L - 2 - RFP N6134024R0064_Att L-2 PPQ.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Surface COMS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N61340-24-R-0064
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for the solicitation N61340-24-R-0064 seeking a contractor to provide Surface COMS. The Navy Naval Air Systems Command is requesting a past performance assessment of an offeror be completed and returned within two weeks. The assessment includes ratings in two areas - quality of product or service and management - using a five-level scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory. Examples must be provided to substantiate each rating. Upon completion, the assessor's signature is required to verify the information. No other details are provided on the required products or services, response dates, or award information.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Surface COMS, newest first.
File Type Posted
L - 4 - RFP N6134024R0064_Att L-4 PEW (1)_16Nov23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N6134024R0064_Draft.pdf PDF
L - 3 - RFP N6134024R0064_ATT L-3 Past Performance Contract Data- Final for Draft RFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L - 5 - RFP N6134024R0064_ATT L-5_SBPCD.docx DOCX document
Exhibit CDRL A00A OPSEC PLAN SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R3 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
Exhibit CDRL A001 CONTRACT FUNDING STATUS REPORT SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R1 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
Exhibit CDRL A003 MOB CONTRACTOR PERFORM STATUS REPORT SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R2 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
ExhibitCDRL A005 INVENTORY REPORT SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R2 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
ExhibitCDRL A006 QUALITY PRORAM PLAN SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R2 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
Att 10 - CLIN_BREAKOUT_FOR_SURF_COMS_23Oct23 MAS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
L - 1 -RFP N6134024R0064_Att L-1 QandA Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit CDRL A002 CONFERENCE MINUTES SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R2 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
Exhibit CDRL A004 CONTRACTOR PEROM STATUS REPORT SURFACE COMS FINAL DRAFT RFP R2 13 OCT 2023.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment L-2 Past Performance Questionnaire RFP N6134024R0064

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

I. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATIVE DATA (To be completed by the Offeror) Offeror Name:

Contract Title:

Contract Number/Task Order:

II. POINT OF CONTACT (POC) Data (To be completed by the Offeror) Name:

Position or role:

Entity:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Other:

III. INFORMATION TO THE PPQ POC

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection. Please complete the assessment below and send all pages of this questionnaire to john.k.lina.civ@us.navy.mil within two weeks of receipt.

Assessment: (To be completed by the PPQ POC) Instructions to complete the assessment: Please provide responses to 1 through 3 that are listed below the assessment Rating System Table. Place an “X” in the rating that best assesses the offeror’s performance in the areas listed below. Then provide examples to substantiate your rating based on the ratings in the Rating System Table. For example, if you provide a rating of ‘Exceptional’, list the “many” contractual requirements that were exceeded “to the government’s benefit”.

Rating System Table:

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor's performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here's a breakdown of each category:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the procuring entity’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the procuring entity’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

1. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what he promised in the proposal, I WOULD or WOULD NOT award to this offeror today given that I had a choice.

2. Quality of Product or Service:

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

List the positive and negative examples that substantiate rating IAW the ratings from the Ratings System Table above:

3. Management:

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

N/A

List the positive and negative examples that substantiate rating IAW the ratings from the Ratings System Table above:

Signature ______________________________ Date _____________ Electronic signatures are acceptable. An e-mail from the originator of this document will suffice. Signatures (electronic or hand written) verify that the signatory completed this form and agrees with the information.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .