Redacted_ORD.pdf

PDF 631 KB Posted

Attached to
Industry Studies in Support of the USCG Polar Icebreaker
Solicitation number
HSCG23-17-Q-APB004
Issued by

About this file

Attachment J-2 Operational Requirements Document

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document

Industry Version Distribution Statement C: Distribution authorized to the DHS/USCG/DoD/USN/USMC/DOS/DOC/NOAA/DOT/NSF/USARC and their contractors (Administrative or Operational use), November 2015. Other requests shall be referred to Coast Guard Headquarters, COMDT CG-751, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. AVE SE, Washington, DC 20593-7324.

November 2015

UNCLASSIFIED

Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements – Industry Version

N O T I C E This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Homeland Security in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof.

The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers.

Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report.

This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Bert N. Macesker Executive Director United States Coast Guard Research & Development Center 1 Chelsea Street New London, CT 06320 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) Polar Icebreaker (PIB) Operational Requirements Document (ORD) is the formal statement, developed by the Sponsor in collaboration with the stakeholders, of the operational performance and related operational parameters for the proposed concept. The PIB ORD consolidates and describes the operational system in terms of a range of acceptable and desirable standards of performance. In addition, the PIB ORD documents support and maintenance requirements and serves as the source document for a host of systems engineering activities, ongoing requirements analysis and cost estimating to ensure the success of the program. The PIB ORD was developed by a 46-member, 11-Agency Integrated Product Team (IPT) to describe the operating requirements that span the doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF) spectrum needed to meet the mission performance gaps identified in the 2012 High Latitude Mission Analysis Report (HLMAR).

The HLMAR identified the following mission gaps in the high latitudes: Ice Operations (IO), Defense Readiness (DR), Aids to Navigation (AtoN), Living Marine Resources (LMR), Marine Safety (MS), Other Law Enforcement (OLE), Marine Environmental Protection (MEP), Ports, Waterways, & Coastal Security (PWCS), and Search and Rescue (SAR).

National Security Presidential Directive 66 (NSPD 66) / Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (HSPD 25) Arctic Region Policy states, “The United States is an Arctic nation, with varied and compelling interests in that region.” NSPD 66 / HSPD 25 identifies a range of U.S. policies and associated actions that the U.S. will take to further those policies. The document further tasks the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security to “Develop greater capabilities and capacity, as necessary…” and to “Project a sovereign United States maritime presence for the Arctic in support of essential United States interests.”

The National Strategy for the Arctic Region prioritizes actions and positions the U.S. to respond effectively to the changing conditions in the Arctic. United States Antarctic policy is influenced by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959. Amplifying guidance to the Antarctic Treaty is provided in National Security Decision Memoranda and Presidential Memorandum 6646. Presidential Decision Directive/National Security Council Report 26 (PDD/NSC-26) U.S. Antarctica Policy states that “the United States has important foreign policy and national security interests in Antarctica.”

The PIB will operate worldwide and will be exposed to extreme environmental conditions found in the Polar, Tropical, and Temperate regions. The PIB will experience ice up to large concentrations of multi-year consolidated pack ice with ridging, air temperatures ranging from -72 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) to 114°F, sea water temperatures ranging from 28.8°F to 87°F, wind speeds that can exceed 100 miles per hour (mph) (87 knots (kts)) and sea conditions up to sea state 8. Some of these extremes will be encountered as the PIB transits tropical and/or temperate zones, others will be encountered within the intended polar operational areas.

The PIB ORD identifies the effectiveness requirements that define the operational performance required of the PIB to complete its missions. These statements identify the special or unique requirements of the PIB pertaining to: Basic Requirements, Communications, Information Technology and Intelligence, Navigation, and Sensors. Highlights of the PIB effectiveness requirements include:

The PIB shall be capable of independently breaking through ice with a thickness > 6 ft (threshold) / > 8 ft (objective) at a continuous speed > 3 kts.

The PIB shall be capable of independently breaking through ridged ice with a thickness of 21 ft.

ii

The PIB shall have a fully mission capable (in accordance with Table 20) cutter endurance per deployment without replenishment (subsistence and fuel) > 80 days underway (threshold) / > 90 days underway (objective).

The PIB shall have the capability to exchange information (voice and data) with: USCG, DoD, DHS, NATO, DoS, NSF and NOAA.

The PIB’s suitability requirements will form the basis for portions of the system specification and the Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP). These statements identify the special or unique requirements of the PIB pertaining to: Design Drivers, Supportability and Sustainment (Integrated Logistics), Reliability, Availability and Maintainability, Survivability, Human Systems Integration, Environmental Considerations, Documentation, and Security. Highlights of the PIB suitability requirements include:

The PIB shall be designed and built to meet applicable United States laws and regulations and applicable international conventions, codes, resolutions and circulars for a vessel of its type engaged on international unlimited voyages. This specifically includes, but is not limited to acts, regulations and treaties governing operations in the Polar Regions (Arctic and Antarctic) and the domestic water of the United States.

The PIB shall have an AO of 0.85 (threshold) and 0.92 (objective) based on the total Mission Critical Functions (MCF) listed in Table 20 that defines the minimum functions required for the PIB to maneuver and control the cutter, conduct damage control, and sustain the crew.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................ ix LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... xiv LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................................... xiv VERSION SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ xv

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Background

1.3 Timeframe

1.3.1 Initial Operational Capability Date

1.3.2 Coast Guard Support Date

1.4 Full Operational Capability Date

1.5 Constraints

1.5.1 International Operations

1.5.2 Panama Canal

1.5.3 Communications in the High Latitudes

1.5.4 DryDock Facilities

2 MISSION REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Operating Requirements

2.1.1 Operating Environment

2.1.2 Operational Functions

2.1.3 Interoperability Requirements

2.1.4 Geographic Area

2.1.5 Climatic Envelope

2.2 Concept of Operations

2.2.1 Mission Operations Scenario #1

2.2.2 Mission Operations Scenario #2

2.2.3 Mission Operations Scenario #3

3 EFFECTIVENESS REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Basic Requirements

3.1.1 Ice Breaking

3.1.2 Endurance

3.1.3 Speed

3.1.4 Range

3.1.5 Operational Tempo

3.1.6 Seakeeping

3.1.7 Maneuvering, Mooring, Anchoring and Berthing

3.1.8 Lighting

3.1.9 Cargo Handling and Underway Replenishment

3.1.10 Aviation Capabilities

3.1.11 Boat Capabilities

3.1.12 Boarding Operations

3.1.13 Rescue and Assistance

3.1.14 Towing Capabilities

iv

3.1.15 Dive Detachment Missions Support

3.1.16 OGA Science/Survey Mission Support

3.1.17 Heavy Lift

3.1.18 Aids to Navigation

3.1.19 Marine Environmental Response

3.1.20 Defensive/Offensive Capability Systems

3.2 Communications, Information Technology and Intelligence

3.2.1 Interoperability

3.2.2 External Communications

3.2.3 Internal Communications

3.2.4 OGA Science/Survey Mission Support (Communications)

3.2.5 Shore Tie

3.2.6 Command and Control

3.3 Navigation

3.3.1 Navigation Systems

3.4 Sensors

3.4.1 Surface Search RADAR

3.4.2 Air Search RADAR

3.5 Measures of Effectiveness

3.6 Measures of Performance

4 SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

4.1 Design Drivers

4.1.1 Design Concept – Constraints/Limitations

4.1.2 Commonality

4.1.3 Open System

4.1.4 Technology

4.1.5 Habitability and Outfit

4.1.6 Food Service Operations

4.1.7 Training Support

4.1.8 Morale and Well-Being

4.1.9 Storage Capacity

4.1.10 Work Space

4.2 Supportability and Sustainment (Integrated Logistics)

4.2.1 Integrated Logistics Support

4.2.2 Ship’s Berth Facilities

4.2.3 Packaging, Handling, Storage and Transportation

4.3 Reliability, Availability and Maintainability

4.3.1 Design Criteria

4.3.2 Definitions

4.3.3 Operational Availability (AO)

4.4 Survivability

4.4.1 Damage Control

4.4.2 Wintering Over

4.4.3 Crew Rescue and Life Raft Capabilities

4.4.4 Recoverability

4.5 Human Systems Integration

4.5.1 Human Systems Integration Processes

4.5.2 Operational Sustainment and Workforce Allocation

v

4.6 Environmental Considerations

4.6.1 Environmental Safety and Occupational Health

4.7 Training

4.7.1 Training Concept

4.8 Documentation

4.8.1 Document Management

4.9 Security

4.9.1 Security Features

4.9.2 Access Control

4.9.3 Classified and Sensitive Material

4.9.4 Accreditation

5 KEY PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS

6 CRITICAL OPERATIONAL ISSUES

6.1 Operational Effectiveness COIs

6.1.1 Protection Response (PR)

6.1.2 Law Enforcement Response (LER)

6.1.3 Surveillance and Reconnaissance (SR)

6.1.4 Defense Readiness (DR)

6.1.5 Maintain Mobility (MM)

6.1.6 Transport (TRAN)

6.1.7 Force Movement (FM)

6.1.8 Information Management (IM)

6.1.9 Force Protection (FP)

6.1.10 Cyber Security (CS)

6.2 Operational Suitability COIs

6.2.1 Reliability

6.2.2 Maintainability

6.2.3 Availability

6.2.4 Logistic Supportability

6.2.5 Crewing

APPENDICES.............................................................................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX A. REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. A-1

APPENDIX B. LIST OF ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOLS..............................B-1

APPENDIX C. BRETSCHNEIDER SEA STATE TABLE ................................................................C-1

APPENDIX D. BEAUFORT WIND SCALE.........................................................................................D-1

APPENDIX E. GLOSSARY.....................................................................................................................E-1 vi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. High latitude key locations and transit distances

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. USCG high latitudes mission performance gaps Table 2. Polar Icebreaker linkage to DHS/USCG mission and goals Table 3. USCG polar icebreaking capacity Table 4. Polar Icebreaker operational hours and DAFHP Table 5. PIB operational functions Table 6. PIB activities Table 7. PIB seakeeping requirements Table 8. PIB defensive/offensive capability systems Table 9. Command and Control (C2) display access Table 10. Measures of effectiveness and measures of performance Table 11. PIB embarked personnel detachments Table 12. PIB homeport hotel services Table 13. PIB Mission Critical Functions Table 14. Key Performance Parameters Table C-1. Bretschneider Sea State Table .......................................................................................................C-1 Table D-1. Beaufort Wind Scale Table .........................................................................................................D-1 vii

VERSION SUMMARY

Version Change Effective Date

0.1 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document – First Draft 26NOV2014

0.2 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document – First Final 10DEC2014

0.3 Polar Icebreaker Integrated Product Team Review 20JUL2015

0.4 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document – Second Draft 07AUG2015

0.5 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document – Second Final 20AUG2015

0.6 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document - Concurrent Clearance 21AUG2015

1.0 Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document - Sequential Clearance 09NOV2015 viii

(This page intentionally left blank.)

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose

The United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) Polar Icebreaker (PIB) Operational Requirements Document (ORD) is the formal statement of operational performance and related operational parameters for the proposed system (United States Coast Guard (USCG (2)), 2013). The PIB ORD serves as the source document for a host of system engineering activities, ongoing requirements analysis, cost estimating and as a “contract” between the Sponsor and the Program Manager (PM) (Publication (PUB) 7-7, 2011). The PIB ORD was developed by a 46-member, 11-Agency Integrated Product Team (IPT) to describe the operating requirements that span the doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF) spectrum in the high latitudes needed to meet the mission needs identified in the Polar Icebreaker Mission Need Statement (MNS). The high latitudes include areas of both the Arctic and Antarctic as defined below:

Arctic: As defined by the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 this area includes: "All United States and foreign territory north of the Arctic Circle and all United States territory north and west of the boundary formed by the Porcupine, Yukon, and Kuskokwim Rivers; all contiguous seas, including the Arctic Ocean and the Beaufort, Bering and Chukchi Seas; and the Aleutian chain."

Arctic Circle: The Arctic Circle is one of the five major circles that mark maps of the earth. For Epoch 2010, it is the parallel of latitude that runs 66 degrees 33 minutes 44 seconds (or 66.562 degrees) north of the equator.

Antarctic: All land and waters south of 60 degrees south latitude.

The HLMAR analyzed the USCG’s 11 mandated missions in the high latitude regions identifying nine mission gaps. The Coast Guard’s Counter Drug and Alien Migrant Interdiction Operations missions were not identified as mission gaps in the high latitudes. Table 1 identifies the mission gaps identified in the

HLMAR.

Table 1. USCG high latitudes mission performance gaps.

USCG Missions with Gaps in the High Latitudes Ice Operations (IO)1 Defense Readiness (DR) Aids to Navigation (AtoN)

Living Marine Resources (LMR) Marine Safety (MS) Other Law Enforcement (OLE) Marine Environmental Protection (MEP) Ports, Waterways, & Coastal

Security (PWCS) Search and Rescue (SAR)

1 Ice Operations directly support the Nation’s science and survey needs in the Polar Regions. Section 3.1.15 further defines the science and survey mission support requirements.

In addition to the HLMAR, the 2011 Navy Arctic Capabilities Based Assessment identified the following as the Navy’s highest priority Arctic gaps:

Conduct training, exercise and education.

Provide environmental information.

Maneuver safely on the sea surface.

The PIB MNS and the PIB CONOPS further analyzed the USCG’s nine mission gaps in the high latitudes linking the missions to the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Missions and Goals identified in the 2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR). These linkages are reflected in Table 2.

Table 2. Polar Icebreaker linkage to DHS/USCG mission and goals.

DHS Missions and Goals USCG Missions

1. Prevent Terrorism and Enhance Security Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security

Defense Readiness1.1 Prevent Terrorist Attacks

1.2 Prevent and Protect Against the Unauthorized Acquisition or

Use of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Materials and Capabilities

1.3 Reduce Risks to the Nation’s Most Critical Infrastructure, Key Leadership, and Events

2. Secure and Manage our Borders Ice Operations Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security Defense Readiness Search and Rescue Other Law Enforcement Living Marine Resources Marine Safety Aids to Navigation

2.1 Secure U.S. Air, Land, Sea Borders and Approaches

2.2 Safeguard and Expedite Lawful Trade and Travel

2.3 Disrupt and Dismantle Transnational Criminal Organizations and Other Illicit Actors

3. Enforce and Administer our Immigration Laws Not Directly Supported

4. Strengthen the Nation’s Cyber Security Defense Readiness

Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security4.1 Strengthen the Security and Resilience of Critical Infrastructure

4.2 Secure the Federal Civilian Government Information

Technology Enterprise

5. Strengthen National Preparedness and Resilience Aids to Navigation

Marine Safety Search and Rescue Ice Operations Marine Environmental Protection

5.1 Enhance National Preparedness

5.2 Mitigate Hazards and Vulnerabilities

5.3 Ensure Effective Emergency Response

5.4 Enable Rapid Recovery

Maturing and Strengthening (M&S) the Homeland Security Enterprise Search and Rescue Marine Safety Marine Environmental Protection Ice Operations Living Marine Resources Other Law Enforcement Defense Readiness Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security

M&S 1 Integrate Intelligence, Information Sharing and Operations

M&S 2 Enhance Partnerships and Outreach M&S 3 Strengthen the DHS International Affairs Enterprise in

Support of Homeland Security Missions M&S 4 Conduct Homeland Security Research and Development M&S 5 Train and Exercise Frontline Operators and First

Responders

1.2 Background

The USCG’s Polar Icebreaking Operations Program is charged with providing the United States with the capability and resources necessary to carry out and support federally mandated missions in the Polar Regions. The program also facilitates the movement of maritime transportation through ice-laden waters that assists other governmental and scientific organizations in the pursuit of science activities. The United States Arctic policy, as discussed in National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD) 25 (2009) provides the foundation and guidance to meet the national security and homeland security requirements in the Arctic region to include protecting the Arctic environment and resources, and ensuring that the management of natural resources and economic development are environmentally sustainable. The United States’ National Strategy for the Arctic Region (NSAR), released in May 2013, further defines the Nation’s strategic priorities for the Arctic region and is built upon three lines of effort:

Advance United States Security Interests.

Pursue Responsible Arctic Region Stewardship.

Strengthen International Cooperation.

The USCG’s Arctic Strategy, also released May 2013, supports the NSAR and the U.S. Navy Arctic Roadmap 2014 - 2030 by outlining the USCG’s strategic objectives in the Arctic as:

Improving Awareness.

Modernizing Governance.

Broadening Partnerships.

United States Antarctic Policy is influenced by the Antarctic Treaty of 1959. Amplifying guidance to the Antarctic Treaty is provided in National Security Memorandum 318, dated 25 February 1976, Presidential Memorandum 6646, dated 5 February 1982, and Presidential Decision Directive (PDD)/National Security Council (NSC)-26, dated 9 March, 1996. United States Antarctic policy observes the following principles:

using the Antarctic for peaceful purposes, facilitating scientific research and international cooperation in the Antarctic, facilitating the rights of inspection afforded in Article VII of the Treaty, and preserving and conserving living resources in the Antarctic.

The USCG’s current fleet of PIBs consists of two heavy icebreakers, Coast Guard Cutter (CGC) POLAR STAR and CGC POLAR SEA (not operational) and one medium icebreaker, CGC HEALY. The USCG’s heavy icebreakers have both exceeded their design service life. CGC POLAR STAR has recently undergone a service life extension designed to allow the cutter to operate for an additional 7-10 years.

Table 3 provides the current status for each icebreaker as well as their icebreaking capacities.

Table 3. USCG polar icebreaking capacity.

Platform Year Commissioned

Service Life Design

Estimated End of Service Life1 Icebreaking Capacity

POLAR STAR 1976 30 2020–2023 6 ft@3 Knots (kts) /21 ft back & ram POLAR SEA 1978 30 2010 (Currently Inactive) 6 ft@3kts /21 ft back & ram HEALY 2000 30 2030 4.5 ft @ 3kts /8 ft back & ram

1 Dates include additional service life provided by Service Life Extension Projects (SLEP)

The USCG utilizes operational hours and Days Away From Homeport (DAFHP) to track operational tempo and personnel tempo for its cutters and crews. Currently, each class of PIB uses the same maximum metric values: 3,300 operational hours or 185 DAFHP per fiscal year (FY). The USCG calculates one DAFHP as

17.84 operational hours. The delta of 6.16 hours in a 24 hour period correlates to port calls for crew rest and logistics during deployments. CGC HEALY has operated at 106 percent of targeted operational capacity during the period of 2006 - 2014. CGC POLAR SEA has been inactive since 2011 and CGC POLAR STAR completed reactivation and recommenced operations in 2014. Table 4 provides a breakdown of operational tempo and DAFHP targets for CGC HEALY, CGC POLAR SEA and CGC POLAR STAR from FY 2006 through FY 2014.

Table 4. Polar Icebreaker operational hours and DAFHP.

FY

CGC HEALY CGC POLAR SEA CGC POLAR STAR

Operational Hours /

Percent of Target

DAFHP /

Percent of

Target

Operational Hours /

Percent of Target

DAFHP /

Percent of

Target

Operational Hours /

Percent of Target

DAFHP /

Percent of

Target

2006 3,634 / 110% 191 / 103% 802 / 24% 38 / 21% Inactive Inactive 2007 3,620 / 110% 166 / 90% 2,818 / 85% 141 / 76% Inactive Inactive 2008 4,055 / 123% 181 / 98% 1,661 / 50% 75 / 41% Inactive Inactive 2009 4,194 / 127% 198 / 107% 1,949 / 59% 83 / 45% Inactive Inactive 2010 3,046 / 92% 153 / 83% 2,236 / 68% 115 / 62% Inactive Inactive 2011 2,964 / 90% 159 / 86 % Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive 2012 3,829 / 116% 205 / 111% Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive 2013 2,527 / 77% 145 / 78% Inactive Inactive Inactive Inactive 2014 3,607 / 109% 192 / 103% Inactive Inactive 2,508 / 76% 189 / 102% Total 31,476 / 106% 1,590 / 95% 9,466 / 57% 452 / 49% 2,508 / 76% 189 / 102% Note: The National Science Foundation (NSF) had budget authority for USCG polar icebreaking from 2006 to 2011.Operational availability of POLAR SEA was reduced in 2006 due to maintenance and again in 2010 due to premature engine failure. From 2008 to 2010, the NSF contracted foreign icebreakers for Operation Deep Freeze at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. POLAR SEA stood by in Seattle, WA as an emergency back-up to the contracted vessels.

As national assets, heavy icebreakers are often requested to support other agency operations such as NSF through the U.S. Pacific Command's Operation Deep Freeze, the annual break out of McMurdo Station, Antarctica in support of the U.S. Antarctic Program as well as Department of State (DoS) Antarctic inspection operations. In 2011 and 2012, NSF requested the USCG explore making icebreaker assistance available for Operation Deep Freeze; however, the USCG was unable to provide the support due to the reduced capacity and capability of the operational fleet as well as national Arctic commitments.

1.3 Timeframe

The High Latitude Mission Analysis Report, July 2012, documented current and expected Coast Guard capability and capacity gaps in the Polar Regions and concluded that additional icebreaking vessels are required to meet national requirements. Notwithstanding the acquisition timelines presented below, the United States is at risk of failing to achieve national strategic objectives in the Polar Regions should the

Coast Guard not acquire heavy icebreaker capabilities as soon as possible. The projected timeframe in which the PIB program can satisfy these operational requirements is based on an acquisition plan and a funding profile that has not yet been approved. Accordingly, the below dates will require reassessment based on the results of ongoing programming decisions and budget approvals.

1.3.1 Initial Operational Capability Date

The Initial Operational Capability (IOC) date is anticipated to occur during or before FY-2026. IOC is defined as the delivery of the vessel.

1.3.2 Coast Guard Support Date

The Coast Guard Support Date (CGSD) is the formal transition from CG-932 to Surface Forces Logistics Center Product Line (SFLC PL) and is anticipated to occur during or before FY-2028. CGSD will occur when the following logistic elements are in place and the CG mission support community accepts sustainment responsibility for the asset:

1.3.2.1 An approved Integrated Support Plan (ISP) shall be in place.

1.3.2.2 A job task analysis shall be completed and used to validate a final manpower requirement for cutter crew and shore side support personnel.

1.3.2.3 Shore side support personnel shall be identified and in place.

1.3.2.4 Sustainment training solutions for the crew and shore side support personnel shall be identified.

1.3.2.5 Major training aids and permanent Coast Guard training facilities to support the PIB(s) shall be identified.

1.3.2.6 The PIB will be maintained using Coast Guard, commercial and Other Government Agency (OGA) facilities with a level of funding commensurate with Operational Availability specified in this document.

1.3.2.7 All maintenance procedures shall be validated with levels and types of maintenance identified.

1.3.2.8 The Coast Guard shall have access to technical data required to operate, maintain, diagnose, and repair the lead ship in both hard copy and electronic form.

1.3.2.9 Placed under Configuration Management (CM) control in accordance with the USCG Configuration Manual M4130.6 (Series).

1.3.2.10 Homeport shore-side facility requirements shall be identified in terms of space, volume, equipment, and utilities to support operations and maintenance. Facility modifications required to support lead ship shall be identified.

1.4 Full Operational Capability Date

The Full Operational Capability (FOC) date occurs upon the successful completion of operational testing and evaluation and is anticipated to occur during or before FY-2028.

1.5 Constraints

Constraints are limitations imposed upon the PIB by organizations, laws, policies and factors external to the

USCG.

1.5.1 International Operations

The PIB will operate in international waters, within the territorial seas of foreign governments, and in the fragile ecosystems of the high latitude regions. Therefore, the PIB shall, to the maximum extent possible, consider international maritime standards, including those for safety, machinery, equipment, environmental compliance, signaling, communications, weather, meteorology and oceanography (METOC), and navigation support including, but not limited to the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Polar Code, Convention on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), and the Antarctic Treaty.

1.5.2 Panama Canal

The Panama Canal provides an economical transit route between the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean.

The PIB shall meet Panama Canal transit requirements in order to expedite transit time. The Panama Canal is scheduled to be upgraded by 2015. The current locks require ships to be less than 320.04 meters (m) (1,050 ft) long, less than 33.53 m (110 (feet) ft) wide and have a draft of less than 12.56 m (41.2 ft) deep.

The new lock chambers will be 426.72 m (1,400 ft) long, 54.86 m (180 ft) wide, and 18.29 m (60 ft) deep.

The PIB shall be capable of transiting the new size locks.

1.5.3 Communications in the High Latitudes

Vast distances, lack of communication architecture, severe weather conditions, high latitude ionic disturbances, and geomagnetic storms combine to make communications in the high latitudes difficult. Line of Sight (LOS) and beyond LOS communication in the high latitudes are severely degraded above 65 degrees north and south latitudes.

1.5.4 Dry Dock Facilities

There are a limited number of dry dock facilities in the United States that have the capacity to handle a PIB due to the density (tons per square foot) of the PIB's footprint. Drydock capacity limitation shall be a factor in homeporting/design decisions.

2 MISSIONREQUIREMENTS

This section contains the background information specific to the operational context of the PIB during the execution of its missions.

2.1 Operating Requirements

2.1.1 Operating Environment

The PIB will operate for extended periods of time in an open ocean environment and littoral zones (littoral waters are considered those waters between the shoreline out to 50 miles offshore) while executing its assigned missions. Due to the nature of its responsibilities, the PIB shall be capable of conducting extended deployments to the Arctic and Antarctic regions during the same calendar year. The remoteness of the Arctic and Antarctic requires the PIB to be self-sufficient during mission execution and capable of long transits between logistical stops. The expectation that the PIB will operate in all oceans requires that the PIB be capable of operating in and surviving extremely harsh environments and severe maritime weather conditions. Open ocean transits may subject the PIB to hurricane/tropical cyclone force winds capable of producing sea state 8 conditions (29.5 ft – 45.5 ft).

The hazardous marine conditions in which the PIB will operate are a result of wind, seas, reduced visibility, extreme temperatures, vessel icing and sea ice conditions. The most extreme sea states that the PIB will encounter are anticipated to occur during transit periods to and from the Arctic and Antarctic. The low pressure cells that move clockwise around Antarctica generate high winds and seas, resulting in violent ship motion, testing the limits of equipment durability and human performance during transits across the Southern Ocean. Cyclonic conditions in the vicinity of tropical Australia can occur during any month with the highest frequency occurring during the months of January, February, and March and are capable of producing sea state 8 conditions (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), 2013). In the North Pacific Ocean leading to the Beaufort Sea, occasional sudden storms can occur where the lack of natural wind barriers results in unrestricted winds. These storms bring cold temperatures and occur most frequently between September and November. The storms commonly produce gale-force winds up to 40 kts, and hurricane strength winds (74 mph and greater) have been recorded in the region (Veltkamp and Wilcox, 2007).

The PIB will experience severe sea surface ice conditions while operating in the Arctic and Antarctic regions. The Analysis of Polar Icebreaker Requirements (2015) compiled the following ice conditions information:

2.1.1.1 Arctic

2.1.1.1.1 Ice Thickness: First Year Ice (FYI) thickness expected to be encountered averages 2 m (6.5 ft). Long term trends in FYI maximum ice thickness and decadal comparisons were assessed and showed a trend of 1 to 3 centimeters (0.4 to 1.2 inches) decrease per decade.

2.1.1.1.2 Ice Strength: FYI flexural strength varies across the year and across the Arctic but for the times of year and expected locations the PIB will operate, it will encounter FYI flexural strengths between .5 Megapascals (MPa) to .7 MPa.

2.1.1.1.3 Ice Coverage / Concentration: Ice Coverage has decreased, in both winter (-3% per decade) and summer (-13.3% per decade). This decrease is attributed to an increase in air temperature. Ice Concentrations in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas have decreased approximately 50% (8 tenths to 4 tenths) in summer. Winter concentrations remain constant at 10 tenths in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas.

Central Arctic concentrations have remained constant in both summer and winter at 10 tenths.

2.1.1.1.4 MYI: Data collected over 35+ years indicates that MYI average thickness is approximately 6.5 m (21.3 ft) in the western Arctic.

2.1.1.1.5 Ice Ridges: Based on data collected from over 200 ridges, typical ridge sails and keels expected to be encountered are: Southern Beaufort Sea: Sail 2.75m (9 ft) , Keel 12 m (39.4 ft); Beaufort Ice Pack: Sails 5 m (16.4 ft), Keels 18 m (59 ft);

Chukchi Sea: Sails 2 m (6.5 ft), Keels 10 m (32.8 ft).

2.1.1.2 Antarctic

2.1.1.2.1 Ice Thickness: FYI ice thickness expected to be encountered is approximately 2 m (6.5 ft). Long term trends in FYI maximum ice thickness show no change in FYI thickness.

2.1.1.2.2 Ice Strength: FYI flexural strength varies across the year but for the times of year the PIB will operate, it will encounter FYI flexural strengths between .5 MPa to .7 MPa. Average FYI flexural strength is not decreasing.

2.1.1.2.3 Ice Coverage / Concentration: In contrast to the Arctic, there has been an increase in sea ice coverage in the Antarctic. The increase in austral winter is +1.3% per decade and the increase in summer is +4.5% per decade

2.1.1.2.4 MYI: Limited data has been collected in the Antarctic to assess MYI thickness.

Based on the limited data, average MYI thickness is estimated to be approximately

7.9 m (25.9 ft).

2.1.1.2.5 Ice Ridges: Given the increase in ice coverage ridging and the spatial density (frequency of encounter) is not expected to decrease. Ridge size and frequency has not changed based on data collected over the past 10 years.

2.1.2 Operational Functions

The PIB CONOPS identifies the operational and mission support functional capabilities that the PIB shall perform in order to complete its assigned missions. Functional capabilities and their working definitions are provided in Table 5.

Table 5. PIB operational functions.

Functional Capability Working Definition for Establishing Linkage Between Activities and the Functional Capability

Break Ice Capability to create a passage through ice bound waters Maneuverability/Sea Keeping/Navigation

Capability to transit at various courses and speeds from one location to the next to include traversing tropical latitudes

Escort Vessels Capability to guide vessels through surface ice conditions Boat Operations Capability to conduct operations with organic and non-organic boats Aviation Operations Capability to conduct operations with organic and non-organic aircraft Defensive/Offensive Operations Capability to defend against threats and employ armament

Sensors Capability to sense, detect, and characterize the surrounding environment and to gather and transmit data about it

Boarding Operations Capability to prosecute a target of interest and place a fully trained boarding team with required equipment on another vessel including a landing party

Search and Rescue Capability to locate and assist mariners in distress Damage Control Capability to respond to organic and non-organic damage Towing Vessels Capability to take another vessel in tow Marine Environmental Response

Capability to respond to a marine environmental incident

Science/Survey Missions Capability to collect and analyze information in support of science and survey operations

Command and Control Capability to integrate multiple assets participating in an operation Communications Capability to transfer data and voice internally and externally Mission Support Capability to sustain and maintain the PIB, deployed assets, and crew Diving Operations Capability to deploy and retrieve personnel into the water in order to conduct underwater maintenance, repair, damage control, AtoN, search, recovery, salvage, and security measures.

U/W Refueling/Replenishment Capability to receive and transfer liquids and supplies while underway Heavy Lift Capability to transport and handle heavy (> 1 ton), indivisible items

In order to successfully fulfill the operational and mission support functional capabilities, the PIB shall be capable of performing the activities in Table 6.

Table 6. PIB activities.

No. Category Activity

Break Ice Conduct ice breaking operations

2 Groom/maintain a channel through ice 3 Break out beset vessels

Maneuvering/ Seakeeping/ Navigation

Moor without assistance 5 Anchor/weigh anchor 6 Get underway without assistance 7 Avoid collisions and allisions 8 Maintain assigned station 9 Maintain position for direct water recovery 10 Calculate intercept with contact of interest 11 Fix own position 12 Update and maintain navigation references (charts and publications) 13 Maintain navigation log 14 Navigate safely in all environmental conditions cognizant of hydrographic restrictions 15 Collect environmental data 16 Fix positions of other vessels 17 Track ice conditions beyond the horizon 18 Escort Vessels Escort vessels in ice conditions

Boat Operations

Launch boats 20 Operate two boats simultaneously 21 Recover boats 22 Stow boats

Aviation Operations

Launch organic/non-organic aircraft 24 Operate organic/non-organic aircraft 25 Control and track organic/non-organic aircraft

26 Recover organic/non-organic aircraft 26 Hangar organic aircraft 28 Conduct vertical replenishment (VERTREP) 29 Conduct helicopter in-flight refueling (HIFR)

Table 6. PIB activities (continued).

No. Category Activity

Defensive/Offensive Operations

Perform Operations Security 31 Apply physical security 32 Positively identify friend or foe 33 Provide personal protective equipment 34 Protect boarding team 35 Perform unit defense 36 Apply Rules of Engagement/Use of Force 37 Perform safety measures 38 Respond to a casualty 39 Recover from a casualty 40 Protect cutter and crew from casualty 41 Perform/enact anti-terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) measures

Intelligence Operations

Plan and direct law enforcement intelligence activities

44 Collect law enforcement intelligence

46 Receive law enforcement intelligence

48 Process and exploit law enforcement intelligence

50 Analyze and produce law enforcement intelligence

52 Disseminate law enforcement intelligence

54 Evaluate law enforcement intelligence and provide feedback

Sensors

Search for contact of interest 58 Detect surface contact of interest 59 Collect target data with organic sensors 60 Analyze data to identify contact of interest 61 Collect environmental conditions data (sea, air and ice) 62 Analyze environmental conditions data (sea, air and ice)

Boarding Operations

Stop/neutralize a vessel through the use of force continuum 64 Conduct boarding operations 65 Apply Rules of Engagement/Use of Force 66 Detain suspects

Boarding Operations (cont’d)

Arrest suspects 68 Collect evidence 69 Issue violations 70 Seize property 71 Employ custody crew 72 Hold contraband 73 Hold other evidence 74 Recover objects from the water 75 Embark detachments 76 Transfer personnel at sea 77 Transfer seized assets, personnel, and evidence at sea

Search and Rescue

Coordinate and direct search and rescue activities 79 Execute surface search for missing or distressed persons, vessels, aircraft 80 Render mechanical assistance 81 Provide temporary shelter

Damage Control

Provide initial and follow up basic medical services 83 Plan, train for and execute damage control tasks for own ship 84 Assist other vessels with damage control 85 Monitor damage control 86 Towing Vessels Conduct towing operations 87 Marine Environmental

Response Coordinate and direct pollution response activities

88 Transfer pollution response equipment

Science/Survey Missions

Support the deployment of science/survey devices 90 Support the recovery of science/survey devices and artifacts 91 Support the science and survey data analysis 92 Support the launch of airborne, surface and sub-surface unmanned vehicles 93 Support the recovery of airborne, surface and sub-surface unmanned vehicles

Command and Control

Plan operations 95 Establish liaisons 96 Establish search and operations area 97 Allocate resources 98 Coordinate resources 99 Issue orders 100 Maintain a common operational picture 101 Evaluate results 102 Create lessons learned 103 Communications Sound and display required signals

Communications (cont’d)

Communicate voice and data with Blue Forces 105 Communicate voice and data internally 106 Communicate clear, protected and secure voice and data where applicable 107 Receive distress calls 108 Determine direction to received calls 109 Conduct simultaneous communications with Department of Defense (DoD) and foreign entities 110 Conduct simultaneous communications with land, surface and air assets 111 Conduct simultaneous communications with federal, state and local law enforcement and regulatory agencies 112 Communicate via loudhailer 113 Store, search, retrieve and archive information 114 Communicate via flag hoist 115 Access USCG Data Network

117 Access physically separated science/survey support networks 118 Support Electronic AtoN Operations / Marine Safety Information (MSI) operations 119 Support the transfer/communication of science data and artifacts

Mission Support

Conduct training 121 Receive training 122 Provide supply support (internal) 123 Provide personnel administration 124 Perform honors and ceremonies 125 Accommodate the crew and embarked detachments – morale, welfare and recreation 126 Accommodate the crew – professional development 127 Accommodate the crew and embarked detachments – berthing 128 Accommodate the crew and embarked detachments – subsistence 129 Accommodate the crew and embarked detachments – health care 130 Receive guest and visitors 131 Plan organizational level maintenance 132 Execute organizational level maintenance 133 Track organizational level maintenance 134 Plan depot level maintenance

Mission Support (Cont’d)

Facilitate depot level maintenance 136 Track depot level maintenance 137 Plan organic boat organizational maintenance 138 Execute organic boat organizational maintenance 139 Track organic boat organizational maintenance 140 Plan organic aircraft organizational maintenance 141 Execute organic aircraft organizational maintenance 142 Track organic aircraft organizational maintenance 143 Monitor/maintain stability 144 Export electrical power 145 Receive hotel services in port 146 Store data

Diving Operations Support a Dive Detachment in conducting underwater hull inspections, maintenance, repair, damage control, AtoN, search, recovery, salvage, and security measures

Refueling/Replenishment

Transfer and receive liquids in port and at sea 149 Transfer and receive cargo in port and at sea 150 On load equipment 151 Off load equipment 152 Transport AtoN Equipment

2.1.3 Interoperability Requirements

The PIB will be an integral asset in a command and control environment. The PIB shall exchange information (voice, video, and data) at various classification levels with USCG/DoD/Other Government Agency (OGA)/Allied government’s operational assets, including land-based operational centers, other vessels, and aircraft. The PIB shall work with other federal agencies (inside and outside of DHS), as well as state, local, tribal and foreign governments. The PIB shall also be able to communicate and exchange information with private and commercial vessels. The PIB shall be able to communicate simultaneously with multiple operational assets and shore side command and control facilities in order to fully execute its command and control duties.

2.1.4 Geographic Area

The PIB will primarily operate in the Polar Regions, but the transit routes to and from these areas require the PIB to operate world-wide. Figure 1 (USCG (4), 2012) highlights key logistical ports that the PIB may utilize as well as the vast distances between operational areas.

Figure 1. High latitude key locations and transit distances.

The PIB will operate in the following regions:

2.1.4.1 Arctic: As defined by the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 this area includes: "All United States and foreign territory north of the Arctic Circle and all United States territory north and west of the boundary formed by the Porcupine, Yukon, and Kuskokwim Rivers;

all contiguous seas, including the Arctic Ocean and the Beaufort, Bering and Chukchi Seas; and the Aleutian chain."

2.1.4.2 Antarctic: All land and waters south of 60 degrees south latitude.

2.1.4.3 Equatorial: Land and seas located between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.

2.1.4.4 Littoral: For the purposes of this document, littoral waters are considered those waters between the shoreline out to 50 miles offshore.

2.1.4.5 Deepwater: As described in Commandant Instruction (COMDTINST) M16014.2 (Series) this area is primarily defined as waters that extend beyond 50 miles offshore.

2.1.5 Climatic Envelope

The PIB will operate in a variety of climates and maritime weather conditions, including tropical, dry, temperate, and polar climates. The PIB will encounter air temperatures that range from -72 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) to 114°F, and sea water temperatures that range from 28.8°F to 87°F. In addition to the extreme air and sea water temperature, the PIB will experience currents of up to 8 kts with salinity ranges of 20 to 34 parts per thousand (ppt) and winds that can reach well above 100 mph (87 kts). The PIB will be expected to operate in all seasons, both day and night, including extended periods of darkness and light, through all marine weather conditions to include hail, dust, sleet, fog, haze, smoke, drizzle, rain, snow, thunderstorm, blowing spray, sleet showers, ground fog, ice fog, ice crystals, rain showers, snow showers, freezing rain, and/or freezing drizzle, and low to zero visibility or white out conditions. The following is a synopsis of expected climatological conditions for the regions listed in section 2.1.4.

2.1.5.1 Arctic: The Arctic region yields extremely cold air and water temperatures with the summer’s high temperatures only reaching near 40°F and water temperatures rarely reaching above 30°F. Winters bring continuous darkness (polar night), stable weather conditions and clear skies while the Arctic summers bring continuous day (midnight sun), dense fog and weak cyclones. Average wind speeds reach between six and 12 mph (five and 10 kts) and are most prevalent from the East. A National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) study indicates that the frequency and intensity of Arctic storms has increased over the past half century provoking an increase in Arctic sea ice drift.

Maximum wind gusts have been measured up to 110 mph (96 kts) during storm conditions. The Arctic waters have the lowest salinity range of Earth’s major oceans of 20 to 32 ppt and an average current speed of 0.33 kts (NOAA, 2013).

2.1.5.2 Antarctic: The Antarctic can produce some of the most extreme weather conditions that the PIB will experience. McMurdo Station, Antarctica features a polar ice cap climate with an average high/low temperature of 7°F/-6°F with an average water temperature near 28°F (Lalli and Parsons, 1993). McMurdo Station averages 228 days below 0°F each year with average wind speeds reaching between 13 mph (11 kts) and 15 mph (13 kts). The highest recorded wind velocity in Antarctica was 199 mph (173 kts) measured at Dumont d'Urville, July of 1972 (http://antarctica.kulgun.net/Weather/). Cyclonic activity is most pronounced west of the Ross Sea due to the cold continental air masses meeting the relatively warmer waters of the Ross Sea. The cyclonic activity is most frequent during September and October (NGA, 2011).

2.1.5.3 Equatorial, Littoral, and Deepwater: Due to the vastness of this region, average air temperatures during a single voyage fall within a large range (High: 80°F, Low: 36°F) with extreme highs/lows broadening the range further to 114°F to -8°F. Water temperatures also vary greatly during a single voyage with a range of 29°F to 87°F. The average wind speed in these regions is 11 mph (10 kts) with winds reaching 150 mph (130 kts) during cyclones. Cyclonic activity is prevalent in the Southern Pacific Ocean during the months of November through April. These waters have a salinity range between 22 and 34 ppt and currents that can reach speeds of 8 kts in the Strait of Magellan (NGA, 2013).

2.2 Concept of Operations

The following Mission Operations Scenarios are a synopsis of the operational scenarios developed for the PIB CONOPS. The scenarios describe operations that are envisioned for the PIB in terms of the activities anticipated to be conducted during mission execution.

2.2.1 Mission Operations Scenario #1

Missions fulfilled: Ice Operations, Defense Readiness

While en route to Antarctica in support of Operation Deep Freeze and the annual break-in of McMurdo Station, OGA scientists conduct sonar surveys of the ocean floor using vessel-mounted systems operated by the PIB crew. The data obtained is then transmitted back to research laboratories, production centers, and platforms as the mission warrants. During the transit, the polar icebreaker experiences extreme fluctuations in air temperature (-59ºF to 114ºF) and sea temperature (28°F to 87°F) while transiting through the tropics and into Antarctic waters.

The PIB calls on Sydney, Australia and Hobart, Tasmania, Australia for crew rest and refueling. In addition, the PIB loads scientific equipment and stores using onboard weight handling equipment and conducts military and civilian personnel transfers including the on-load of a dive detachment (DIVEDET).

As the polar icebreaker heads south, personnel use all available METOC information, including Optimal Track Ship Routing (OTSR) recommendations, to determine the best route through the notoriously rough Southern Ocean. Once the PIB enters the Southern Ocean, it shifts its operational control (OPCON) to the DoD’s Support Forces Antarctica (SFA) and communicates with DoD personnel in Hawaii and the continental U.S.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .