M0026420Q0003 PPQ (Attachment 2).DOCX
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Museum Artifacts Cataloging Services
- Solicitation number
- M00264-20-Q-0003
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal solicitation. The solicitation is for museum artifact cataloging support services for the National Museum of the Marine Corps. The services required include unpacking, describing, measuring, photographing, and entering artifacts into a database according to the museum's standards. The period of performance is three years with two optional one-year extensions. The incumbent contractor is evaluated on customer satisfaction, timeliness, technical success, quality, and cost control. The completed PPQ must be submitted by the assessor to the contracting office by February 13, 2020 to be considered for this requirement.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Instructions:
· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office at least two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation on 13 February 2020.
· Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: judith.campbell@usmc.mil and michael.t.curley@usmc.mil. Questionnaires must be received from the references and not the contractor.
I. Solicitation Data
| Request for Quote |
| M00264-20-Q-0003 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Artifact Cataloging Support Services |
| Customer/Agency |
| National Museum Of The Marine Corps (NMMC) |
| Project/Requirement Description |
| Cataloging will include but is not limited to the packing and unpacking of artifacts, providing a description of the artifact, measurements of the artifact in inches, entering any associated provenance of the artifact, photographing the artifact (front, back, markings, damage, and any other unique aspects of the object), renaming and resizing the photograph files per NMMC standards, and attaching them into DONHAMS. |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Agency
Type of Contract
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project Name
Requirement Description/
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/
Email Addres
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation Please mark a rating and provide comments
1. Customer Satisfaction
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Customer Satisfaction
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
2. Timeliness
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones
Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
3. Technical Success
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Success
b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.
| Technical Success |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Execution—(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)
MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
4. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Performance
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Conformance to Specifications
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
5. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| COST CONTROL |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
FORECASTING/ MANAGEMENT/ COST CONTROL
Comments:
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
| _______________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .