M67854-25-R-5104-P0001.pdf

M6785425R5104

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of the amendment is to make the changes in response to the inquiries during the Questions and Answ ers period of this solicitation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 43

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-May-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M6785425R5104

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Apr-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-May-2025

CODE

M67854 - MARCORSYSCOM

ATTN: KIMBERLY STONE

2200 LESTER STREET

QUANTICO VA 22134

M67854 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0005

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of Performance 8 months from date of contract award.

To:

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per year in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of Performance 8 months from date of contract award.

CLIN 1005

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of Performance 12 months from date of exercise of Option 1.

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per year in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of Performance 12 months from date of exercise of Option 1.

CLIN 2001

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of

Performance 8 months from date of award.

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of Performance 12 months from date of exercise of Option 2.

CLIN 2005

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per year in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

CLIN 3001

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of Performance 12 months from date of exercise of Option 3.

CLIN 3005

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per year in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

CLIN 4001

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 40 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Any assets that have not been completed during the month may be carried over to subsequent months within the contract period, provided the total value of carried-over assets does not exceed the funded amount in that period of performance.Period of Performance 12 months from date of exercise of Option 4.

CLIN 4005

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per month in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

Repair, restoration and Government acceptance of approximately 6 Corrosion Category Codes 3 and 4, Principal End Items (PEI) per year in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). These 6 may be produced anytime during the period of performance when delivered for repair not to exceed the funded amount. Period of

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Services

1.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The following are specific instructions to Offerors that are applicable to this Request for Proposal (RFP).

a. A concise and comprehensive proposal is required. The proposal shall be complete and clear in all respects without the need for additional explanation or information. The proposal shall be in sufficient detail and scope to permit the Government to evaluate it with respect to the evaluation factors specified in FAR Provision 52.212-2.

b. Unnecessarily elaborate proposals, beyond what is sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal, are not desired. The Government will not assume that an Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, and/or commitment that is not specifically identified, described with specificity, and supported in its respective proposal.

c. The Offeror shall not include classified material in any proposal section.

d. A ceiling on the number of pages in the proposal has been imposed, as indicated in the sections below. In the event an Offeror exceeds the maximum page limitations provided below, the Government will only evaluate the pages that comply with the maximum page number prescribed (starting with page one and continuing until the maximum number is reached) for the respective volume. The Government will not evaluate any pages, or any other material, which exceed the applicable Page Limit.

e. The Government will make a single award to the Offeror that provides the best value to the Government.

The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated according to four factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Understanding of the Requirements Factor 2 – Management and Staffing Approach Factor 3 – Past Performance Factor 4 – Price

f. As prescribed by FAR 52.212-1, the Government may award on the basis of initial offers received, without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

g. Offerors shall not submit more than one (1) offer in response to this solicitation. Organization, clarity, accuracy of information, relevance, and completeness are of prime importance. The proposal shall be complete and clear in all respects without the need for additional explanation or information.

h. Proposals submitted for consideration for award must address each and every requirement of the solicitation, in sufficient detail to be meaningfully responsive to the respective requirement.

1.2 QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the solicitation documents are due by 1600 Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 5 May 2025 and must be submitted via e-mail to Kimberly Stone at kimberly.a.stone@usmc.mil and Deshawn Gaines at deshawn.gaines@usmc.mil in the following table format. See Table 1 below. Please do not bundle multiple questions into one. Questions received after the above time and date may not be answered. Government responses will be posted to https://www.SAM.gov.

Questions

Document/Section Paragraph Question/Issue/Concern General Issue Solicitation

PWS

Other

2.0 PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS

a. Proposals shall be prepared using “Times New Roman” font and 12-point type, on 8½ x 11inch white paper. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font style not less than 8 point. Foldouts are not allowed.

Margins shall be 1 inch on all sides. All material submitted may be single-spaced. Offerors shall ensure that each page provides identification of the submitting Offeror in the header or footer. Number all pages sequentially.

b. Offeror shall include two electronic copies (one copy of the business volume and one copy of the technical volume accounts for one copy) of the full proposal. The first copy shall be submitted using the Microsoft Office for Windows suite of applications and the second shall be submitted in portable document format (PDF). In the event that there is a conflict between the two electronic copies of the proposal, the PDF copy will take precedence. Such conflicts may be considered as a weakness during the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal.

c. Each proposal volume shall contain a title page, table of contents, acronym list, and list of tables and figures for that volume. The title page, table of contents, acronym list, list of tables and figures do not count against the page count. Only material allocated to a specific section shall be in that section. Business and Technical Volumes shall be submitted in separate files.

d. Proposals shall be submitted via email to Kimberly Stone at kimberly.a.stone@usmc.mil and Deshawn Gaines at deshawn.gaines@usmc.mil. Proposals are due no later than 1600 EST on 28 May 2025.

2.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE PROPOSAL

The offeror shall comply with the instructions shown in the table below. The Business Volume consists of Part I. The Technical Volume consists of Parts II, III, and IV.

Volume Content

Volume Part Content Copies Page Limit

Business Volume

Part I Executive Summary Word and

PDF

5 Pages

“ “ Completed SF30 Model Contract including pricing PDF N/A

Technical Volume

Part II Executive Summary Word and

PDF

1 Pages*

“ Technical Understanding of the Requirements and Management and Staffing Approach

Word and

PDF

10 Pages*

Part III Past Performance “ 10 Pages*

Past Performance Questionnaire Word or

PDF

N/A

* Page limit indicated is no more than (No minimum).

2.2 CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL

The following instructions are provided for the respective portions of the proposal:

Business Volume:

Part I

Executive Summary. This section shall certify that the proposal has been prepared completely consistent with the terms and conditions of the solicitation. Any exceptions, deviations, and/or waivers shall render the Offeror’s proposal unacceptable to the Government. Offerors must certify that their respective offer provided in response to solicitation M67854-25-R-5104 does not take any exception to deviate from, or otherwise request a waiver for any of the requirements described in solicitation M67854-25-R-5104. This part should include the Offeror’s cognizant DCMA, DCAA, and DFAS payment office. This part should also include the Offeror’s size standard and Sam.gov Unique Entity ID.

SF 33 and Model Contract/Pricing. The Business Volume shall include a completed, signed original copy of the entire solicitation, with all appropriate “fill-ins” completed. This volume shall consist of the model contract with all proposed pricing. The offeror shall submit a signed and completed copy of the Standard Form 1449, acknowledging any solicitation amendments signed by a person authorized to enter the proposed contract on behalf of the Offeror.

The Government reserves the right to accept the offer by signing this document without discussions or clarifications, which (if applicable) would then become the awarded contract.

Technical Volume:

Part II

Executive Summary. This section shall include a brief summary of the Offeror’s capability to accomplish the requirements of the contract. Any exceptions, deviations, and/or waivers taken to any aspect of the RFP shall be identified in the Executive Summary. Such exceptions, deviations, or waivers may cause the Offeror’s proposal to be evaluated as unacceptable which would make such proposal ineligible for award.

Technical Understand of the Requirements and Management and Staffing Approach. Offerors shall briefly describe how they intend to meet the support service requirements set forth in the performance work statement (PWS).

Specifically, offerors shall list any teaming partners or subcontractors and explain the roles and responsibilities of such teaming partners or subcontractors. Offerors shall list and define all labor categories utilized in meeting the PWS requirements. Offerors shall provide a staffing table which lists the labor categories and positions that are being proposed to fulfill the PWS requirements.

Part III

Past Performance. The Offeror shall document its past performance by identifying relevant contracts performed within the past three years. Offerors shall explain the relevance for each listed contract to the requirements of the solicitation. Relevancy, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance. Contracts valued between $12 million to $16million may be more relevant than contracts for similar work with a total value below $12 million or greater than $16 million. Offerors shall address how the listed contracts are similar to the requirements in this solicitation.

Ensure that accurate and concise information is provided for each contract including:

• Title of Contract, Contract Number, and Sponsoring Organization;

• Name, mailing address, telephone and email address for the Technical POC or COR and

Contracting Officer;

• Type of Contract, Value, Award and Completion Dates;

• Brief description of the services performed, problems identified, and corrective action taken, awards/recognition received; and

• Indicate if Cure Notice/Show Cause notices received, and reasons.

Offerors are advised that the Government may also use and evaluate independently obtained past performance data from other sources such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs).

For each contract reference listed, the Offeror shall provide a PPQ as provided in Appendix D. The Offeror shall send out and track the completion of the PPQs. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires must be submitted directly from the Offeror's Government/Commercial Points of Contact (POCs) to the Government. Offerors shall direct their POCs to mail or email completed PPQ’s directly to the contract specialist at kimberly.a.stone@usmc.mil.

3.0 INTENT TO INCORPORATE CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL

All or part of the successful Offeror’s proposal may be incorporated in any contract resulting from this solicitation.

Nothing contained in the successful Offeror’s proposal shall constitute a waiver to any requirement of the contract.

In the event of any conflict between the successful Offeror’s proposal and other requirements of the contract, the conflict shall be resolved in favor of the contract requirements.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 EVALUATION-COMMERCIAL Services

1. The Government intends to make award on a best value basis using trade-offs. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 2 – Management and Staffing Approach

2. The non-price factors are listed in descending order of importance and, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

3. As prescribed by FAR 52.212-1, the Government may award based on initial offers received, without discussions.

Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a business and technical standpoint.

4. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions, clarifications, or other communications with one or more single offerors, if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

5. The Business Volume will be evaluated separately from the Technical Volume. Relevant information directly impacting risk in either the Technical or Business Volumes will be exchanged between panels. Factors 1 and 2 will be evaluated using the Combined Technical/Risk Rating table below.

6. The technical rating evaluates the quality of the Offeror’s technical solution for meeting the Government’s requirement with respect to the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, and deficiencies to determine the technical rating. A deficiency rating for a requirement will only be assigned when both parts of the deficiency definition are evaluated to be present in a material failure or combination of weaknesses and unacceptable risk to contract success. A rating of Unacceptable in any evaluated non-price factor will render the proposal unacceptable. Unacceptable proposals are ineligible for award without discussions.

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 - Technical Understanding of the Requirements

The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror has demonstrated a clear technical understanding and ability to meet all of the Government requirements set forth in the PWS.

Factor 2 - Management and Staffing Approach

The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine whether its staffing approach provides a clear and complete plan for meeting all Government requirements set forth in the PWS. The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s proposal provides sufficient resources to accomplish each PWS task. The Government will assess whether the Offeror’s proposed labor mix provides the requisite skills and abilities to accomplish each PWS task.

Unreasonably low estimates of the required labor to accomplish a task may be evaluated as a weakness or deficiency based on an assessment of the potential risk for unacceptable performance. Likewise, use of labor categories which lack the necessary skills and abilities to accomplish specific PWS tasks may also be evaluated as a weakness or deficiency based on an assessment of the risk for unacceptable performance.

Factor 3 - Past Performance

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance in providing similar support services. The Government’s evaluation will focus on past performance information which demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to provide high quality services in a timely manner. Problems not addressed by the Offeror will be considered to still exist. However, consideration for mitigating problems may be given when those problems are addressed through demonstrated and/or documented improvement.

The Government will determine the relevancy of each past performance submitted in the Offeror’s proposal and assign a Past Performance Relevancy rating for each past performance as set forth in Appendix C. Once the SSEB has applied the relevancy criteria, the Government will assign a Performance Confidence Rating as set forth in Appendix C.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will receive a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably for past performance.

Factor 4 - Price

Price will be evaluated but will not be rated. A total evaluated price will be calculated by summing the proposed price for all base year and option CLINs. Please note that the RFP contains FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. This clause permits the Government to require continued performance for a period not to exceed six months at the rates specified in the contract. The Government will evaluate this potential option by multiplying the Offeror’s pricing for the fourth option year by a factor of 1.5.

EVALUATION FACTOR ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS

The table below will be used to assign an adjectival rating for Factor 1 – Technical Understanding of the Requirements, and Factor 2 – Management and Staffing Approach

Rating Description

Outstanding

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

The Government’s evaluation of Technical Capability will be based on the Offeror’s written Technical Volume in their proposal. During the technical evaluation, strengths assigned to PWS items where an Offeror’s proposal exceeds requirements will be afforded more weight in the evaluation of Factors 1 and 2.

Past Performance – Factor 3. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation rating.

1) The first (relevancy) will be to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

Past performance will be evaluated for relevancy based on the Offeror’s experience performing tasks similar in size, scope, and/or complexity. Performance within the past five years shall also be evaluated to determine the level of risk posed on the basis of customer satisfaction with the Offeror’s prior performance.

2) The second (confidence) past performance evaluation will be to determine how well the Offeror performed on those contracts.

The table below will be used to the relevancy of each past performance reference submitted.

Relevancy Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The table below will be used to assign a Confidence Rating for Factor 3 – Past Performance:

Confidence Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Price – Factor 4. The price proposed by the Offeror will be evaluated but not rated. The total evaluated price includes the sum of the “Total Amount” identified for all CLINs (including any option CLINs). The price evaluation will determine whether each Offeror’s proposed price to the Government is reasonable using one or more of the methods cited in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2). The total evaluated price will be utilized in conducting a best value trade-off analysis.

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Corrosion Repair Facility (CRF) Services, Okinawa, Japan

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

C-1.0 SCOPE. The Contractor shall provide all labor, training, management, supervision, tools, equipment, materials, and supplies (except those items specifically noted as Government-furnished in section C-3) necessary to perform corrosion repair and restoration of Government owned vehicles, equipment, and components. Corrosion repair services include, but are not limited to:

Inspection Disassembly Cleaning Body Repair Corrosion Removal & Surface Preparation

Coating System Application

Registration Marking Reassembly

All services shall comply with the References, Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specifications, and/or other technical guidance provided in Appendix A. The Contractor shall perform quality control continuously throughout the process, and the Government will complete Quality Assurance (QA) inspections after each stage of repair. All work shall be completed at the Government’s site:

Corrosion Repair Facility (CRF) Building 616, Camp Kinser, Okinawa, Japan

C-1.1 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS & REFERENCE MATERIAL. Appendix A provides a list of technical publications, technical specifications, and policy guidance relating to services required. The Government will make all these documents available to the Contractor on award and will provide updates as changes are incorporated. Only the current version of each publication shall be used in performance of this contract.

C-1.2 WORKLOAD PLANNING & MANAGEMENT

C-1.2.1. PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS. The Contractor shall be capable of repairing and restoring a monthly production objective of between 50 – 70 Principal End Items (PEI) categorized in of various Corrosion Category Codes (CCC), (Para. C-1.6.1.3.) and size equipment (Para. C-1.6.1.4.).

C-1.2.1.1. Production Breakdown by Service Organization. Multiple Government organizations will participate in this contract; production shall be completed and invoiced as follows:

C-1.2.1.2. U.S. Marine Corps Equipment. 40 PEI per month / 480 per year.

C-1.2.1.3. U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) Equipment. 6 PEI per month / 72 per year.

C-1.2.1.4. U.S. Navy Naval Construction Regiment (NCR) 30. 4 per month / 48 per year.

C-1.2.1.5. U.S. Navy Aviation Intermediate Maintenance Detachment (AIMD). 3 per month / 36 per year.

C-1.2.1.6. Other service agencies that may require corrosion repair services.

C-1.3 Repair Cycle Time (RCT). The Contractor shall be capable of completing all required repair tasks in thirty days or less from the equipment induction date. The RCT period begins on the day the Government makes a PEI available to the Contractor for work. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) promptly when the 30-day RCT cannot be achieved. The COR will determine if the delay is reasonable and acceptable.

C-1.4 Accelerated RCT. Due to unpredictable emerging mission requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to reprioritize equipment in the process and to expedite repairs of identified equipment. The COR will provide the Contractor with a schedule reprioritizing equipment currently in the repair process to accommodate repair of the identified equipment. In-process items that exceed the 30-day RCT because of reprioritization shall be documented by the COR as a “Government Delay,” and the Contractor will not be penalized.

C-1.5 Monthly Production Requirement Adjustments. If it is not reasonable to achieve monthly production requirements identified in (Para. C-1.2.1.) because of an unbalanced ratio of equipment sizes (e.g., excessive amount of heavy and oversized equipment (Para. C-1.6.1.4.), then the Government will automatically reduce the requirement for that month. The optimal size distribution is calculated within the Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPAC) Program Management Tool (Para. C-1.6.1.1.).

C-1.6 Changes to Production Requirements. This is an Indefinite quantity procurement. The Contractor will be provided with ninety days advance notice in the event the Government requires adding or reducing the production requirements identified in (Para C-1.2.1.). The Contractor may only perform services up to the funded amount of the CLIN(s).

C-1.6.1. Production Planning Considerations.

C-1.6.1.1. CPAC Program Management Tool. The CPAC Program Management Tool is the primary source of information for CRF production planning, maintenance data recording, equipment condition, and historical production and material consumption data. The CPAC Program Management Tool is a Microsoft Access database maintained by the Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC), CPAC Program Office. The COR and or designated personnel will make this database available to the Contractor and provide training to aid in monthly workload management.

C-1.6.1.2. Scheduling Process & Timelines. The Government uses a three-month process to schedule, deliver and repair equipment at the CRF:

C-1.6.1.2.1. Scheduling (Month #1). On/about the 25th of each month, the Government will publish (via the CPAC Program Management Tool) a list of equipment scheduled for delivery to the CRF in the following month (e.g., in April, the Government will schedule equipment to be delivered in May).

C-1.6.1.2.2. Delivery (Month #2). During the delivery month, equipment will be delivered to the CRF and accepted by the COR. The Contractor shall conduct a joint inspection with the COR and owning organization to capture equipment identification data, current condition, and work requirements. All equipment delivered becomes the planned production items for the following month (e.g., equipment delivered in May should be serviced by the Contractor in June).

C-1.6.1.2.3. Production (Month #3). During the production month, the Contractor shall complete repair services outlined in (Para. C-1.0.) The COR, in consultation with the Contractor, will determine the order of induction. A first-in/first-out (FIFO) methodology is normally used;

however, this will be adjusted based on Government mission requirements and opportunities to maximize facility space and capabilities.

C-1.6.1.2.4. Changes to Schedule. At any time, the Government may change the equipment scheduled for delivery. When this happens, the replacement equipment will be the same CCC, (Para. C-1.6.1.3.) and size categories (Para. C-1.6.1.4.) or less than the originally scheduled item.

C-1.6.1.3. Corrosion Category Codes (CCC). The Marine Corps categorizes equipment condition in one of five CCC. The definition of these codes is available in Marine Corps Order

4790.18. The CCC is a reference point for workload planning purposes. Equipment delivered for repair services will be a CCC 3 or 4 (unless authorized by the COR), and the Contractor shall return it to CCC 1 or 2 condition.

C-1.6.1.4. Equipment Size Categories. All equipment receiving services will be classified as ULTRA-LIGHT (< 300 cubic-feet), LIGHT (300-1000 cubic-feet), MEDIUM (1000-2000 cubic-feet), HEAVY (2000-3500 cubic-feet), or OVERSIZED (> 3500 cubic feet). Examples of equipment types that fall into these categories is available in Appendix C. This list IS NOT all inclusive. The Government believes, but does not warranty or otherwise guarantee, that Appendix C is a fairly representative list of likely PEI that will require repair under this contract.

Appendix C and is provided for Contractor planning purposes and proposal development ONLY.

C-1.7. Corrosion Repair Services. The Government will deliver the equipment to the CRF so that it can be accepted by the COR and inducted by the Contractor. The Contractor shall apply the basic performance steps outlined herein. The order of services shall follow the procedures described In Accordance With (IAW) the references outlined in Appendix A unless deviations are authorized and or agreed to by the COR.

C-1.7.1. Government QA Inspections. The Contractor shall notify the Government upon completion of each performance step described herein. Government QA representatives shall conduct an inspection of the service and provide approval to proceed to the next step. If a service fails the Government’s QA inspection, then the Contractor shall perform corrective action and request a new inspection when complete. Production delays caused by Contractor rework shall be deemed “Contractor Delay.”

C-1.7.2. Equipment Acceptance Inspections & Service Requirements. The Contractor, Government QA, and owning unit shall conduct a joint inspection upon delivery of equipment to the CRF to document basic equipment identification information, operational condition, accompanying Stock List Level 3 (SL-3) items, extent of damage, and repair requirements. The Contractor shall develop an acceptance inspection form to capture this information and provide copies to the using unit and the Government QA immediately after the inspection.

C-1.7.3. Corrosion Repair Level of Effort. The CCC determines baseline Level of Effort (LOE);

however, should the Contractor identify additional repair requirements during the acceptance inspection, these shall also be documented on the inspection form.

C-1.7.4. Services to be Performed. The COR (or Government QA) shall determine which repair services described herein shall be performed for each asset being processed.

C-1.7.5. Equipment Designated for Spot Repair. During the inspection procedures, if a determination is made that corrosion or coating damage is less than 25% of the asset, then the COR may authorize Spot Repair for just the affected area(s).

C-1.7.6. Documentation of Man-Hours for Services Performed. The Contractor shall record the total man-hours for each phase of the repair process and provide this to the Government throughout the production process on the Services Required form (Appendix H) generated from within the CPAC Program Management Tool. The information will further be utilized to identify completed assets for payment of completed services/assets.

C-1.8. Contractor Operation of Equipment.

C-1.8.1. Tactical Equipment Operation. The Contractor shall operate to facilitate maintenance activities), repair and maintain platforms, systems, subsystems and support equipment as required.

C-1.8.2. Garrison Mobile Equipment (GME) Operation. Contractor personnel must have a commercial forklift license to operate a GME forklift. A Government training class will be provided for Contractor’s employees to obtain the required Government forklift operator permit(s).

C-1.9. Service Procedures. Service of all equipment shall be in accordance with the references outlined within Appendix A. A general description of services is outlined below:

C-1.9.1. Disassembly. Equipment will be delivered with required collateral equipment required to operate within the CRF following acceptance (e.g., fire extinguisher, spare tires, SL-3, etc.).

The Contractor shall remove, and stow these items equipment, as required. The Contractor shall disassemble equipment to the extent necessary gain access to, and arrest corrosion. This includes, but is not limited to bumpers, gun mounts and turrets, truck beds, seats, toolboxes, canvas, or vinyl covers, lights, reflectors. Parts or components removed are considered part of the equipment they were removed from and are not to be considered additional equipment.

Note: All Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement (MTVR) beds shall be removed unless the COR authorizes alternate procedures.

C-1.9.2. Steam Cleaning. The Contractor shall use pressurized water and a pressure steam device to remove grease, carbon, oil, peeling paint, and all other foreign residue and debris from equipment. The Contractor shall follow the procedures and only use cleaning solvents identified in Appendix A.

C-1.9.3. Body Repair. This service includes repairing dents, scratches, holes, reshaping metal, fabrication and replacement of sheet metal panels, fiberglass and aluminum repair, and the reinforcement of metal supports to restore original appearance, function, and structural integrity of the equipment. All body repairs requiring replacement or patching shall be accomplished with like materials. No deviations from OEM materials shall be used unless authorized by the COR.

All welds shall be inspected by the Government QA prior to application of body fillers. Body fillers are to be applied as little and thinly as possible to cover only the affected welded areas.

Items to be fabricated include but are not limited to equipment battery boxes and trays, rear panels, cowlings, rocker panels, quarter panels, windshield frames, cargo beds, cab interiors, door panels, headboards, and floorboards. Upon completion of repairs, all equipment shall be re-assembled and restored to its operational condition.

C-1.9.4. Frame Repair. Repair or modification to equipment frames is NOT authorized. The COR will determine the severity of damage and determine if it constitutes structural or frame repair.

C-1.9.5. Skid Repair & Replacement. Skid-mounted equipment (e.g., generators, environmental control units, etc.) shall be inspected by the COR to determine if skids require fabrication and replacement. The Contractor shall provide all material needed for skid fabrication and replacement. Replacement skids shall be constructed by the Contractor using the same dimensions of the skids being replaced. The Contractor shall drill 1/2-inch drain holes on each end of the skid near the bottom. Undercoating shall be applied inside of each skid prior to mounting to preserve the repair.

C-1.9.6. Corrosion Removal & Surface Preparation. The Contractor shall prepare equipment surfaces in accordance (IAW) the references outlined within Appendix A. This includes the mechanical removal of corrosion, blistered, flaking, and peeling paint from metal surfaces.

C-1.9.7. Masking. All hydraulic bare metal cylinder tubes, windows/windshields, and other sensitive mechanical surfaces on the equipment that are not intended to be exposed to abrasive blasting shall be protected from damage by taping and covered with paper or cloth, or other protective material (grease is NOT a suitable protective covering against abrasive blasting). The Contractor shall be responsible for damages resulting from related abrasive blasting services because of inadequate protection.

C-1.9.8. Abrasive Blast Services. The Contractor shall perform abrasive blasting as needed to remove corrosion and achieve proper surface profiles for the specific substrate IAW the references outlined within Appendix A.

C-1.9.9. Power Tool Cleaning. In areas where abrasive blast is not necessary or not feasible, the Contractor shall perform power tool cleaning to remove corrosion and achieve proper surface profiles for the specific substrate IAW the references outlined within Appendix A.

C-1.9.10. Hand Tool Cleaning. In areas where abrasive blast and/or power tool cleaning is not necessary or not feasible, the Contractor shall perform hand tool cleaning to remove corrosion and achieve proper surface profiles for the specific substrate outlined within Appendix A.

C-1.9.11 Intact Coatings Preparation. Intact, tightly adhered coatings where corrosion is not present SHALL NOT be removed. For these areas, the Contractor shall scuff sand only as outlined within TM 4750-15/1 and references outlined within Appendix A.

C-1.9.12. Equipment Blowdown. The Contractor shall remove all blast media, dust, or other debris generated during the surface preparation process prior to proceeding.

C-1.9.13. Coating System Application. The Contractor shall apply the Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) system IAW the references outlined within Appendix A Coatings shall be mixed and applied IAW manufacturers’ instructions and the references outlined within Appendix A. For equipment that is not receiving the CARC system (e.g., aviation ground support equipment, etc.), the Contractor shall follow the procedures in the applicable TM or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specification provided. The Contractor shall receive approval from the Government QA representative prior to proceeding in each step of the coating system application process (i.e., masking, zinc, epoxy, topcoat, camouflage pattern).

C-1.9.14. Masking. All areas that should not be painted shall be masked appropriately. This includes but is not limited to bare metal cylinder tubes, windows/windshields, mirrors, lights, etc.

C-1.9.15. Primer Application

C-1.9.15.1. Zinc Rich Primer Application. All areas of exposed bare steel shall first be coated with zinc rich primer.

C-1.9.15.2. Epoxy Primer Application. Apply epoxy primer over all areas of the equipment that will receive a topcoat. Note: this includes areas of tightly adhered, intact coatings that will be painted over.

C-1.9.15.3. Delays in Primer Application. The Contractor shall request Government QA approval to begin primer application if more than four hours have passed since completion of surface preparation. If more than twenty-four hours have passed, then the Contractor shall re-complete surface preparation procedures.

C-1.9.16. Topcoat Application. The Contractor shall apply topcoat after primer is sufficiently dry.

C-1.9.16.1. Delays in Topcoat Application. If more than 168 hours have passed since primer has been applied, then the Contractor shall scuff sand the primer coat prior to proceeding with the topcoat application.

C-1.9.16.2. Camouflage Pattern Application. When applicable, the Contractor shall apply the tri-color camouflage pattern to equipment designated by the COR. Patterns for specific equipment platforms are provided in the current references outlined within Appendix A, or other provided drawings. Marking the pattern and order of color application shall adhere to the references outlined within Appendix A. As a general rule equipment that comes in with a camouflage pattern then that pattern will be replied, if it comes in with only the green topcoat then only green can be applied, unless the III Marine Expeditionary Forces (MEF)/Marine Depot Maintenance Command (MDMC) personnel direct then it will receive the reapplication of camouflage coatings.

C-1.9.16.3. Undercoat Application. The Contractor shall apply underbody coatings to equipment designated by the COR and in accordance with the references outlined within Appendix A.

Note: equipment that will receive undercoating requires primer application only (C-1.3.2.15.) to the undercarriage and suspension components; it does not require a topcoat to these areas.

C-1.9.16.4. Bed Liner Application. The Contractor shall apply bed liner coatings to specific areas as designated by the COR and IAW the references outlined within Appendix A.

C-1.9.16.4.1. Bedliner Application Exclusions. Army Equipment will not receive application of bedliner under any circumstances.

C-1.9.16.5. Registration, Safety, and Tactical Markings Application. The Contractor shall re-produce all registration, safety, and tactical markings, as well as any additional markings designated by the COR. Stencil size and color scheme shall conform to the references outlined within Appendix A, or other directives for non-USMC equipment.

C-1.9.16.6. Paint Type & Date. The Contractor shall apply paint identification and date markings IAW the references outlined in Appendix A.

C-1.10. Close-Out Procedures.

C-1.10.1. Reassembly. The Contractor shall reinstall all items removed during the repair process and return equipment to its original operating condition.

C-1.10.2. Final Cleaning. This service requirement includes cleaning windows, mirrors and any dust or dirt that was the by-product of the repair process. The Contractor shall remove all tape or other materials applied during servicing and repairing of the equipment.

C-1.11. Materials Management. The Contractor shall procure and manage all coatings, blast media, and other materials required to perform services described in (Para. C-1.0.) A list of typical materials and associated Military Details (MIL-DTL) and specifications authorized and used in this process is provided in Appendix D additionally the current full inventory is provided within Appendix G. The Contractor shall not deviate from these materials unless authorized by the COR.