ATT J07 PPQ 060724.docx

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

ATT J07: Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

1. Past Performance Assessment. The Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC), Program Executive Office Manpower, Logistics, and Business Solutions (PEO MLB), is soliciting competitive offers from existing Department of Defense Contractors for the acquisition of Post Deployment Systems Support (PDSS) services for the Program Manager - Logistics Integration Information Solutions-Marine Corps (LI2S-MC). MCSC seeks proposals from potential offerors with the capability to provide PDSS support services for the Global Combat Support System-Marine Corps, the Tactical Logistics System, and the Data Environment and Integration enterprise logistics community. These three portfolios combine to deliver advanced modern logistics operations across the Marine Corps.

To assist our source selection process, please complete this questionnaire and provide via E-Mail to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist listed below. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages. Your response is needed no later than the closing time for receipt of offers, 1059 ET 26 August 2024. Your responses will be marked as Source Selection Sensitive Information; this information will only be shared with contractors if it constitutes adverse past performance information as determined by the Government source selection team and which the offeror has not previously had the opportunity to respond to. The contractor soliciting your feedback to MCSC may complete only Section 2 of this form; the balance is to be completed solely by you, as the reporting customer.

If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist via E-Mail.

Ms. Renée S. Stahl, Contracting Officer (PM LI2S) E-Mail: renee.stahl@usmc.mil

Mr. Phillip M. Makely, Contract Specialist (PM-LI2S) E-Mail: phillip.makely@usmc.mil mailto:

2. Government Assessor and Contract Information.

a. Government Assessor.

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

b. Contract Information.

Contract/Task Order Number:

Contract Type:

Contractor:

Total Period and Dates of Performance (including available options/award terms):

Total Contract Value at Award (including available options/award terms):

Supported Government client’s name, location, and principal mission:

3. Contract Relevancy. To assist our comparison of the contract identified in Section 2 with the size and scope of the PM LI2S-MC acquisition, please complete the following:

a. Annual contract dollars for the effort, on average, or by performance period:

b. Type(s) of Support Services Performed for Your Organization: Place an X in each applicable box.

Providing technical support services for the operation, maintenance, and sustainment of a large enterprise logistics system's hardware and software.

Providing technical support services for the operation, maintenance, and sustainment of the solution development environment for a large highly integrated logistics system.

Providing accreditation processes, administration, and management support services for large integrated military enterprise systems.

Providing disaster and recovery planning, operations, and maintenance support services for large integrated enterprise systems.

Providing operation, maintenance, sustainment, and upgrade support services for a high volume, multi-system enterprise service desk.

Providing technical and functional subject matter experts to oversee the daily operations of a large integrated enterprise system, which includes the continual surveillance of systems operations, systems maintenance, systems sustainment, and system upgrade support services.

Providing a fleet of support services, including fulfilling logistics, training, manpower, financial, and auditing tasks, for a large integrated enterprise logistics system.

Providing change request services using the Agile methodology to address software operation, maintenance, sustainment, and upgrade support for a large integrated enterprise.

Providing integrated enterprise cloud operation, maintenance, sustainment, storage, migration, and upgrade support services.

Providing support services for cybersecurity monitoring, intrusion prevention, vulnerability analysis and management, security planning, vulnerability management, Information Technology position category requirements, compliance monitoring, and testing services.

Providing system engineering, configuration management, and system level management for a large enterprise system.

Other Support (please describe: _______________)

4. Performance Assessment Ratings. Please use these definitions when rating elements of performance in Section 5.

Exceptional. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory. Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal. Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

5. Assessment Elements. Please enter the appropriate performance assessment rating for each item below and provide supporting comments/narrative.

a. Mission Requirements. Please rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

b. Business Relations. Please rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

c. Quality. Please rate the contractor’s ability to provide services that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.). Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

d. Schedule. Please rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances? Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

e. Management of Key Positions. Please rate the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

f. Subcontract Management. Please rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

Comments:

6. Recommendation. Would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts of similar scope and size?

Yes No

7. Other References. As appropriate, please identify any other Government point of contact (POC) familiar with the offeror’s performance of the assessed contract whom we may contact for additional inputs on the Contractor’s performance.

Name:

Organization:

Phone:

E-Mail: