J.8 Past Performance Questionaire.docx

The company listed below is preparing a quote on the above requirement for the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) in Washington, DC. You have been identified as a previous user of the below listed company and would have information on its past performance under a contract awarded by your company. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, please be advised that your response to this Past Performance Questionnaire will be safeguarded to the extent cited in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 42.1503. The FAR prohibits in part the release of past performance evaluations to other than Government personnel for use to evaluate source selection sensitive information.

This past performance questionnaire is being submitted to your company by the company listed below; however, you are requested to complete the form and return it directly to the AOC. Please provide your responses to the Contracting Officer of record, Roman Davydov. Send your response to this questionnaire via email to roman.davydov@aoc.gov on or before the due date of proposals on May 20, 2024 at noon EST. While not all elements in this questionnaire may apply, please complete as much as possible. There is no page limit for these responses.

Company Requesting Past Performance Information:

Name:

Past Contract on Which the Company Is Being Evaluated:

Contract Title:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Company/Agency Information/Point of Contact (POC) Providing Past Performance Information:

Company/Agency Name: Date:

Point of Contact Name:

Phone No.:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation # AOCSSB24R0032 Source Selection Information Fire Protection Systems and Equipment Testing, Inspection, Maintenance, and Development Blanket Purchase Agreement

E-mail Address:

Address:

Position held or function in relation to project:

Ratings: Please evaluate the contractor’s performance using the following ratings:

Substantial Confidence – The contractor exceeded all contract requirements with significant strengths identified in its performance; minor weaknesses are allowable which would result in a high expectation of successful contract performance.

Satisfactory Confidence – The contractor met all contract requirements with some strengths identified in its performance; minor weaknesses are allowable which would result in a reasonable expectation of successful contract performance.

Limited Confidence – The contractor met all contract requirements with few to no strengths. The contractor however did have weaknesses identified in its performance, which would result in a limited expectation of successful contract performance.

No Confidence – The contractor did not meet all contract requirements with more weaknesses than strengths identified in its performance, which would result in no expectation of successful contract performance.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) – The contractor does not have recent or relevant past performance or the past performance record is so sparse that a meaningful confidence rating cannot be reasonably assigned.

Please rate and provide supporting information for the following questions. If the rating is Limited Confidence or No Confidence, please provide specific contract/job performance areas that were not performed in accordance with the requirements outlined in the applicable contract. (Use additional sheets as needed).

1. How did the contractor perform in meeting delivery/completion schedules?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

2. What did the contractor do to improve or resolve scheduling problems?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

3. How was the contractor’s quality control?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

4. How was the contractor’s performance in delivering quality work in accordance with the contract?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

5. Was the contractor able to provide the required work at a reasonable total price?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

6. Did the contractor comply with labor standards?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

7. Did the contractor comply with safety standards?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

8. Was the contractor issued any of the following: Cure notice, show cause, letters of concern, reprimand, suspension of payments, or termination? If yes, please explain.

[Type answer here]

Rating:

9. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, please state reasons.

[Type answer here]

Rating:

10. Was the customer satisfied with the end product?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

11. How was the relationship between the contractor’s team and the government’s team?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

12. How was the contractor’s on-site management and coordination of subcontractors?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

13. How was the contractor’s overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

14. Did the contractor request any modifications? If yes, how many and to what extent?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

15. Has the contractor been provided an opportunity to discuss any negative performance ratings? If yes, what were the results?

[Type answer here]

Rating:

16. OVERALL RATING:

17. Please provide any additional comments:

[Type answer here]