Attachment_4_PPQ__M68909-18-Q-7603.pdf
PDF 348 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M68909-18-Q-7603
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire, M68909-18-Q-7603
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
M68909-18-Q-7603 Attachment 4
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the questionnaire and return it to the Government Contracting Officer. DO NOT send completed questionnaires to the vendor. Please submit via email the completed questionnaire no later than the solicitation closing date specified in the RFQ.
Email Address: roy.layug1@usmc.mil and rosemarie.e.mendoza1@usmc.mil
SECTION I: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Please complete the following information on the contract in which you are involved.
Customer/Agency Name
Contract Number
Contractor
Cage Code
Contract Type
(Please check one box from each column)
Total Contract Value
IDIQ Contract Ceiling
Firm-Fixed Price
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Independent Contract Labor Hour IDIQ Contract
Time and Materials
Other, Specify:
(if applicable)
Status Active Complete
Award Date
Period of Performance
(inc. unexercised options) Start End
Geographic location of performance
Extent of Competition Full and Open Full and Open After Exclusion of Sources
Other than Full and Open
Provide a description of the service provided:
Describe the type and extent of subcontracting:
mailto:rosemarie.e.mendoza1@usmc.mil
M68909-18-Q-7603 Attachment 4
SECTION II: EVALUATION
Use the following ratings and descriptions as guidance in providing element ratings. Ratings should only reflect the performance of the contractor in question.
Rating Definition
Exceptional (E)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good (VG)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the customer were effective.
Satisfactory (S)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal (M)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (U)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains a problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral (N) Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported.
For each question, please place an “X” in the box corresponding to the rating. For all ratings except “Satisfactory (S)” or “Neutral (N),” place an “X” in the “Comments” box and provide supporting rationale below. For each comment, reference the corresponding performance area number. The narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed, clear and concise.
Please rate Contractor performance in the following areas:
Performance Area
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Comments
Ability of the contractor to comply with contract terms and conditions
Quality of the contractor’s management relationship with Government (or customer) counterparts
Ability of the contractor to consistently meet performance timeline requirements
M68909-18-Q-7603 Attachment 4
Performance Area
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Comments
Accuracy and timeliness in providing contract deliverables
Ability of the contractor to recruit, hire, and retain sufficient personnel to ensure contract performance
Ability of the contractor to respond to short notice requirements
Resolution of contract discrepancies
Identified problems as they occurred
Ability of the contractor to obtain appropriate company and personnel security clearances
Ability of the contractor to safeguard classified materials in compliance with Government regulations
Responsiveness to contract changes
What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
Please discuss all ratings except “Satisfactory” or “Neutral.” Provide a reference to the performance area number being discussed.
M68909-18-Q-7603 Attachment 4
Government Contracts Only
1. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice? Yes No If yes, please explain.
2. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?
Yes If yes or pending, select: Default No Pending Termination
Convenience
If yes or pending, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION III: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
2. What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?
M68909-18-Q-7603 Attachment 4
3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
4. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
SECTION IV: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
Please provide information for the primary individuals completing this survey.
Name
Office Identifier
Telephone Number
Mailing Address
Email Address
Relationship to Contract
File details come from the government source that posted it.