LBP_Survey_Wall_Guardhouse.pdf

PDF 11 MB Posted

Attached to
SANTA ELENA GUARDHOUSE LEAD PAINT REMEDIATION AT S
Solicitation number
140P5426R0026
Issued by

About this file

This is an Environmental Survey Report documenting lead-based paint (LBP) testing results for a Casa Rosa Structure located on Bastion de Santa Elena Guard House at El Morro in San Juan, Puerto Rico, prepared for the National Park Service in April 2025.

The survey identified lead-based paint components on concrete exterior surfaces at or above the 1.0 mg/cm² federal action level. LBP was detected on approximately 9,000 square feet of pink-painted concrete walls (A, B, C, and D), columns, and arches on the exterior, plus white-painted concrete column trims and trims on walls (A, B, and D). Additionally, white-painted concrete surfaces totaling 24 square feet (arch) and 120 square feet (lower wall A) in interior area 1-1 tested positive for LBP. The testing was conducted on April 16, 2025 by Elme Rivera, a DRNA/EPA Certified LBP Risk Assessor, using an XRF instrument (SciAps Model X-550, serial 03210) following HUD protocol revised in 2012. The assessment involved 102 XRF readings with calibration verification performed at ±0.3 mg/cm² acceptance criteria using NIST standards. The report recommends establishing a lead hazard control strategy if demolition or renovation activities are conducted, and notes that the LBP study is valid for five years from the test date. All tested surfaces were accessible and not covered by rigid barriers; hidden painted surfaces must be assumed to contain LBP.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P5426R0026_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf PDF
Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Sol_140P5426R0026.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Prepared For:

National Park Services

April 2025

Analytical Environmental

Services International, Inc.

611 Monserrate Street

2nd Floor, Santurce, PR 00907

(787) 722-0220 / Fax (787) 724-5788

ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY

FOR

LEAD BASED PAINTED (LBP) COMPONENTS

FOR

A CASA ROSA STRUCTURE LOCATED ON

BASTION DE SANTA ELENA GUARD HOUSE,

EL MORRO, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

LEAD

ADY PADAN, PH.D.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 TESTING PROCEDURES

3.0 LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING METHODOLOGY

4.0 RESULTS

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

APPENDIX I - AESI Credentials

APPENDIX II - PCS Data Sheet

APPENDIX III - XRF Data

APPENDIX IV - Site Location and Selective Photos

APPENDIX V - Schematic Distribution of LBP Components

ADY PADAN, PH.D 1

I. SUMMARY

AES International was contracted to perform a lead-based paint (LBP) survey for a

Casa Rosa Structure located on Bastion de Santa Elena Guard House, El Morro, San

Juan, Puerto Rico.

The LBP investigation was conducted on 4/16/2025 by Elme Rivera, a DRNA/EPA

Certified LBP Risk Assessor, respectively.

The following components were found to be painted with LBP:

Room Substrate Color Component & Location Quantity

Casa Rosa

Exterior

Concrete Pink Wall A

Concrete Pink Wall B

Concrete Pink Wall C

Concrete Pink Wall D

9,000sq.ft Concrete Pink Columns on Walls A, B & D

Concrete Pink Arches on Walls A, B & D

Concrete White Column Trims on Walls A, B & D

Concrete White Trims on Walls A, B & D

1-1

Concrete White Arch 24sq.ft

Concrete White Lower Wall A 120sq.ft

*Quantity presented is an approximate estimate.

If demolition, or renovation activities, are conducted in the nearest future it is recommended to establish a lead hazard control strategy that will account for the potential LBP risks present in the site.

ADY PADAN, PH.D. 2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

AES International was contracted to perform a lead-based paint (LBP) survey for a Casa Rosa

Structure located on Bastion de Santa Elena Guard House, El Morro, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The LBP investigation was conducted on 4/16/2025 by Elme Rivera, a DRNA/EPA Certified LBP

Risk Assessor. The credentials of AESI are attached in Appendix I. The survey was performed with an XRF instrument SciAps, Model X-550 (serial 03210) manufactured by SciAps. The survey was conducted using HUD protocol of 1997, revised in 2012.

2.0 TESTING PROCEDURES

The testing was performed with an XRF instrument manufactured by SciAps, Model X-550 (see

PCS in Appendix II). The selected mode allows reference to the abatement level set at 1.0 mg/cm2.

The results are reported at 95% confidence levels.

3.0 LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING METHODOLOGY

The hazard level of lead in paint has been determined by the department of Housing & Urban development as 1.0 mg/cm2, as measured by XRF, or AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy), or

0.5% be weight (or 5000 ppm) as measured by AAS, or Inductive Coupled Plasma (ICP). The same level was adopted by EPA regulations published in 1992, under Title X.

The only lead-based paint testing protocol officially available at this time was published by HUD initially in 1990, revised in 1991 and finalized in 1995 (see HUD reference above). A revised chapter 7 was published in 1997 and 2012. In accordance with the new protocol, almost all surfaces present in the units must be tested. The above guidelines were used to perform lead-based paint testing for this project.

The main steps involved in a single-family inspection are:

1. Perform inventory of all testing combinations;

2. Select painted area to be tested;

3. Perform XRF testing (including calibration checks);

4. Collect and analyze paint chip samples, for inconclusive results;

5. Classify XRF and paint chips results;

6. Review and evaluate the data;

7. Report findings.

ADY PADAN, PH.D. 3

AES International personnel classify each XRF lead reading as positive, negative, or inconclusive.

This classification is based on manufacturer XRF performance characteristic sheet (PCS), for each substrate. Samples and/or additional readings are taken from inconclusive areas. Calibration verification of the instrument was performed prior to beginning of daily task, when the instrument was turned on, and at the end of the day. The verification was conducted on a NIST standard of 1.0 mg/cm2. Acceptance criteria used was +-0.3 mg/cm2. The data for calibration verification is attached in Appendix III. The structure was divided into room equivalents and labeled accordingly

(see Appendix III). One testing combination of similar components and four walls was tested for each room equivalent.

The identification of tested walls is based on HUD guidelines as follows:

Wall A - Entrance wall.

Walls B, C, and D - Sequential walls, clockwise from Wall A.

4.0 RESULTS

The results of the tested components are shown in Appendix III. One hundred and two (102) XRF readings were taken. LBP components were detected and presented herein.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

An LBP survey was conducted for a Casa Rosa Structure located on Bastion de Santa Elena Guard

House, El Morro, San Juan, Puerto Rico. LBP findings are presented herein.

Some painted surfaces may contain levels of lead below 1.0 mg/cm2, which could create lead dust, or lead contaminated soil hazards if the paint is turned into dust by abrasion, scraping, or sanding. This report shall be kept by the owner and all future owners. A copy of the relevant report shall be given to each tenant, buyer or lessor, to comply with federal requirements for disclosure under the lead disclosure rule of 1996 (see also section 1018 of Title X).

The LBP survey relates to surfaces accessible and not covered by rigid barriers. Should any hidden painted surfaces or components be present, they must be assumed as LBP. Reported results are valid for the day of testing indicated in the reports. According to DNRA the LBP study is valid for a period of five years.

Elme Rivera

Lead Risk Assessor

DRNA Lic. LBPI-22524-243

Appendix I

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC acknowledges that

Analytical Environmental Services International, Inc.

611 Monserrate St. Suite 2 Santurce, PR 00907

Laboratory ID: LAP-102702 along with all premises from which key activities are performed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirements of the AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs (AIHA LAP), LLC accreditation to the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 international standard, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories in the following:

LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS

INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Accreditation Expires: July 01, 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD Accreditation Expires: July 01, 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY Accreditation Expires:

FOOD Accreditation Expires:

UNIQUE SCOPES Accreditation Expires:

BERYLLIUM FIELD/MOBILE Accreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/Method(s) within each Accreditation Program for which the above named laboratory maintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of Accreditation. Continued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and AIHA LAP, LLC requirements. This certificate is not valid without the attached Scope of Accreditation. Please review the AIHA LAP, LLC website (www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org) for the most current Scope.

Revision21: 05/15/2023

Cheryl O Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

Date Issued: 07/01/2023

AES International, Inc.

has fulfilled the requirements of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 402, and has received certification to conduct lead-based paint renovation, repair, and painting activities pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745.89

All EPA Administered States, Tribes, and Territories

This certification is valid from the date of issuance and expires November 15, 2025

Certification #

NAT-87801-3

Issued On

September 04, 2020

Michelle Price, Chief

Lead, Heavy Metals, and Inorganics Branch

DRNA Lead Risk Assessor Credential

Appendix II

SciAps X-550 PCS February 2022 Action Level: 1.0 mg/cm2

Performance Characteristic Sheet

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2022

MANUFACTURER AND MODEL:

Make: SciAps

Models: Model X-550

X-Ray Source: Rhodium (Rh) or Gold (Au) Anode

FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE

ACTION LEVEL SETTING:

1.0 mg/cm2

OPERATING PARAMETERS:

Timed mode: fixed 10-second reading.

Quick mode: variable-time reading (approximately 2-6 seconds).

XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS:

0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm2 (inclusive) on NIST SRM 2579 (1.02 mg/cm2)/NIST SRM 2573, or equivalent

SUBSTRATE CORRECTION:

Not applicable

INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD:

Au Anode (quick)

READING DESCRIPTION

SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD (mg/cm2)

Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate

Brick 1.0 Concrete 1.0 Drywall 1.0 Metal 1.0

Plaster 1.0 Wood 1.0

Rh Anode (Timed or Quick), Au Anode (Timed)

READING DESCRIPTION

SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD (mg/cm2)

Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate

Brick 0.9 Concrete 0.9 Drywall 0.9 Metal 0.9

Plaster 0.9 Wood 0.9

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE:

This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the

Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, 2012 Edition ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated using test results on building components in the HUD archive.

Testing was conducted on 146 test samples in February 2022, with two separate instruments of each Anode type, operated in both Timed and Quick modes.

OPERATING PARAMETERS

Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines.

XRF CALIBRATION CHECK:

The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST

Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film; for NIST SRM

2579a, use film 2573 (1.04 mg/cm2).

If the average (rounded to 1 decimal place) of three readings is outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instrument into control before XRF testing proceeds.

EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING:

Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing.

Conduct XRF re-testing at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting.

Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below. Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps:

Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. In single-family and multi-family housing, a result is defined as a single reading. Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units.

Calculate the average of the original XRF result and the retest XRF result for each testing combination.

Square the average for each testing combination.

Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C.

Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D.

Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E.

Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F.

Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit.

Compute the average of all ten original XRF readings.

Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF readings.

Find the absolute difference of the two averages.

If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient.

Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested.

TESTING TIMES:

The reading time in Archive tests was 10 seconds in Timed mode and from 2-6 seconds in Quick mode, for both the Rh Anode and Au Anode.

CLASSIFICATION OF RESULTS:

XRF results for the Au Anode in Quick mode are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 and negative if they are less than to 1.0 mg/cm2. XRF results for the Au Anode in Timed mode and for the Rh Anode in Timed or Quick mode are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to 0.9 mg/cm2 and negative if they are less than to 0.9 mg/cm2

DOCUMENTATION:

A report titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets (EPA 747-R-95-008) provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to develop Performance Characteristic Sheets at the Federal standard (Action Level) of 1.0 mg/cm2 and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. The report may be downloaded at http://www2.epa.gov/lead/methodology-xrf-performance-characteristic-sheets-epa-747-r-95-008-september-

1997.

Appendix III

ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

611 Monserrate Street, 2 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

Calibration

Calibration

Calibration

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall A

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall A

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall A

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall A

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall B

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall B

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall B

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall B

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall D

2.1

3.1

3.1

4.3

0.9

1.0

1.9

0.7

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

2.4

4.1

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

0.9

3.2

0.1

3.6

2.9

3.4

2.9

2.1

Approved By: Ady Padan Ph.D. Date: 2/10/2025 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & LocationReading #

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Wall D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Columns on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Columns on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Columns on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Columns on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Arches on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Arches on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Arches on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete Pink Arches on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Column Trims on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Column Trims on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Column Trims on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa Exterior Metal Black Window Railing Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Metal Black Window Railing Wall D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Window Arc Wall C

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Window Arc Wall D

Casa Rosa Exterior Concrete White Trims on Walls A, B & D

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Arch

21 1.8

2.1

1.6

1.9

0.9

2.3

2.1

1.6

2.1

2.4

2.3

1.9

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

1.7

2.1 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

Casa Rosa 1-1 Wood Brown Door Frame

Casa Rosa 1-1 Wood Brown Door

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Baseboard

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Window Sill

Casa Rosa 1-1 Ceramic Brown Floor Tile

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Lower Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Lower Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Lower Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Lower Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Upper Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-1 Concrete White Upper Wall D

Casa Rosa Bathroom Concrete White Wall A Arch

Casa Rosa Bathroom Concrete White Wall A

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Lt. Brown Upper Wall B

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

1.3

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Lt. Brown Upper Wall C

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Lt. Brown Upper Wall D

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Brown Floor Tile

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Lt. Brown Sink

Casa Rosa Bathroom Wood White Shelves

Casa Rosa Bathroom Wood White Shelves Support

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Cream Lower Wall A

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Cream Lower Wall B

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Cream Lower Wall C

Casa Rosa Bathroom Ceramic Cream Lower Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Wood Brown Door Frame

Casa Rosa 1-2 Wood Brown Door

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete White Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete Cream Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete Cream Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete Cream Baseboard

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete White Baseboard

71 0.1

72 0.2

68 0.2

69 0.4

70 0.3

65 0.1

66 0.1

67 0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.2 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete White Baseboard

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Concrete Cream Baseboard

Casa Rosa 1-2 Lower Level Ceramic Brown Floor Tile

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete White Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Green Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Green Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Center Level Concrete Cream Window Sill

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Green Wall A

80 0.2

77 0.2

78 0.3

79 0.1

74 0.2

75 0.1

76 0.1

73 0.1

88 0.1

89 0.2

90 0.1

85 0.1

86 0.2

87 0.1

81 0.1

82 0.2

83 0.1

84 0.2 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall A

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall B

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Green Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Green Wall C

94 0.5

95 0.1

96 0.3

91 0.1

92 0.3

93 0.4

106 0.1

107 0.2

RE-TESTING

103 0.1

104 0.2

100 0.3

101 0.1

102 0.2

97 0.2

98 0.1

99 0.2

0.1 nd

Floor, Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907

Client Name: Date: 4/16/2015

Project Name: Inspector: Elme Rivera

Address: XRF Serial No.: 03210

Building Room Substrate Color Component & Location

LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING DATA SHEET

National Park Services

Casa Rosa El Morro

San Juan, PR

XRF Reading

(mg/cm

Reading #

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall C

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete Cream Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Wall D

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Casa Rosa 1-2 Upper Level Concrete White Ceiling

Calibration

Calibration

Calibration

111 0.3

108 0.3

109 0.1

110 0.2

116 1.0

117 1.1

0.4

0.1

0.2

0.1

1.0

Appendix IV

Site Location: Casa Rosa Structure, El Morro, San Juan, Puerto Rico

SELECTIVE PHOTOS

CASA ROSA, EL MORRO

SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

GENERAL VIEW

Casa Rosa

SELECTIVE PHOTOS

CASA ROSA, EL MORRO

SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

LBP Pink/White Concrete Walls A & D, Columns

& Trims, Arches Wall and Front Trim, Exterior

LBP Pink Concrete Walls C & D, Exterior

LBP White Concrete Arch, Area 1-1 LBP White Concrete Lower Wall A, Area 1-1

Appendix V

DISTRIBUTION OF LBP COMPONENTS

Casa Rosa, El Morro San Juan, Puerto Rico

Environmental Consulting, Training, and Laboratory Services

(787) 722-0220 / (787) 724-5788

LEGEND:

LBP Exterior Concrete Walls A, B, C & D

LBP Exterior Concrete Columns, Trims and Arches on Walls A, B and D

LBP Interior Concrete Lower Wall A and Arch

Not at Scale

N

BATHROOM

1-1

1-2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .