Protégé relationships and market research using websites such as the NAVAIR Officer of Small Business Programs website http://www.navair.navy.mil/osbp to locate small business concerns; and

- Demonstrate (Large Business only) that its SB Utilization Strategy is consistent with its SB Subcontracting Plan. If the Offeror is a participant in the DoD Comprehensive Subcontracting Test Program specified in DFAR 219.7, the Offeror shall describe how SB participation on this contract will contribute to its overall Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan goals.

(2) SB Subcontracting Plans: The Large Business Offeror shall provide its SB Subcontracting Plan conforming to the requirements of FAR 19.7 and DFARS 219.7 as Annex 1, unless there is an already approved comprehensive SB Plan. The Subcontracting Plan of the successful Offeror(s) will be reviewed and approved by the PCO prior to contract award. See FAR 19.702(a)(1) Statutory Requirements, regarding failure of the apparent successful Offeror to negotiate and submit a Subcontracting Plan acceptable to the Contracting Officer. The successful Offeror's Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into the resultant contract.

3.0 VOLUME 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

3.1 General

The Offeror shall identify on the Past Performance Matrix (as identified in 3.1(a) below) any contracts performed within five years of the RFP release date which contains efforts similar to those performed by the Offeror, the Offeror's principal subcontractors, and the Offeror's critical team members in solicitation. E.g., tasks, complexity, contract type, contract dollar value, etc. Offerors shall not reference an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract without referencing the appropriate task orders containing the effort similar in nature to this requirement. Commercial contracts may be included. In general, recent performance will be considered more relevant than older performance. When possible, the Past Performance Matrix should include at least five of the most relevant contracts for the prime contractor, five of the most relevant contracts for each critical team member, and two of the most relevant contracts for each principal subcontractor. If less than five past performance references are available for team members (i.e., entities that make up a JV or any other partnership or teaming arrangement), each member should submit five references individually in addition to their team member references.

For each contract identified, provide contract data, relevancy, past performance, and systemic improvement information as described below. Demonstrate the relevancy of the Offeror's, and if applicable, the Offeror's principal subcontractors' or critical team members' past performance, as well as demonstrated systemic improvements with respect to the solicitation requirements. For each past performance problem identified, describe the status of the demonstrated systemic improvement efforts and, where applicable, demonstrate the impact that the demonstrated systemic improvement effort had on resolving the problem such that it would not reoccur.

The Past Performance Information Reporting System (PPIRS) will be used to evaluate Past Performance. For contracts that have CPARS Reports or similar reports that are more than six months old, e.g., the completion date is more than six months before the due date for this Past Performance Volume, the Offeror will forward a copy of the CPARS Update Questionnaire (Section L, Attachment((1)) to that contract customer's Program Manager. For all contracts identified which do not have CPARS Reports, the Offeror will forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Section L, Attachment ( 2)) to that contract customer's PCO, Administrative Contracting Officer, and Program Manager. All questionnaires shall be forwarded within two weeks from the RFP release date with enough lead-time so that responses can be received by the Government concurrently with the Government's receipt of the Offeror's Past Performance information submitted as per paragraph 4.1 and 4.2 The Offeror shall include instructions for the customers to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of its receipt via e-mail to Selinda Joyner, PCO, at Email Selinda.Joyner@navy.mil, and to Regina Ford, Contract Specialist, at Email Regina.Ford@navy.mil. thereby allowing the customer approximately two weeks to complete their response. This submittal information is provided at the top of the questionnaires to facilitate the Offeror's effort in meeting these instructions. The Offeror shall not conduct follow-up actions with regard to this questionnaire. The Government may send any other questionnaires as necessary.

The Offeror shall provide written consent from their principal subcontractors and critical team members that will allow the Government to coordinate their Past Performance issue(s) with the Offeror. If the Offeror does not submit such written consent, then the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal subcontractor or critical team member and the Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any principal subcontractors and critical team members that do not provide such written consent, provide a point of contact (name, address, phone number, and email address) with whom the Government may coordinate these issues and obtain any responses as needed.

The Government may use information other than that provided by the Offeror in their proposals to evaluate past performance. The Government may use Past Performance information obtained from sources other than those identified by the Offeror. It is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevancy of the data provided by the Offeror. The Government has no duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds in the information provided by the Offeror. The Offeror has the burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information.

(a) Contract Data - Provide all the information identified below separately for each contract. Additionally, provide this information electronically as a separate file on CD-ROM, which contains Offeror's Past Performance proposal in a Word Table in the format depicted below:

Past Performance Matrix

Relevant Contract Data

Prime (P), or Sub (S)

1Place of Performance should be the same as being proposed in this solicitation. If different please include an explanation.

2CPARS (yes/no) - CPARS completion date - on DOD PPAIS (yes/no) (Indicate whether or not any CPARS have been completed and identify the last CPARS completion date and if it is currently on DoD PPAIS) 3Recency - See definition in Section M. Only list efforts performed within five years of the date of the RFP release.

4Relevancy - Provide a concise assessment of the degree of relevancy (using the relevancy ratings below) that each contract identified has to the solicitation; identifying tasks and/or aspects of the effort undertaken on the contract that are relevant to the program.

(b) Past Performance Information - The Offeror shall provide a brief description of performance in delivering quality services in each of the following areas: 1) meeting technical requirements, i.e., the quality of technical performance, e.g., performing analysis, design, testing, etc., 2) meeting schedule requirements, i.e., schedule performance, e.g., on time or late delivery, modification of original schedules and reasons for any changes, etc., 3) controlling contract cost, i.e., cost performance, e.g., on time or late delivery, modification of original schedules and reasons for any changes, etc., and 4) managing the contracted effort, i.e., program management, e.g., cooperation with customer, subcontract management.

(c) Demonstrated Systemic improvement Information - Identify those demonstrated systemic improvement actions taken to resolve past problems. Describe the techniques, elements, and tools used to correct problems and, if applicable, how these techniques, elements, and tools will be used during this contract.

(d) Award Fee (If applicable): Provide a summary of the award fee available and earned for each evaluation period over the past three years of an on-going contract, or last three years of a completed contract (both in dollars earned and percentage of available award fee received).

(e) Small Business Utilization - The Large Business Offeror shall provide copies of the final or most recent SF 294s/Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for the three most relevant Government contracts provided in the Past Performance section of their proposal. The Small Business Offeror may provide this information in a format substantially the same as the ISR. If the Offeror is a participant in the DoD Comprehensive Subcontracting Test Program, they shall provide copies of DCMA's most recent Review of Contractor's Comprehensive Subcontracting Program (DCMA Form 640), and three final or most recent SF 295s/Summary Subcontracting Reports (SSRs), and explain how the results shown in these documents demonstrate the realism of their proposed SB Utilization Strategy. If applicable, note whether the contract met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business utilization and subcontracting goals. All Offerors providing this information must explain how this information translates to reasonableness of their proposed SB Utilization Strategy goals in the Technical Volume.

3.2. Past Performance Data Requirements

Provide all the information identified below separately for each contract. Provide a summary of the Customer's Points of Contact in a MS Word Table using the format below which is illustrated with an example. Include an electronic copy of this table in MS Word on a CD. Offerors are advised that they should contact the points of contact prior to sending a questionnaire or CPARS update to ensure they are current and willing to accommodate the request. Failure to ensure that points of contact are current may prevent the Government from obtaining sufficient information to fully assess the Offeror's performance, which could result in an “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)” or less that “Substantial Confidence” Performance Confidence Assessment Rating as defined in Section M of this solicitation.

Offeror's Name (Prim e, Principal Sub, or Critical Team Member, or Team Member)

1. Contract #,

2. Offeror's Role (e.g., prime or sub)

2. Questionnaire # __ Sent?

3. For Subs - Agreement to allow Coordination with Prime?

Point of Contact Information; Name;

Phone Number, Fax Number and E-mail address

2. Prime

2. Questionnaire #1: - Sent 2/23/12

3. N/A

Al (PM) 444-444-4444, fax 555-555-5555, Al@RYP

1. CPARS: No

2. Questionnaire #2: - Sent 5/4/12

3. N/A Sue (PCO) 333-333-3333 fax 222-222-2222 Sue@RTP

1. CPARS: No

2. Questionnaire #3: - Sent 5/4/12

3. N/A Joe (ACO) 111-111-1111 fax 888-888-8888 Joe@ RYP

2. Sub

2. Questionnaire # 1: - Sent 5/4/12

3. N/A Sue (PCO) 333-333-3333 fax 222-222-2222 Sue@AB

2. Prime

2. Questionnaire: - Not Sent

3. Agreement: Yes Sue (PCO) 333-333-3333 fax 222-222-2222 Sue@NNB

4.0 VOLUME 4: PRICE/COST PROPOSAL

4.1 Volume Content:

(a) This Volume shall contain the information requested below and shall include a copy of Section B with the Contract Line Item (CLIN) Unit Prices and, for evaluation purposes, the Total Prices filled in using the estimated quantities value in the solicitation and the instructions below. If applicable, Offeror's labor classifications should cross-reference to Department of Labor (DOL) wage determination classifications as much as possible. In addition, the Offeror shall provide a percentage breakdown of the Offeror's indirect costs and burdens added to the Government estimates for any and all Cost Reimbursable CLINs in Section B. Section B prices shall be provided separately in one digital data copy in MS Office 2010 Excel format on CD-ROM media. Within all Excel spreadsheets, the Offeror shall use formulas and functions to the maximum extent possible and avoid using output type “value only” cells. If links are utilized, supply those referenced files. Spreadsheets shall not be protected.

(b) All price/cost and price/cost supporting information shall be contained in section B and the price/cost proposal. No price or pricing information shall be included in any other technical volume including cover letters. Offerors are responsible for submitting sufficient information to enable the Government to fully evaluate their price/cost proposal.

4.2 Ground Rules and Assumptions:

(a) As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate price competition anticipated, any price/cost documentation requested shall not be certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from both the Offeror and subcontractors and may conduct negotiations with the Offeror, pursuant to FAR Part 15.403-4, in order to ensure a reasonable and realistic price/cost. Further, the Offeror may be required to provide a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to FAR 15.406-2. Offeror shall acknowledge the requirement to provide additional cost or pricing information and certify the data prior to award if/when requested by the Government.

(b) The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its price/cost as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price/cost estimates.

4.3 Price Information:

4.3.1 Firm Fixed Price CLINs

The Offeror shall provide the proposed price for each CLIN. The offeror shall provide an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect price.

4.3.2 Labor Hour CLINs

4.3.2.1 The Offeror shall provide the proposed price for each CLIN. The offeror shall provide an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price estimates. 4.3.2.2 Example Evaluated Price and Calculation

Example calculation for Labor Hour CLINs 0X09 (Engineering, Technical Services)

CLIN Estimated Amount = Evaluated Price = Unit Price multiplied by Estimated Quantity (QTY)

4.3.3 Cost Reimbursable CLINs

4.3.3.1 The Offeror shall provide an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price estimates. The proposed cost shall be the Government estimated amount plus any Offeror burdens applied. The Offeror shall not add any additional direct costs to the Government Estimated Amount. The Offeror shall clearly show the total burden rate, and the individual cost elements that make up the total burden rate. If the Offeror chooses not to burden the Government estimated amount, then the Offeror shall propose an H-clause to identify this special term and condition. Fee or profit are not allowable on Cost Reimbursable CLINs and will not be included as part of the burden rate.

For CLINs 0X10, ODCs which include travel, the Government will reimburse the Contractor for travel and per diem costs on the basis of maximum allowable actual costs incurred up to the daily equivalent allowed for a Government employee IAW the Department of Defense (DOD) Civilian Personnel Joint Travel Regulations and the Federal Travel Regulations, prescribed by the General Services Administration, and the Standardized Regulations (Government Civilians, Foreign Areas), as prescribed by the Department of State.

4.3.3.2 Example Evaluated Price and Calculation

Example calculation for Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0X07 (Material in Support of Minor Repair)

Example calculation for Cost Reimbursable CLINs 0X10 (Other Direct Cost)

CLIN Estimated Amount = Evaluated Price = Government Estimated Amount plus the Indirect Costs and Burdens

4.4 Use of Government Furnished Property:

If the Offeror proposes/requires the use of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) or Government Furnished Information (GFI), then the Offeror shall provide:

- A complete description of the required GFE/GFI including part number and serial number, if applicable.

- Where the GFE/GFI is to be located.

- The name, organization, complete address and telephone number of a cognizant Government point of contact.

- In the case of GFE/GFI accountable to other Government contracts, a copy of the correspondence authorizing use of such GFE/GFI on this contract.

- The monetary impact to the Offeror's proposal if the proposed GFE/GFI is not provided as GFE/GFI.

Attachment (5), “Scheduled Government-Furnished Property (SGFP)”, specifies the Government Property to be furnished.

If no GFE/GFI/GFP is required, the Offeror shall so state.

4.5 Other Costs

The Offeror shall identify additional costs that would be incurred that have not been identified in the solicitation and describe in detail the performance that would cause these costs. Also, describe any assumptions with regard to Government actions (e.g., providing resources whether it be equipment or people) that enabled the proposed price/cost to be lower and identify the amount by which it is lower.

5.0 VOLUME 5 -- EXCEPTIONS, DEVIATIONS AND WAIVERS:

In this Volume, the Offeror must state that its offer contains all exceptions, deviations, and waivers that the Offeror takes from the provisions of the solicitation and its applicable documents. An “exception” is where an Offeror states it will not comply with a requirement, usually involving contract terms and conditions. A “deviation” is where an Offeror states it will not comply with a requirement but proposes an alternative to meet the intent of the requirement, usually involving a specification. A “waiver” is where an Offeror requests authorization for the Government to accept an item, which will depart from, specified requirements, but would nevertheless be considered suitable. Exceptions, deviations, and requests for waivers may cause proposals to be considered deficient.

Provide a detailed description for each exception, deviation, or request for waiver, as applicable. The Offeror shall indicate the Offerors difficulty with the applicable requirement and the Offeror's proposed solution. The Offeror shall specifically identify the portion of the solicitation and the Offeror's proposal which are affected. If there are no exceptions, deviations or waivers, the Offeror shall provide a one-page Volume 5.0 in the Executive Summary stating so.

Section L Attachment (1)

CPARS UPDATE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to Selinda Joyner, PCO at selinda.joyner@navy.mil, and to Regina Ford, Contract Specialist at regina.ford@navy.mil, thereby allowing the customer approximately 2 weeks to complete their response.

If the last CPAR on the subject contract was completed more than 6 months prior to the receipt of this questionnaire, please complete the questionnaire below, Section L, Attachment (2).

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

*If possible, the Program Manager should complete this questionnaire.

3. SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE

3.1 Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR? For example, during the last CPAR period, the contractor was primarily doing design work, but now the program has entered into the testing phase.

NO, CURRENT WORK IS SIMILAR TO LAST CPARS EFFORTS _____

If YES, please explain.

Section L Attachment (2)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire return this form to Selinda Joyner, PCO at selinda.joyner@navy.mil and to Regina Ford, Contract Specialist at regina.ford@navy.mil, thereby allowing the customer approximately 2 weeks to complete their response.

1.0 CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2.0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

3.0 PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:

1. Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS)/Non-Developmental Items (NDI) usage. ________

1. Aircraft Modifications. _________

1. Aircraft Field Maintenance at multiple sites in support of flight operations. __________

1. Directed subcontracts. ___________

1. Management of U.S. Government Furnished Property (GFP). ___________

1. Aircraft Heavy Maintenance to include major aircraft repairs/inspections, engine, propeller and aircraft component overhaul, repair and configuration tracking. ______

1. Operation, Development and Maintenance of Computerized Management Information Systems in support Aircraft Field and Heavy Maintenance requirements at multiple sites. __

1. Configuration Management of Aircraft and Aircraft Components. __________

1. Aircraft Flight Operations on Military sites. ___________

1. Engineering support for Field and Heavy Maintenance Activities supporting multiple aircraft sites. ___________

1. Hazmat/Environmental Program Development, Control and Management. __________

1. Flight/Industrial Safety/Quality Assurance Management and Oversight of Field and Heavy Maintenance activities. ____________

1. Corporate Oversight and Management of Aviation Maintenance Programs to include use of subcontract(s) in support of aircraft operating out of multiple sites. ________

1. Supply Support for Field and Heavy Maintenance activities supporting multiple aircraft sites. _________

1. Management of Personnel performing aircraft maintenance at multiple sites to include training, recruitment and transfer of personnel between sites. _____

1. Obtaining Customs Clearances for export/import shipment of parts and material. __________

1. Aircraft Strip and Paint _________

1. Engine Overhaul and Repair _________

1. Landing Gear Overhaul _________

1. Propeller Overhaul _________

1. Support Equipment Maintenance _________

1. Aviation Life Support Systems Maintenance and Issue _________

1. Engineering Services ________

1. Does this contract have a subcontracting plan________

1. Date of last individual Subcontracting Report (ISR) / Summary Subcontracting Report______.

4.0 PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the U.S. Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the U.S. Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet many contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear to be or were ineffective.

4.2 QUESTIONS

4.2.1 TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

a. What kind of technical performance problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these technical problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's technical performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.2: SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

a. What kinds of delivery/schedule problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. What was the cause of these delivery/schedule problems or strengths?

c. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

d. Overall, the contractor's delivery/schedule performance is rated _________________.

4.2.3. COST PERFORMANCE

1. What kinds of Cost problems or strengths were experienced by the contractor?

b. If the contractor experienced an overrun please provide the percentage. _________

1. What was the cause of these Cost problems or strengths?

1. If available, provide earned value cost performance measures including indices for cost efficiency (CPI) and schedule efficiency (SPI). Based on this information, please provide a narrative assessment of their performance.

1. To what extent have corrective actions been taken to correct problem(s) identified above and to what extent have the corrective actions been effective? Describe the progress made to date. Also explain to what extent the corrective actions addressed the root cause of the problem(s) and led to systemic improvement such that similar problems would not reoccur.

1. Overall, the contractor's Cost performance is rated ________________________.

4.2.4 MANAGEMENT

4.2.4.1 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENSS

a. What was the contractor’s record of timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering change proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions), the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction?

4.2.4.2 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

a. What was the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor…