M0026423Q0127 PPQ (Attachment S-1).DOCX
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NMMC Korean War Gallery Updates Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M0026423Q0127
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire (PPQ) for a contractor bidding on solicitation number M0026423Q0127 from the United States Marine Corps for the fabrication and installation of updates to the National Museum of the Marine Corps' Korean War gallery. The PPQ requests performance information from references for the contractor's past relevant contracts to assess timeliness, technical success, quality, and cost control. References are asked to provide ratings in these categories as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory. The solicitation close date is not specified but the PPQ must be returned at least two days before.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M0026423Q0127 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| M0026423Q0127 Amendment 0001 Attachment H Drawing Set REV2.pdf | ||
| Attachment C Graphic Schedule.pdf | ||
| Attachment F Dataloggers.pdf | ||
| Attachment H Drawing Set.pdf | ||
| Attachment E Case Lighting.pdf | ||
| Attachment D ADS.pdf | ||
| Attachment G Case locks.pdf | ||
| M0026423Q0127.pdf | ||
| Attachment B Artifact Schedule.pdf | ||
| Attachment A Artifact Case Schedule.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Quoter shall provide a copy of this PPQ to each of their listed Past Performance references provided in their quote submitted to the Request for Quote identified below.
Instructions:
· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office at least two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation listed in block 8 of the 1449.
· Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: michael.t.curley@usmc.mil and carmen.martinezliran@usmc.mil. Questionnaires must be received from the references and not the contractor.
I. Solicitation Data
| Request for Quote |
| M00264-23-Q-0127 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Korean War Upgrade |
| Customer/Agency |
| National Museum of the Marine Corps (NMMC) |
| Project/Requirement Description |
| Fabrication and installation of the NMMC Korean War Gallery Updates. |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Agency
Type of Contract
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project Name
Requirement Description/
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/
Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation Please mark a rating and provide comments
1. Customer Satisfaction
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Customer Satisfaction
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
2. Timeliness
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones
Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
3. Technical Success
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Success
b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.
| Technical Success |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Execution—(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)
MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
4. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Performance
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Conformance to Specifications
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
5. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| COST CONTROL |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
FORECASTING/ MANAGEMENT/ COST CONTROL
Comments:
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
| _______________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .