Amendment 0002 Released.pdf

M933284601520-0001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to do the follow ing: Extend the Proposal Due Date from 14 March 2025 at 12:00 PM PST to 25 March 2025 at 9:00 AM PST and to provide updates Sections L and M.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Mar-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M0068125R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Feb-2025

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Mar-2025

CODE

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE-MCIWEST

BLDG 22180 REGIONAL CONTRACTS

CAMP PENDLETON CA 92055-5027

M00681 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M0068125R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the proposal due date and time, and provide updates to Sections L and

M.

I. EXTEND REQUIRED RESPONSE DATE AND TIME

The required response date/time has changed from 14 March 2025 at 12:00 PM PST to 25 March 2025 at 9:00 AM

PST.

II. CHANGES TO SECTIONS L AND M

A. Page 83, Section L, paragraph L9, subparagraph Technical Content, bullet 2 stating, “Proposer’s ability to meet all Tasks IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C6.”

B. Page 83, Section L, paragraph L9, subparagraph Technical Content, bullet 3 stating, “Proposer’s ability to meet place of performance requirements IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C3.

C. Page 83, Section L, paragraph L9, subparagraph Technical Content, bullet 4 stating, “Submit a draft accident prevention plan to mitigate employee accidents while working on a DoD installation in accordance with

Section C, paragraph C9. A complete accident prevention plan shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer’s

Representative (COR) and the Contracting Officer (KO) within 10 days of contract award providing a detailed narrative.”

D. Page 83, Section L, paragraph L9, subparagraph Technical Content, bullet 5 stating, “Offers shall provide a Quality Control Plan IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C8.”

E. Page 88, Section M, paragraph M2, subparagraph III, item C stating, “Accident Prevention Plan – Draft plan to mitigate employee accidents while working on DoD installations in accordance with (IAW) the PWS under

Section C, paragraph C9.”

F. Page 88, Section M, paragraph M2, subparagraph III, item D stating, “The offeror shall provide a narrative to develop and maintain an effective Quality Control Program to ensure services are adequately performed

IAW the PWS under Section C, paragraph C8.”

III. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

A. All other solicitation terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-1

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR

L1. TITLE: Equipment Maintenance and Repair Services

L2. PRIMARY POC: The primary point of contact (POC) for this procurement is David Lange at david.lange@usmc.mil.

L3. SECONDARY POC: The secondary POC for this procurement is Philip Maaninen philip.maaninen@usmc.mil.

L4. NAICS: The appropriate North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is

811310 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and

Maintenance with a small business size of $12.5M.

L5. DESCRIPTION: The services set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). This requirement is to provide equipment checks, services, cleaning, refueling, and minor repair tasks on mobile equipment. This effort will support six (6) sites: Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Pendleton (CPEN), California (CA), Marine Corps Air

Station (MCAS) Miramar, CA, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) Twentynine Palms, CA, Marine Corps Logistics Base (MCLB) Barstow, CA, Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center (MCMWTC)

Bridgeport, CA, and MCAS Yuma, Arizona (AZ).

L6. PROCUREMENT METHOD: This procurement has been set-aside as Service-Disabled Veteran Owned

Small Business (SDVOSB) acquisition utilizing FAR Part 12 and FAR Part 13.5 resulting in a Firm Fixed Price

(FFP) contract.

L7. TERM OF CONTRACT: The contract contains provisions for a Base Period of one (1) year and four (4)

Option Year Periods (refer to FAR 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract), not to exceed sixty-six

(66) months, including the Option to Extend Services in accordance with FAR 52.217-8.

L8. WAGE DETERMINATION: Service Contract Act (SCA) Wage Determinations:

-Arizona County of Yuma - #2015-5475 rev 24 dated 23 December 2024 – See Attachment B

-California Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino - #2015-5629 rev 25 dated 23 December 2024 – See

Attachment C

-California County of San Diego - #2015-5635 rev 26 dated 23 December 2024 – See Attachment D

-California County of Mono - #2015-5671 rev 26 dated 23 December 2024 – See Attachment E

The most current wage determination for each county will be incorporated in the contract at the time each option is exercised.

L9. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT:

I. Submission of Proposal. Proposals must be received no later than the date and time specified in block #8, page #1 – Pacific Time (PT). Proposals shall be submitted via electronic form. The USMC email system does not accept email messages larger than 25MB and therefore multiple emails may be required if the proposal package email (to include attachments) exceed 25MB. Please ensure that each email attachment is limited to no more than 2MB. If multiple emails are submitted, please number the email. For example, “email 1 of 3”, “2 of 3”, and “3 of 3”. Please send proposal to both Mr. David Lange at david.lange@usmc.mil and Mr. Philip Maaninen at philip.maaninen@usmc.mil.

*** MAILED and FAXED PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED***

***CDs / External Media Devices WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED***

***Hand-Carried Submissions WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED***

All Transmissions must clearly state the solicitation number in the email subject line to ensure proper receipt.

mailto:david.lange@usmc.mil mailto:philip.maaninen@usmc.mil mailto:david.lange@usmc.mil

Proposals shall be formatted using a page size of 8.5 inches x 11 inches. The Government’s preferred formatting is as follows: (1) Page are single-spaced but shall have at least double spacing between paragraphs, and (2) Times New

Roman, 12-point font shall be used except for figures, tables, and diagrams where smaller point font is acceptable as long as it is readable.

For email proposals, the Government office designated for receipt of the proposal is the email inbox of the addressees indicated above. Notwithstanding the provisions at FAR 52.212-1(f), delivery is not accomplished until the addressees can open the email; delivery to a server or an email inbox on a server is not considered delivery to the designated Government office and the proposal is not under the Government’s control until the addressees can open the email. The email shall not be considered to be delivered unless the entire content of the email and all attachments can be read by the addressees indicated above. Receipt of an electronic acknowledgment from the addressee establishes that a record was received but does not establish that the content sent corresponds to the content received. Email attachments are limited to no more than 25MB total. Offerors are specifically warned that email may be subjected to spam filters or attachment stripping.

Attention is directed to FAR 52.212-1(f), concerning late submissions. Offerors are responsible for allowing adequate time for electronic submissions to be completed. The offeror bears the risk of ensuring that all pages of the proposal (and any authorized modifications) and receipt of attachments have been received by the designated office before the deadline indicated. Any pages of the proposal or receipt of attachments that arrive after the deadline will not be considered.

The Government may make award based solely on the proposals received. However, pursuant to FAR 52.212-1, the

Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

II. Period of Acceptance of Offerors. The pricing terms and condition of the proposal shall be valid for at least 90 days unless a longer time is stated otherwise in the proposal.

III. Questions Concerning the Solicitation. Questions must be submitted by email to David Lange at david.lange@usmce.mil and Philip Maaninen at philip.maaninen@usmc.mil no later than 5 calendar days after the solicitation issue date (identified in block 6 of the SF1449). No phone questions will be accepted. The deadline is necessary to ensure timely award and the Government may, in its sole discretion, choose not to respond to questions received after the deadline. All questions will be reviewed and responded via an amendment to the solicitation.

The question should be in the following format:

Solicitation Section Solicitation Page Paragraph Question

Example: PWS 22 1.0 What does SWRFT mean?

IV. Complete Submissions. This section specifies the format and limitations that offerors must use when submitting proposals. Submissions shall be in the form prescribed below and shall contain a response to each of the areas identified. Each of the parts must be separate and complete so that the evaluation may be accomplished independently for each part. All applicable provisions and clauses that require vendor completion must be completed. (For example, FAR provision 52.212-3 Alt 1.) Complete submission must be received in order for a proposal to be considered. A complete submission requires the following electronic files:

FILE 1: Price

File 1 does not have a page limitation. It shall include the following:

• Signed page 1 of the solicitation (block 30) and all amendments, if applicable

• All applicable provisions and clauses that require contractor completion such as FAR provision 52.212-3 alt 1.

• Proposers shall complete Blocks 17a, 30b and 30c of page 1 of the SF1449.

• Price proposal, including SF1449 CLIN pricing, completed as follows:

mailto:david.lange@usmce.mil

SF1449: The proposer must complete the total price for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to include the respective Option Year CLINs (1001, 1002, 2001, etc.) in the schedule of supplies/services of the solicitation

Standard Form 1449.

All proposed prices shall be whole dollar amounts or limited to two decimal points, for example $10.10 not

$10.009.

FILE 2: Technical

Technical proposals shall include the technical content as described below. Technical proposals are limited to 35 pages in length and shall be written in English. Each page must be numbered consecutively. Pages that exceed the page number limitation will not be evaluated. Any page in the Technical proposal that contains a table, chart, graph, or other visual depictions, not otherwise specifically excluded below, counts toward the above page limitation for the Technical proposal. Not included in the page limitation are the following:

• Cover/title page

• Table of contents (if any)

Technical Content. The following information must be provided:

The proposer shall provide a detailed narrative which clearly describes and demonstrates how the proposer will accomplish the stated requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). At a minimum, the narrative shall address the each of following elements:

1. Description of how the proposer’s workforce will be utilized to carry out this requirement at each installation (including any surge needs).

2. Proposer’s ability to meet all Tasks IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C6.

3. Proposer’s ability to meet place of performance requirements IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C3.

4. Submit a draft accident prevention plan to mitigate employee accidents while working on a DoD installation in accordance with Section C, paragraph C9. A complete accident prevention plan shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and the Contracting Officer (KO) within 10 days of contract award providing a detailed narrative.

5. Offers shall provide a Quality Control Plan IAW PWS Section C, paragraph C8.

FILE 3: Past Performance - Proposers shall submit the following information as part of their proposal:

The proposer shall supply past performance information for up to three (3) contracts of similar size, scope, and complexity, either with a government agency or commercial entity, which demonstrate the proposer’s ability to perform the requirement. The submitted past performance information must be recent (i.e. performed within past three years).

The proposer shall include the following information for each contract identified: contract number, dollar value of the contract, name of contract POC, along with POC’s title, phone number, and email address.

Failure to submit a proposal in the format described in the RFP could result in a proposal being deemed nonresponsive and therefore not subject to evaluation and/or award.

***At the Contracting Officer’s discretion, incomplete submissions may not be considered***

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM 52.212-2

EVALUATION

M1. EVALUATION PROCESS

This is a simplified acquisition in which the competing proposals will be evaluated using the factors identified in

FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services and this section, in accordance with

FAR 13.5 as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Navy

Marine Corps Acquisition Regulation Supplement (NMCARS). Award will be made utilizing the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process. Proposals will be arranged in order of price from lowest to highest.

The lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability and past performance. If the lowest price proposal is determined technically acceptable and the offeror demonstrates a history of acceptable performance, evaluations will conclude and proceed to award. If the lowest price proposal is determined not technically acceptable or the offeror has an unacceptable history of performance, the second lowest proposal will be sent for technical and past performance evaluation. This process will continue until a proposal is determined to be both technically acceptable and the offeror demonstrates an acceptable performance record. An unacceptable rating on any technical element or a negative performance record will result in the proposal being deemed unawardable.

The Government will evaluate proposed prices for reasonableness using price analysis techniques. Unreasonably high/unrealistically low, unbalanced, inaccurate or incomplete price proposals may be the grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition.

Award for All of the Work. The Government intends to award one (1) contract as a result of this solicitation. As set forth in FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

M2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

I. Evaluation criteria consist of factors and subfactors. The proposals will be evaluated under the following three (3) evaluation factors:

Factor 1: Price

Factor 2: Technical Capability

Factor 3: Past Performance

II. Factor 1 – Price. In order to be considered for an award, the price must be determined to be fair and reasonable, and balanced (or if unbalanced pricing exists that it does not pose an unacceptable risk to the government) using one or more techniques set forth in FAR 13.106-3(a).

Options.

In accordance with the provision at FAR 52.217-5, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options, including the option under FAR 52.217-8, to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise options. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

Offerors are advised that the Option to Extend Services Clause at 52.217-8 is included in the solicitation and will be included in the awarded contract. When proposing prices for base and option years, Offerors should consider that the

Government may choose to exercise the option to extend services at the end of any period of performance (base or option periods), utilizing the rates in effect during the period of performance in which the option is exercised. The

Government assumes that any price proposed for base and option periods reflects the possibility that a period of performance may be extended. For evaluation purposes, the Government will take the total price for the last option period, divide it by two, and add it to the total contract price.

III. Factor 2 - Technical Capability. The Offeror shall submit a detailed narrative of how the contractor will accomplish the deliverables as outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Technical Approach:

A. The offeror shall provide a narrative demonstrating ability to perform the PWS.

Acceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor has demonstrated a technical approach to meet all PWS requirements; technical approach receives an acceptable rating.

Unacceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor did not demonstrate a technical approach to meet one or more of the PWS requirements; technical approach receives an unacceptable rating.

B. The offeror shall provide a narrative how their workforce will be utilized to carry out the requirements at each installation, including any surge needs, IAW the PWS.

Acceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor has demonstrated an approach to carry out the requirements at each installation; technical approach receives an acceptable rating.

Unacceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor did not demonstrated an approach to carry out the requirements at each installation; technical approach receives an

C. Accident Prevention Plan – Draft plan to mitigate employee accidents while working on DoD installations in accordance with (IAW) the PWS under Section C, paragraph

C9.

Acceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor has submitted an Accident

Prevention Plan identifying measures to mitigate employee accidents; Accident Prevention Plan receives an acceptable rating.

Unacceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor did not submit an Accident

Prevention Plan that identifies measures to mitigate employee accidents; Accident Prevention

Plan receives an unacceptable rating.

D. The offeror shall provide a narrative to develop and maintain an effective Quality

Control Program to ensure services are adequately performed IAW the PWS under

Section C, paragraph C8.

Acceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor has demonstrated an approach to carry out a Quality Control Program; Quality Control Program receives an acceptable rating.

Unacceptable Based on the proposal, the Government has determined the contractor has not demonstrated an approach to carry out a Quality Control Program; Quality Control Program receives an

IV. Factor 3 - Past Performance. The Government will conduct a performance risk assessment of the offeror’s record of past and current performance, to include information within the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS) and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), as well as that of its proposed subcontractors and team member as it relates to the probability of successfully performing the requirements of the solicitation. The past performance evaluation will consider the Past Performance Worksheet submitted by offerors, Past Performance Questionnaires submitted by Offeror references, their own experience with offerors, and information from third-party references of recent (within the past three (3) years) and relevant

(providing the same or similar services identified in the PWS) record of performance in supplying services that meet the solicitation’s requirements. Offerors are advised that in conducting the past performance assessment, the

Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources.

Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis in accordance with the below table.

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have “unknown” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

(End of Summary of Changes)