ATTACHMENT_5_-_PPQ.doc
DOC document 63 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Logistics Aircraft and Drone Recovery Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC711-16-R-R015
About this file
Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_ _As_-_10_-_11.pdf | ||
| Q_ _As_-_6_-_8.docx | DOCX document | |
| AMDT_0006__-_w-AMENDED_ATCH_5.pdf | ||
| AMDT_0005.pdf | ||
| Q_ _As_-_9.pdf | ||
| Q_ _As_-_6_-_8.docx | DOCX document | |
| AMDT_0003_-_16-R-R015.pdf | ||
| Q_ _As_-_1_-_5.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_1_-_PWS.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_6_-_DD_254.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_4_-_PRICING.doc | DOC document | |
| Solicitation_HTC711-16-R-R015.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_3_-_WAGE_DETERMINATION.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 5
SOLICITATION HTC711-16-R-R015
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive
Information IAW FAR 2.101& 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror submitting a response to USTRANSCOM Solicitation number HTC711-16-R-
R015 completes this section prior to sending to the Respondent.
A. Contractor Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
B. Contract Title/Number: ______________________________________________________________________
C. Brief Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates):
D. Location(s) where service was performed under this contract: _______________________________________
E. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: _____Prime or _____Subcontractor (Mark one)
F. Contract Type: _____Fixed Price _____Cost _____IDIQ _____Single Award _____Multiple Award
Other:____________________________________________________________________________________ G. Period of performance (month/year – month/year): ________________________________________________
H. Dollar Value (include per year cost and life cycle cost): ____________________________________________
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The remaining sections are to be completed by Respondent.
The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) Logistics Aircraft and Drone Recovery Services effort. Therefore, it is important the responses be candid, factual, and as complete as possible.
If you do not have knowledge of, or experience with, the contract referenced above, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who can provide the information. Also, if offeror holds or has held other relevant contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Questionnaires must be returned no later than 17 June 2016, to USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office via E-mail: deborah.l.long26.civ@mail.mil and mary.p.chapie.civ@mail.mil. Please indicate “Performance Survey” in the subject. Note, this information is to be received directly from the respondent and will not be considered if received from the Offeror.
A. Respondent's name: __________________________________________________________________________
B. Respondent's title: ___________________________________________________________________________
C. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________
D. Respondent's phone number: ___________________________________________________________________
E. Respondent’s Email: _________________________________________________________________________
F. Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates). Note: If any of the information in Section 1 is incorrect, please provide the correct information here.
G. Was contract performance assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?
________ Yes ________ No
NOTE: The Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) may be reviewed for the referenced contract as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: Place a mark in the block that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
In responding to the survey, please justify and explain Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. As the Respondent, you may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. In order for the government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the offeror’s performance on your contract or project:
Exceptional (E) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Very Good (VG) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (US) - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Unknown (U) - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Not Applicable (NA) – The requested information was not related to the referenced contract effort.
| Work Area |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| U |
| NA |
| A |
| Provided qualified/experienced personnel and management with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| B |
| Provided scheduled maintenance on aircraft to ensure limited interruption of service. |
| C |
| Provided security processes to safeguard aircraft and personnel |
| D |
| Responsive to aircraft mission changes |
| E |
| Provided service with minimum oversight. |
| F |
| Complied with contract terms and conditions. |
| G |
| Complied with contract transit time and on-time percentages. |
| H |
| Demonstrated effective flight planning. |
| I |
| Demonstrated accurate and timely billing processes. |
| J |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period, ensuring attrition did not result in a degradation of services. |
| K |
| Reacted to and overcame stressful situations caused by unforeseen events. |
| L |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| M |
| Provide accurate and timely reports. |
| N |
| Worked with established sequence of events to facilitate on-time aircraft departures and tracked delays to determine the root cause. |
| O |
| Demonstrated an acceptable record of safety of flight and ground operations. |
| P |
| Overall Rating/Customer Satisfaction |
| Q |
| Has any part of this contract been terminated for default or convenience? If so, explain below. |
| R |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain below. |
Rating Comments. Please discuss each response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory performance in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Survey Respondent’s Signature
Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .