Legacy Evaluation Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000547
- Issued by
- Fulton County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) and local agencies to assess consultant performance on completed projects. The form captures evaluation data for a specific project phase across defined service dates, with the evaluation completed by a GDOT Project Manager or agency owner's representative. The form evaluates consultants on their delivery of project scope, including all associated deliverables such as invoices, studies, reports, and design requirements. No specific response dates, bid deadlines, site visits, or bidders' conferences are referenced in this evaluation document, as it functions as a post-project assessment tool rather than a solicitation document.
The evaluation employs a standardized scoring methodology across two primary rating categories: Management (four factors assessing resource management, independence, scope adherence, and communication) and Prosecution and Progress (three factors assessing timeliness, deliverable quality and completeness, and budget performance). Scores are rated on a scale where 5 exceeds requirements, 3 meets requirements, 1 does not meet requirements, or N/A if not applicable. The form includes signature blocks for the Agency/Owner PM, Consultant PM, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor for formal acknowledgement. No pricing terms, contract amounts, set-asides, funding sources, or incumbent information are included in this evaluation template, as it serves as a quality assessment mechanism rather than a procurement instrument.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_484_042026 Drainage Analysis Inventory _ .pdf | ||
| Statewide Stormwater Field Maps Manual_v3.pdf | ||
| IM_Manual.pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_042026 Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| RFQ_484_042026 Drainage Analysis Inventory (C.pdf | ||
| LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Local Project Evaluation Form
Local Project Evaluation Form
Evaluation Date:
Consultant:
GDOT PI No.(if applicable):
GDOT PM (if applicable):
Agency/Owner:
Agency/Owner PM:
Phone:
Email:
Project Description & Scope:
Project Phase:
Service Dates:
Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation
| A | Management | Rating | Factor | ||
| 1 | Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.) | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 2 | Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 3 | Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 4 | Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
| B | Prosecution and Progress | Rating | Factor | ||
| 5 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 6 | All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 7 | Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget. | N/A | - - - | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | ||||
| Sub Total: | 0.00 | ||||
| Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required): |
Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):
Total Score: 0
| Agency/Owner PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: | |
| Supervisor's Acknowledgement: |
| Consultant PM: | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
| Agency Evaluator's | ||
| Supervisor (if applicable): | ||
| Signature: | Date: |
&12&A Page &P of &N
Scoring
| 1 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| N/A | |||||
| Factor Table | |||||
| Section Value: | 50 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0 | Ratings | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 1 | Ratings | 50.00 | 30.00 | 10.00 | |
| 2 | Ratings | 25.00 | 15.00 | 5.00 | |
| 3 | Ratings | 16.67 | 10.00 | 3.33 | |
| 4 | Ratings | 12.50 | 7.50 | 2.50 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .