EPSE IV J-2 TO1 QASP Attachment2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Enterprise Product Support Engineering (EPSE) IV
- Solicitation number
- ID05180026
- Issued by
-
GSA Federal Acquisition Service
About this file
J-2 TO1 QASP Attachment 2
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Answers_-_June_13.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE_IV_J-1_TO1_PWS_-_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE_IV_RFP_-_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV RFP - final.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-2 TO1 QASP Attachment 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-3 TO2 PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-1 TO1 PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-4 TO2 QASP Attachment 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-4 TO2 QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-2 TO1 QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| EPSE IV J-4 TO2 QASP Attachment 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| EPSE_IV_RFP_-_draft.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Robotic Paint Application System Effort (Task 01) - Performance Evaluation Report / Surveillance Checklist | |||||||||||||||||
| Performance Requirement / Objective | PWS Ref. | Performance Standard | Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) | Surveillance Method | Record of Observation. Satisfactory performance IAW the established AQL shall be documented by entering a rating: (1) Does not meet, (2) Meets, or (3) Exceeds Acceptable Performance. Provide a short narrative explaining a rating of 1 or 3. N/A indicates that services were not required for the period. The initials of the individual completing the checklist and the date the checklist was completed shall be identified for each inspection period. | ||||||||||||
| Sep-18 | Oct-18 | Nov-18 | Dec-18 | Jan-19 | Feb-19 | Mar-19 | Apr-19 | May-19 | Jun-19 | Jul-19 | Aug-19 | Sep-19 | |||||
| Status Reports | Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) | ■ 100% complete. |
■ 100% accurate.
■ Monthly report submitted NLT 15th calendar day of the month following the reporting period and concurrent with the Funds and Man Hour Expenditure Report. No violations per month.
A violation is an error, omission, or delayed delivery.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input Funds and Man-Hour Expenditure Reports Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) ■ 100% complete.
■ 100% accurate.
■ Monthly report submitted NLT 15th calendar day of the month following the reporting period and concurrent with the monthly Status Report. No violations per month.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input Contract Funds Status Reports (CFSR) Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) ■ 100% complete.
■ 100% accurate.
■ Quarterly report submitted NLT 15th calendar day of the month following the reporting period. No violations per month.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input Program / Project / Test Plans and Schedules Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) ■ The plans contain all details/components and intended/desired outcomes necessary for both advocacy and implementation of the technologies evaluated.
■ The plans leverage best practices and already existing use(s) of the technologies.
■ The plans include all details, timelines for evaluation and implementation; identify areas of potential risk, and recommendations.
■ Plans are communicated and coordinated with appropriate stakeholders.
■ The plans identify and prioritize key technology solutions and gaps.
■ Any required testing/tools and the methodology/approach are identified. No violations per month.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input CBA / Technical / Program / Project Reports, Specifications, Analyses, Reviews, Designs, and Assessments Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) ■ The documents contain all details/components necessary for advocacy, implementation, operation, user training, and/or maintenance of the technology evaluated, as required.
■ The documents include all details, identify areas of potential risk, costs/benefits and recommendations, as appropriate.
■ Analysis, conclusions and recommendations are communicated and coordinated with appropriate stakeholders.
■ Reports, specifications, and assessments Include unrestricted electronic data, test results, and coding compatible with current Air Force databases (raw and summarized)
No violations per month.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input Invoices Paragraphs 3, 4 (including sub-paragraphs) ■ 100% complete.
■ 100% accurate.
■ Submitted to ITSS 5 days following the monthly financial report. No violations per month.
Each violation may be reflected as such within the CPARS assessment. Monthly Checklist & Customer Input
| Date Checklist Completed |
| Initials of Individual Completing Checklist |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it.