New Jersey Recompete Pre-Proposal Slides v.2.ppt

PPT presentation 584 KB Posted

Attached to
PSO Services for the State of NJ
Solicitation number
HSHQE3-12-R-00001
Issued by

About this file

Slides for Pre-Proposal Conference on Tuesday September 18 2012

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_000007.pdf PDF
NJ_Questions_ _Answers__110_to__133.pdf PDF
Amendment_000006.pdf PDF
Past_PerformanceQuestionaire_for_HSHQE3-12-R-00001_(Corrected_version_10_-31-12).pdf PDF
Amendment_000005.pdf PDF
NJ_Questions_ _Answers_10-31-12.pdf PDF
Amendment_000004.pdf PDF
NJ_Questions_ _Answers_(Final_10-26).pdf PDF
Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
Schedule_A_-_Addendum_to_CBA.pdf PDF
Amendment_000002.pdf PDF
NJ_Recompete_Schedule_of_Services.xls XLS spreadsheet
NJ_RECOMPETE_-_Seniority_Dates.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amendment_000001.pdf PDF
NJ_Recompete-_SOW_Exhibits.pdf PDF
Document 7 - Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
document 6 - Section D - Contract Documents.pdf PDF
Document 20 - Sub-Section E-4.pdf PDF
Document 17 - Section E Subsection E-1.pdf PDF
Document 19 - Sub-Section E-3.pdf PDF
Document 10 - Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Document 3 - Section C Sub-Section C-1.pdf PDF
Document 16 - Attachment 9 - Proposal ChecklisDocument 15 - t.pdf PDF
Document 18 - Sub-Section E-2.pdf PDF
Document 14 - Attachment 7 - Award Approval Request.pdf PDF
Document 21 - Sub-Section E-5.pdf PDF
Document 12 - Attachment 5 - Collective Bargaining Agreement.pdf PDF
Document 11 - Attachment 5 - CBA WD Cover Sheet.pdf PDF
Document 9 - Attachment 3 - Past Project Form.pdf PDF
Document 13 - Attachment 6 - Price Element Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
Document 4 - Sub-Section C-2.pdf PDF
Document 15 - Attachment 8 - Field Level Supervision Exhibit.pdf PDF
Document 5 - Sub-Section C-3.pdf PDF
Document 8 - Attachment 2 - Post Exhibit.pdf PDF
Document 1 - Table of Contents.pdf PDF
Document 2 - SF 1449.pdf PDF
SF 1449.pdf PDF
Table of Contents.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Federal Protective Service Pre-Proposal Conference

Solicitation HSHQE3-12-R-00001 State of New Jersey

Sign In Sheets

The purpose of this pre-proposal conference is to provide a briefing on the contracting concept and FPS requirements so that you, as a potential offeror can ascertain the general conditions of the solicitation that could materially affect the proposal submission.

Disclaimer Changes to the solicitation must be made in writing via amendment.

Verbal statements made at this meeting or in response to inquiries do not revise the written terms of the solicitation.

Federal Protective Service Mission Statement

Protecting the critical infrastructure and key resources of the United States is essential to our Nation’s security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and way of life. The Federal Protective Service (FPS) protects one component of the Nation’s infrastructure by mitigating risk to Federal facilities and their occupants. FPS ensures that Federal properties are safe and secure for Federal employees, officials, and visitors in a professional and cost-effective manner by deploying a highly trained and multi-disciplined police force.

State of New Jersey Excluded Counties:

Union, Essex, Bergen, Hudson and Pasaic

Included Counties:

All others.

NOTE: There may not currently be sites in all of the counties.

Services Required

Armed Protective Security Officers (PSOs).
Basic Services
Temporary Additional Services (TAS)
Emergency Services
Compliance with all terms and conditions set forth in the RFP, including the Statement of Work (SOW).
Only DHS Suitability Required. (No clearances)

Wanner, Todd M (WTM) - does this fit under this section? it's talking about services....probably don't want to reference how we are evaluating proposals.

I know everyone has read the solicitation in front to back, but as a reminder… By submitting a proposal, the Contractor agrees to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the RFP, including the Statement of Work (SOW).

- Licenses
- Training requirements
- Weapon requirements
- Uniform requirements
- Etc.

This RFP contains 4 sites in Washington, D.C. to include… DC0366: 800 K Street NW, Washington, D.C. – FEMA – sensitive site; active ATRs; Whitestone incumbent DC0382: 810 7th Street NW, Washington, D.C. – OJP – sensitive site; active ATRs; Whitestone incumbent *DC0367: 801 I Street NW, Washington, D.C. - DOJ, VA, DHS; Secret Security Clearance; MVM incumbent DC0691: 799 9th Street NW, Washington, D.C. – IRS; Coastal International Security incumbent

Best Value Procurement = this means we are not necessarily awarding to the offer with the lowest price.

We are looking for excellence!

- Technical factors when combined are significantly more important than price

Basic Services Permanent ongoing services specifically included in the task order(s) at time of award or added through modification up to any established maximums identified in the contract.

Temporary Additional Services (TAS) Short term, non-recurring needs for service such as an increase in hours to an existing or subsequently added post

Little advance notice

If the Government provides the contractor with more than 72 hours notification to perform TAS, the Government shall issue an order using the basic services rates

If less than 72 hours notification is provided, the Government shall issue an order using the TAS rates.

Emergency Services Emergency surge security force services for large and small-scale events such as natural disasters, civil disturbances, or other unanticipated events on an as-needed basis.

The requirements under Emergency Services shall be ordered for anywhere in the geographic area covered under this contract with little, if any, advance notice.

Statement of Work All management, supervision, manpower, training, equipment, supplies, licenses, permits, certificates, insurance, pre-employment screenings, reports, files and any other resources necessary to accomplish PSO services as described and required within this SOW and any revisions to SOW as specified in contract modifications.

Existing vs. New Requirement

Differences between the current and existing requirement:
Estimated PSO hours went from 341,652 over a 5-yr. period to approximately 634,475
The increase in hours can be attributed to Emergency Security Services (ESS), the addition of sites for various agencies and FEMA requirements.
SOW Difference in comparison to current requirements
5.2.2 More stringent medical requirements
5.2.4 Increase of annual random drug screening from 5% to 10%; new quarterly reporting requirement
6.6.3 Change from annual weapons qualifications to twice a year
13.5 Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Card
14.6 Uniform changes (color, ball cap, disposable glove pouch, jackets) and body armor

Contract Type Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ contract)

Labor hour with fixed hourly rates.

Period of Performance Anticipated Contract Award: 11/15/2012

Transition: 120 days

Contract Period of Performance March 15, 2013 – March 14, 2018

Option to Extend Services – FAR 52.217-8 March 15, 2018 – September 30, 2018

Proposal Submission Requirements SF1449 – cover page

Two sealed envelopes:

(1) Price Proposal (2 copies) plus CD containing Excel spreadsheets (with formulas)

(2) Technical Proposal (5 copies) plus CD containing searchable documents 20 page limit

11 pt. font
1” margins

Proposal Expiration Date = 120 days

Submission of all signed amendments and other clause requirements with Price Proposal

Proposal Due Date Monday, October 15, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. EST

Submit offers to:

U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Office of Procurement Operations – FPS
701 Market Street, Suite 3200
Attn: Beth H. Arnold-Messick
Philadelphia, PA 19106

Reminder the RFP does not allow for electronic email or fax submissions.

Efficient Competition

Initial review of the total evaluated price
Most competitive may be reviewed prior to, or instead of
May not evaluate the technical proposals of other offerors, whose total evaluated pricing was higher than that of one already evaluated and already assigned the highest possible technical rating

Technical Evaluation Technical Ratings – In descending order of importance:

Relevant Past Performance

Management Approach

Socio-Economic Factor

Note - The above factors when combined are significantly more important than price.

Evaluation Criteria – Relevant Past Performance & Teaming

Relevant Past Performance
Maximum of 3 projects
Timeframe: within the past 3 years
Complexity- Armed, Multiple Locations, Top Secret Posts, Similar Duties as SOW.
Minimum magnitude of xx hours per year
Past Performance Questionnaires
Teaming Arrangements – narrative
Prime/Sub Contractors
Joint Ventures

The submission should include a 3 project maximum = 3 for prime and 3 for sub The timeframe should be within the past 3 years In terms of complexity we are looking for experience with armed guards having similar duties as the SOW – i.e. screening, x-ray magnetometers In terms of magnitude the projects must demonstrate a similar level of magnitude (i.e. hours).

We are also looking for references and past performance questionnaires… References = attachment 3 past project form Past performance questionnaires – attachment 4 = sent to customers and returned to Katelyn.

Teaming arrangements = narrative required clearly detailing the roles, responsibilities, and distribution of effort - one page supplement to past project forms; not counting against 12 page size limit

Evaluation Criteria – Management Approach

Quality Assurance
Supervision
Field level Supervision Exhibit
Narrative
address methods, processes and procedures
Quality Control
Methods, processes and procedures for inspections
Processes to address non-compliance
Transition
Methods for transitioning
Timeline of transition
Staffing
How you intend to staff the max quantities in the RFP

Staffing - Relief Detailed relief plan indicating your approach to providing relief.

Address how your firm will manage the relief requirements and include the number of PSOs required to provide relief and the total annual estimated relief hours.

Looking for more than statements such as “relief shall be provided in accordance with the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement or applicable Department of Labor regulations” or other non-definitive statements

Address and quantify whether any relief hours are being provided by supervisory personnel signing-off as a supervisor to provide relief.

Evaluation Criteria – Socio-economic Factor All offerors including Small Businesses shall address the extent of participation of Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns.

The table in the RFP must be included as part of the technical proposal.

Both the dollar value and percentage value of the total evaluated contract price must be provided for the services required for this solicitation.

Differs from Subcontracting Plan!

NOTE: This table will be removed by the CO before the submission of the tech proposal to the tech team

1. Total Evaluated Contract Price$100%
2. Target for SDB participation in the contract by the Prime Contractor or Joint Venture$% of line 1 = ______
3. Target for SDB participation in the contract by subcontracting$% of line 1 = ______
4. Target for Total SDB participation in the contract$% of line 1 = _______

Evaluation Criteria – Price

Submit fixed hourly rate pricing on SF1449
Detailed price breakdown
Total evaluated price (Base + options + 52.217-8)
Prices may be evaluated for realism.

Bid WD wages Stagnant!

Note: this does not apply to non SCA covered positions.

Responsibility Determination Adequate financial resources Contractor has to be in good financial standing Have adequate resources to perform contract Current assets cover current liabilities.

Ability to meet the delivery or performance schedule Satisfactory performance record Satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics Satisfactory operational controls, equipment and facilities Qualified to receive an award No felony conviction Even if best value-still can be found non-responsible

The government looks for a satisfactory performance record, a record of integrity and business ethics, satisfactory operational control, etc.

A big part of the determination is that a contractor has adequate financial resources…we review payrolls and financial statements in detail; therefore it is important that a contractor is in good financial standing.

The government wide listing is verified to ensure a contractor is qualfied to receive an award; this listing includes any debarrments or suspensions where a contractor is not eligible to receive a contract award.

In addition, in accordance with HSAR 3052.209-76, contractor has verified that it is not a business concern owned, controlled, or operated by an individual convicted of a felony.

Subcontracting Plans FAR 19.702 implements the requirements of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. § 637(d)) for submission and negotiation of small business subcontracting plans. With respect to negotiated acquisitions, “shall require the apparently successful offeror” to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan, and if such offeror fails to negotiate a plan acceptable to the contracting officer within the time limit set by the contracting officer, the offeror will be ineligible for award. FAR 19.702(a)(1).

Applies to Large Businesses Only

Proposal Submission Requirements Summary/Proposal Preparation Proposal Submission Checklist (Attachment 9)- review prior to submitting proposal.

1449 issues COOP – Use costs shown on page 12 of Sub-section E-2 Multiplication Management Approach issues Attachment 8 – Field Level Supervision Exhibit Past Performance Questionnaires Company Background etc.

Useful information

Lessons Learned from the Tech Teams
Please refrain from using words such as may/possible.
Make definitive statements about how this requirement will be fulfilled.
3 hours of Weapons Transition Training is required when new weapons are provided, regardless of whether the weapon platform changes.
Field Level Supervision Exhibit
Preferred – List each building in the exhibit with how they will be supervised (roving part-time, roving full-time etc.)
The proposal should explicitly state how supervision of buildings will be handled.
Please provide details regarding:
Post inspections
Supervision
Quality Assurance

Useful Information Lessons Learned from the Procurement Analyst:

Supervisor and Non-PSO hours are not provided in enough detail so provide subsidiary worksheets

Incremental cost breakdown is required regarding relief

Lead PSOs are not considered supervisors
Supervisors may serve as PSOs and provide relief; however, those hours can not be counted as supervisory hours in the management approach

Frequently Asked Questions

Proposal submission
Font/spacing requirements do not apply to graphs and charts
Although a three ring binder is not required it is preferred.
SF 1449 is only required as the cover for the pricing proposal
Table of contents and cover pages are excluded from the page limitation.
Financial Determination Information
This information is not required as part of the initial proposal. It will be requested once a best value determination is made.
The RFP is clear on its face. Recommendations are just that.
All costs should be factored into the rates.
Proposals should use the WD provided.
The post exhibit provided as part of the RFP is sample of the typical service and should not be used as the basis of your proposal.
Proposed rates should be based on the ceiling hours as shown in SF1449.

Wanner, Todd M (WTM) - were questions asked already and you are providig clarifications? if this was used frmo Jessica's sample,she already had qeustions in hand, which is why she used this slide.

What comes next….

Answers to submitted questions are anticipated by 2PM on September 28, 2012.
RFP will be amended to include this presentation and answers to the submitted questions.
The RFP close date may be extended.

Federal Protective Service Points of Contact Beth H. Arnold-Messick

E-mail: beth.arnold-messick@dhs.gov Phone: 215-521-2277

Annmarie Bartholomeo E-mail: annmarie.bartholomeo@dhs.gov Phone: 215-521-2260

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .