Attachment_III_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
TSA Janitorial Services - Ontario International Airport (ONT)
Solicitation number
HSTS01-16-R-RES001
Issued by

About this file

RFP Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete the following questionnaire and return it to the attention of the individual named below, no later than [date]:

Name: Michael Capovilla Title: Contract Specialist Address: 701 S 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598 Telephone Number: (571) 227-5833 Email: michael.capovilla@tsa.dhs.gov

This survey pertains to:

Department/Component: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Solicitation Number: RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001 Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: ______________________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: ___________________________________________ Your Company/Agency: ________________________________________________________ Your Role in this Contract: ______________________________________________________ Survey Period of Performance: ___________________________________________________ General description of products/services required under the contract: __________________

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.

Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Overall quality of product/service:

1234N/A
7.Product performance:
1234N/A
8.Spare parts availability:
1234N/A
9.Ease of use:
1234N/A
10.Quality and timeliness of warranty work:
1234N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Responsive to technical direction:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

1 2 3 4 N/A

BUSINESS RELATIONS:

1. Effective management, including subcontracts:

1 2 3 4 N/A

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

1 2 3 4 N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

1 2 3 4 N/A

4. Notification of problems:

1 2 3 4 N/A

5. Flexibility:

1 2 3 4 N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

1 2 3 4 N/A

COST CONTROL:

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

1234N/A
2.Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:
1234N/A

3. Cost efficiencies:

1 2 3 4 N/A

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

a. Contractor Management Personnel (circle one) Yes No

b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel (circle one) Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001 - Attachment III – Past Performance Questionnaire

Reviewing Contractor Past Performance 1

Rating Guidelines

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
4-Outstanding
There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer.
There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer.
There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations.
3-Good
There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements.
There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements; however, the contractor was still able to better or meet the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements.
2-Acceptable
The contractor met the contract requirements. However, overall compliance required some assistance from the customer.
The contractor met the contract requirements. However, customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs.
The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. However, customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements.
1-Unsatisfactory
Nonconformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements.
Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively.
Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives.
Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues were not timely or effective.

Reviewing Contractor Past Performance 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .