Legacy Evaluation Form_.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-022626 Roundabouts and Alternative Intersections/Interchanges Support Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000519
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form captures evaluation data across two primary rating categories: Management (Factor A) and Prosecution and Progress (Factor B). The evaluation addresses consultant resource management, independence, scope adherence, communication, timeliness of deliverable completion, quality and completeness of work products, and budget compliance. The form accommodates ratings on a scale where 5 represents exceeding requirements, 3 represents meeting requirements, 1 represents failing to meet requirements, and N/A indicates non-applicable criteria. The evaluation includes fields for the consultant's project identification number, project manager information, project phase, and service dates, with scoring subtotals for each rating category that contribute to a maximum total score of 50 points.

The form structure provides designated spaces for justification of scores by the Agency/Owner Project Manager or Subject Matter Expert, consultant responses to evaluations, and signature blocks for the Agency/Owner PM, consultant PM, and evaluating supervisor. The scoring methodology assigns weighted point values to each rating level, with factors receiving between 8 and 20 points based on their assigned rating. This evaluation instrument serves as a legacy assessment tool for monitoring consultant performance on GDOT projects and establishing a performance record that may inform future contract awards and consultant selections for services such as those outlined in RFQ-484-022626 for roundabout and alternative intersection design support services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_484_022626 Roundabout Alt Intersections I.pdf PDF
LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Finalist (Shortlist) Announcement.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.100
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.5200
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.100
3Ratings
Sub Total:20
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.3150
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.3150
2Ratings
Sub Total:30
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 50

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:60531
0Ratings000
1Ratings60300
2Ratings30150
3Ratings20100
4Ratings1580

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .