Justification_and_Approval_document_ALCM Eng Svs_24 Aug 2023_PEO Redacted.pdf

Justification and Approval (J&A) for Other Than Full and Open Competition

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 1 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 1 of 10

Was a J&A approved for the preceding acquisition where that acquisition required a J&A? Yes No

Is this a new or amended J&A Document? New Amended ( Prior to Award Only! )

Is this a Bridge Action as defined at AFFARS 5302.101? Yes No

Dollar Value of this Acquisition: < $750K > $750K and < $15M > $15M and < $100M > $100M

Contracting Activity: AFNWC/PZNT 7330 Sentry Blvd., Bldg. 469 Post C6

Tinker AFB, OK 73145-3032

Purchase Request (if available) / Local ID Number: FD2030-23-32205

Program / Project (and PE, if applicable): Air Launch Cruise Missile (ALCM) Engineering Services

Program Type (PEO, Enterprise, of Operational): AFPEO/Strategic Systems (SS)

Authority: 6.302-1 – 10 USC 3204(a)(1), Only One Responsible Source - No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency

Requirements

Estimated Contract Cost (including options): $ 70,617,859

J&A Type: Class Individual

COORDINATION ( AFFARS 5306.304(a) )

Date Project Lead / Program Mgr / Requiring Activity Steven M. Douglas

AFNWC/NDMLL

Signature

Date

12 Jul 2023

Contracting Officer Tiffany Rodriguez

AFNWC/PZNT

Signature

Date

24 Jul 2023

Legal Reviewer Michael A. Puzio 72nd ABW/JAQ; 405 739-2692

Signature

Date

08 Aug 2023

AFSC/PZCA Reviewer Amy Hawkins

AFSC/PZCA

Signature

Date Chief of the Contracting Office (COCO) Theodore Kopec, Jr

AFNWC/PZN, 850-279-2945

Signature

Date Competition Advocate Stephanie Gisseman

AFNWC/PZC, 478-714-8398

Signature

DOUGLAS.STEVEN.M.11

24128974

Digitally signed by

DOUGLAS.STEVEN.M.1124128974

Date: 2023.07.12 14:44:32 -05'00'

RODRIGUEZ.TIFFANY.M.1072830845

Digitally signed by

RODRIGUEZ.TIFFANY.M.1072830845

Date: 2023.07.12 15:21:06 -05'00'

PUZIO.MICHAEL.ANDRE

W.1031215877

Digitally signed by

PUZIO.MICHAEL.ANDREW.1031215877

Date: 2023.07.24 16:28:06 -04'00'

HAWKINS.AMY.LYNN.1

245099670

Digitally signed by

HAWKINS.AMY.LYNN.1245099670

Date: 2023.08.08 12:04:09 -05'00'

KOPEC.THEODORE.S.JR.1027

477484

Digitally signed by

KOPEC.THEODORE.S.JR.1027477484

Date: 2023.08.23 13:54:21 -04'00'

GISSEMAN.STEPHANIE

.M.1253442731

Digitally signed by

GISSEMAN.STEPHANIE.M.1253442731

Date: 2023.08.23 12:20:09 -06'00'

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 2 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 2 of 10

Date Director of Contracting Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Robert J. Yates III, Col

Signature

APPROVAL ( AFFARS 5306.304(a) )

Date John P. Newberry, Maj Gen Commander, Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center

Strategic Systems

Signature

YATES.ROBERT.J

.III.1166705092

Digitally signed by

YATES.ROBERT.J.III.1166705092

Date: 2023.08.31 15:05:50 -06'00'

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 3 of 10

Agency and Contracting Activity.

United States Air Force

AFNWC/PZNT

7330 Sentry Blvd., Bldg 469 Post C6 Tinker AFB, OK 73145-3032

739-8826

DSN 339-8826

Purchase Request: FD2030-23-32205

Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

A class J&A is appropriate due to the inclusion of FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services and will be multiple task orders generated from the basic contract.

This will be a new, non-commercial contract. This acquisition is not a bridge contract.

This contract will provide recurring and nonrecurring system engineering and logistics analysis services to maintain the Air

Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) weapon system integrity. The recurring logistics and engineering support activities include, but are not limited to, configuration and data management, laboratory support, design tools support, supportability analyses, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) impact analyses, technical surveillance, technical inquiries, flight test support ( missions a year with flights in each mission, equaling flight tests a year), Force

Development Evaluation (FDE) mission screening, and Functional Ground Test (FGT) ( ground tests a year) support. The non-recurring engineering support activities include, but are not limited to, Engineering Assignments (EAs), program support, engineering data support, service related deficiencies, technical surveillance support, engineering change proposals, system software maintenance, field support, feasibility studies, and emergency engineering tasks. This requirement includes support o legacy strategic cruise missile integration carriage equipment and peculiar support equipment.

This is a follow-on contract The Boeing Company, CAGE 1N929

Awarded: 09/29/2017

Period of Performance: 09/29/2017 - 01/31/2024

Total Estimated Value at Inception: $90,000,000.00

Current total Estimated Value at completion: $45,000,000.00

The estimated total value of this acquisition is $70,617,859

This contract will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Fixed Price Incentive Firm Target

(FPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee Level of Effort (CPFF LOE) "D" contract.

Four (4) Two-Year ordering periods and One 1-year ordering period with a 6-month Option to Extend Services under FAR

52.217-8 is considered to be appropriate for this acquisition. The Period of Performance will be established on each individual

Task Order issued hereunder. Ordering Periods are as follows:

Ordering Period 1, Year 1: February 2024 - January 2025

Ordering Period 1, Year 2: February 2025 - January 2026

Ordering Period 2, Year 1: February 2026 - January 2027

Ordering Period 2, Year 2: February 2027 - January 2028

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 4 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 4 of 10

Ordering Period 3, Year 1: February 2028 - January 2029 Ordering Period 3, Year 2: February 2029 - January 2030 Ordering Period 4, Year 1: February 2030 - January 2031 Ordering Period 4, Year 2: February 2031 - January 2032 Ordering Period 5, Year 1: February 2032 - January 2033 Option to Extend Services (6-Month Extension): January 2033 - July 2033

The estimated award date is

III. Description of supplies/services required to meet agency needs.

This acquisition is for a Follow-on Engineering Services contract for ALCM sustainment.

This requirement is to acquire system engineering and logistics services to ensure critical reliability of the ALCM. This includes testing by performing FDEs and FGTs, maintaining the unique ALCM System Integration Lab (ASIL), as well as, investigative engineering, feasibility and data analysis studies, prototype/engineering model fabrication and tests, software and hardware problem investigations and development of recommended corrective actions, laboratory testing and analyses, technical data package (TDP) development, development of engineering inputs preceding and supporting formal modifications, and air vehicle and component test and analyses. Additionally, includes support on the legacy B-52 strategic cruise missile integration, carriage equipment and peculiar support equipment.

Ordering Period 1, Year 1: February 2024 - January 2025, estimated amount $7,585,249 Ordering Period 1, Year 2: February 2025 - January 2026, estimated amount $10,617,527 Ordering Period 2, Year 1: February 2026 - January 2027, estimated amount $10,591,635 Ordering Period 2, Year 2: February 2027 - January 2028, estimated amount $8,675,702 Ordering Period 3, Year 1: February 2028 - January 2029, estimated amount $7,763,128 Ordering Period 3, Year 2: February 2029 - January 2030, estimated amount $6,854, 322 Ordering Period 4, Year 1: February 2030 - January 2031, estimated amount $5,949,538 Ordering Period 4, Year 2: February 2031 - January 2032, estimated amount $5,048,751 Ordering Period 5, Year 1: February 2032 - January 2033, estimated amount $5,152,115 Option to Extend Services (6-Month Extension), January 2033 - July 2033, estimated amount $2,379,893 Total Estimated Contract Value $70,617,859

CLIN DESCRIPTION

X001 Recurring Engineering - Data Management - FFP X002 Recurring Engineering - ALCM System Integration Lab (ASIL) Support - FFP X003 Recurring Engineering - Flight Test - FFP X003AA Flight Test 1st Mission - FFP X003AB Flight Test 2nd Mission - FFP X004 Recurring Engineering - Functional Ground Test Support - FFP X004AA Ground Test 1 - FFP X004AB Ground Test 2 - FFP X005 Recurring Engineering - Pre-Air Launch Munitions Analysis Group (ALMAG) Support - FFP X006 Recurring Engineering - Technical Inquiries - CPFF LOE X007 Recurring Engineering - Travel - CR No Fee X008 Recurring Engineering - Material (ASIL and TI) - CR No Fee X009 Nonrecurring Engineering Assignments - FFP X010 Nonrecurring Engineering Assignments - FPIF Target X011 Nonrecurring Engineering Assignments - CPIF X012 Nonrecurring Engineering Assignments - CPFF X013 Over & Above - FFP X014 Data - NSP

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 5 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 5 of 10

Types of funding to be utilized are as follows:

3400 funds for Operations and Maintenance of the ALCM Weapon System; recurring engineering 3400 funds for Operations and Maintenance of the ALCM Weapon System; nonrecurring engineering 3020 funds for the Service Life Extension of the ALCM Weapon System; nonrecurring engineering 3600 funds for the development and testing for new capability; nonrecurring engineering

The total estimated contract valued is $70,617,859. Methodology used for the total estimated contract value is as follows:

Utilized hours from Option Years & that were previously negotiated for recurring engineering efforts.

Utilized current DCMA cost model (CUI 50_CLIN_MY_07Sept2022) with Forward Pricing Rate Proposal labor rates for F Y 2024 - FY 2029. (15% profit rate) - Boeing current rates.

Calculated the increase in price from FY 2027-2029 an average increase of 3.8%.

Increased price by 3.8% each FY from 2030-2033, as the DCMA cost model through 2029.

Included estimated $100 for material, based upon upcoming Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) Technical Inquiry projects and investigations, as well as ASIL material purchase expectations.

Included estimated $25 for travel, based upon historical travel surrounding recurring engineering efforts; flight and ground test and pre-ALMAG support, as well as Technical Inquiry travel.

Included estimated $10 for Over & Above, based upon an average over years.

Calculated FY 2033 total in accordance with (IAW) potential -month Option to Extend Services.

Reduced the FY 2033 total by a penny as the Strategic Management Tool (SMT) system was not taking into consideration rounding.

Removed the $0.22 per the J&A template guidance to round to the whole dollar.

There will be no separately priced CLINs for I P or IP rights. The IP rights strategy is consistent with the Acquisition Strategy as approved by the appropriate authority.

This J&A covers all contract actions including Ordering Periods and Task Order for all CLINs detailed in the CLIN discussion above.

Due to circumstances below in Sections V there are no immediate actions that could be taken to develop competition. Therefore, it is considered appropriate to seek approval for more than one fiscal year. If other qualified or approved sources become known during the life of this contract this J&A will not be utilized to support any buys using other than full and open competition.

This acquisition will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract. The Minimum will be the First Negotiated Task Order for Recurring Engineering services, Ordering Period One/Year One; and the Maximum will be $70,617,859.

IV. Demonstration that the contractor's unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the

Boeing, the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), is the only company with the special equipment, personnel and technical data to satisfy the Air Force's minimum need. Boeing has provided engineering services support for this major Nuclear system, the ALCM, since the 1970s. Boeing has also been the contractor on all ALCM major system upgrades.

Activities such as Flight and Ground Test, ongoing specialized services and OEM Technical Data continue to be a part of the current contract. This ALCM Engineering services follow-on contract will continue these activities until the ALCM missile transitions out of the inventory. Therefore, this acquisition will be a follow-on contract for the continued performance of a highly specialized service .

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 6 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 6 of 10

Boeing has been the only source providing the highly specialized technical engineering and engineering support required for the ALCM Engineering Services for over the last 40 years. oeing a wealth of legacy knowledge and experience.

The government requires Boeing to provide testing on all ALCM parts. The Government does not have complete data package to provide test requirements for ALCM parts . Boeing is the only source with the complete specialized test data requirement for the ALCM. As well, Boeing currently maintains the ASIL. The ASIL uses specialized test equipment that is required to initiate all testing requirements, as well to analyze test results. The Government has bee Boeing purchase of data unique to the ALCM, Boeing has stated they are not willing to sell the data to the Government. This highly specialized and unique lab is essential for performing evaluation and test for all ALCM Engineering Service components. There is no other vendor that has the specialized testing facilities in place, access to OEM data or the technically qualified staff to perform this Engineering Service.

The Missile Sustainment Division believes that award to any other source would result in substantial duplication of cost to the Government that is not expected to be recovered through competition and unacceptable delays in fulfilling the Air Force's requirement. Duplication of the ASIL would require redesign, re-qualification, and excessive time to complete. As a comparable effort, the Program Office completed a historical analysis and determined duplication would amount to $30M which was a quote from 10 years ago. Average inflation per year is 2.68%. In addition to the years added after contract award and an estimated completion time of 2026. otal ASIL would cost $42M. This does not include cost for new testing hardware, and software development, as well as re-hosting and qualification of new hardware and software.

While the Government owns build-from print limited data rights for the missile; this data alone would not allow another source to provide the level of sustainment support the Government requires. Lastly, there is no guarantee the OEM would provide a license to the new source; therefore, the recreation of Technical Data is a high risk to the Government. The delay to attempt this redesign would also be unacceptable. The expected time it would take to establish a new source is estimated to be 3 years. Establishing a new source would include administrative planning, permits, lead times for construction, recreate technical data, training and test analysis. This would also incorporate e-build of a new ASIL, which is required in support of every aspect of the ALCM and the required engineering services long with potentially requiring the moving of test stations and equipment in place since the 1980s. This is an unacceptable delay causing severe impact to the ALCM Program, which provides one leg of the Nuclear Triad support for the Department of Defense.

1. The Contract Deliverables (CDRLS) received from the current ALCM Engineering Services contract are:

Conference Agenda, Report, Record of Meeting Minutes, Product Drawings and Associated Lists, Integrated Program Management Report, Suppliers Configuration Management Plan, Technical Manuals/Orders/TCTO, Engineering Change Proposal, Service Engineering Report, Quality System Plan, System Safety Hazard Analysis Report, Test Requirements Document, Test Plan, Test Procedure, Test/Inspection Report, Automated Computer Program Identification Number Data and Control Record, Failure Modes/Effects and Criticality Analysis Report, Computer Software Product, Performance Specification Documents, Software Requirements Specifications, Systems/Subsystem Specification, Software Version Description, Contractor's Risk Management Plan, Risk Management Status Report, Deficiency Report, Government Industry Data Exchange Program Alert/Safe-Alert Report, CEMS Reporting, Systems Engineering Management Plan, Counterfeit Prevention Plan, Nuclear Certification Impact Statement, Briefing Materials, Management Plan, Design Review Information Package, Test Readiness Review Information Package, Government Furnished Material (GFM) by National Stock Number, and Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR). CDRLS provided by the contractor included a Distribution D statement marking on all deliverables. The Government Engineering Services contract CDRLs do not include a complete and specialized data package to provide test requirements. This greatly hinders the ability for any other source to provide the Engineering Service testing requirements needed thus making it insufficient to compete these services.

2. The following clauses are included in the current and previous ALCM Engineering Services contracts:

DFARS 252.227-7013 Rights in Technical Data - Noncommercial Items DFARS 252.227-7014 Rights in Noncommercial computer software and noncommercial computer software documentation DFARS 252.227-7030 Technical Data -- withholding of payment DFARS 252.227-7037 Validation of Restrictive Markings on Technical Data

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 7 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 7 of 10

The previous contract nor the current contract includes the Deferred Ordering Clause, DFARS 252.227-7027.

The Government did not purchase the IP at the onset of the development and production of the ALCM. The current requirements owner does not have the information the IP was not purchased.

The Government did not initiate any pre-challenge information requests or formal challenges to the assertions of development.

Boeing declined to provide the government a dollar value or opportunity to purchase the IP on the contract. A formal request for the cost to purchase data was submitted to the Boeing ALCM Program Manager on

30 January 2023 by the Government ALCM Engineering Services Contracting Officer. The response from Boeing, on 9 February 2023 stated, "Boeing Company is not interested in selling their data or company funded labs to the United States Government."

Reverse engineering was not considered as the ALCM is projected to transition out of the inventory in 2035, and a new weapon system will come on-line. Additionally, it would be economically unfeasible at this time for the Government to buy IP the system is within 12 years of retirement.

Accordingly, Boeing is the only firm capable of providing the services described in Section III above without the Government experiencing substantial duplication of cost that could not be expected to be recovered through competition and unacceptable delays in fulfilling its requirements.

Description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under

FAR 5.202 applies.

Sources Sought Synopsis (SSS)/Request For Information (RFI) - A SSS for Engineering Services for the ALCM, Synopsis number ID FA8128-24-D-TBD posted on 28 December 2022 and closed 31 January 2023 through Sam.gov. The Government did not receive any responses.

A General Services Administration (GSA) RFI for Engineering Services for Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) was posted to the Government Point of Entry (GPE) website, https://gsa.gov, on 4 January 2023 through 10 February 2023. The Government received nine esponses - Large Business and - Small Business.

The Small Businesses (8 interested Small Business vendors) were analyzed as part of Market Research. one of the Small Businesses that showed interest were identified as having capabilities, facilities, experiences, nor access pursuant to technical data. Due to complexity of the scope of work and unavailability of technical data, it was determined that there are no small businesses capable of supporting this requirement.

Raytheon ( interested Large Business) presented a detailed capabilities statement. Raytheon has extensive experience with

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 8 of 1011 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 8 of 10 developing weapons and weapons delivery systems. However, using Raytheon to fulfill these tasks will come with critical program risks. These risks could disrupt/delay ongoing ALCM maintenance efforts, aging surveillance information analysis studies, Technical inquir es, Flight Test Support and Engineering Assignments. It is stated in Raytheon's provided answers, that the company does not have the necessary equipment or technical data to conduct sustainment and maintenance of the ALCM. Therefore, it was determined that Raytheon was not capable of supporting this requirement.

Navy Crane provides lower skilled engineering support for the ALCM. Navy Crane does not have the extensive engineering capabilities required with the highly specialized skill set needed to accomplish the work stated in the ALCM Engineering Services PWS. Also, Navy Crane uses working capital funds to optimize the workload and person l for maximum efficiency. Once the Working Capital Funds fund is fully allocated, Navy Crane cannot receive more workload during that fiscal year. Not having the highly specialized engineering skillset the Working Capital Funds cap, would be a detriment to the requirements of this follow-on contract. Lastly, Navy Crane does not have the necessary equipment or technical data to conduct sustainment and maintenance of the ALCM.

Boeing, as the OEM, is the only source with the experience, expertise, and facilities to satisfy specific ALCM military sustainment requirements not found in the commercial sector. The Government requested to acquire all ALCM Technical Data from the OEM, Boeing, to include component, subcomponents, unlimited rights, licensing agreements on 30 January 2023. Boeing declined/refused to sell/provide technical data outside their current distribution statement.

Synopsis - This requirement will be synopsized in http://sam.gov as a notice of proposed contract action IAW FAR 5.201.

Expected date of publication is 2023

Qualifying Country Sources - No qualifying country sources have expressed interest.

Determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

The Contracting Officer will ensure that the services described herein are negotiated at a fair and reasonable price to the Government. IAW FAR as supplemented, the contractor will be required to submit Certified Cost and Pricing Data and/or other certified cost and pricing data. A detailed cost and pricing analysis will be performed. The Contracting Officer will request a technical evaluation from AFNWC/NDME to aid in the evaluation of the contractor's proposal. The Contracting Officer will seek audit assistance from the D C A A and DCMA, if necessary.

Description of the market research conducted and the results, or a statement of the reasons market research was not conducted.

Market Research has been conducted IAW the FAR and is current, accurate and relevant.

The Market Research Report was signed by Program Manager and Contracting Officer on 25 April 2023.

The date the Market Research was completed is 17 April 2023 and conducted IAW FAR 10.001 and 10.002.

The Market Research techniques used include:

Posting a SSS in Sam.gov on 28 December 2023; no responses received.

Post a RFI in GSA.gov on 3 January 2023; nine responses (1-Large and 8-Small); all evaluated and determined not to be viable sources.

NAICS 541330 was searched in SAM.gov, as well as a Dynamic Small Business search, to which no additional

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 9 of 10

d. Navy Crane, which the ALCM Program currently utilizes for small engineering efforts, was contacted to discuss the likelihood of their ability to take the ALCM Engineering Services contract effort in its entirety. Navy Crane uses Working Capital funds to support their workload, and once the funds are fully allocated, Navy Crane cannot accept any additional workload. This is not a feasible option for the ALCM Program.

e. The Contracting Officer identified a potential Umbrella Engineering Services contract with AFLCMC that could be utilized for the ALCM Engineering Services effort. However, after discussion with the Teams, there is no avenue to leverage the AFLCMC contract other than utilizing lessons learned for CLIN structure, additional deliverables, and administrative tracking processes and procedures.

Boeing was contacted by the Contracting Officer to ensure their continued support surrounding ALCM Engineering Services, due to the fact that Boeing did not respond to the SSS nor the RFI. They concurred to continuing to provide support to the ALCM Program.

Boeing was contacted by the Contracting Officer on 30 January 2023 via contracts letter, with the Government s request to purchase the ALCM IP/Technical Data. Boeing declined to provide a cost/price, nor sell the data, via contracts letter dated 9 February 2023.

The Contracting Officer contacted the AFSC/Small Business Office for SSS/RFI review, and to discuss any additional Market Research techniques. However, the nature of this effort does not lend any additional avenues to research.

The Government team reviewed the ALCM Contractor Logistics upport contract to ensure there were no overlaps in work scope, as well as to view any additional sources which responded to that announcement that could leveraged. It was determined there are no overlaps, and no additional sources to be leveraged.

This effort is military unique and non-commercial.

None of the respondents requested additional information, therefore there were no documents shared via the bidder's library.

The Contracting Officer will post a Synopsis indicating the intent for a Sole Source contract, which is estimated to post 2023 on Sam.gov.

In summation, Boeing, the OEM, continues to be the only viable source to fulfill the Government s requirement for ALCM Engineering Services. Boeing has the IP/Technical Data, facilities, personnel and expertise supporting critical ALCM efforts, such as flight and ground testing, configuration management, ASIL support and additional ALCM engineering efforts.

VIII. Any other facts supporting the use of Other Than Full and Open Competition.

No further information.

IX. List of any sources that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.

BOEING COMPANY, DBA BOEING DIV DEFENSE, SPACE & SECURITY

6001 S AIR DEPOT BLV. OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73135-5922 UNITED STATES

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code: 1N929

Allegient Defense, 4401 Farifax Dr, STE 321, Arlington, VA 22203-1622 Cage 61YD3

11 Jul 2022 CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Page 10 of 10

Avain LLC, 22111 Three Notch Road, Lexington Park, MD 20653 Cage 345J8

BC Engineered Products, 1500 Mount Kimble Ave. Morristown, NJ 07960-8700 Cage 92550

Biz Solutions 360, 1725 DeSales St NW, STE 600, Washington DC, 20036-4413, Cage 4YVQ8

Constellation Software, 180 Admiral Cochrane Dr, STE 230, Annapolis, MD 21401 Cage 1XJD6

DEFTEC CORP, 200Westside SQ, STE 410, Huntsville, AL, 35801-4864 Cage 6TYK3

Eclipse Technical Systems LLC, 5520 Research Park DR, STE 100, Cage 87HAO

Raytheon Missiles & Defense, 1151 E. Hermans Rd, Tucson, AZ 85756, Cage 15090

Tesla Laboratories INC., 2711 Richmond Highway, Suite 200, Arlington, VA 22202, Cage 5FK54

See Section V and VII for more detail.

A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisitions for the supplies or services required.

As a result of continued refusal by the sole source contractor to technical data as well as duplication of cost of developing additional sources per section IV and X, there are no known additional actions which can be taken to remove barriers to competition and therefore, specific actions and milestones cannot be established. However, the ALCM Program Office will continue to monitor the marketplace for any changes which identify new sources and the Government will continue to synopsize the requirement.

Per PGI 206.304(a)(S-70) as indicated by signature on the Coordination and Approval document, the previous J&A has been reviewed and the Approval Authority determines that all stated actions as to remove barriers to competition have been accomplished.

Certification by the Contracting Officer.

As evidenced by their signature, the contracting officer certifies that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge and belief.

Certification by the technical/requirements personnel.

As evidenced by their signatures, the technical and requirements personnel have certified that any supporting data contained herein, which is their responsibility, is both accurate and complete.

2023-09-07T02:41:18+0000