J-13- Past Perf Questionaire.MEV.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS MEDGAR EVERS (T-AKE 13) Mid-Term Availability (MTA) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N3220520R4112
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and request for references regarding a contractor's performance on a previous contract. The Military Sealift Command is soliciting offers for a contract to provide mid-term availability services for the USNS MEDGAR EVERS (T-AKE 13). The questionnaire asks references to provide ratings and comments on the contractor's overall performance as well as its performance in the areas of quality of product or service, timeliness or scheduling, business relations and customer satisfaction, and key personnel and staffing. References are asked to rate the contractor's performance as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory and to provide explanations for exceptional or unsatisfactory ratings. The completed questionnaire must be returned before the closing date of solicitation N3220520R4112.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS MEDGAR EVERS (T-AKE 13) Mid-Term Availability (MTA), newest first.
File Type Posted
N3220520R4112 Amend 0005.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4112 Amend 0004.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4112 Amend 0003.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4112 Amend 0002.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4112 Amend 0001.docx DOCX document
J-A USNS MEDGAR EVERS MTA FY21.Redacted.REV01.pdf PDF
J-10 Interport Differential.docx DOCX document
J-14 Technical NDA.docx DOCX document
J-A USNS MEDGAR EVERS TAKE 13 MTA FY21.Redacted.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRLs DD Form 1423.zip ZIP file
J-2 Category A Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-3 Category B Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation N3220520R4112.pdf PDF
J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.doc DOC document
J-4 MEV MTA FY21 GFP REPORT.pdf PDF
J-8 RFC.doc DOC document
J-12 Past Perf Data.docx DOCX document
J-9 Disclsr Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.doc DOC document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Kathryn Bates at Kathryn.s.bates@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Kathryn Bates
Contract Specialist

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .