Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-042026 Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII)
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000547
Issued by
Fulton County, Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on completed projects. The form captures evaluation data for a specific project phase across defined service dates, with the evaluation completed by a GDOT Project Manager or agency owner's representative. The form evaluates consultants on their delivery of project scope, including all associated deliverables such as invoices, studies, reports, and design requirements. No specific response dates, bid deadlines, site visits, or bidders' conferences are referenced in this evaluation document, as it functions as a post-project assessment tool rather than a solicitation document.

The evaluation employs a standardized scoring methodology across two primary rating categories: Management (four factors assessing resource management, independence, scope adherence, and communication) and Prosecution and Progress (three factors assessing timeliness, deliverable quality and completeness, and budget performance). Scores are rated on a scale where 5 exceeds requirements, 3 meets requirements, 1 does not meet requirements, or N/A if not applicable. The form includes signature blocks for the Agency/Owner PM, Consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor for formal acknowledgement. No pricing terms, contract amounts, set-asides, funding sources, or incumbent information are included in this evaluation template, as it serves as a quality assessment mechanism rather than a procurement instrument.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .