Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
OCONUS Responder Support Camp (RSC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSFE80-16-R-0004
Issued by
Federal Emergency Management Agency Headquarters Office of the Chief Procurement Officer

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to OCONUS Responder Support Camp (RSC), newest first.
File Type Posted
HSFE80-16-R-0004_Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
Buy_American_Certificate_52.225-2.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_Identification_Card_Standard_Template.pdf PDF
OCONUS_RSC_RFP_000002.pdf PDF
HSFE80-16-R-0004_OCONUS_Questions_and_Responses_FINAL.pdf PDF
Amendment_000002.pdf PDF
Amendment_000001.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_1_-_OCONUS_PWS_Revised.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Past_Performance_Supplemental_Comment_Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_-_Pricing_Template_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_7_-_Subcontracting_Plan_Review_Checklist.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_1_-_OCONUS_PWS_FINAL.pdf PDF
OCONUS_RSC_RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_QASP.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_-_Scenarios.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT_4_-_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
DRAFT_OCONUS_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FEMA, recently released a Request for proposal for the procurement of supplies or services RFP #HSFE80-16-R-0004. Offerors were asked to provide information on contracts similar in nature, size and complexity to the present requirement on which they had performed in the past. An offeror has submitted this to you as a reference for past performance. (See blocks 1 to 3 below).

We need your opinion on how well the contractor performed on your contract(s). Please fill out the attached questionnaire and send it electronically to either the Contracting Officer at ____________or the Contract Specialist at____________. To be considered, this form must be filled out and received by the contracting officer no later than the closing date and time listed in the request for proposal. DHS/FEMA may contact you to clarify or verify any information provided. For purposes of confidentiality, only send this completed form to the FEMA contracting officer.

Your input will be confidential. Please note your comments will be used to form the basis for evaluation of this offeror. Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any questions please contact the Contracting Officer at _______________________

A. CERTIFICATION

By law, the Government will not disclose the names of individuals providing reference information during discussions with the contractor identified in Block 1 below.

Block 1. Contractor Name:

Block 2. Contractor phone number and address:

Block 3. Contract Name and Number: | I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

Evaluator’s Printed Name Title

Evaluator’s Mailing Address (Agency, Bldg/Room, Street, City, State, Zip)

________________________ ____________________________________
Evaluator’s SignatureDatePhoneFax

B. INSTRUCTIONS

Two forms are provided to document your opinion: 1) Performance Rating Form; and 2) Supplemental Comment Form. Please fill out both forms in accordance with the instructions provided on each. Please use the following standards in arriving at your rating: 1) Superior – the contractor’s overall performance was superior. Satisfactory – the contractor’s overall performance was successful but with some minor exceptions 2) Unsatisfactory – the contractor’s overall performance was unsatisfactory.

PERFORMANCE RATING FORM (put an X in the appropriate box)

Performance Element
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICES: The contractor provided high quality products and/or services.

2. COMMUNICATION: The contractor worked and communicated well with client management and contracting officials.

3. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: The contractor made deliveries on time or sooner than agreed.

4. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: The contractor exhibited a commitment to customer satisfaction and achieved customer satisfaction.

5. RESPONSIVENESS AND ATTENTIVESNESS: The contractor was responsive to client changes, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and in detecting and correcting errors, poor performance, and other problems.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE::

YES
NO

6. Given the choice would you do business with this contractor again?

Attachment 6 – Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .