Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Branded Office Furniture
- Solicitation number
- M0026318R1001
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_M00263-18-R-1001U0002_Branded_Furniture.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation_Amendment_I_-_for_Branded_Furtinture_M00263-18-R-1001.pdf | ||
| 4.1_SOW_Encl_1_FACILITIES_MASTER_LIST.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18R1001.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information – See FAR 3.104
M00263-18-R-1001 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
We will treat the information contained in the completed survey as source selection sensitive information and will not disclose it to anyone other than those on the evaluation board with a need to know.
Part I – General Information
PART I.
A. SOLICITATION DATA
Solicitation Number: M00263-18-R-1001____ Project/ Requirement: Branded Furniture Customer/Agency: Marine Corps Recruiting Command
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:______________________________ Program Identification/Title:_________________________ Contract Number:________________________________ Contract Award Date:__________________________________________
C. ASSESSOR INFORMATION
Name:______________________________ Title:_______________________________ Telephone Number:__________________ E-mail Address:_____________________ Rating Scale:
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor’s performance.
Excellent: Performance Exceeds Most contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. The Risk Level - NONE.
Good: Performance Exceeds SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. The Risk Level is - LOW Satisfactory: Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. The Risk Level - LOW Marginal: Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. The Risk Level - Moderate Un-Satisfactory: Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. The Risk Level - High Past Performance Evaluation Questions
QUALITY OF PERFOMANCE:
1. To what extent was the contractor in compliance with the contract requirements?
· Excellent
· Good
· Adequate
· Marginal
· Poor
· Too soon to tell
· Not Applicable
Narrative_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. To what extent was the contractor’s ability to adhere to schedules and complete work on time?
· Excellent
· Good
· Adequate
· Marginal
· Poor
· Too soon to tell
· Not Applicable
Narrative____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:
3. To what extent were the contractor’s responsiveness to business relations, teamwork, and customer satisfaction?
· Excellent
· Good
· Adequate
· Marginal
· Poor
· Too soon to tell
· Not Applicable
Narrative____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PRICE:
4. To what extent did the contractor stay within price estimates for developmental activities?
· Excellent
· Good
· Adequate
· Marginal
· Poor
· Too soon to tell
· Not Applicable
Narrative__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NAME (Printed)/Phone ____________________________________________
SIGNATURE DATE_______________________________________________
Comments: (attach additional sheets if necessary) ______________________________________________________________
OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE:
· Excellent: Good: Satisfactory:
Marginal:
Un-Satisfactory:
Narrative__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PAGE
Source Selection Information – See FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it.