M6785423R4907_Additional Responses_30 June 2023_Amendment 0004.pdf

Question

Number

In Regard to

Amendment

0001 or 0002

Question #

Document/

Section

Paragraph

Number

Question/Issue/Concern Gov Response

1 54-56 Attch_10_PDO

_0001_Pricing

_Workbook_

26May2023

ODC/Travel Tab The Government provided formulas in the Travel tables that contain errors or missing calculations. A few examples, (1) the Subtotal does not calculate the

# of people traveling, (2) the Subtotal calculates Per

Diem twice and does not take into account the reduction in M&IE for travel days, (3) the Per Diem column has no calculation, and (4) the Grand Total cell calculate a text cell. Can the government provide and updated Attachment 10 with modified formulas, or would the government provide permission for the bidder to update formulas as needed?

The offeror may use their own formulas for the ODC/Travel tab in Attachment 10

Pricing Workbook. The offeror must ensure that # of personnel, # of trips, # of days, from location, to location, rental car rate, airfare cost, lodging cost, M&IE cost and burden are included in the development of their proposed travel costs. Attachment

10 has been updated. FAR 52.212-1

Addendum 11.1 Volume III, Section 5.1 –

Pricing Workbook has been updated.

2 107 Solicitation Page 51, Instruction to

Offerors, Paragraph 3

In consideration of the changes within Amendments 2 and 3, will the Government consider extending the proposal response due date by two (2) weeks?

No proposal response extension will be granted.

3 8 Solicitation, Responses to

Questions &

Attachment 8

Configuration

Items table, DWDM line under the column marked “RDSD”

Response to Question 8 indicates removal of Tellabs

7100 for DWDM support but Attachment 8 still reflects that Tellabs 7100 nano at MCRD SD.

Presuming that is an error and that no DWDM will be required for the solution. Requesting the Government to please confirm.

See response to Amendment 0001 Q83.

Attachment 8 has been updated for clarity.

4 Solicitation &

Attachment 8

Estimated

Quantities table, SBC and Data

Distribution

Routers lines under the column marked “RDSD”

Revised Attachment 8 also indicates no Distribution

Routers (DR) nor Session Border Controllers (SBC) are required at MCRD SD as indicated by “n/a” in the

“Estimated Quantities” table. This seems in conflict with the requirement for a pair of DRs and SBCs in support of the MCRD solution. Request the

Government please clarify.

See response to Amendment 0001 Q214.

Attachment 8 has been updated for clarity.

5 Solicitation, Attachment 8, and

Attachment 13

Configuration

Items table, TMS line under the column marked

“RDSD”

Revised Attachment 8 also indicates no TMS system exists, though Attachment 13 specifies that a TMS is required for the solution. Since a CAIRS system is non-existent as indicated in Attachment 8, is a TMS required for the IP-based solution or can that functionality be provided by the Call Manager?

See response to Amendment 0001 Q238.

6 Solicitation /

Responses to

Questions /

Attachment 13

Table 2, providing growth

ONT sizes and quantities, summation at the bottom of column

Response to Question 6 indicates approximately 2,000

(1,903 summed total) users identified in Attachment

13. Revised Attachment 13 also provides an estimated

1,008 users for growth in the subsequent table. Does the proposal not need to include an additional 1,000 users for anticipated growth?

See response to Amendment 0002 Q13.

Offerors should use Attachment 13 to determine the number of users requiring voice services and 10% growth in accordance with Attachment 12 on top of those services. Attachment 13 has been updated for clarity.