IntRFPAtt D Reference Check.pdf
PDF 123 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Baseline Archaeological and Recconaissance Level Survey of the Minam Widllife Area Phase 2 Acquisiti
- Solicitation number
- S-63500-00011379
- Issued by
- Union County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for RFP #S-63500-00011379 issued by the State of Oregon's Department of Administrative Services (DAS) Procurement Services. The RFP is for a Baseline Archaeological and Reconnaissance Level Survey of the Minam Wildlife Area Phase 2 Acquisition. The Offeror must submit completed Reference Check Forms from three (3) references, including at least two (2) current professional references and one (1) professional reference for previous work. The Reference Check Form includes questions to be rated on a scale of 0-5 regarding the Offeror's overall quality of services, delivery of service, safety, and responsiveness to customer service issues. Additional sample questions are provided if the Project Manager desires more information.
The document specifies that the Agency will make three (3) attempts to contact each reference provided by the Offeror, and if the attempts are unsuccessful, the Offeror will receive a score of zero for that reference. The Offeror could receive a grand total of 15 points based on the reference checks.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OregonBuys RFP #S-63500-00011379 Baseline Archaeological and Reconnaissance Level Survey of the Minam Wildlife Area Phase 2 Acquisition AttD
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – August 16, 2021
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Grand Total Points Possible (15)
Offeror shall submit completed Reference Check Forms from three (3) References.
Offeror must provide at least two (2) current professional references and one (1) professional reference for work (from different firms and clients) supportive of Offeror’s ability to comply with the requirements of this RFP. Offeror shall submit reference names and contact information.
Offeror must submit one (1) attachment D for each Reference.
Offeror Name: __________________________________________
Reference Entity: __________________________________________
Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________
Contact Email Address: __________________________________________
Agency will make three (3) attempts to contact each of the references provided by the Offeror. If these attempts are unsuccessful, the Offeror will receive a score of zero for that reference.
When Agency contacts each Reference, the following questions will be rated on a scale of 0-5:
0 = Not satisfied 2 = Moderately satisfied 5 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Offeror’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Offeror?
2. How would you rate the Offeror’s delivery of service?
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall Safety?
4. How would you rate the Offeror’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Offeror could receive a grand total of 5 points for each reference.
EXTRA SAMPLE QUESTOINS below IF THE PM WANTS MORE: Delete if not needed
1. For what type of services did you engage Offeror?
2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1.
OregonBuys RFP #S-63500-00011379 Baseline Archaeological and Reconnaissance Level Survey of the Minam Wildlife Area Phase 2 Acquisition AttD
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – August 16, 2021
3. Describe Offeror’s customer service.
4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror.
5. Describe Offeror’s methods for problem resolution.
6. How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again?
7. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the most satisfied?
8. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the least satisfied?
9. How well did Offeror stay within the proposed timeline?
10. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?
| Grand Total Points Possible (15) |
| Offeror shall submit completed Reference Check Forms from three (3) References. Offeror must provide at least two (2) current professional references and one (1) professional reference for work (from different firms and clients) supportive of Offeror... |
| Offeror must submit one (1) attachment D for each Reference. |
| Offeror Name: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: __________________________________________ |
| EXTRA SAMPLE QUESTOINS below IF THE PM WANTS MORE: Delete if not needed |
| 1. For what type of services did you engage Offeror? |
| 2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1. |
| 3. Describe Offeror’s customer service. |
| 4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror. |
| 5. Describe Offeror’s methods for problem resolution. |
| 6. How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again? |
| 7. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the most satisfied? |
| 8. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the least satisfied? |
| 9. How well did Offeror stay within the proposed timeline? |
| 10. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .