LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-042026 Drainage Analysis Inventory & Inspection Services (DAII)
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000547
Issued by
Fulton County, Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section assesses whether consultants appropriately managed resources, worked independently without excessive agency staff support, remained within the contracted scope of work, and maintained effective communication and cooperation with GDOT staff. The Prosecution and Progress section evaluates whether consultants completed deliverables by agreed-upon dates, produced complete and accurate invoices, reports, and design requirements with minimal revisions, and stayed within assigned budgets. The evaluation uses a five-point scale where 5 indicates exceeds requirements, 3 indicates meets requirements, and 1 indicates does not meet requirements, with subtotals calculated for each section.

The form requires signature and acknowledgment from multiple parties, including the GDOT Project Manager, project supervisor, consultant project manager, and the agency evaluator's supervisor. When a rating of 1 is recorded in any category, acknowledgment from both the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head is mandatory. The scoring table applies weighted factors based on the number of ratings provided, with single ratings valued at 50 points for a score of 5, 30 points for a score of 3, and 10 points for a score of 1. The form includes fields for the GDOT PI number, project description, scope, phase, and service dates, along with spaces for justification of scores and consultant responses to evaluations.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .