Attachment_III_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HSTS01-16-R-RES001
About this file
Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HSTS01-16-R-RES001_-_Amendment_000002.pdf | ||
| HSTS01-16-R-RES001_-_Amendment_000001.pdf | ||
| HSTS01-16-R-RES001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_III_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the following questionnaire and return it to the attention of the individual named below, no later than [date]:
Name: Michael Capovilla Title: Contract Specialist Address: 701 S 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598 Telephone Number: (571) 227-5833 Email: michael.capovilla@tsa.dhs.gov
This survey pertains to:
Department/Component: U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) / Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Solicitation Number: RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001 Date of Survey: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Person Completing Survey: ______________________________________________ Signature of Person Completing Survey: ___________________________________________ Your Company/Agency: ________________________________________________________ Your Role in this Contract: ______________________________________________________ Survey Period of Performance: ___________________________________________________ General description of products/services required under the contract: __________________
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.
Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Overall quality of product/service:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 7. | Product performance: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 8. | Spare parts availability: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 9. | Ease of use: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 10. | Quality and timeliness of warranty work: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Reliability:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Responsive to technical direction:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:
1 2 3 4 N/A
BUSINESS RELATIONS:
1. Effective management, including subcontracts:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Notification of problems:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Flexibility:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
1 2 3 4 N/A
COST CONTROL:
1. Current, accurate and complete billings:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
| 2. | Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals: | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | N/A |
3. Cost efficiencies:
1 2 3 4 N/A
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Management Personnel (circle one) Yes No
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel (circle one) Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
RFP HSTS01-16-R-RES001.Amendment 000001 - Attachment III – Past Performance Questionnaire
Reviewing Contractor Past Performance 1
Rating Guidelines
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 4-Outstanding |
| There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer. |
| There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer. |
| There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations. |
| 3-Good |
| There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements; however, the contractor was still able to better or meet the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements. |
| 2-Acceptable |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, overall compliance required some assistance from the customer. |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs. |
| The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. However, customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements. |
| 1-Unsatisfactory |
| Nonconformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements. |
| Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively. |
| Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues were not timely or effective. |
Reviewing Contractor Past Performance 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .