LAP Evaluation Form.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-022626 Roundabouts and Alternative Intersections/Interchanges Support Services
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000519
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on contracted projects. The form documents evaluation criteria across two primary rating categories: Management and Prosecution and Progress. The Management section evaluates the consultant's resource management, independence from agency staff, adherence to scope of work, and communication and cooperation with GDOT personnel. The Prosecution and Progress section assesses whether deliverables were completed by agreed-upon dates within the contracted duration, the completeness and accuracy of invoices and reports with minimal revisions required, and whether work was completed within the assigned budget. The form includes fields for project identification information, including GDOT PI number, project manager details, agency information, project description, phase, and service dates.

The evaluation uses a five-point rating scale where 5 indicates exceeds requirements, 3 indicates meets requirements, and 1 indicates does not meet requirements, with N/A as an option. Scoring is converted to weighted values based on the number of ratings in each section, with the scoring table providing specific point allocations. The form requires documentation of justification for scores from the GDOT Project Manager and allows for consultant response. Completion and sign-off is required from multiple parties including the GDOT PM, supervisor, Agency Evaluator's Supervisor, and Consultant PM. Additional acknowledgements from the GDOT Assistant Office Head and Office Head are mandated if any item receives a rating of 1, ensuring oversight of substandard performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Legacy Evaluation Form_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Finalist (Shortlist) Announcement.pdf PDF
RFQ_484_022626 Roundabout Alt Intersections I.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

LAP Evaluation Form

Local Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No:

GDOT PM:

Agency:

Agency PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.N/A- - -1
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.N/A- - -1
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with GDOT staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by GDOT staff.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.N/A- - -1
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.N/A- - -1
0Ratings
Sub Total:0.00
GDOT PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 0

GDOT PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:

Local's Comments:

Local's Acknowledgement:

The GDOT Assistant Office Head (AOH) and Office Head (OH) Acknowledgements are required if a Rating of 1 is recorded for any item above.
AOH Acknowledgement: OH Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:50531
0Ratings0.000.000.00
1Ratings50.0030.0010.00
2Ratings25.0015.005.00
3Ratings16.6710.003.33
4Ratings12.507.502.50

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .