J.15 Teacher professional Performance standards.docx
DOCX document 308 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 72066920R00010
About this file
This document provides details on a federal contract opportunity to support education systems strengthening in Liberia. The U.S. Agency for International Development in Liberia seeks proposals from qualified U.S. or non-U.S. nonprofit or for-profit organizations to assist the Government of Liberia's priorities in transforming the education system for teachers and students. Eligible organizations will support priorities such as teacher professional development, early grade reading instruction, and strengthening education management and governance. The NAICS code is 541990 for all other professional, scientific and technical services. The period of performance and total value are not specified. Proposals must be submitted through beta.sam.gov by the deadline indicated to be considered for award under this full and open competition solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
FOR LIBERIA
(2020 Revised Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers)
This document is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID.) The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Contractor and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
Foreword
Acknowledgments Thanks and appreciation go to the more than 1,600 educators, students, and community members from both urban and rural areas in Liberia, including international experts on standards-setting, who have been involved in the development of the 2007 Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers as well as this updated 2020 version.
This 2020 version of the performance standards was guided by the Ministry of Education (MOE) Teacher Education Bureau and Center of Excellence for Teacher Education, with teacher support from USAID Read Liberia. The development and updating of the Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers was made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID.)
The Bureaus of Teacher Education also extend appreciation to the 2007 participants and organizations, including international donors and implementing organizations. Finally, many thanks and appreciation to collaborating partners, learning institutions, and participants who contributed to the upgrading and finalization of this 2020 version.
2007 Contributing Organizations The Academy for Educational Development International Rescue Committee Mississippi Consortium for International Development University of Liberia Cuttington University Stella Maris University National Teachers’ Association of Liberia United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Norwegian Refugee Council Open Society Institute Save the Children-UK 2020 Contributing Organizations The MOE Teacher Education Bureau MOE center of Excellence- Teacher Accreditation USAID Read Liberia University of Liberia, Cuttington University Stella Maris University National Teachers’ Association of Liberia
UNESCO
UNICEF
Kid’s Educational Engagement Project (KEEP) Peace Corps Save the Children-UK.
(More to be added after the validation) 2019 Facilitation Team Galfor Washington – Assistant Minister – Teacher Education – MOE Dr. Charles Gbollie – Director – Teacher Accreditation – MOE Karina J Richards - Training Coordinator – Teacher Education - MOE Preeta J. Sonpon - Training Coordinator – Teacher Education - MOE Trokon B. Wayne – Senior Education Advisor – Read Liberia
Table of Contents
Foreword …………………………………………………………………………………………………..i
| Acknowledgments | iiii |
| List of Acronyms | v |
| The Purpose and Background of the Standards………………………………………………….…..1 The Domains of the Standards | 3 |
| Who are the Standards for? | 4 |
| The Five Domains of the Professional Standards | 5 |
| Domain 1: Knowledge | 5 |
| Domain 2: Teaching Skills | 6 |
| Domain 3: Classroom Management | 7 |
| Domain 4: Student Assessment and Evaluation | 8 |
| Domain 5: Professional Ethics and Behavior | 9 |
| Domain, Standards, and Performance Indicators | 10 |
| Domain 1. Knowledge – Standards and Performance Indicators | 10 |
| Domain 2. Teaching Skills – Standards and Performance Indicators | 15 |
| Domain 3. Classroom Management – Standards and Performance Indicators | 20 |
| Domain 4. Student Assessment and Evaluation – Standards and Performance Indicators | 23 |
| Domain 5. Professional Ethics and Behavior – Standards and Performance Indicators | 26 |
| How are the Standards to be Used/Implemented? | 32 |
| Conducting Classroom Observation | 32 |
| References | 34 |
List of Acronyms
| ECE | Early Childhood Education |
| CPD | Continuous Professional Development |
| ECE | Early Childhood Education |
| EGR | Early Grade Reading |
| MOE | Ministry of Education |
| STEM | Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics |
| USAID | United States Agency for International Development |
| UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization |
| UNICEF | United Nations Children’s Fund |
National Teachers Professional Performance Standards for Liberia i Background and Purpose of the Standards
The Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers was developed by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in 2007 through its Department of Instruction with funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The 2007 version of Professional Standards had the major support of parents, and the MOE’s goal was to use the standards as a baseline when improving teachers’ instructional practices at early childhood, primary, junior, and senior high school levels. This is in recognition of the fact that effectively providing the necessary guidance and support to teachers would improve teachers’ instructional practices and subsequently improve students’ learning outcomes, especially at the lower, basic, and early childhood education (ECE) levels. Additionally, the MOE recognized and effective guidance and support for teachers would require not just the existing teacher code of conduct and other regulatory instruments but also professional standards for teachers.
These standards stated explicitly what level of knowledge, skills, value standards, etc. teachers were expected to exhibit in the performance of their noble duties.
The 2007 Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers was organized under five domains that stated what the teacher should know and do, their level of competence, and what they value and practice. The domains are (1) Knowledge, (2) Teaching Skills, (3) Classroom Management, (4) Student Assessment and Evaluation, and (5) Professional Ethics and Behavior. Even though the 2007 Professional Standards did give a set of general set of expectations to teachers, it did not spell out standards for teachers at specific school levels (e.g., ECE, lower primary education) or focused on areas such as Reading, Science, and Inclusive Education.
Against this backdrop, the MOE requested support to revise and upgrade the professional standards, with consideration for specific skills for lower basic education and ECE and with focus on specific areas (e.g., Reading, Science, Inclusive Education, and other related curricular materials), as well as teacher performance. This revision process concentrated not just on the five domains but was also guided by the following five principles.
1. Engaging families and communities
2. Designing and maintaining a safe and nurturing early learning environment
3. Knowledge of child development and curricular content
4. Child-centered and play-based instructional methods and approaches
5. Continuous professional development The 2020 Revised Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers goes beyond the five domains and includes in descriptive terms the specific skills, knowledge, and attitudes needed, with associated indicators that teachers are expected to perform during their practices.
The purpose of the standards is to (1) help the teachers understand what is expected of them in the classroom during the teaching and learning process and (2) provide instructional supervisors, school administrators, monitoring and evaluation officers, teacher training facilitators, Community Participatory Curriculum Development (CPCD) planners, coaches, and even the teachers themselves the guidance on what they (teachers) are expected to do. Hence, these standards are the key references against which every teacher is prepared and assessed; given constructive feedback; and, where necessary, given practical demonstrations on how to improve.
The revised standards’ aim is to inform teacher education curricula and ensure that teachers are being trained in line with minimum standards, including the following:
To enable education service in which teachers’ practices are consistent with the standards governing the performance of teaching To provide teachers a goal to aim for To enable teachers to coordinate their work, avoiding duplication of efforts, and to ensure that all teacher training is standards-driven To make sure that pre-service training institutions prepare teachers in conformity with the MOE standards To enable the MOE to identify any gaps in training The revisions that have characterized the Professional Standards instrument clearly indicate that the MOE is exerting every possible effort to guide against mediocrity and unethical practices on the part of teachers, thereby improving the quality of instruction in the classroom. It provides avenues for the improvement of the nation’s education system as it encompasses every level of the education system, ranging from ECE and primary levels to junior and senior high school levels. However, implementation of these professional standards requires the concerted efforts of all education practitioners, ranging from teachers to education administrators, planners, policymakers, and the parent–teacher associations (PTAs) who constitute most of the school community.
The Domains of the Standards The Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers has been organized under five domains that state what the teachers should know and do, their level of competence, and what they value and practice. The domains, first developed in 2007 and continued in this revision, are as follows:
Knowledge Teaching Skills Classroom Management Student Assessment and Evaluation Professional Ethics and Behavior
Knowledge
Teaching
Skills
Student Assessment & Evaluation
Professional Ethics Behavior
Classroom Management
Professional Ethics and Behavior are at the core of the standards encompassing all other domains.
It is expected that the updated 2020 Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers will complement the existing MOE Teacher Code of Conduct, Education Management Policy, Teacher Career Ladder for Liberia, and the previous version of the Professional Standards for Liberian Teachers guidance and expectations.
Who are the Standards for?
The Professional Standards document is meant for all teachers practicing in the Republic of Liberia in all classifications, categories, and school levels (ECE, Basic and Secondary levels) as well as teachers in pre and in-service programs. The categories are as follows:
All early grade (EG) and ECE teachers currently in the classroom All science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teachers; vocational teachers; and special education teachers All alternative education facilitators and instructors of programs for children with special needs All teachers of language, literacy, and early grade reading (EGR) instruction Education researchers involved in the assessment and evaluation of education programs and teacher performance Education officers (Regional Education Officers, County and District Education Officers [REOs, CEOs & DEOs], providing instructional supervision and mentoring support to teachers Coaches, instructional supervisors, principals, and vice principals as guides in providing support to teachers Educators involved in the development of teacher training curriculum and teacher instruction materials The Center of Excellence – teacher accreditation and the National Teacher Association for the purpose of accrediting, assessing, and evaluating cases of misconduct by members of the teaching profession
The Five Domains of the Professional Standards Domain 1: Knowledge Domain Description Knowledge refers to the content knowledge, the technical knowledge, and practical understanding a teacher needs in order to carry out his or her duties.
The teacher…….
| Domain 1 Standards |
| Statement of the standards |
| Standard 1.1 |
| has sound knowledge of the content taught and a thorough knowledge of the subject matter he or she teaches. |
| Standard 1.2 |
| has thorough knowledge of the National MOE curricular content, including the goals and expectations of the teacher, and applies this effectively in teaching and making connections across subject matters where applicable. |
| Standard 1.3 |
| has basic knowledge of the Constitution of Liberia and philosophy of education in Liberia and knows and applies the rules and policies of the MOE. |
| Standard 1.4 |
| has knowledge of theories of child development and child psychology, including psychosocial issues, and applies these in teaching. |
| Standard 1.5 |
| has a strong understanding of child development in relationship to curriculum content and the teaching and learning of language and literacy skills. |
| Standard 1.6 |
| has knowledge of approaches to teaching and learning and related methodologies and applies these in the classroom as appropriate. |
| Standard 1.7 |
| at the ECE and early grade level, knows the curriculum content for their appropriate grade level; has knowledge on how to teach oral reading fluency and early grade reading and numeracy, and writing. |
| Standard 1.8 |
| has knowledge of the heritage, values, customs, and traditions of Liberian society and how these affect individual students. |
| Standard 1.9 |
| is aware of the importance of integrating psychosocial and vocational life skills into teaching to promote self-responsibility in students and help each student achieve his or her personal best in life. |
| Standard 1.10 |
| has sound knowledge of the English language in spoken and written forms and is able to transfer that knowledge to students. |
| Standard 1.11 |
| is aware of the issues of inclusion relative to gender equality and learners with physical disability and students with other special needs. |
Domain 2: Teaching Skills
Domain Description Teaching Skills refers to the processes, strategies, and techniques of planning and implementation of teaching and learning.
The teacher …
| Domain: 2 Standards |
| Statement of the standards |
| Standard 2.1 |
| makes learning relevant and meaningful to the students’ needs and relates it to their everyday lives. |
| Standard 2.2 |
| communicates clearly and correctly with the students and provides ample opportunities for meaningful dialogue in the classroom. |
| Standard 2.3 |
| plans daily lessons and executes the daily lesson with clear objectives into meaningful topics for the medium and long term. |
| Standard 2.4 |
| consistently provides developmentally appropriate and constructive feedback to students. |
| Standard 2.5 |
| follows the daily routine as indicated in the lesson plan and teacher guide. This includes allowing sufficient time for the development of oral language and literacy skills. |
| Standard 2.6 |
| uses developmentally appropriate and effective ECE/EGR instructional approaches to support the development of oral language and literacy skills. |
| Standard 2.7 |
| produces and uses a variety of teaching aids/resources, making use of available modern technology (ICT), student-centered methods, and extra-curriculum activities to enhance learning and child development. |
| Standard 2.8 |
| breaks down the curriculum into meaningful topics according to the instructional time available and provides needed help to struggling students. |
| Standard 2.9 |
| uses student-centered methods, extracurricular activities, sport, play, and drama to enhance better learning and child development. |
| Standard 2.10 |
| pays attention to all learners, especially girls and those with special needs, ensuring their progress in learning. |
| Standard 2.11 |
| develops techniques to effectively motivate learners. |
Domain 3: Classroom Management
Domain Description Classroom Management refers to the strategies and implementation means used by the teacher to maintain a conducive teaching and learning environment. It includes classroom setting as well as all other arrangements to ensure proper behavior and interactions that enhance learning.
The teacher…
| Domain 3 Standards |
| Statement of the standards |
| Standard 3.1 |
| makes sure that maximum time is spent on learning by getting and keeping students’ attention and ensuring that they are actively engaged by establishing routines to manage activities. |
| Standard 3.2 |
| directs his/her attention to and encourages active participation from all types of students, including boys and girls, students of different abilities and needs, and students seated in different parts of the room. |
| Standard 3.3 |
| possesses good communication skills, presents new materials clearly, gives clear instructions, and checks for understanding and output. |
| Standard 3.4 |
| uses suitable counseling and disciplinary procedures and techniques of conflict resolution to deal with problems both in and out of the classroom. |
| Standard 3.5 |
| creates a positive atmosphere in the classroom conducive to learning and motivates students through appropriate supportive actions; this includes using positive disciplinary strategies and not using corporal punishment or other forms of abuse to discipline students. |
| Standard 3.6 |
| ensures that the physical environment of the classroom is as conducive to learning as possible; this includes eliminating bullying and other forms of abuse perpetrated against students by other students or adults in the classroom. |
| Standard 3.7 |
| uses student-friendly approaches to address/resolve issues and ensures that the general interests are guaranteed. |
Domain 4: Student Assessment and Evaluation Domain Description Student Assessment and Evaluation refers to the process of collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about students’ performance using a range of tools to indicate students’ levels of achievement and to determine and improve the effectiveness of instruction.
| Domain 4 Standards |
| Statement of the standards |
| Standard 4.1 |
| follows students’ progress and monitors understanding and improvement over time as a result of instruction. |
| Standard 4.2 |
| gives students frequent, constructive feedback on their performance in a timely manner. |
| Standard 4.3 |
| adheres to the MOE’s policy on promotion of students and composition of classes. |
| Standard 4.4 |
| involves students in evaluating their own work, and interprets and communicates grades to parents, guardians, and school authorities through report cards or grade sheets. |
| Standard 4.5 |
| uses objective criterion references to assess and evaluate students in a fair and consistent manner, regardless of their individual differences between and amongst them, and marks work and returns it in a timely manner. |
| Standard 4.6 |
| plans, conducts, and administers valid and reliable tests and makes informal assessments of students in the classroom on a regular basis. |
| Standard 4.7 |
| plans, conducts, and keeps meaningful records of every learner’s grades that will guide the decision on students’ performance and promotion and communicates progress to students, parents, and the MOE (Central, county, and district levels). |
Domain 5: Professional Ethics and Behavior Domain Description Professional Ethics and Behavior refers to teachers’ code of behavior as they carry out their duties. It includes good citizenship, dress code, and the teacher’s ability to interact with others and society at large. This code of conduct should be reflected in all the activities carried out by the teachers.
| Domain 5 Standards |
| Statement of the standards |
| Standard 5.1 |
| is guided by legal and ethical teacher codes of conduct in their development of professional teacher ethics. |
| Standard 5.2 |
| contributes to the life of the community and society at large and maintains good working relationships with students, parents, other staff, and the school community. |
| Standard 5.3 |
| is consistently aware of the importance of psychosocial issues such as ills in society and the home like rape, child abuse, forced labor at home, and denial of access to learning facilities, and takes these into account in their teaching. |
| Standard 5.4 |
| recognizes and respects the cultural, religious, and personal differences between and amongst students, parents, and members of the community, valuing established norms and maintaining a level of effective collaboration between and amongst fellow teachers. |
| Standard 5.5 |
| takes steps to address and resolve conflicts, instances of bullying and other forms of abuse, and other problems that develop in the classroom and the community. |
| Standard 5.6 |
| is a model of good citizenship, following the rules of the MOE and the laws of the country, and acts as a moral role model for his/her students and the community. |
| Standard 5.7 |
| addresses issues of child protection, matters related to health and safety, and HIV/AIDS, STIs, and substance abuse (drugs, smoking, and alcohol) and violence. |
| Standard 5.8 |
| plans and executes his or her duties with diligence, commitment, dedication, and fairness. |
| Standard 5.9 |
| establishes and demonstrates effective provision of leadership in the classroom and outside school. |
| Standard 5.10 |
| is properly attired and representable at all times while observing ethical standards of good conduct and professional behavior. |
Domain, Standards, and Performance Indicators In order to set the basis for the diagnostic review and comprehensive assessment of teachers’ performance and adherence to the standards, these revised teachers’ performance standards include the session on performance indicators. Each domain, and its respective standards, provides the indicators in three categories: (1) indication of performance below the standards, (2) performance according to the standards, and (3) performance at a high proficiency level. The indicators will serve as helpful measurable reference points for planning and implementing assessment and evaluation of teachers’ performance.
Domain 1. Knowledge – Standards and Performance Indicators
| Standards |
| Performance below standard |
| Performance according to the standard |
| Proficiency |
| 1.1 has sound knowledge of the content taught and a thorough knowledge of the subject matter he or she teaches. |
| shows a lack of understanding of core content of the subject he/she teaches |
gives incorrect or insufficient information; does not correct student content errors; omits critical content from instruction displays deep and broad content knowledge in his/her subject area(s) provides sufficient and correct information on the content teaches all content of the subject as per the curriculum and does not omit critical content from instruction demonstrates sufficient knowledge on specialized teaching subjects and knows all the applicable topics and content prescribed by national curriculum for the subjects
| 1.2 has thorough knowledge of the National MOE curricular content, including the goals and expectations of the teacher and applies this effectively in teaching, making connections across subject matters where applicable. |
| does not teach the curriculum for his/her grade level(s) and subject(s) as defined by the Liberian National Curriculum |
struggles with developing meaningful instructional objectives and linking them to the goals and learning outcome of the national curriculum not able to show connection across subjects where applicable teaches the curriculum for his/her grade level(s) and subject(s) as defined within Liberian National Curriculum demonstrates an understanding of core curriculum content, competencies, and appropriate objectives of subjects per grade level conversant with other relevant sections of the national curriculum other than just the content of the subject they teach; is able to show linkages across subjects where applicable (i.e., integrating math into science, language arts or reading) knows all the themes and topics in their specialized teaching subjects prescribed by the Minimum Academic Standards and has advanced knowledge of these subjects based on recent theories and research findings
| 1.3 has basic knowledge of the constitution of Liberia, philosophy of education in Liberia and knows and applies the rules and policies of the MOE. |
| shows a lack of knowledge of the Liberian philosophy of education |
shows a lack of respect for the teacher code of conduct and basic education policy, including teacher professional ethics shows total disrespect for school administration takes cognizance of all relevant basic human rights, education issues relative to the national Constitution, Liberian philosophy of education, and education laws and policies, while dealing with learners.
demonstrates knowledge of MOE teacher code of conducts, teacher education policy, and lives according to their roles and responsibilities has versatile knowledge, appreciates, disseminates, and monitors compliance of the relevant educational laws and policies of Liberia and is able to provide professional advice and counseling support to peers, students, and parents; reporting cases of abuses or violation
| 1.4 has knowledge of theories of child development and child psychology including psychosocial issues and applies these in teaching. |
| lacks the basic knowledge on child development |
teaches content below or above learners’ learning abilities does not demonstrate that each learner’s cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical development influence how they learn cannot deign instructional approaches that build on learners’ strengths and needs reveals a strong understanding of child development and the teaching and learning of language and literacy skills allows sufficient time for the development of oral language and literacy skills demonstrates an understanding of the stages of child development; the impact of the stages on physical, social, and psychological activities of the learner; and how to deal effectively with persons at the various stages of development understands how learning occurs—how learners construct knowledge, acquire skills, and develop disciplined thinking processes--and knows how to use instructional strategies that promote student learning goes beyond the knowledge of the stages of human development, implications, and strategies for successful learning; but also understands the appropriateness of the various teacher and learning strategies and is able to select the most suitable ones that meets specific situations
| 1.5 has strong understanding of child development in relationship to curriculum content and the teaching and learning of language and literacy skills. |
| shows limited understanding of child development |
uses inappropriate methodology that leaves learners struggling to comprehend lesson content uses language above learners’ ability shows strong understanding of child development and is able to apply it to their lesson presentation uses appropriate language in the teaching and learning process to develop literacy skills employs various methodologies to improve learners’ literacy skills initiates innovative learning activities that promote learners’ interest (e.g., puzzles, flash cards/games, competitions, etc.)
| 1.6 has knowledge of approaches to teaching and learning and related methodologies and applies these in the classroom as appropriate. |
| has limited or minimum knowledge on the student-centered/participatory method of teaching |
is not able to adapt to new learning concepts / critical thinking approaches demonstrates an understanding and utilization of a variety of student-centered/participatory methods and how that impacts learning creates developmentally appropriate instructional activities that take into account individual learners’ learning styles, strengths, interests, and needs and that enable each learner to advance and accelerate his/her learning goes beyond the knowledge of the stages of human development, implications, and strategies for successful learning; but also understands the appropriateness of the various teaching and learning strategies and is able to select the most suitable ones that meet specific situations
| 1.7 at the ECE and early grade levels, knows the curriculum content for their appropriate grade level; has knowledge on how to teach oral reading fluency and EGR, numeracy, and writing. |
| does not demonstrate knowledge of early grade-level curriculum content as it relates to EGR skills |
has poor oral reading fluency, numeracy, and writing skills applies strong knowledge of ECE and EGR skills shows competent knowledge of oral reading fluency, numeracy, and writing skills demonstrates strong knowledge of ECE and EGR skills supports other teachers on how to teach oral reading fluency, numeracy, and writing skills
| 1.8 has knowledge of the heritage, values, customs, and traditions of Liberian society and how these affect individual students. |
| shows no respect for the values and customs of the individual student |
shows preference of for the traditions of some students over those of others in the school and classroom is not sensitive to the norms, customs, or traditions of their school community; creating uneasiness in the learning environment knows the diversity of religion and cultures in Liberia; the various social, economic, and political situations and how they impact learning uses appropriate teaching strategies to help each learner to achieve excellent academic results, notwithstanding their individual backgrounds uses appropriate integrated approaches that are practical, resulting in the learners demonstrating their appreciation for their heritage and cultural values is recognized by the school community as a person whose appreciation of the norms and values is exceptional, notwithstanding learners’ individual backgrounds
| 1.9 aware of the importance of integrating psychosocial and vocational life skills into teaching to promote self-responsibility in students and help each student achieve his or her personal best in life. |
| does not demonstrate understanding of the relationship of psychosocial, vocational, and life skills in the learning process |
has no clue on how to integrate life skills, psychosocial, and lifelong skills into teaching the learning process has limited or no information on the major crux of the revised national curriculum (i.e., competence-based that incorporates psychosocial issues, vocational skills, and lifelong learning) possesses a thorough understanding of how to help their students develop critical skills and pursue lifelong learning develops an understanding of how to use ICT in their practice and incorporates ICT into their practice to support learning fully understands the focus and overall learning outcome of the 2018 revised competency-based curriculum and can differentiate the three track systems,[footnoteRef:1] demonstrates his/her understanding of the relationship of psychosocial and vocational and life skills in the learning process [1: The revised 2018 MOE Senior Secondary level consists of three track systems: (1) Liberal Arts, (2) STEM, and (3) Vocational/Technical and Training. ] leads students into vocational and/or ICT projects that could benefit their communities
| 1.10 has sound knowledge of the English language in spoken and written forms and is able to transfer that knowledge to students. |
| struggles with speaking and writing the English language; cannot speak the English language and content set by the national curriculum |
does not have the basic reading and writing skills to teach the English language that motivates learning; makes learning of English difficult for students’ comprehension displays good knowledge of phonology, letter names and sounds, syllables, whole words, teaching of extended text (stories, poems, songs) in English articulates high standards of literacy and correct use of oral and written language knows basic reading and writing of English and their language of classroom instruction knows how to modify instruction to make language comprehensible and instruction relevant, accessible, and challenging, especially in consideration of the learners’ backgrounds has advanced ability to comprehend literature, grammar, and composition; knows how to write essays, compositions, applications, feature articles, and similar assignments.
has up to 80% of learners meeting the MOE benchmark for reading
| 1.11 is aware of the inclusion issues relative to gender equality and learners with special needs. |
| is unable to identify learners with special needs and the strategies or avenues open to assisting them |
has limited or insufficient mastery of content on gender equality, inclusive education identifies learners with difficulties and the strategies or avenues open to assisting them has sufficient mastery of content on gender equality, inclusive education, etc., and is able to vary methods of teaching in consideration of students with special needs identifies learners whose performance is extremely high (the gifted and talented) and extremely low (due to physical, social, economic, emotional, and other challenges) to give them support, or refer their cases to the responsible person when/where necessary, for appropriate action sees the education of special learners as an integral part of their responsibility for treating the learners appropriately and providing them with special programs or playing leadership roles in the identification and nurturing of talented and gifted learners
Domain 2. Teaching Skills – Standards and Performance Indicators
| Standards |
| Performance below standard |
| Performance according to the standard |
| Proficiency |
| 2.1 makes learning relevant and meaningful to students’ needs and relates it to their everyday life. |
| does not make learning meaningful or relevant nor relates lessons to students’ daily life or to real-life applications |
does not provide examples of related learning experiences to learners fails to link instruction to students’ prior knowledge provides lessons that relate to daily life and are relevant to students; links learning to real-life applications helps students make learning relevant and advances their skills across academic settings develops learning activities that are informed by students’ knowledge, skills, and experiences plans activities that create links between students’ prior understanding and new knowledge organizes learning events that are motivational helps parents to identify and link the success of students to tangible activities in the community ensures that enrollment and retention in the school is improved by organizing program and activity enrollment and retention in the school is associated with the teacher’s performance
| 2.2 communicates clearly and correctly with the students and provides ample opportunities for meaningful dialogue in the classroom. |
| provides explanations that are limited, vague, or lack coherence |
does not clearly communicate lesson content and lesson objectives to students does not clearly communicate criteria to students provides clear and correct explanations and instructions using expressive language tailored to the students’ level of understanding, supported when necessary by gestures, visual aids, and other comprehension scaffolds effectively uses spoken languages, gestures, symbols, signs, questionings, and other techniques to share information with and enrich understanding of the learners communicates learning targets and content in a variety of ways that are engaging and participatory has excellent writing and speech skills that distinguishes her/him among other teachers
| 2.3 plans daily lessons and executes the daily lessons with clear objectives into meaningful topics for the medium and long term. |
| plans lessons that focus only on coverage or activities |
plans lessons that do not include sequence and balance all curricular goals is unfamiliar with the plan and lesson content records unclear goals and objectives the lessons must achieve shows evidence of having prepared each lesson before starting to teach it. For example, the teacher should be familiar with the lesson plan, write lesson notes, and prepare necessary materials (e.g., letter cards, record vocabulary words, or text on chalkboard) ahead of time plans for the year, semester, marking period, unit, and day; includes all curricular goals with appropriate sequencing and time allocation provides children and young adults with a clear understanding of what the objectives are and why they are relevant, encouraging students to take ownership of them has perfected the art of framing learning goals and objectives that best achieve overall curriculum goals
| 2.4 consistently provides developmentally appropriate and constructive feedback to students. |
| rarely or never checks for understanding |
provides few or no opportunities for students to summarize/reflect on what they have learned, articulate why it is important, and extend their thinking checks for understanding in a variety of ways and modifies instruction to meet student needs affirms correct responses and flags incorrect responses for correction or re-teaching when necessary to clear up confusion provides opportunities for students to summarize/reflect on what they have learned, articulate why it is important, and extend their thinking provides timely and constructive feedback that addresses the learner’s strengths and weaknesses and demonstrates how they can do better often provides extra support and learning resources to struggling students focusing on individual for progress
| 2.5 follows the daily routine as indicated in their lesson plan and teacher guide. This includes allowing sufficient time for the development of oral language and literacy skills. |
| uses pacing in the lesson that does not support all learners in the class, given that students learn at different paces |
skips critical language lesson content and teaches at an inappropriate pace and progression for oral language and literacy skill development struggles to follow the curriculum guide or teacher guide spends an appropriate amount of time on each activity (i.e., close to the time suggested in the curriculum or teacher guide, unless extenuating circumstances warranted more or less), keeping the pace quick enough to maintain the students’ interest and cover the lesson components but not so fast as to compromise their understanding gives extra time and special attention to assisting learners with slow progress or deficient in the subject;
identifies talented and gifted learners and provides them with nurturing support demonstrates the quality of a good teacher and is able to provide sufficient information using a variety of reading instruction strategies but planning activity participatory with their time frame employs innovative strategies to advance student learning pace with the dynamic conditions of the classroom plays leadership role in identifying and nurturing talented and gifted learners
| 2.6 uses developmentally appropriate and effective ECE/EGR instructional approaches to support the development of oral language and literacy skills. |
| unable to use developmentally appropriate instructional approaches to teaching language and literacy skills |
has excellent understanding of written and spoken English and language of classroom instruction struggles to follow the curriculum guide or teacher guide modifies instruction to make language comprehensible and instruction relevant, accessible, and challenging, especially in consideration of the learner’s background uses developmentally appropriate and effective instructional approaches (e.g., “I Do – We Do – You Do” in the primary grades or oral read aloud in kindergarten) as indicated in the curriculum guide or teacher guide to support the development of oral language and literacy skills spends an appropriate amount of time on the lesson activity, keeping the pace quick enough to maintain the students’ interest and cover the lesson components but not so fast as to compromise their understanding leads the 70 percent of his/her students to reach the benchmark set for reading provides support to other teachers in terms of coaching support, training, and material development demonstrates learning strategies that engage most learners in rigorous and relevant learning experiences
| 2.7 produces and uses a variety of teaching aids/resources, making use of available modern technology (ICT), student-centered methods, extra-curricular activities to enhance learning and child development |
| uses a limited variety of sources of information within his/her subject(s) |
does not use a variety of materials, and the ones used are inappropriate integrates few or no technology tools and applications into instructional design and implementation identifies, produces, and uses a variety of sources of information within his/her subject(s) uses a variety of appropriate instructional materials, including technology knows parts of a computer and basic computer operations; uses computer software (e.g., Microsoft Word, PowerPoint); uses the Internet; uses emails and other communication devices selects and collates appropriate instructional materials and resources; improvises and develops where possible integrates a variety of technology tools and applications into instructional design and implementation creative and innovative and is capable of employing early-to-use tools to promote learning
| 2.8 breaks down the curriculum into meaningful topics according to the instructional time available and is able to provide needed help to struggling students |
| plans learning activities that do not align with curricular goals |
| plans learning activities that are appropriately matched to curricular goals |
| individually and collaboratively selects and creates learning experiences that are appropriate for curricular goals and content standards and are relevant to learners |
| 2.9 uses student-centered methods, extracurricular activities, sport, play and drama to enhance better learning and child development. |
| provides only whole-class instruction or keeps students in same inflexible groups for instruction |
uses mainly teacher-centered methods or only few sets of teaching methods plans for flexible student grouping to maximize student learning utilizes various grouping techniques and group exercises and projects to elicit effective participation and boost learning by students uses several teaching strategies, including drama, sports, excursion, project, problem-solving, etc. and techniques to promote learning constantly invents and reorganizes strategies that address specific needs of their learners and remains open minded to learners’ opinions that may assist in deciding strategies
| 2.10 pays attention to all learners, especially girls and those with special needs, ensuring their progress in learning |
| uses one type of strategy that applies to one learning style |
does not pay attention to all learners in the classroom, especially with students that need special attention uses a teaching approach that is more teacher-centered and has little, if any, participation of students teaches learning activities that clearly show progression across ages and general ability of learners uses strategies that apply to a variety of learning styles creates developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual learners’ learning styles, strengths, interests, prior knowledge, ages, mixed-ability, and needs and that enables each learner to advance and accelerate his/her learning identifies learners that require special attention and takes measures to provide needed support encourages active participation for all types of learning in the classroom, including styles of those who may have special needs or disabilities is an expert in the management of learners with special needs has advanced skills for identifying talented and gifted learners and takes responsibility for treating the learners appropriately and linking them up with special persons and institutions that deal with such cases
| 2.11 develops techniques to effectively motivate learners |
| does not use variety of teaching techniques. Lesson presentation is repetitive, bold and does not motivate the learners |
does not give students an opportunity to share their learning is unable to design teaching strategies that build upon the learner’s experience nor encourages learner self-direction ownership of learning.
models and teaches students a variety of ways to share their learning incorporates techniques that stimulate the interest and challenges the students during the teaching/learning process includes activities that help develop the learning/thinking process, stimulating curiosity and participation employs a variety of motivational techniques to stimulate the interest of the students. For example, providing incentives, always creating and recreating a motivational learning environment that is participatory and learner-centered
Domain 3. Classroom Management – Standards and Performance Indicators
| Standards |
| Performance below standard |
| Performance according to the standard |
| Proficiency |
| 3.1 makes sure that maximum time is spent on learning by getting and keeping students’ attention and ensuring that they are actively engaged by establishing routines to manage activities. |
| spends less time on student learning, students are not actively engaged, and the teaching/learning activities are not involving or participatory |
spends more time during non-instructional activities that are not related to academic work makes maximum use of time for learning and keeps students actively engaged by using a variety of student-centered methods and also manages the classroom activities with students, collaboratively establishes clear expectations for classroom procedures entices students to explore issues that will benefit their teaching/learning process demonstrates the quality of a good teacher and is able to provide sufficient information using a variety of reading instruction strategies that are mostly participatory engages students to take active part in managing their behaviors in the classroom and takes responsibility for their actions
| 3.2 directs his/her attention to and encourages active participation from all types of students, including boys and girls, students of different abilities and needs, and students seated in different parts of the room. |
| lacks skills and does not consider diversity in learning |
engages students in non-subject related matters uses an approach to teaching that is centered on the “median” student and shows no consideration for the different abilities of learners routinely monitors student involvement and provides means of strategic support to get all students involved in the learning process manages large, mixed-ability, and multi-level classes effectively fosters a classroom environment in which all students are welcome, engaged, and encouraged employs a variety of participatory methods that promote participation of the diverse groups of students in the classroom develops a system to call upon every student over a period; to establish ways that struggling students, including those who may have disabilities, have peer support
| 3.3 possesses good communication skills, presents new materials clearly, gives clear instructions, and checks for understanding and output. |
| does not clearly communicate directions, procedures, and content; students are struggling to comprehend the lesson |
is unable to maintain an enabling environment where each student feels respected, valued, safe and is encouraged to participate uses instructional materials that reflect diversity and emphasizes the commonality of all people clearly communicates direction, procedures and is able to maintain an enabling environment where all are able to pursue their full potential demonstrates the appropriate skills effectively in differing environments has excellent control of the subject matter and is an expert in communicating new ideas, leading student to easily grasp the content of their lesson and to apply it effectivity
| 3.4 uses suitable counseling and disciplinary procedures and techniques of conflict resolution to deal with problems both in and out of the classroom. |
| does not use suitable counseling and disciplinary techniques and skills on conflict resolution |
is involved in administering corporal punishment is involved in conflicting situations at the school and community demonstrates suitable and effective counseling techniques and skills on conflict resolution, helping students to resolve their difficulties is able to manage classrooms effectively across diverse contexts in order to ensure a conducive learning environment.
provides advice to students that helps to guide their actions and learning about their consequences and responsibilities associated with their actions provides counseling support to students whose safety, health, and rights may have been compromised maintains the integrity of discipline in dealing with students in the learning environment is the leader in resolving conflicts; always exhibits a non-confrontational tendency even in the most challenging situations
| 3.5 creates a positive atmosphere in the classroom conducive to learning and motivates students through appropriate supportive actions; this includes using positive disciplinary strategies and not using corporal punishment or other forms of abuse to discipline students. |
| Lacks the ability to keep the learner engage; classroom activity does not solicit responses from the learners |
uses corporal punishment to discipline learners lacks the ability to create a motivational classroom uses various motivational strategies to keep learners engaged in the learning process avoids the usage of corporal punishment as a means of disciplining learners applies appropriate motivational strategies to keep learners engaged in the learning process applies positive disciplinary strategies as a means of encouraging learners in classroom activities
| 3.6 ensures that the physical environment of the classroom is as conducive to learning as possible; this includes eliminating bullying and other forms of abuse perpetrated against students by other students or adults in the classroom. |
| has poor classroom management skills |
is not impartial or fair in rendering judgement among learners has very good classroom management skills renders fair judgement to avoid chaos and bullying among learners creates a conducive classroom, applies effective management skills, and renders fair judgement ensures an active participatory classroom
Domain 4. Student Assessment and Evaluation – Standards and Performance Indicators
| Standards |
| Performance below standard |
| Performance according to the standard |
| Proficiency |
| 4.1 follows students’ progress and monitors understanding and improvement over time as a result of instruction. |
| records and reports are inaccurate and/or consistently late |
record keeping system demonstrates errors or lack of professional attention or does not adequately track student progress does not monitor students and…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .