PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Point of Sale Hardware, Brand Name Hewlett Packard
Solicitation number
M00264-15-T-1098
Issued by

About this file

Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_M00264-15-T-1098_Amendment_0001.doc DOC document
M00264-15-T-1098-0001_Conformed_Copy.doc DOC document
Draft_Evaluation_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Draft_Evaluation_Sheet.docx DOCX document
M00264-15-T-1098-0001_Conformed_Copy.doc DOC document
RFQ_M00264-15-T-1098_Amendment_0001.doc DOC document
RFQ_M00264-15-T-1098.doc DOC document
Breakdown_of_POS_Hardware_Sept_8 _2015.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

· Sections II through III are to be completed by the Quoter and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Quoter on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections II through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Quoter should also submit with its quote (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail or FAX the completed questionnaire(s) to: monica.curley@usmc.mil prior to 3:00 PM EST on September 22, 2015.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number
M00264-15-T-1098
Project/Requirement
USMC POS Hardware & Service Maintenance
Customer/Agency
USMC
Project/Requirement Description
168 Brand Name Hewlett Packard Point of Sale hardware systems configured to Government specifications. Procurement also includes associated peripherals.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The information listed below is |_| Correct |_| Incorrect.

CONTRACTOR

NAME & ADDRESS:

<<<<<INSERT CONTRACT NAME & ADDRESS HERE>>>>

Contract Number

Type of Contract

Initial
Final

Contract Value

Performance Period Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
|_| PRIME
|_|SUBCONTRACTOR
Termination History
|_| Convenience
|_| Default
|_| N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship *

* Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Responsiveness

Program Management

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

_____________________________________________________
Assessor’s SignatureDate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .