PastPerformance.doc

DOC document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
Marine Cranes
Solicitation number
HSCG40-08-R-50008
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Doc.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF30Amdmt8.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt7.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt6.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt5.doc DOC document
Spec.REV2.P-573-0518.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt4.doc DOC document
SpecificationRev1.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt3.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt2.doc DOC document
SF30Amdmt1.doc DOC document
Attachments to Solicitation.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION —
SF 1449 —
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT

The U. S. Coast Guard ELC, Contracting Office, Baltimore, MD is conducting a competitive acquisition. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate the offeror’s past performance.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance and fax it to Patricia Dobbins (410) 762-6056, or email completed questionnaire to: Patricia.L.Dobbins@uscg.mil.

Name of Contractor being evaluated:

Contract No.

Description

Total contract cost:

1. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?

Considerably surpassed/exceeded delivery schedules

Met delivery schedule (no unexcusable delays)

Minimal delays (did not impact achievement of contract requirements) [ ]

Extensive unexcused delays

COMMMENTS:__________________________________________________________

2 To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from the government?

Completely successful [ ]

Generally successful [ ]

Little success [ ]

No success [ ]

3. To what extent did the contractor display initiative in meeting requirements?

Displayed considerable initiative [ ]

Displayed some initiative [ ]

Displayed little initiative [ ]

Displayed no initiative [ ]

4. Has the contract been partially or complete terminated for default?

[ ] YES

[ ] NO

If YES, briefly explain (i.e. inability to meet performance or delivery schedules).

5. Provide an overall rating of the contractor’s quality of the products supplied.

Excellent – conformed to contract/specification requirements [ ]

Satisfactory – slight nonconformances did not effect product [ ]

Unsatisfactory – nonconformance’s inhibited product usefulness [ ]

Poor – extensive non conformances [ ]

If the contractor experienced extensive non conformances, please explain below the circumstances surrounding nonconformance’s (i.e. inability to meet specification requirements).

6. Would you contract with the contractor again and would you refer this contractor to other potential sources?

[ ] YES

[ ] NO

If NO, please explain:___________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .