Exhibit_E-1_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_FINAL_10.28.16__.pdf

DRAFT

M67854-17-R-2602

Exhibit E-1

Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment. The Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC), Program Manager for Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Command, Control and Communications (MC3), Marine Corps Base Quantico, is soliciting competitive offers to provide Software Maintenance Support, Software Technical and Development Support for Connectors, Applications, and Application Extensions to the Product Manager, MAGTF Command and Control Systems (PdM MC2S).

To assist MCSC in its source selection process, please complete this questionnaire and provide via E-Mail to the Contracting Officer listed below. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages. Your response is needed no later than the closing time for receipt of offers, 1:00 p.m. local time, December 15, 2016. Your responses will be protected as Source Selection Sensitive Information.

If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist via E-Mail.

Ms. Jodie Shifflett, Contracting Officer (MC3) E-Mail: Jodie.Shifflett@usmc.mil

Ms. Patricia Peterson E-Mail: Patricia.Peterson@usmc.mil

(Continued) mailto:odie.Shifflett@usmc.mil mailto:Patricia.Peterson@usmc.mil

2. Government Assessor and Contract Information.

Government Assessor.

Name:

Title:

Organization and Location:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Contract Information.

Contractor Name:

Prime Contractor or Subcontractor?

CAGE Code: DUNS Number:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Total Period of Performance:

(include available options/award terms)

Total Contract Value at Award:

(include available options/award terms)

Title of Contract Effort:

3. Contract Relevancy. To assist our comparison of the contract identified in Section 2 with the size and scope of the PdM MC2S acquisition, please complete the following:

(a) Annual contract dollars for the current or most recent performance period:

4. Performance Assessment Ratings. Please use these definitions when rating elements of performance in Section 5.

Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal. Performance barely meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. This element is not applicable to the effort being assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please enter the appropriate performance assessment rating for each item below and provide supporting comments/narrative.

a. Mission Requirements. Please rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Excellent

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not Applicable

Comments:

b. Business Relations. Please rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically considering the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and the contractor’s ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Marginal

c. Quality. Please rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.). Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Marginal

d. Schedule. Please rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule.

What were the causes of any schedule variances? Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Marginal

e. Management of Key Personnel. Please rate the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

f. Subcontract Management. Please rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include its ability to timely award and manage subcontracts. Place an X in the applicable box and provide comments to assist in our evaluation process.

Marginal

6. Recommendation. Would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts of similar scope and size?

Yes

No

7. Other References. As appropriate, please identify any other Government point of contact (POC) familiar with the offeror’s performance of the assessed contract whom we may contact for additional input on the Contractor’s performance.

Name:

Organization:

Phone:

E-Mail: