M00264-22-R-0012 PPQ.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Instructions:

Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor

(Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office at least two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation 1 August 2022.

Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting

Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to emmanuel.velez@usmc.mil and jeffrey.a.sisk@usmc.mil . Questionnaires must be received from the references and not the contractor.

I. Solicitation Data

Request for Quote M00264-22-R-0012

Project/Requirement Driver’s Training Course

Customer/Agency USMC Embassy Security Group

Project/Requirement

Description

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is correct or incorrect.

CONTRACTOR

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Agency

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of

Performance/Delivery

Schedule

Project Name mailto:emmanuel.velez@usmc.mil mailto:jeffrey.a.sisk@usmc.mil

Requirement Description/

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

Termination History Convenience Default N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/

Email Addres

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

Please mark a rating and provide comments

1. Customer Satisfaction

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Customer

Satisfaction

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

2. Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Timeliness

Performance

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness in

Completion of

Contract/Task

Order/Delivery

Timeliness in

Meeting

Milestones

Timeliness in

Submitting

Deliverables

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Technical Success

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?

Technical

Success

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.

Technical Success Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Technical Execution—

(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork

AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT

MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)

PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT—

(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF

PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the

Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above

4. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Quality of

Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional Very

Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Conformance to

Contract

Requirements

Conformance to

Specifications

Standards of

Good

Workmanship

(technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above

5. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

COST/PRICE

ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST

EFFICIENCIES—

(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/

MANAGEMENT/

COST CONTROL

Comments:

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature Date